The rare-earth elements, also called the rare-earth metals or (in context) rare-earth oxides, or the lanthanides (though yttrium and scandium are usually included as rare-earths) are a set of 17 nearly-indistinguishable lustrous silvery-white soft heavy metals. Scandium and yttrium are considered rare-earth elements because they tend to occur in the same ore deposits as the lanthanides and exhibit similar chemical properties, but have different electronic and magnetic properties.
The 1985 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry "Red Book" (p. 45) recommends that lanthanoid is used rather than lanthanide. The ending "-ide" normally indicates a negative ion. However, owing to wide current usage, "lanthanide" is still allowed and is roughly analogous to rare earth element.
In pure form, these metals tarnish slowly in air at room temperature, and react slowly with cold water to form hydroxides, liberating hydrogen. They react with steam to form oxides, and at elevated temperature (400 °C) ignite spontaneously and burn with a fierce colorful pyrotechnic flame.
These elements and their compounds have no known biological function. The water-soluble compounds are mildly to moderately toxic, but the insoluble ones are not.
The rare earths have diverse applications in electrical and electronic components, lasers, glass, magnetic materials, and industrial processes, but since they do not occur as base metals or in lump or visible quantities like iron or aluminum, their names and properties are unfamiliar in everyday life. One of the most familiar may be unusually powerful neodymium magnets sold as novelties.
Despite their name, rare-earth elements are relatively plentiful in Earth's crust, with cerium being the 25th most abundant element at 68 parts per million, more abundant than copper. All isotopes of promethium are radioactive, and it does not occur naturally in the earth's crust; however, a trace amount is generated by decay of uranium 238. They are often found in minerals with thorium, and less commonly uranium. Because of their geochemical properties, rare-earth elements are typically dispersed and not often found concentrated in rare-earth minerals. Consequently, economically exploitable ore deposits are sparse (i.e. "rare"). The first rare-earth mineral discovered (1787) was gadolinite, a black mineral composed of cerium, yttrium, iron, silicon, and other elements. This mineral was extracted from a mine in the village of Ytterby in Sweden; four of the rare-earth elements bear names derived from this single location.
According to chemistry professor Andrea Sella, rare-earth elements differ from other elements, insofar that "rare-earth metals, when looked at anatomically, seem to be inseparable from each other, in that they are all almost exactly the same in terms of their chemical properties. However, in terms of their electronic properties, their magnetic properties, each one is really exquisitely unique, and so it can occupy a tiny niche in our technology, where virtually nothing else can." For example, "the rare-earth elements praseodymium (Pr) and neodymium (Nd) can both be embedded inside glass and they completely cut out the glare from the flame when one is doing glass-blowing."
A table listing the 17 rare-earth elements, their atomic number and symbol, the etymology of their names, and their main uses (see also Applications of lanthanides) is provided here. Some of the rare-earth elements are named after the scientists who discovered them, or elucidated their elemental properties, and some after their geographical discovery.
|21||Sc||Scandium||from Latin Scandia (Scandinavia).||Light aluminium-scandium alloys for aerospace components, additive in metal-halide lamps and mercury-vapor lamps, radioactive tracing agent in oil refineries||22|
|39||Y||Yttrium||after the village of Ytterby, Sweden, where the first rare earth ore was discovered.||Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser, yttrium vanadate (YVO4) as host for europium in television red phosphor, YBCO high-temperature superconductors, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) (used in tooth crowns; as refractory material - in metal alloys used in jet engines, and coatings of engines and industrial gas turbines; electroceramics - for measuring oxygen and pH of hot water solutions, i.e. in fuel cells; ceramic electrolyte - used in solid oxide fuel cell; jewelry - for its hardness and optical properties; do-it-yourself high temperature ceramics and cements based on water), yttrium iron garnet (YIG) microwave filters, energy-efficient light bulbs (part of triphosphor white phosphor coating in fluorescent tubes, CFLs and CCFLs, and yellow phosphor coating in white LEDs), spark plugs, gas mantles, additive to steel, aluminium and magnesium alloys, cancer treatments, camera and refractive telescope lenses (due to high refractive index and very low thermal expansion), battery cathodes (LYP)||33|
|57||La||Lanthanum||from the Greek "lanthanein", meaning to be hidden.||High refractive index and alkali-resistant glass, flint, hydrogen storage, battery-electrodes, camera and refractive telescope lenses, fluid catalytic cracking catalyst for oil refineries||39|
|58||Ce||Cerium||after the dwarf planet Ceres, named after the Roman goddess of agriculture.||Chemical oxidizing agent, polishing powder, yellow colors in glass and ceramics, catalyst for self-cleaning ovens, fluid catalytic cracking catalyst for oil refineries, ferrocerium flints for lighters, robust intrinsically hydrophobic coatings for turbine blades||66.5|
|59||Pr||Praseodymium||from the Greek "prasios", meaning leek-green, and "didymos", meaning twin.||Rare-earth magnets, lasers, core material for carbon arc lighting, colorant in glasses and enamels, additive in didymium glass used in welding goggles, ferrocerium firesteel (flint) products, single mode fiber optical amplifiers (as a dopant of fluoride glass)||9.2|
|60||Nd||Neodymium||from the Greek "neos", meaning new, and "didymos", meaning twin.||Rare-earth magnets, lasers, violet colors in glass and ceramics, didymium glass, ceramic capacitors, electric motors of electric automobiles||41.5|
|61||Pm||Promethium||after the Titan Prometheus, who brought fire to mortals.||Nuclear batteries, luminous paint||1×10−15 [b]|
|62||Sm||Samarium||after mine official, Vasili Samarsky-Bykhovets.||Rare-earth magnets, lasers, neutron capture, masers, control rods of nuclear reactors||7.05|
|63||Eu||Europium||after the continent of Europe.||Red and blue phosphors, lasers, mercury-vapor lamps, fluorescent lamps, NMR relaxation agent||2|
|64||Gd||Gadolinium||after Johan Gadolin (1760–1852), to honor his investigation of rare earths.||High refractive index glass or garnets, lasers, X-ray tubes, Bubble (computer) memories, neutron capture, MRI contrast agent, NMR relaxation agent, magnetostrictive alloys such as Galfenol, steel and chromium alloys additive, magnetic refrigeration (using significant magnetocaloric effect), positron emission tomography scintillator detectors, substrate for magneto-optical films, high performance high temperature superconductors, ceramic electrolyte used in solid oxide fuel cells, oxygen detectors, possibly in catalytic conversion of automobile fumes.||6.2|
|65||Tb||Terbium||after the village of Ytterby, Sweden.||Additive in Neodymium based magnets, green phosphors, lasers, fluorescent lamps (as part of the white triband phosphor coating), magnetostrictive alloys such as terfenol-D, naval sonar systems, stabilizer of fuel cells||1.2|
|66||Dy||Dysprosium||from the Greek "dysprositos", meaning hard to get.||Additive in Neodymium based magnets, lasers, magnetostrictive alloys such as terfenol-D, hard disk drives||5.2|
|67||Ho||Holmium||after Stockholm (in Latin, "Holmia"), native city of one of its discoverers.||Lasers, wavelength calibration standards for optical spectrophotometers, magnets||1.3|
|68||Er||Erbium||after the village of Ytterby, Sweden.||Infrared lasers, vanadium steel, fiber-optic technology||3.5|
|69||Tm||Thulium||after the mythological northern land of Thule.||Portable X-ray machines, metal-halide lamps, lasers||0.52|
|70||Yb||Ytterbium||after the village of Ytterby, Sweden.||Infrared lasers, chemical reducing agent, decoy flares, stainless steel, stress gauges, nuclear medicine, monitoring earthquakes||3.2|
|71||Lu||Lutetium||after Lutetia, the city that later became Paris.||Positron emission tomography – PET scan detectors, high-refractive-index glass, lutetium tantalate hosts for phosphors, catalyst used in refineries, LED light bulb||0.8|
- Parts per million in earth's crust, e.g. Pb=13 ppm
- No stable isotopes occurring in nature.
A mnemonic for the names of the sixth-row elements in order is "Lately college parties never produce sexy European girls that drink heavily even though you look".
Discovery and early history
The first rare-earth element discovered was the black mineral "ytterbite" (renamed to gadolinite in 1800). It was discovered by Lieutenant Carl Axel Arrhenius in 1787 at a quarry in the village of Ytterby, Sweden.
Arrhenius's "ytterbite" reached Johan Gadolin, a Royal Academy of Turku professor, and his analysis yielded an unknown oxide (earth) that he called yttria. Anders Gustav Ekeberg isolated beryllium from the gadolinite but failed to recognize other elements the ore contained. After this discovery in 1794, a mineral from Bastnäs near Riddarhyttan, Sweden, which was believed to be an iron–tungsten mineral, was re-examined by Jöns Jacob Berzelius and Wilhelm Hisinger. In 1803 they obtained a white oxide and called it ceria. Martin Heinrich Klaproth independently discovered the same oxide and called it ochroia.
Thus by 1803 there were two known rare-earth elements, yttrium and cerium, although it took another 30 years for researchers to determine that other elements were contained in the two ores ceria and yttria (the similarity of the rare-earth metals' chemical properties made their separation difficult).
