In mathematics, in the field of number theory, the Ramanujan–Nagell equation is an equation between a square number and a number that is seven less than a power of two. It is an example of an exponential Diophantine equation, an equation to be solved in integers where one of the variables appears as an exponent.
The equation is named after Srinivasa Ramanujan, who conjectured that it has only five integer solutions, and after Trygve Nagell, who proved the conjecture. It implies non-existence of perfect binary codes with the minimum Hamming distance 5 or 6.
Equation and solution
The equation is
and solutions in natural numbers n and x exist just when n = 3, 4, 5, 7 and 15 (sequence A060728 in the OEIS).
This was conjectured in 1913 by Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, proposed independently in 1943 by the Norwegian mathematician Wilhelm Ljunggren, and proved in 1948 by the Norwegian mathematician Trygve Nagell. The values of n correspond to the values of x as:-
Triangular Mersenne numbers
The problem of finding all numbers of the form 2b − 1 (Mersenne numbers) which are triangular is equivalent:
The values of b are just those of n − 3, and the corresponding triangular Mersenne numbers (also known as Ramanujan–Nagell numbers) are:
for x = 1, 3, 5, 11 and 181, giving 0, 1, 3, 15, 4095 and no more (sequence A076046 in the OEIS).
Equations of Ramanujan–Nagell type
An equation of the form
for fixed D, A , B and variable x, n is said to be of Ramanujan–Nagell type. The result of Siegel implies that the number of solutions in each case is finite. By representing with and with , the equation of Ramanujan–Nagell type is reduced to three Mordell curves (indexed by ), each of which has a finite number of integer solutions:
The equation with has at most two solutions, except in the case corresponding to the Ramanujan–Nagell equation. There are infinitely many values of D for which there are two solutions, including .
Equations of Lebesgue–Nagell type
An equation of the form
for fixed D, A and variable x, y, n is said to be of Lebesgue–Nagell type. This is named after Victor-Amédée Lebesgue, who proved that the equation
has no nontrivial solutions.
Results of Shorey and Tijdeman imply that the number of solutions in each case is finite. Bugeaud, Mignotte and Siksek solved equations of this type with A = 1 and 1 ≤ D ≤ 100. In particular, the following generalization of the Ramanujan-Nagell equation:
has positive integer solutions only when x = 1, 3, 5, 11, or 181.
- ^ a b Saradha & Srinivasan 2008, p. 208.
- ^ Siegel 1929.
- ^ Saradha & Srinivasan 2008, p. 207.
- ^ Lebesgue 1850.
- ^ Shorey & Tijdeman 1986.
- ^ Saradha & Srinivasan 2008, p. 211.
- ^ Bugeaud, Mignotte & Siksek 2006.
- Bugeaud, Y.; Mignotte, M.; Siksek, S. (2006). "Classical and modular approaches to exponential Diophantine equations II. The Lebesgue–Nagell equation". Compositio Mathematica. 142: 31–62. arXiv:math/0405220. doi:10.1112/S0010437X05001739. S2CID 18534268.
- Lebesgue (1850). "Sur l'impossibilité, en nombres entiers, de l'équation xm = y2 + 1". Nouv. Ann. Math. Série 1. 9: 178–181.
- Ljunggren, W. (1943). "Oppgave nr 2". Norsk Mat. Tidsskr. 25: 29.
- Nagell, T. (1948). "Løsning till oppgave nr 2". Norsk Mat. Tidsskr. 30: 62–64.
- Nagell, T. (1961). "The Diophantine equation x2 + 7 = 2n". Ark. Mat. 30 (2–3): 185–187. Bibcode:1961ArM.....4..185N. doi:10.1007/BF02592006.
- Ramanujan, S. (1913). "Question 464". J. Indian Math. Soc. 5: 130.
- Saradha, N.; Srinivasan, Anitha (2008). "Generalized Lebesgue–Ramanujan–Nagell equations". In Saradha, N. (ed.). Diophantine Equations. Narosa. pp. 207–223. ISBN 978-81-7319-898-4.
- Shorey, T. N.; Tijdeman, R. (1986). Exponential Diophantine equations. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Vol. 87. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137–138. ISBN 0-521-26826-5. Zbl 0606.10011.
- Siegel, C. L. (1929). "Uber einige Anwendungen Diophantischer Approximationen". Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl. 1: 41–69.
- "Values of X corresponding to N in the Ramanujan–Nagell Equation". Wolfram MathWorld. Retrieved 2012-05-08.
- Can N2 + N + 2 Be A Power Of 2?, Math Forum discussion