Readability (service)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Readability logo

Readability was an Internet-based "read it later" service launched in 2009 by Arc90. It ceased its 'bookmarklet' service on September 10, 2016, and discontinued its API service on December 10, 2016. It was similar to competitors Instapaper and Pocket in that it allows a user to save an article from the web and read it later without the clutter of the original website. It started originally as a bookmarklet to remove clutter from webpages and reformat the main article text in a readable font and layout,[1] but following the popularity of the bookmarklet, it evolved to become a service with an app.[2]

An example of a cleaned up page, the Wikipedia article "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time"

One distinguishing aspect of Readability was that it attempted to set up a subscription model where users of the service paid a monthly fee, a large portion of which would go to the publishers of the content they read in the Readability service. This business model faced two major hurdles: criticism by publishers and issues with Apple's iOS App Store pricing model. In 2011, Readability got a large amount of publicity after Apple rejected their app from the iOS App Store as it used a third-party payment system that circumvented Apple's 30% cut for in-app subscription payments. Readability argued that Apple's taking of a 30% share from their subscription revenues would cut into the money they were giving to publishers.[3]

Money that was collected for publishers who did not sign up to Readability's publisher program would be kept by Readability themselves. This led John Gruber, author of the popular Daring Fireball technology blog, to describe Readability in 2012 as "scumbags"[4] as well as extended discussion among bloggers and journalists as to the ethics of Readability's business model.[5] Gruber later clarified that his primary issue was that Readability told its users that it would distribute 70% of its subscription fee to publishers, when in fact it was only distributing a portion of that 70% to the publishers who had registered, which he described as "misleading at best, and arguably dishonest".[6] Following the controversy, Readability's subscription model was discontinued.

All services were terminated on December 10, 2016, per an announcement[7] on the company's website.


  1. ^ Frakes, Dan (29 September 2009). "Readability makes Web pages more readable". MacWorld. Archived from the original on 21 April 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  2. ^ Gordon, Whitson (27 August 2013). ""Read Later" Apps Compared: Pocket vs. Instapaper vs. Readability". Lifehacker. Archived from the original on 14 April 2016.
  3. ^ MG Siegler (21 February 2011). "Apple Smacks Readability In The Face With Subscription Rules; All SaaS In Trouble". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
  4. ^ Gruber, John (30 March 2012). "Readability directs Shared Articles to own servers, cuts out original publishers". Daring Fireball. Archived from the original on 17 March 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  5. ^ Ingram, Matthew (3 April 2012). "Instapaper, Readability and monetizing other people's content". GigaOm. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  6. ^ Gruber, John (2 April 2012). "What the Betamax Case teaches us about Readability". Daring Fireball. Archived from the original on 5 April 2012. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  7. ^ "The Readability bookmarking service will shut down on September 30, 2016". Readability.Com. 16 November 2016. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 16, 2016.

External links[edit]