In 1839 Carl Gustav Mosander, an assistant of Berzelius, separated ceria by heating the nitrate and dissolving the product in nitric acid. He called the oxide of the soluble salt lanthana. It took him three more years to separate the lanthana further into didymia and pure lanthana. Didymia, although not further separable by Mosander's techniques, was in fact still a mixture of oxides.
In 1842 Mosander also separated the yttria into three oxides: pure yttria, terbia and erbia (all the names are derived from the town name "Ytterby"). The earth giving pink salts he called terbium; the one that yielded yellow peroxide he called erbium.
So in 1842 the number of known rare-earth elements had reached six: yttrium, cerium, lanthanum, didymium, erbium and terbium.
Nils Johan Berlin and Marc Delafontaine tried also to separate the crude yttria and found the same substances that Mosander obtained, but Berlin named (1860) the substance giving pink salts erbium, and Delafontaine named the substance with the yellow peroxide terbium. This confusion led to several false claims of new elements, such as the mosandrium of J. Lawrence Smith, or the philippium and decipium of Delafontaine. Due to the difficulty in separating the metals (and determining the separation is complete), the total number of false discoveries was dozens, with some putting the total number of discoveries at over a hundred.
There were no further discoveries for 30 years, and the element didymium was listed in the periodic table of elements with a molecular mass of 138. In 1879 Delafontaine used the new physical process of optical flame spectroscopy and found several new spectral lines in didymia. Also in 1879, the new element samarium was isolated by Paul Émile Lecoq de Boisbaudran from the mineral samarskite.
The samaria earth was further separated by Lecoq de Boisbaudran in 1886, and a similar result was obtained by Jean Charles Galissard de Marignac by direct isolation from samarskite. They named the element gadolinium after Johan Gadolin, and its oxide was named "gadolinia".
Further spectroscopic analysis between 1886 and 1901 of samaria, yttria, and samarskite by William Crookes, Lecoq de Boisbaudran and Eugène-Anatole Demarçay yielded several new spectroscopic lines that indicated the existence of an unknown element. The fractional crystallization of the oxides then yielded europium in 1901.
In 1839 the third source for rare earths became available. This is a mineral similar to gadolinite, uranotantalum (now called "samarskite"). This mineral from Miass in the southern Ural Mountains was documented by Gustav Rose. The Russian chemist R. Harmann proposed that a new element he called "ilmenium" should be present in this mineral, but later, Christian Wilhelm Blomstrand, Galissard de Marignac, and Heinrich Rose found only tantalum and niobium (columbium) in it.
The exact number of rare-earth elements that existed was highly unclear, and a maximum number of 25 was estimated. The use of X-ray spectra (obtained by X-ray crystallography) by Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley made it possible to assign atomic numbers to the elements. Moseley found that the exact number of lanthanides had to be 15, and that element 61 had yet to be discovered.
Using these facts about atomic numbers from X-ray crystallography, Moseley also showed that hafnium (element 72) would not be a rare-earth element. Moseley was killed in World War I in 1915, years before hafnium was discovered. Hence, the claim of Georges Urbain that he had discovered element 72 was untrue. Hafnium is an element that lies in the periodic table immediately below zirconium, and hafnium and zirconium are very similar in their chemical and physical properties.
During the 1940s, Frank Spedding and others in the United States (during the Manhattan Project) developed chemical ion-exchange procedures for separating and purifying the rare-earth elements. This method was first applied to the actinides for separating plutonium-239 and neptunium from uranium, thorium, actinium, and the other actinides in the materials produced in nuclear reactors. Plutonium-239 was very desirable because it is a fissile material.
The principal sources of rare-earth elements are the minerals bastnäsite, monazite, and loparite and the lateritic ion-adsorption clays. Despite their high relative abundance, rare-earth minerals are more difficult to mine and extract than equivalent sources of transition metals (due in part to their similar chemical properties), making the rare-earth elements relatively expensive. Their industrial use was very limited until efficient separation techniques were developed, such as ion exchange, fractional crystallization and liquid–liquid extraction during the late 1950s and early 1960s.
Before the time that ion-exchange methods and elution were available, the separation of the rare earths was primarily achieved by repeated precipitation or crystallization. In those days, the first separation was into two main groups, the cerium earths (scandium, lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, and samarium) and the yttrium earths (yttrium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium). Europium, gadolinium, and terbium were either considered as a separate group of rare-earth elements (the terbium group), or europium was included in the cerium group, and gadolinium and terbium were included in the yttrium group. The reason for this division arose from the difference in solubility of rare-earth double sulfates with sodium and potassium. The sodium double sulfates of the cerium group are poorly soluble, those of the terbium group slightly, and those of the yttrium group are very soluble. Sometimes, the yttrium group was further split into the erbium group (dysprosium, holmium, erbium, and thulium) and the ytterbium group (ytterbium and lutetium), but today the main grouping is between the cerium and the yttrium groups. Today, the rare-earth elements are classified as light or heavy rare-earth elements, rather than in cerium and yttrium groups.
Light versus heavy classification
The classification of rare-earth elements is inconsistent between authors. The most common distinction between rare-earth elements is made by atomic numbers; those with low atomic numbers are referred to as light rare-earth elements (LREE), those with high atomic numbers are the heavy rare-earth elements (HREE), and those that fall in between are typically referred to as the middle rare-earth elements (MREE). Commonly, rare-earth elements with atomic numbers 57 to 61 (lanthanum to promethium) are classified as light and those with atomic numbers greater than 62[clarification needed >62 or >61?] are classified as heavy-rare earth elements. Increasing atomic numbers between light and heavy rare-earth elements and decreasing atomic radii throughout the series causes chemical variations. Europium is exempt of this classification as it has two valence states: Eu2+ and Eu3+. Yttrium is grouped as heavy rare-earth element due to chemical similarities. The break between the two groups is sometimes put elsewhere, such as between elements 63 (europeum) and 64 (gadolinium). The actual metallic densities of these two groups overlap, with the "light" group having densities from 6.145 (lanthanum) to 7.26 (promethium) or 7.52 (samarium) g/cc, and the "heavy" group from 6.965 (ytterbium) to 9.32 (thulium), as well as including yttrium at 4.47. Europium has a density of 5.24.
Rare-earth elements, except scandium, are heavier than iron and thus are produced by supernova nucleosynthesis or by the s-process in asymptotic giant branch stars. In nature, spontaneous fission of uranium-238 produces trace amounts of radioactive promethium, but most promethium is synthetically produced in nuclear reactors.
Due to their chemical similarity, the concentrations of rare earths in rocks are only slowly changed by geochemical processes, making their proportions useful for geochronology and dating fossils.
As seen in the chart to the right, rare-earth elements are found on earth at similar concentrations to many common transition metals. The most abundant rare-earth element is cerium, which is actually the 25th most abundant element in Earth's crust, having 68 parts per million (about as common as copper). The exception is the highly unstable and radioactive promethium "rare earth" is quite scarce. The longest-lived isotope of promethium has a half-life of 17.7 years, so the element exists in nature in only negligible amounts (approximately 572 g in the entire Earth's crust). Promethium is one of the two elements that do not have stable (non-radioactive) isotopes and are followed by (i.e. with higher atomic number) stable elements (the other being technetium).
The rare-earth elements are often found together. During the sequential accretion of the Earth, the dense rare-earth elements were incorporated into the deeper portions of the planet. Early differentiation of molten material largely incorporated the rare-earths into mantle rocks. The high field strength[clarification needed] and large ionic radii of rare-earths make them incompatible with the crystal lattices of most rock-forming minerals, so REE will undergo strong partitioning into a melt phase if one is present. REE are chemically very similar and have always been difficult to separate, but a gradual decrease in ionic radius from LREE to HREE, called lanthanide contraction, can produce a broad separation between light and heavy REE. The larger ionic radii of LREE make them generally more incompatible than HREE in rock-forming minerals, and will partition more strongly into a melt phase, while HREE may prefer to remain in the crystalline residue, particularly if it contains HREE-compatible minerals like garnet. The result is that all magma formed from partial melting will always have greater concentrations of LREE than HREE, and individual minerals may be dominated by either HREE or LREE, depending on which range of ionic radii best fits the crystal lattice.
Among the anhydrous rare-earth phosphates, it is the tetragonal mineral xenotime that incorporates yttrium and the HREE, whereas the monoclinic monazite phase incorporates cerium and the LREE preferentially. The smaller size of the HREE allows greater solid solubility in the rock-forming minerals that make up Earth's mantle, and thus yttrium and the HREE show less enrichment in Earth's crust relative to chondritic abundance than does cerium and the LREE. This has economic consequences: large ore bodies of LREE are known around the world and are being exploited. Ore bodies for HREE are more rare, smaller, and less concentrated. Most of the current supply of HREE originates in the "ion-absorption clay" ores of Southern China. Some versions provide concentrates containing about 65% yttrium oxide, with the HREE being present in ratios reflecting the Oddo–Harkins rule: even-numbered REE at abundances of about 5% each, and odd-numbered REE at abundances of about 1% each. Similar compositions are found in xenotime or gadolinite.
