In mathematics, a rational number is a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q. For example, is a rational number, as is every integer (e.g. 5 = 5/1). The set of all rational numbers, also referred to as "the rationals", the field of rationals or the field of rational numbers is usually denoted by boldface Q, or blackboard bold 
A rational number is a real number. The real numbers that are rational are those whose decimal expansion either terminates after a finite number of digits (example: 3/4 = 0.75), or eventually begins to repeat the same finite sequence of digits over and over (example: 9/44 = 0.20454545...). This statement is true not only in base 10, but also in every other integer base, such as the binary and hexadecimal ones (see Repeating decimal § Extension to other bases).
A real number that is not rational is called irrational. Irrational numbers include square root of 2 (), π, e, and the golden ratio (φ). Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and the set of real numbers is uncountable, almost all real numbers are irrational.
The fraction then denotes the equivalence class of (p, q).
Rational numbers together with addition and multiplication form a field which contains the integers, and is contained in any field containing the integers. In other words, the field of rational numbers is a prime field, and a field has characteristic zero if and only if it contains the rational numbers as a subfield. Finite extensions of are called algebraic number fields, and the algebraic closure of is the field of algebraic numbers.
In mathematical analysis, the rational numbers form a dense subset of the real numbers. The real numbers can be constructed from the rational numbers by completion, using Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, or infinite decimals (see Construction of the real numbers).
The term rational in reference to the set refers to the fact that a rational number represents a ratio of two integers. In mathematics, "rational" is often used as a noun abbreviating "rational number". The adjective rational sometimes means that the coefficients are rational numbers. For example, a rational point is a point with rational coordinates (i.e., a point whose coordinates are rational numbers); a rational matrix is a matrix of rational numbers; a rational polynomial may be a polynomial with rational coefficients, although the term "polynomial over the rationals" is generally preferred, to avoid confusion between "rational expression" and "rational function" (a polynomial is a rational expression and defines a rational function, even if its coefficients are not rational numbers). However, a rational curve is not a curve defined over the rationals, but a curve which can be parameterized by rational functions.
Although nowadays rational numbers are defined in terms of ratios, the term rational is not a derivation of ratio. On the opposite, it is ratio that is derived from rational: the first use of ratio with its modern meaning was attested in English about 1660, while the use of rational for qualifying numbers appeared almost a century earlier, in 1570. This meaning of rational came from the mathematical meaning of irrational, which was first used in 1551, and it was used in "translations of Euclid (following his peculiar use of ἄλογος)".
This unusual history originated in the fact that ancient Greeks "avoided heresy by forbidding themselves from thinking of those [irrational] lengths as numbers". So such lengths were irrational, in the sense of illogical, that is "not to be spoken about" (ἄλογος in Greek).
Starting from a rational number its canonical form may be obtained by dividing a and b by their greatest common divisor, and, if b < 0, changing the sign of the resulting numerator and denominator.
Embedding of integers
Any integer n can be expressed as the rational number which is its canonical form as a rational number.
- if and only if
If both fractions are in canonical form, then:
- if and only if and 
If both denominators are positive (particularly if both fractions are in canonical form):
- if and only if
On the other hand, if either denominator is negative, then each fraction with a negative denominator must first be converted into an equivalent form with a positive denominator—by changing the signs of both its numerator and denominator.
Two fractions are added as follows:
The rule for multiplication is:
Every rational number has an additive inverse, often called its opposite,
If is in canonical form, the same is true for its opposite.
A nonzero rational number has a multiplicative inverse, also called its reciprocal,
If is in canonical form, then the canonical form of its reciprocal is either or depending on the sign of a.
If b, c, d are nonzero, the division rule is
Exponentiation to integer power
If n is a non-negative integer, then
The result is in canonical form if the same is true for In particular,
If a ≠ 0, then
If is in canonical form, the canonical form of the result is if a > 0 or n is even. Otherwise, the canonical form of the result is
Continued fraction representation
A finite continued fraction is an expression such as
- common fraction:
- mixed numeral:
- repeating decimal using a vinculum:
- repeating decimal using parentheses:
- continued fraction using traditional typography:
- continued fraction in abbreviated notation:
- Egyptian fraction:
- prime power decomposition:
- quote notation:
are different ways to represent the same rational value.
More precisely, let be the set of the pairs (m, n) of integers such n ≠ 0. An equivalence relation is defined on this set by
Addition and multiplication can be defined by the following rules:
This equivalence relation is a congruence relation, which means that it is compatible with the addition and multiplication defined above; the set of rational numbers is the defined as the quotient set by this equivalence relation, equipped with the addition and the multiplication induced by the above operations. (This construction can be carried out with any integral domain and produces its field of fractions.)
The equivalence class of a pair (m, n) is denoted Two pairs (m1, n1) and (m2, n2) belong to the same equivalence class (that is are equivalent) if and only if
This means that
Every equivalence class may be represented by infinitely many pairs, since
Each equivalence class contains a unique canonical representative element. The canonical representative is the unique pair (m, n) in the equivalence class such that m and n are coprime, and n > 0. It is called the representation in lowest terms of the rational number.
