Real world evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Real world evidence (RWE) in medicine means evidence obtained from real world data (RWD), which are observational data obtained outside the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and generated during routine clinical practice. In order to assess patient outcomes and to ensure that patients get treatment that is right for them, real world data needs to be utilized. RWE is generated by analyzing data which is stored in electronic health records (EHR), medical claims or billing activities databases, registries, patient-generated data, mobile devices, etc.[1] It may be derived from retrospective or prospective observational studies and observational registries. In the USA the 21st Century Cures Act required the FDA to expand the role of real world evidence.

Real World Evidence comes into play when clinical trials cannot really account for the entire patient population of a particular disease. Patients suffering from comorbidities or belonging to a distant geographic region or age limit who did not participate in any clinical trial may not respond to the treatment in question as expected. RWE provides answers to these problems and also to analyze effects of drugs over a longer period of time. Pharmaceutical companies and Health Insurance Payers study RWE to understand patient pathways to deliver appropriate care for appropriate individuals and to minimize their own financial risk by investing on drugs that work for patients.

Data quality[edit]

In order to use real world data to generate evidence, data must be of sufficient quality. Kahn et al. define data quality as consisting of three components: (1) conformance (do data values adhere to do specified standard and formats?; subtypes: value, relational and computational conformance); (2) completeness (are data values present?); and (3) plausibility (are data values believable?; subtypes uniqueness, atemporal; temporal).[2]

Fitness for purpose[edit]

Similarly to having sufficient data quality, the real world data must be fit for purpose. An RWD resource can be fit for addressing some questions, but not others. For example, a dataset that lacks mother-to-baby links may not be appropriate to address drug risk for fetus but can be used for questions for drug safety in patients taking epilepsy treatment (limited to the patient; not including safety for fetus). Since data quality can be evaluated outside a particular purpose (on a general level), fitness for purpose is evaluated separate from data quality and is not included in the concept of data quality.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Commissioner, Office of the. "Real World Evidence". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-08-05.
  2. ^ Kahn MG, Callahan TJ, Barnard J, Bauck AE, Brown J, Davidson BN, Estiri H, Goerg C, Holve E, Johnson SG, Liaw ST, Hamilton-Lopez M, Meeker D, Ong TC, Ryan P, Shang N, Weiskopf NG, Weng C, Zozus MN, Schilling L (2016). "A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data". EGEMS (Wash DC). 4 (1): 1244. doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1244. PMC 5051581. PMID 27713905.
  • Real-World Evidence — What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? The New England Journal of Medicine, Dec. 6, 2016
  • Real World Evidence, FDA, June 21, 2018.
  • Mahajan, Rajiv. “Real World Data: Additional Source for Making Clinical Decisions.” International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research 5.2 (2015): 82. PMC. Web. 5 May 2018.
  • Berger, Marc L. et al. “Good Practices for Real‐world Data Studies of Treatment And/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR‐ISPE Special Task Force on Real‐world Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 26.9 (2017): 1033–1039. PMC. Web. 5 May 2018.

External links[edit]