Well-known minerals containing yttrium, and other HREE, include gadolinite, xenotime, samarskite, euxenite, fergusonite, yttrotantalite, yttrotungstite, yttrofluorite (a variety of fluorite), thalenite, yttrialite. Small amounts occur in zircon, which derives its typical yellow fluorescence from some of the accompanying HREE. The zirconium mineral eudialyte, such as is found in southern Greenland, contains small but potentially useful amounts of yttrium. Of the above yttrium minerals, most played a part in providing research quantities of lanthanides during the discovery days. Xenotime is occasionally recovered as a byproduct of heavy-sand processing, but is not as abundant as the similarly recovered monazite (which typically contains a few percent of yttrium). Uranium ores from Ontario have occasionally yielded yttrium as a byproduct.
Well-known minerals containing cerium, and other LREE, include bastnäsite, monazite, allanite, loparite, ancylite, parisite, lanthanite, chevkinite, cerite, stillwellite, britholite, fluocerite, and cerianite. Monazite (marine sands from Brazil, India, or Australia; rock from South Africa), bastnäsite (from Mountain Pass rare earth mine, or several localities in China), and loparite (Kola Peninsula, Russia) have been the principal ores of cerium and the light lanthanides.
Enriched deposits of rare-earth elements at the surface of the Earth, carbonatites and pegmatites, are related to alkaline plutonism, an uncommon kind of magmatism that occurs in tectonic settings where there is rifting or that are near subduction zones. In a rift setting, the alkaline magma is produced by very small degrees of partial melting (<1%) of garnet peridotite in the upper mantle (200 to 600 km depth). This melt becomes enriched in incompatible elements, like the rare-earth elements, by leaching them out of the crystalline residue. The resultant magma rises as a diapir, or diatreme, along pre-existing fractures, and can be emplaced deep in the crust, or erupted at the surface. Typical REE enriched deposits types forming in rift settings are carbonatites, and A- and M-Type granitoids. Near subduction zones, partial melting of the subducting plate within the asthenosphere (80 to 200 km depth) produces a volatile-rich magma (high concentrations of CO
2 and water), with high concentrations of alkaline elements, and high element mobility that the rare-earths are strongly partitioned into. This melt may also rise along pre-existing fractures, and be emplaced in the crust above the subducting slab or erupted at the surface. REE enriched deposits forming from these melts are typically S-Type granitoids.
Alkaline magmas enriched with rare-earth elements include carbonatites, peralkaline granites (pegmatites), and nepheline syenite. Carbonatites crystallize from CO
2-rich fluids, which can be produced by partial melting of hydrous-carbonated lherzolite to produce a CO2-rich primary magma, by fractional crystallization of an alkaline primary magma, or by separation of a CO
2-rich immiscible liquid from. These liquids are most commonly forming in association with very deep Precambrian Cratons, like the ones found in Africa and the Canadian Shield. Ferrocarbonatites are the most common type of carbonatite to be enriched in REE, and are often emplaced as late-stage, brecciated pipes at the core of igneous complexes; they consist of fine-grained calcite and hematite, sometimes with significant concentrations of ankerite and minor concentrations of siderite. Large carbonatite deposits enriched in rare-earth elements include Mount Weld in Australia, Thor Lake in Canada, Zandkopsdrift in South Africa, and Mountain Pass in the USA. Peralkaline granites (A-Type granitoids) have very high concentrations of alkaline elements and very low concentrations of phosphorus; they are deposited at moderate depths in extensional zones, often as igneous ring complexes, or as pipes, massive bodies, and lenses. These fluids have very low viscosities and high element mobility, which allows for crystallization of large grains, despite a relatively short crystallization time upon emplacement; their large grain size is why these deposits are commonly referred to as pegmatites. Economically viable pegmatites are divided into Lithium-Cesium-Tantalum (LCT) and Niobium-Yttrium-Fluorine (NYF) types; NYF types are enriched in rare-earth minerals. Examples of rare-earth pegmatite deposits include Strange Lake in Canada, and Khaladean-Buregtey in Mongolia. Nepheline syenite (M-Type granitoids) deposits are 90% feldspar and feldspathoid minerals, and are deposited in small, circular massifs. They contain high concentrations of rare-earth-bearing accessory minerals. For the most part these deposits are small but important examples include Illimaussaq-Kvanefeld in Greenland, and Lovozera in Russia.
Rare-earth elements can also be enriched in deposits by secondary alteration either by interactions with hydrothermal fluids or meteoric water or by erosion and transport of resistate REE-bearing minerals. Argillization of primary minerals enriches insoluble elements by leaching out silica and other soluble elements, recrystallizing feldspar into clay minerals such kaolinite, halloysite and montmorillonite. In tropical regions where precipitation is high, weathering forms a thick argillized regolith, this process is called supergene enrichment and produces laterite deposits; heavy rare-earth elements are incorporated into the residual clay by absorption. This kind of deposit is only mined for REE in Southern China, where the majority of global heavy rare-earth element production occurs. REE-laterites do form elsewhere, including over the carbonatite at Mount Weld in Australia. REE may also by extracted from placer deposits if the sedimentary parent lithology contained REE-bearing, heavy resistate minerals.
In 2011, Yasuhiro Kato, a geologist at the University of Tokyo who led a study of Pacific Ocean seabed mud, published results indicating the mud could hold rich concentrations of rare-earth minerals. The deposits, studied at 78 sites, came from "[h]ot plumes from hydrothermal vents pull[ing] these materials out of seawater and deposit[ing] them on the seafloor, bit by bit, over tens of millions of years. One square patch of metal-rich mud 2.3 kilometers wide might contain enough rare earths to meet most of the global demand for a year, Japanese geologists report in Nature Geoscience." "I believe that rare[-]earth resources undersea are much more promising than on-land resources," said Kato. "[C]oncentrations of rare earths were comparable to those found in clays mined in China. Some deposits contained twice as much heavy rare earths such as dysprosium, a component of magnets in hybrid car motors."
The application of rare-earth elements to geology is important to understanding the petrological processes of igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rock formation. In geochemistry, rare-earth elements can be used to infer the petrological mechanisms that have affected a rock due to the subtle atomic size differences between the elements, which causes preferential fractionation of some rare earths relative to others depending on the processes at work.
In geochemistry, rare-earth elements are typically presented in normalized "spider" diagrams, in which concentration of rare-earth elements are normalized to a reference standard and are then expressed as the logarithm to the base 10 of the value. Commonly, the rare-earth elements are normalized to chondritic meteorites, as these are believed to be the closest representation of unfractionated solar system material. However, other normalizing standards can be applied depending on the purpose of the study. Normalization to a standard reference value, especially of a material believed to be unfractionated, allows the observed abundances to be compared to initial abundances of the element. Normalization also removes the pronounced 'zig-zag' pattern caused by the differences in abundance between even and odd atomic numbers. The trends that are observed in "spider" diagrams are typically referred to as "patterns", which may be diagnostic of petrological processes that have affected the material of interest.
The rare-earth elements patterns observed in igneous rocks are primarily a function of the chemistry of the source where the rock came from, as well as the fractionation history the rock has undergone. Fractionation is in turn a function of the partition coefficients of each element. Partition coefficients are responsible for the fractionation of a trace elements (including rare-earth elements) into the liquid phase (the melt/magma) into the solid phase (the mineral). If an element preferentially remains in the solid phase it is termed ‘compatible’, and it preferentially partitions into the melt phase it is described as ‘incompatible’. Each element has a different partition coefficient, and therefore fractionates into solid and liquid phases distinctly. These concepts are also applicable to metamorphic and sedimentary petrology.
In igneous rocks, particularly in felsic melts, the following observations apply: anomalies in europium are dominated by the crystallization of feldspars. Hornblende, controls the enrichment of MREE compared to LREE and HREE. Depletion of LREE relative to HREE may be due to the crystallization of olivine, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene. On the other hand, depletion of HREE relative to LREE may be due to the presence of garnet, as garnet preferentially incorporates HREE into its crystal structure. The presence of zircon may also cause a similar effect.
In sedimentary rocks, rare-earth elements in clastic sediments are a representation provenance. The rare-earth element concentrations are not typically affected by sea and river waters, as rare-earth elements are insoluble and thus have very low concentrations in these fluids. As a result, when a sediment is transported, rare-earth element concentrations are unaffected by the fluid and instead the rock retains the rare-earth element concentration from its source.
Sea and river waters typically have low rare-earth element concentrations. However, aqueous geochemistry is still very important. In oceans, rare-earth elements reflect input from rivers, hydrothermal vents, and aeolian sources; this is important in the investigation of ocean mixing and circulation.
Global rare-earth production
Until 1948, most of the world's rare earths were sourced from placer sand deposits in India and Brazil. Through the 1950s, South Africa was the world's rare-earth source, from a monazite-rich reef at the Steenkampskraal mine in Western Cape province. Through the 1960s until the 1980s, the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in California made the United States the leading producer. Today, the Indian and South African deposits still produce some rare-earth concentrates, but they are dwarfed by the scale of Chinese production. In 2017, China produced 81% of the world's rare-earth supply, mostly in Inner Mongolia, although it had only 36.7% of reserves. Australia was the second and only other major producer with 15% of world production. All of the world's heavy rare earths (such as dysprosium) come from Chinese rare-earth sources such as the polymetallic Bayan Obo deposit. The Browns Range mine, located 160 km south east of Halls Creek in northern Western Australia, is currently under development and is positioned to become the first significant dysprosium producer outside of China.