The integers may be considered to be rational numbers identifying the integer n with the rational number
A total order may be defined on the rational numbers, that extends the natural order of the integers. One has
has no field automorphism other than the identity. (A field automorphism must fix 0 and 1; as it must fix the sum and the difference of two fixed elements, it must fix every integer; as it must fix the quotient of two fixed elements, it must fix every rational number, and is thus the identity.)
is a prime field, which is a field that has no subfield other than itself. The rationals are the smallest field with characteristic zero. Every field of characteristic zero contains a unique subfield isomorphic to
With the order defined above, is an ordered field that has no subfield other than itself, and is the smallest ordered field, in the sense that every ordered field contains a unique subfield isomorphic to
(where are positive), we have
The set of all rational numbers is countable, as is illustrated in the figure to the right. As a rational number can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, it is possible to assign two integers to any point on a square lattice as in a Cartesian coordinate system, such that any grid point corresponds to a rational number. This method, however, exhibits a form of redundancy, as several different grid points will correspond to the same rational number; these are highlighted in red on the provided graphic. An obvious example can be seen in the line going diagonally towards the bottom right; such ratios will always equal 1, as any non-zero number divided by itself will always equal one.
As the set of all rational numbers is countable, and the set of all real numbers (as well as the set of irrational numbers) is uncountable, the set of rational numbers is a null set, that is, almost all real numbers are irrational, in the sense of Lebesgue measure.
Real numbers and topological properties
The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers; every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions.
By virtue of their order, the rationals carry an order topology. The rational numbers, as a subspace of the real numbers, also carry a subspace topology. The rational numbers form a metric space by using the absolute difference metric and this yields a third topology on All three topologies coincide and turn the rationals into a topological field. The rational numbers are an important example of a space which is not locally compact. The rationals are characterized topologically as the unique countable metrizable space without isolated points. The space is also totally disconnected. The rational numbers do not form a complete metric space, and the real numbers are the completion of under the metric above.
In addition to the absolute value metric mentioned above, there are other metrics which turn into a topological field:
In addition set For any rational number we set
The metric space is not complete, and its completion is the p-adic number field Ostrowski's theorem states that any non-trivial absolute value on the rational numbers is equivalent to either the usual real absolute value or a p-adic absolute value.
- Dyadic rational
- Floating point
- Ford circles
- Gaussian rational
- Naive height—height of a rational number in lowest term
- Niven's theorem
- Rational data type
- Divine Proportions: Rational Trigonometry to Universal Geometry
- Rosen, Kenneth (2007). Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 105, 158–160. ISBN 978-0-07-288008-3.
- Lass, Harry (2009). Elements of Pure and Applied Mathematics (illustrated ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 382. ISBN 978-0-486-47186-0. Extract of page 382
- Robinson, Julia (1996). The Collected Works of Julia Robinson. American Mathematical Soc. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-8218-0575-6. Extract of page 104
- It was thus denoted in 1895 by Giuseppe Peano after quoziente, Italian for "quotient",
- It first appeared in Bourbaki's Algèbre.
- "Rational number". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Rational Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
- Biggs, Norman L. (2002). Discrete Mathematics. India: Oxford University Press. pp. 75–78. ISBN 978-0-19-871369-2.
- Gilbert, Jimmie; Linda, Gilbert (2005). Elements of Modern Algebra (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. pp. 243–244. ISBN 0-534-40264-X.
- Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 1989. Entry ratio, n., sense 2.a.
- Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 1989. Entry rational, a. (adv.) and n.1, sense 5.a.
- Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 1989. Entry irrational, a. and n., sense 3.
- Shor, Peter (2017-05-09). "Does rational come from ratio or ratio come from rational". Stack Exchange. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
- Coolman, Robert (2016-01-29). "How a Mathematical Superstition Stultified Algebra for Over a Thousand Years". Retrieved 2021-03-20.
- Kramer, Edna (1983). The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics. Princeton University Press. p. 28.
- "Fraction - Encyclopedia of Mathematics". encyclopediaofmath.org. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
- Sūgakkai, Nihon (1993). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, Volume 1. London, England: MIT Press. p. 578. ISBN 0-2625-9020-4.
- Bourbaki, N. (2003). Algebra II: Chapters 4 - 7. Springer Science & Business Media. p. A.VII.5.
- Giese, Martin; Schönegge, Arno (December 1995). Any two countable densely ordered sets without endpoints are isomorphic - a formal proof with KIV (PDF) (Technical report). Retrieved 17 August 2021.
- Anthony Vazzana; David Garth (2015). Introduction to Number Theory (2nd, revised ed.). CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-4987-1752-6. Extract of page 1
- Richard A. Holmgren (2012). A First Course in Discrete Dynamical Systems (2nd, illustrated ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-4419-8732-7. Extract of page 26
- Weisstein, Eric W. "p-adic Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2021-08-17.