Increased demand has strained supply, and there is growing concern that the world may soon face a shortage of the rare earths. In several years from 2009 worldwide demand for rare-earth elements is expected to exceed supply by 40,000 tonnes annually unless major new sources are developed. In 2013, it was stated that the demand for REEs would increase due to the dependence of the EU on these elements, the fact that rare earth elements cannot be substituted by other elements and that REEs have a low recycling rate. Furthermore, due to the increased demand and low supply, future prices are expected to increase and there is a chance that countries other than China will open REE mines. REE is increasing in demand due to the fact that they are essential for new and innovative technology that is being created. These new products that need REEs to be produced are high technology equipment such as smart phones, digital cameras, computer parts, semiconductors, etc. In addition, these elements are more prevalent in the following industries: renewable energy technology, military equipment, glass making, and metallurgy.
These concerns have intensified due to the actions of China, the predominant supplier. Specifically, China has announced regulations on exports and a crackdown on smuggling. On September 1, 2009, China announced plans to reduce its export quota to 35,000 tons per year in 2010–2015 to conserve scarce resources and protect the environment. On October 19, 2010, China Daily, citing an unnamed Ministry of Commerce official, reported that China will "further reduce quotas for rare[-]earth exports by 30 percent at most next year to protect the precious metals from over-exploitation." The government in Beijing further increased its control by forcing smaller, independent miners to merge into state-owned corporations or face closure. At the end of 2010, China announced that the first round of export quotas in 2011 for rare earths would be 14,446 tons, which was a 35% decrease from the previous first round of quotas in 2010. China announced further export quotas on 14 July 2011 for the second half of the year with total allocation at 30,184 tons with total production capped at 93,800 tonnes. In September 2011, China announced the halt in production of three of its eight major rare-earth mines, responsible for almost 40% of China's total rare-earth production. In March 2012, the US, EU, and Japan confronted China at WTO about these export and production restrictions. China responded with claims that the restrictions had environmental protection in mind. In August 2012, China announced a further 20% reduction in production. The United States, Japan, and the European Union filed a joint lawsuit with the World Trade Organization in 2012 against China, arguing that China should not be able to deny such important exports.
In response to the opening of new mines in other countries (Lynas in Australia and Molycorp in the United States), prices of rare earths dropped. The price of dysprosium oxide was 994 USD/kg in 2011, but dropped to US$265/kg by 2014.
On August 29, 2014, the WTO ruled that China had broken free-trade agreements, and the WTO said in the summary of key findings that "the overall effect of the foreign and domestic restrictions is to encourage domestic extraction and secure preferential use of those materials by Chinese manufacturers." China declared that it would implement the ruling on September 26, 2014, but would need some time to do so. By January 5, 2015, China had lifted all quotas from the export of rare earths, but export licences will still be required.
In 2019, China supplied between 85% and 95% of the global demand for the 17 rare earth powders, half of them sourced from Myanmar. After the 2021 military coup in that country, future supplies of critical ores were possibly constrained. Additionally, it was speculated that the PRC could again reduce rare earth exports to counter-act economic sanctions imposed by the US and EU countries. Rare earth metals serve as crucial materials for EV-manufacturing and high-tech military applications.
As a result of the increased demand and tightening restrictions on exports of the metals from China, some countries are stockpiling rare-earth resources. Searches for alternative sources in Australia, Brazil, Canada, South Africa, Tanzania, Greenland, and the United States are ongoing. Mines in these countries were closed when China undercut world prices in the 1990s, and it will take a few years to restart production as there are many barriers to entry. One example is the Mountain Pass mine in California, which announced its resumption of operations on a start-up basis on August 27, 2012. Other significant sites under development outside China include Steenkampskraal in South Africa, the world's highest grade rare earths and thorium mine, which is gearing to go back into production. Over 80% of the infrastructure is already complete. Other mines include the Nolans Project in Central Australia, the Bokan Mountain project in Alaska, the remote Hoidas Lake project in northern Canada, and the Mount Weld project in Australia. The Hoidas Lake project has the potential to supply about 10% of the $1 billion of REE consumption that occurs in North America every year. Vietnam signed an agreement in October 2010 to supply Japan with rare earths from its northwestern Lai Châu Province.
In the US, NioCorp Development Ltd has launched a long-shot effort to secure $1.1 billion toward opening a niobium, scandium, and titanium mine at its Elk Creek site in southeast Nebraska which may be able to produce as much as 7200 tonnes of ferro niobium and 95 tonnes of scandium trioxide annually.
Also under consideration for mining are sites such as Thor Lake in the Northwest Territories, and various locations in Vietnam. Additionally, in 2010, a large deposit of rare-earth minerals was discovered in Kvanefjeld in southern Greenland. Pre-feasibility drilling at this site has confirmed significant quantities of black lujavrite, which contains about 1% rare-earth oxides (REO). The European Union has urged Greenland to restrict Chinese development of rare-earth projects there, but as of early 2013, the government of Greenland has said that it has no plans to impose such restrictions. Many Danish politicians have expressed concerns that other nations, including China, could gain influence in thinly populated Greenland, given the number of foreign workers and investment that could come from Chinese companies in the near future because of the law passed December 2012.
In central Spain, Ciudad Real Province, the proposed rare-earth mining project 'Matamulas' may provide, according to its developers, up to 2,100 Tn/year (33% of the annual UE demand). However, this project has been suspended by regional authorities due to social and environmental concerns.
Adding to potential mine sites, ASX listed Peak Resources announced in February 2012, that their Tanzanian-based Ngualla project contained not only the 6th largest deposit by tonnage outside of China, but also the highest grade of rare-earth elements of the 6.
Malaysian refining plans
In early 2011, Australian mining company, Lynas, was reported to be "hurrying to finish" a US$230 million rare-earth refinery on the eastern coast of Peninsular Malaysia's industrial port of Kuantan. The plant would refine ore — lanthanides concentrate from the Mount Weld mine in Australia. The ore would be trucked to Fremantle and transported by container ship to Kuantan. Within two years, Lynas was said to expect the refinery to be able to meet nearly a third of the world's demand for rare-earth materials, not counting China. The Kuantan development brought renewed attention to the Malaysian town of Bukit Merah in Perak, where a rare-earth mine operated by a Mitsubishi Chemical subsidiary, Asian Rare Earth, closed in 1994 and left continuing environmental and health concerns. In mid-2011, after protests, Malaysian government restrictions on the Lynas plant were announced. At that time, citing subscription-only Dow Jones Newswire reports, a Barrons report said the Lynas investment was $730 million, and the projected share of the global market it would fill put at "about a sixth." An independent review initiated by the Malaysian Government, and conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2011 to address concerns of radioactive hazards, found no non-compliance with international radiation safety standards.
However, the Malaysian authorities confirmed that as of October 2011, Lynas was not given any permit to import any rare-earth ore into Malaysia. On February 2, 2012, the Malaysian AELB (Atomic Energy Licensing Board) recommended that Lynas be issued a temporary operating license subject for completion of a number of conditions. On 2 September 2014, Lynas was issued a 2-year full operating stage license by the AELB.
Significant quantities of rare-earth oxides are found in tailings accumulated from 50 years of uranium ore, shale and loparite mining at Sillamäe, Estonia. Due to the rising prices of rare earths, extraction of these oxides has become economically viable. The country currently exports around 3,000 tonnes per year, representing around 2% of world production. Similar resources are suspected in the western United States, where gold rush-era mines are believed to have discarded large amounts of rare earths, because they had no value at the time.
In January 2013 a Japanese deep-sea research vessel obtained seven deep-sea mud core samples from the Pacific Ocean seafloor at 5,600 to 5,800 meters depth, approximately 250 kilometres (160 mi) south of the island of Minami-Tori-Shima. The research team found a mud layer 2 to 4 meters beneath the seabed with concentrations of up to 0.66% rare-earth oxides. A potential deposit might compare in grade with the ion-absorption-type deposits in southern China that provide the bulk of Chinese REO mine production, which grade in the range of 0.05% to 0.5% REO.
Another recently developed source of rare earths is electronic waste and other wastes that have significant rare-earth components. New advances in recycling technology have made extraction of rare earths from these materials more feasible, and recycling plants are currently operating in Japan, where there is an estimated 300,000 tons of rare earths stored in unused electronics. In France, the Rhodia group is setting up two factories, in La Rochelle and Saint-Fons, that will produce 200 tons of rare earths a year from used fluorescent lamps, magnets and batteries. Coal and coal by-products are a potential source of critical elements including rare earth elements (REE) with estimated amounts in the range of 50 million metric tons.
The uses, applications, and demand for rare-earth elements has expanded over the years. Globally, most REEs are used for catalysts and magnets. In USA, more than half of REEs are used for catalysts, and ceramics, glass and polishing are also main uses.
Other important uses of rare-earth elements are applicable to the production of high-performance magnets, alloys, glasses, and electronics. Ce and La are important as catalysts, and are used for petroleum refining and as diesel additives. Nd is important in magnet production in traditional and low-carbon technologies. Rare-earth elements in this category are used in the electric motors of hybrid and electric vehicles, generators in wind turbines, hard disc drives, portable electronics, microphones, speakers.
Ce, La and Nd are important in alloy making, and in the production of fuel cells and nickel-metal hydride batteries. Ce, Ga and Nd are important in electronics and are used in the production of LCD and plasma screens, fiber optics, lasers, as well as in medical imaging. Additional uses for rare-earth elements are as tracers in medical applications, fertilizers, and in water treatment.
REEs have been used in agriculture to increase plant growth, productivity, and stress resistance seemingly without negative effects for human and animal consumption. REEs are used in agriculture through REE-enriched fertilizers which is a widely used practice in China. In addition, REEs are feed additives for livestock which has resulted in increased production such as larger animals and a higher production of eggs and dairy products. However, this practice has resulted in REE bio-accumulation within livestock and has impacted vegetation and algae growth in these agricultural areas. Additionally while no ill effects have been observed at current low concentrations the effects over the long term and with accumulation over time are unknown prompting some calls for more research into their possible effects.
Given the limited supply, industries directly compete with each other for resources, e.g. the electronics sector is in direct competition with renewable energy use in windfarms, solar panels and batteries.
REEs are naturally found in very low concentration in the environment. Mines are often in countries where environmental and social standards are very low, causing human rights violations, deforestation and contamination of land and water.
Near mining and industrial sites the concentrations can rise to many times the normal background levels. Once in the environment REEs can leach into the soil where their transport is determined by numerous factors such as erosion, weathering, pH, precipitation, ground water, etc. Acting much like metals, they can speciate depending on the soil condition being either motile or adsorbed to soil particles. Depending on their bio-availability REEs can be absorbed into plants and later consumed by humans and animals. The mining of REEs, use of REE-enriched fertilizers, and the production of phosphorus fertilizers all contribute to REE contamination. Furthermore, strong acids are used during the extraction process of REEs, which can then leach out in to the environment and be transported through water bodies and result in the acidification of aquatic environments. Another additive of REE mining that contributes to REE environmental contamination is cerium oxide (CeO
2) which is produced during the combustion of diesel and is released as an exhaust particulate matter and contributes heavily to soil and water contamination.
Mining, refining, and recycling of rare earths have serious environmental consequences if not properly managed. Low-level radioactive tailings resulting from the occurrence of thorium and uranium in rare-earth element ores present a potential hazard and improper handling of these substances can result in extensive environmental damage. In May 2010, China announced a major, five-month crackdown on illegal mining in order to protect the environment and its resources. This campaign is expected to be concentrated in the South, where mines – commonly small, rural, and illegal operations – are particularly prone to releasing toxic waste into the general water supply. However, even the major operation in Baotou, in Inner Mongolia, where much of the world's rare-earth supply is refined, has caused major environmental damage. China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology estimated that cleanup costs in Jiangxi province at $5.5 billion.
It is however possible to filter out and recover any rare earth elements that flow out with the wastewater from mining facilities. However, such filtering and recovery equipment may not always be present on the outlets carrying the wastewater.
Recycling and reusing REEs
Literature published in 2004 suggests that along with previously established pollution mitigation, a more circular supply chain would help mitigate some of the pollution at the extraction point. This means recycling and reusing REEs that are already in use or reaching the end of their life cycle. A research done in 2014 suggest a method to recycle REEs from waste nickel-metal hydride batteries, the recovery rate is found to be 95.16%.
Impact of REE contamination
The mining of REEs has caused the contamination of soil and water around production areas, which has impacted vegetation in these areas by decreasing chlorophyll production which affects photosynthesis and inhibits the growth of the plants. However, the impact of REE contamination on vegetation is dependent on the plants present in the contaminated environment: some plants retain and absorb REEs and some don't. Also, the ability for the vegetation to intake the REE is dependent on the type of REE present in the soil, hence there are a multitude of factors that influence this process. Agricultural plants are the main type of vegetation affected by REE contamination in the environment, the two plants with a higher chance of absorbing and storing REEs being apples and beets. Furthermore, there is a possibility that REEs can leach out into aquatic environments and be absorbed by aquatic vegetation, which can then bio-accumulate and potentially enter the human food-chain if livestock or humans choose to eat the vegetation. An example of this situation was the case of the water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in China, where the water was contaminated due to a REE-enriched fertilizer being used in a nearby agricultural area. The aquatic environment became contaminated with cerium and resulted in the water hyacinth becoming three times more concentrated in cerium than its surrounding water.
On human health
REEs are a large group with many different properties and levels in the environment. Because of this, and limited research, it has been difficult to determine safe levels of exposure for humans. A number of studies have focused on risk assessment based on routes of exposure and divergence from background levels related to nearby agriculture, mining, and industry. It has been demonstrated that numerous REEs have toxic properties and are present in the environment or in work places. Exposure to these can lead to a wide range of negative health outcomes such as cancer, respiratory issues, dental loss, and even death. However REEs are numerous and present in many different forms and at different levels of toxicity, making it difficult to give blanket warnings on cancer risk and toxicity as some of these are harmless while others pose a risk.
What toxicity is shown appears to be at very high levels of exposure through ingestion of contaminated food and water, through inhalation of dust/smoke particles either as an occupational hazard or due to proximity to contaminated sites such as mines and cities. Therefore, the main issues that these residents would face is bioaccumulation of REEs and the impact on their respiratory system but overall, there can be other possible short term and long-term health effects. It was found that people living near mines in China had many times the levels of REEs in their blood, urine, bone and hair compared to controls far from mining sites. This higher level was related to the high levels of REEs present in the vegetables they cultivated, the soil, and the water from the wells, indicating that the high levels were caused by the nearby mine. While REE levels varied between men and women, the group most at risk were children because REEs can impact the neurological development of children, affecting their IQ and potentially causing memory loss.
The rare earth mining and smelting process can release airborne fluoride which will associate with total suspended particles (TSP) to form aerosols that can enter human respiratory systems and cause damage and respiratory diseases. Research from Baotou, China shows that the fluoride concentration in air near REE mines is higher than the limit value from WHO, which can affect the surrounding environment and become a risk to those that live or work nearby.
Residents blamed a rare-earth refinery at Bukit Merah for birth defects and eight leukemia cases within five years in a community of 11,000 — after many years with no leukemia cases. Seven of the leukemia victims died. Osamu Shimizu, a director of Asian Rare Earth, said "the company might have sold a few bags of calcium phosphate fertilizer on a trial basis as it sought to market byproducts; calcium phosphate is not radioactive or dangerous" in reply to a former resident of Bukit Merah who said that "The cows that ate the grass [grown with the fertilizer] all died." Malaysia's Supreme Court ruled on 23 December 1993 that there was no evidence that the local chemical joint venture Asian Rare Earth was contaminating the local environment.
On animal health
Experiments exposing rats to various cerium compounds have found accumulation primarily in the lungs and liver. This resulted in various negative health outcomes associated with those organs. REEs have been added to feed in livestock to increase their body mass and increase milk production. They are most commonly used to increase the body mass of pigs, and it was discovered that REEs increase the digestibility and nutrient use of pigs' digestive systems. Studies point to a dose response when considering toxicity versus positive effects. While small doses from the environment or with proper administration seem to have no ill effects, larger doses have been shown to have negative effects specifically in the organs where they accumulate. The process of mining REEs in China has resulted in soil and water contamination in certain areas, which when transported into aquatic bodies could potentially bio-accumulate within aquatic biota. Furthermore, in some cases animals that live in the REE-contaminated areas have been diagnosed with organ or system problems. REEs have been used in freshwater fish farming because it protects the fish from possible diseases. One main reason why they have been avidly used in animal livestock feeding is that they have had better results than inorganic livestock feed enhancers.
Remediation after pollution
This section needs to be updated.(May 2019)
After the 1982 Bukit Merah radioactive pollution, the mine in Malaysia has been the focus of a US$100 million cleanup that is proceeding in 2011. After having accomplished the hilltop entombment of 11,000 truckloads of radioactively contaminated material, the project is expected to entail in summer, 2011, the removal of "more than 80,000 steel barrels of radioactive waste to the hilltop repository."
In May 2011, after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, widespread protests took place in Kuantan over the Lynas refinery and radioactive waste from it. The ore to be processed has very low levels of thorium, and Lynas founder and chief executive Nicholas Curtis said "There is absolutely no risk to public health." T. Jayabalan, a doctor who says he has been monitoring and treating patients affected by the Mitsubishi plant, "is wary of Lynas's assurances. The argument that low levels of thorium in the ore make it safer doesn't make sense, he says, because radiation exposure is cumulative." Construction of the facility has been halted until an independent United Nations IAEA panel investigation is completed, which is expected by the end of June 2011. New restrictions were announced by the Malaysian government in late June.
IAEA panel investigation is completed and no construction has been halted. Lynas is on budget and on schedule to start producing 2011. The IAEA report has concluded in a report issued on Thursday June 2011 said it did not find any instance of "any non-compliance with international radiation safety standards" in the project.
If the proper safety standards are followed, REE mining is relatively low impact. Molycorp (before going bankrupt) often exceeded environmental regulations to improve public image.
China has officially cited resource depletion and environmental concerns as the reasons for a nationwide crackdown on its rare-earth mineral production sector. However, non-environmental motives have also been imputed to China's rare-earth policy. According to The Economist, "Slashing their exports of rare-earth metals… is all about moving Chinese manufacturers up the supply chain, so they can sell valuable finished goods to the world rather than lowly raw materials." Furthermore, China currently has an effective monopoly on the world's REE Value Chain. (all the refineries and processing plants that transform the raw ore into valuable elements). In the words of Deng Xiaoping, a Chinese politician from the late 1970s to the late 1980s, "The Middle East has oil; we have rare earths ... it is of extremely important strategic significance; we must be sure to handle the rare earth issue properly and make the fullest use of our country's advantage in rare earth resources."
One possible example of market control is the division of General Motors that deals with miniaturized magnet research, which shut down its US office and moved its entire staff to China in 2006 (China's export quota only applies to the metal but not products made from these metals such as magnets).
It was reported, but officially denied, that China instituted an export ban on shipments of rare-earth oxides (but not alloys) to Japan on 22 September 2010, in response to the detainment of a Chinese fishing boat captain by the Japanese Coast Guard. On September 2, 2010, a few days before the fishing boat incident, The Economist reported that "China...in July announced the latest in a series of annual export reductions, this time by 40% to precisely 30,258 tonnes."
A 2011 report "China's Rare-Earth Industry", issued by the US Geological Survey and US Department of the Interior, outlines industry trends within China and examines national policies that may guide the future of the country's production. The report notes that China's lead in the production of rare-earth minerals has accelerated over the past two decades. In 1990, China accounted for only 27% of such minerals. In 2009, world production was 132,000 metric tons; China produced 129,000 of those tons. According to the report, recent patterns suggest that China will slow the export of such materials to the world: "Owing to the increase in domestic demand, the Government has gradually reduced the export quota during the past several years." In 2006, China allowed 47 domestic rare-earth producers and traders and 12 Sino-foreign rare-earth producers to export. Controls have since tightened annually; by 2011, only 22 domestic rare-earth producers and traders and 9 Sino-foreign rare-earth producers were authorized. The government's future policies will likely keep in place strict controls: "According to China's draft rare-earth development plan, annual rare-earth production may be limited to between 130,000 and 140,000 [metric tons] during the period from 2009 to 2015. The export quota for rare-earth products may be about 35,000 [metric tons] and the Government may allow 20 domestic rare-earth producers and traders to export rare earths."
The United States Geological Survey is actively surveying southern Afghanistan for rare-earth deposits under the protection of United States military forces. Since 2009 the USGS has conducted remote sensing surveys as well as fieldwork to verify Soviet claims that volcanic rocks containing rare-earth metals exist in Helmand Province near the village of Khanashin. The USGS study team has located a sizable area of rocks in the center of an extinct volcano containing light rare-earth elements including cerium and neodymium. It has mapped 1.3 million metric tons of desirable rock, or about ten years of supply at current demand levels. The Pentagon has estimated its value at about $7.4 billion.
It has been argued that the geopolitical importance of rare earths has been exaggerated in the literature on the geopolitics of renewable energy, underestimating the power of economic incentives for expanded production. This especially concerns neodymium. Due to its role in permanent magnets used for wind turbines, it has been argued that neodymium will be one of the main objects of geopolitical competition in a world running on renewable energy. But this perspective has been criticised for failing to recognise that most wind turbines have gears and do not use permanent magnets.
- Rare-earth mineral
- Rare-earth magnet
- List of elements facing shortage
- Material passport: lists used materials in products
- Digital Product Passport: renewed in function of the Circular Economy Action Plan
- N. G. Connelly and T. Damhus, ed. (2005). Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (PDF). With R. M. Hartshorn and A. T. Hutton. Cambridge: RSC Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85404-438-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2008. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
- Professor of Chemistry at University College London, Andrea Sella, on YouTube, Interview on TRT World / Oct 2016, minutes 4:40 - ff.
- T Gray (2007). "Lanthanum and Cerium". The Elements. Black Dog & Leventhal. pp. 118–122.
- Malhotra, Nemi; Hsu, Hua-Shu; Liang, Sung-Tzu; Roldan, Marri Jmelou M.; Lee, Jiann-Shing; Ger, Tzong-Rong; Hsiao, Chung-Der (September 16, 2020). "An Updated Review of Toxicity Effect of the Rare Earth Elements (REEs) on Aquatic Organisms". Animals. 10 (9): 1663. doi:10.3390/ani10091663. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 552131. PMID 32947815.
- Haxel G.; Hedrick J.; Orris J. (2002). "Rare Earth Elements—Critical Resources for High Technology" (PDF). Edited by Peter H. Stauffer and James W. Hendley II; Graphic design by Gordon B. Haxel, Sara Boore, and Susan Mayfield. United States Geological Survey. USGS Fact Sheet: 087‐02. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
However, in contrast to ordinary base and precious metals, REE have very little tendency to become concentrated in exploitable ore deposits. Consequently, most of the world's supply of REE comes from only a handful of sources.
- Keith R. Long; Bradley S. Van Gosen; Nora K. Foley; Daniel Cordier. "The Geology of Rare Earth Elements". Geology.com. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
- Lide (1997). sfnp error: no target: CITEREFLide1997 (help)
- C. R. Hammond. "Section 4; The Elements". In David R. Lide (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. (Internet Version 2009) (89th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
- "Rare-earth metals". Think GlobalGreen. Archived from the original on November 4, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- Fronzi, M (2019). "Theoretical insights into the hydrophobicity of low index CeO2 surfaces". Applied Surface Science. 478: 68–74. arXiv:1902.02662. Bibcode:2019ApSS..478...68F. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.208. S2CID 118895100.
- Fritz Ullmann, ed. (2003). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 31. Contributor: Matthias Bohnet (6th ed.). Wiley-VCH. p. 24. ISBN 978-3-527-30385-4.
- Mentioned by Prof. Andrea Sella on a BBC Business Daily programme, March 19, 2014 . Unfortunately this mnemonic doesn't distinguish very well between terbium and thulium.
- Gschneidner K. A., Cappellen, ed. (1987). "1787–1987 Two hundred Years of Rare Earths". Rare Earth Information Center, IPRT, North-Holland. IS-RIC 10.
- History of the Origin of the Chemical Elements and Their Discoverers
- Stephen David Barrett; Sarnjeet S. Dhesi (2001). The Structure of Rare-earth Metal Surfaces. World Scientific. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-86094-165-8.
- On Rare And Scattered Metals: Tales About Metals, Sergei Venetsky
- Spedding F., Daane A. H.: "The Rare Earths", John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1961.
- Qi, Dezhi (2018). Hydrometallurgy of Rare Earths. Elsevier. pp. 162–165. ISBN 9780128139202.
- B. Smith Hopkins: "Chemistry of the rarer elements", D. C. Heath & Company, 1923.
- McGill, Ian. "Rare Earth Elements". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 31. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. p. 184. doi:10.1002/14356007.a22_607.
- Zepf, Volker (2013). Rare earth elements: a new approach to the nexus of supply, demand and use : exemplified along the use of neodymium in permanent magnets. Berlin; London: Springer. ISBN 9783642354588.
- Rollinson, Hugh R. (1993). Using geochemical data : evaluation, presentation, interpretation. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical. ISBN 9780582067011. OCLC 27937350.
- Brownlow, Arthur H (1996). Geochemistry. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0133982725. OCLC 33044175.
- Working Group (December 2011). "Rare Earth Elements" (PDF). Geological Society of London. Retrieved May 18, 2018.
- "Seltene Erden – Daten & Fakten" (PDF). Öko-Institut e.V. January 2011.
- P. Belli; R. Bernabei; F. Cappella; R. Cerulli; C. J. Dai; F. A. Danevich; A. d'Angelo; A. Incicchitti; V. V. Kobychev; S. S. Nagorny; S. Nisi; F. Nozzoli; D. Prosperi; V. I. Tretyak; S. S. Yurchenko (2007). "Search for α decay of natural Europium". Nuclear Physics A. 789 (1–4): 15–29. Bibcode:2007NuPhA.789...15B. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.001.
- Winter, John D. (2010). Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780321592576. OCLC 262694332.
- Jébrak, Michel; Marcoux, Eric; Laithier, Michelle; Skipwith, Patrick (2014). Geology of mineral resources (2nd ed.). St. John's, NL: Geological Association of Canada. ISBN 9781897095737. OCLC 933724718.
- Powell, Devin, "Rare earth elements plentiful in ocean sediments", ScienceNews, 3 July 2011. Via Kurt Brouwer's Fundmastery Blog, MarketWatch, 2011-07-05. Retrieved 2011-07-05.
- Kato, Yasuhiro; Fujinaga, Koichiro; Nakamura, Kentaro; Takaya, Yutaro; Kitamura, Kenichi; Ohta, Junichiro; Toda, Ryuichi; Nakashima, Takuya; Iwamori, Hikaru (2011). "Deep-sea mud in the Pacific Ocean as a potential resource for rare-earth elements". Nature Geoscience. 4 (8): 535–539. Bibcode:2011NatGe...4..535K. doi:10.1038/ngeo1185. ISSN 1752-0908.
- Rose, Edward Roderick (February 4, 1960). "Rare Earths of the Grenville Sub-Province, Ontario and Quebec" (PDF) (Paper 59–10). Ottawa: Geological Survey of Canada. Retrieved May 18, 2018. Cite journal requires
- China's Rare Earth Dominance, Wikinvest. Retrieved on 11 Aug 2010.
- Gambogi, Joseph (January 2018). "Rare Earths" (PDF). Mineral Commodity Summaries. U.S. Geological Survey. pp. 132–133. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
- Chao E. C. T., Back J. M., Minkin J., Tatsumoto M., Junwen W., Conrad J. E., McKee E. H., Zonglin H., Qingrun M. "Sedimentary carbonate‐hosted giant Bayan Obo REE‐Fe‐Nb ore deposit of Inner Mongolia, China; a cornerstone example for giant polymetallic ore deposits of hydrothermal origin". 1997. United States Geological Survey. 29 February 2008. Bulletin 2143.
- "Overview". Northern Minerals Limited. Retrieved April 21, 2018.
- "Cox C. 2008. Rare earth innovation. Herndon (VA): The Anchor House Inc;". Retrieved April 19, 2008.
- "As hybrid cars gobble rare metals, shortage looms". Reuters. August 31, 2009. Retrieved Aug 31, 2009.
- Massari, Stefania; Ruberti, Marcello (March 1, 2013). "Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies". Resources Policy. 38 (1): 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.07.001. ISSN 0301-4207.
- "The Rare-Earth Elements—Vital to Modern Technologies and Lifestyles" (PDF). United Stated Geological Survey. November 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2018.
- Ma, Damien (April 25, 2012). "China Digs It". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- Livergood, R. (October 5, 2010). "Rare Earth Elements: A Wrench in the Supply Chain" (PDF). Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
- "China To Limit Rare Earths Exports". Manufacturing.net, 1 September 2009. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2010.
- Ben Geman (October 19, 2009). "China to cut exports of 'rare earth' minerals vital to energy tech". The Hill's E2 Wire. Archived from the original on October 21, 2010. Retrieved October 19, 2010.
- Tony Jin (January 18, 2011). "China's Rare Earth Exports Surge in Value". The China Perspective. Archived from the original on February 13, 2011. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
- Zhang Qi; Ding Qingfen; Fu Jing (July 15, 2011). "Rare earths export quota unchanged". China Daily. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011.
- "China halts rare earth production at three mines". Reuters. September 6, 2011. Retrieved September 7, 2011.
- "WRAPUP 4-US, EU, Japan take on China at WTO over rare earths". Reuters. March 13, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- "Rare Earths: The Hidden Cost to Their Magic", Distillations Podcast and transcript, Episode 242". Science History Institute. June 25, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
- Kevin Voigt (August 8, 2012). "China cuts mines vital to tech industry". CNN.
- Tim Worstall (December 23, 2012). "El Reg man: Too bad, China – I was RIGHT about hoarding rare earths". The Register. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- "China scraps quotas on rare earths after WTO complaint". The Guardian. January 5, 2015. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
- "DS431: China — Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum". World Trade Organization. Retrieved May 1, 2014.
- R. Castellano (Jun. 02, 2019). "China Trade - Invest Based On Rare Earth Price Hikes". seekingalpha.com. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
- S. Burns (Feb. 16, 2021). "Rare earths are the next geopolitical chess game". MetalMiner.com. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
- "EU stockpiles rare earths as tensions with China rise". Financial Post. Reuters. September 6, 2011. Retrieved September 7, 2011.
- "Canadian Firms Step Up Search for Rare-Earth Metals". NYTimes.com. Reuters. September 9, 2009. Retrieved September 15, 2009.
- Leifert, H. (June 2010). "Restarting US rare earth production?". Earth. pp. 20–21.
- Editor. "About The Mine". Steenkampskraal Rare Earths Mine. Retrieved July 19, 2019.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
- Lunn, J. (2006). "Great western minerals" (PDF). London: Insigner Beaufort Equity Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 9, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2008.
- Gorman, Steve (August 30, 2009). "California mine digs in for 'green' gold rush". Reuters. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- "Hoidas Lake, Saskatchewan". Great Western Mineral Group Ltd. Archived from the original on March 31, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
- "Rare earths supply deal between Japan and Vietnam". BBC News. October 31, 2010.
- "Vietnam signs major nuclear pacts". AlJazeera. October 31, 2010. Retrieved October 31, 2010.
- "Mining Venture Draws $200 Million in Tax Incentives and Red Flags (1)". news.bloombergtax.com. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
- "Long-discussed niobium mine in southeast Nebraska is ready to move forward, if it gathers $1 billion in financing ". Retrieved May 18, 2019.
- "NioCorp Superalloy Materials The Elk Creek Superalloy Materials Project" (PDF). Retrieved May 18, 2019.
"Federal minister approves N.W.T. rare earth mine". CBC News. November 4, 2013.
It follows the recommendation from the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Review Board in July, and marks a major milestone in the company's effort to turn the project into an operating mine. Avalon claims Nechalacho is “the most advanced large heavy rare earth development project in the world”.
- "Rare Earth Elements at Kvanefjeld". Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd. Archived from the original on September 18, 2010. Retrieved November 10, 2010.
- "New Multi-Element Targets and Overall Resource Potential". Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd. Archived from the original on November 18, 2010. Retrieved November 10, 2010.
- Carol Matlack (February 10, 2013). "Chinese Workers—in Greenland?". Business Week.
- Bomsdorf, Clemens (March 13, 2013). "Greenland Votes to Get Tough on Investors". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- "Hay tierras raras aquí y están... en un lugar de La Mancha". ELMUNDO (in Spanish). May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
- "Maiden Resource, Ngualla Rare Earth Project" (PDF). ASX Release. Peak Resources. February 29, 2012.
- Petrov, Leonid (August 8, 2012). "Rare earths bankroll North Korea's future". Asia Times. Archived from the original on August 8, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2018.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
- "북한, 올 5~6월 희토류 중국 수출 크게 늘어" [North Korea Rare Earth exports to China increased significantly from May to June]. voakorea.com (in Korean). July 28, 2014.
- Bradsher, Keith (March 8, 2011). "Taking a Risk for Rare Earths". The New York Times. (March 9, 2011 p. B1 NY ed.). Retrieved March 9, 2011.
- "Kronologi Peristiwa di Kilang Nadir Bumi, Bukit Merah" [Chronology of Events at the Rare Earth Factory, Red Hill] (in Malay). Penang Consumer Association. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- Bradsher, Keith (March 8, 2011). "Mitsubishi Quietly Cleans Up Its Former Refinery". The New York Times. (March 9, 2011 p. B4 NY ed.). Retrieved March 9, 2011.
- Coleman, Murray (June 30, 2011). "Rare Earth ETF Jumps As Plans To Break China's Hold Suffer Setback". Barron's. Archived from the original on July 3, 2011. Retrieved June 30, 2011.
- Report of the International Review Mission on the Radiation Safety Aspects of a Proposed Rare Earths Processing Facility (Lynas Project) (PDF). (29 May – 3 June 2011). International Atomic Energy Agency. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2011. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
- Ng, Eileen (September 2, 2014). "Lynas gets full operating licence before TOL expiry date". The Malaysian Insider. Archived from the original on September 4, 2014. Retrieved September 3, 2014.
- Rofer, Cheryl K.; Tõnis Kaasik (2000). Turning a Problem Into a Resource: Remediation and Waste Management at the Sillamäe Site, Estonia. Volume 28 of NATO science series: Disarmament technologies. Springer. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-7923-6187-9.
- Anneli Reigas (November 30, 2010). "Estonia's rare earth break China's market grip". AFP. Retrieved December 1, 2010.
- Cone, Tracie (July 21, 2013). "Gold Rush Trash is Information Age Treasure". USA Today. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
- "Japan Discovers Domestic Rare Earths Reserve". BrightWire. Archived from the original on July 23, 2012.
- "Brightwire". Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- "Seabed offers brighter hope in rare-earth hunt". Nikkei Asian Review. Nikkei Inc. November 25, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
- "Discovery of rare earths around Minami-Torishima". UTokyo Research. University of Tokyo. May 2, 2013. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
- Zhi Li, Ling; Yang, Xiaosheng (September 4, 2014). China's rare earth ore deposits and beneficiation techniques (PDF). 1st European Rare Earth Resources Conference. Milos, Greece: European Commission for the 'Development of a sustainable exploitation scheme for Europe's Rare Earth ore deposits'. Retrieved December 11, 2016.
- Um, Namil (July 2017). Hydrometallurgical recovery process of rare earth elements from waste: main application of acid leaching with devised diagram. INTECH. pp. 41–60. ISBN 978-953-51-3401-5.
- "New liquid extraction frontier for rare earths?". Recycling International. March 26, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- Tabuchi, Hiroko (October 5, 2010). "Japan Recycles Minerals From Used Electronics". New York Times.
- "Rhodia to recycle rare earths from magnets". Solvay — Rhodia. October 3, 2011. Archived from the original on April 21, 2014.
- "Rhodia expands rare earth recycling reach". Recycling International. October 11, 2011. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- Wencai Zhang; Mohammad Rezaee; Abhijit Bhagavatula; Yonggai Li; John Groppo; Rick Honaker (2015). "A Review of the Occurrence and Promising Recovery Methods of Rare Earth Elements from Coal and Coal By-Products". International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. 35 (6): 295–330. doi:10.1080/19392699.2015.1033097. S2CID 128509001.
- Zhou, Baolu; Li, Zhongxue; Chen, Congcong (October 25, 2017). "Global Potential of Rare Earth Resources and Rare Earth Demand from Clean Technologies". Minerals. 7 (11): 203. doi:10.3390/min7110203.
See production in Figure 1 on page 2
- "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019". Mineral Commodity Summaries. 2019. p. 132. doi:10.3133/70202434.
- F. J. Duarte (Ed.), Tunable Lasers Handbook (Academic, New York, 1995).
- Pang, Xin; Li, Decheng; Peng, An (March 1, 2002). "Application of rare-earth elements in the agriculture of China and its environmental behavior in soil". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 9 (2): 143–8. doi:10.1007/BF02987462. ISSN 0944-1344. PMID 12008295. S2CID 11359274.
- Rim, Kyung-Taek (September 1, 2016). "Effects of rare earth elements on the environment and human health: A literature review". Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences. 8 (3): 189–200. doi:10.1007/s13530-016-0276-y. ISSN 2005-9752. S2CID 17407586.
- Ali, Saleem H. (February 13, 2014). "Social and Environmental Impact of the Rare Earth Industries". Resources. 3 (1): 123–134. doi:10.3390/resources3010123.
- Rizk, Shirley (June 21, 2019). "What colour is the cloud?". European Investment Bank. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
- Standaert, Michael (July 2, 2019). "China Wrestles with the Toxic Aftermath of Rare Earth Mining". Yale Environment 360. Yale School of the Environment. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Volokh, A. A.; Gorbunov, A. V.; Gundorina, S. F.; Revich, B. A.; Frontasyeva, M. V.; Chen Sen Pal (June 1, 1990). "Phosphorus fertilizer production as a source of rare-earth elements pollution of the environment". Science of the Total Environment. 95: 141–148. Bibcode:1990ScTEn..95..141V. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(90)90059-4. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 2169646.
- Bourzac, Katherine. "Can the US Rare-Earth Industry Rebound?" Technology Review. October 29, 2010.
- "Govt cracks whip on rare earth mining". China Mining Association. May 21, 2010. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2010.
- Lee Yong-tim (February 22, 2008). "South China Villagers Slam Pollution From Rare Earth Mine". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved March 16, 2008.
- Bradsher, Keith (October 29, 2010). "After China's Rare Earth Embargo, a New Calculus". The New York Times. Retrieved October 30, 2010.
- Rare earth elements removal technisues
- Recovery of rare earth elements from wastewater
- Towards zero-waste valorization of rare earth elements
- Yang, Xiuli; Zhang, Junwei; Fang, Xihui (August 30, 2014). "Rare earth element recycling from waste nickel-metal hydride batteries". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 279: 384–388. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.027. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 25089667.
- Martinez, Raul E.; Pourret, Olivier; Faucon, Michel-Pierre; Dian, Charlotte (June 20, 2018). "Effect of rare earth elements on rice plant growth" (PDF). Chemical Geology. 489: 28–37. Bibcode:2018ChGeo.489...28M. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.012. ISSN 0009-2541.
- Chua, H (June 18, 1998). "Bio-accumulation of environmental residues of rare earth elements in aquatic flora Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms in Guangdong Province of China". Science of the Total Environment. 214 (1–3): 79–85. Bibcode:1998ScTEn.214...79C. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00055-2. ISSN 0048-9697.
- Rim, Kyung Taek; Koo, Kwon Ho; Park, Jung Sun (2013). "Toxicological Evaluations of Rare Earths and Their Health Impacts to Workers: A Literature Review". Safety and Health at Work. 4 (1): 12–26. doi:10.5491/shaw.2013.4.1.12. PMC 3601293. PMID 23516020.
- Sun, Guangyi; Li, Zhonggen; Liu, Ting; Chen, Ji; Wu, Tingting; Feng, Xinbin (December 1, 2017). "Rare earth elements in street dust and associated health risk in a municipal industrial base of central China". Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 39 (6): 1469–1486. doi:10.1007/s10653-017-9982-x. ISSN 0269-4042. PMID 28550599. S2CID 31655372.
- Ramos, Silvio J.; Dinali, Guilherme S.; Oliveira, Cynthia; Martins, Gabriel C.; Moreira, Cristiano G.; Siqueira, José O.; Guilherme, Luiz R. G. (March 1, 2016). "Rare Earth Elements in the Soil Environment". Current Pollution Reports. 2 (1): 28–50. doi:10.1007/s40726-016-0026-4. ISSN 2198-6592.
- Li, Xiaofei; Chen, Zhibiao; Chen, Zhiqiang; Zhang, Yonghe (October 1, 2013). "A human health risk assessment of rare earth elements in soil and vegetables from a mining area in Fujian Province, Southeast China". Chemosphere. 93 (6): 1240–1246. Bibcode:2013Chmsp..93.1240L. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.085. ISSN 0045-6535. PMID 23891580.
- Zhuang, Maoqiang; Wang, Liansen; Wu, Guangjian; Wang, Kebo; Jiang, Xiaofeng; Liu, Taibin; Xiao, Peirui; Yu, Lianlong; Jiang, Ying (August 29, 2017). "Health risk assessment of rare earth elements in cereals from mining area in Shandong, China". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 9772. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.9772Z. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10256-7. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5575011. PMID 28852170.
- Zhong, Buqing; Wang, Lingqing; Liang, Tao; Xing, Baoshan (October 2017). "Pollution level and inhalation exposure of ambient aerosol fluoride as affected by polymetallic rare earth mining and smelting in Baotou, north China". Atmospheric Environment. 167: 40–48. Bibcode:2017AtmEn.167...40Z. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.014.
- Lee, Yoolim, "Malaysia Rare Earths in Largest Would-Be Refinery Incite Protest", Bloomberg Markets Magazine, May 31, 2011 5:00 PM ET.
- "Malaysia court rejects pollution suit against ARE". World Information Service on Energy. February 11, 1994.
- Pagano, Giovanni; Aliberti, Francesco; Guida, Marco; Oral, Rahime; Siciliano, Antonietta; Trifuoggi, Marco; Tommasi, Franca (2015). "Rare earth elements in human and animal health: State of art and research priorities". Environmental Research. 142: 215–220. Bibcode:2015ER....142..215P. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.039. PMID 26164116.
- Redling, Kerstin (2006). "Rare Earth Elements in Agriculture with Emphasis on Animal Husbandry" (Dissertation). LMU München: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. Retrieved April 5, 2018.
- "UN investigation into Malaysia rare-earth plant safety", BBC, 30 May 2011 05:52 ET.
- IAEA Submits Lynas Report to Malaysian Government. Iaea.org (2011-06-29). Retrieved on 2011-09-27.
- Tim Heffernan (June 16, 2015). "Why rare-earth mining in the West is a bust". High Country News.
- Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Greenland votes, split on rare earth metals mining | DW | 06.04.2021". DW.COM. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
- "The Difference Engine: More precious than gold". The Economist September 17, 2010.
- Barakos, G; Gutzmer, J; Mischo, H (2016). "Strategic evaluations and mining process optimization towards a strong global REE supply chain". Journal of Sustainable Mining. 15 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jsm.2016.05.002.
- "Value Chain". Investopedia.
- Dian L. Chu (November 11, 2010). "Seventeen Metals: 'The Middle East has oil, China has rare earth'". Business Insider.
- Cox, C. (November 16, 2006). "Rare earth innovation: the silent shift to China". The Anchor House, Inc. Archived from the original on April 21, 2008. Retrieved February 29, 2008.
- Bradsher, Keith (September 22, 2010). "Amid Tension, China Blocks Vital Exports to Japan". The New York Times Company. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
- James T. Areddy, David Fickling And Norihiko Shirouzu (September 23, 2010). "China Denies Halting Rare-Earth Exports to Japan". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
- Backlash over the alleged China curb on metal exports, Daily Telegraph, London, 29 Aug 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-30.
- "Rare earths: Digging in" The Economist September 2, 2010.
- Mills, Mark P. "Tech's Mineral Infrastructure – Time to Emulate China's Rare Earth Policies." Forbes, 1 January 2010.
- "US Geological Survey: China's Rare-Earth Industry". Journalist's Resource.org. July 18, 2011.
- Simpson, S. (October 2011). "Afghanistan's Buried Riches". Scientific American.
- Trakimavicius, Lukas (February 25, 2021). "EU, U.S. exploring new sources of Rare Earth Minerals, should China limit exports". Energy Post. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
- Overland, Indra (March 1, 2019). "The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths". Energy Research & Social Science. 49: 36–40. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018. ISSN 2214-6296.
- Media related to Rare earth elements at Wikimedia Commons
|"Rare Earths: The Hidden Cost to Their Magic", Distillations Podcast and transcript, Episode 242, June 25, 2019, Science History Institute|
|“10 ways rare earth elements make life better”, animation, Science History Institute|
|Rare Earth Elements: The Intersection of Science and Society, presentation and discussion led by Ira Flatow, Science History Institute, September 24, 2019|