Recklessness (also called unchariness) is disregard for or indifference to the dangers of a situation or for the consequences of one's actions, as in deciding to act without stopping to think beforehand. Aristotle considered such rashness as one end (excessive) of a continuum, with courage as the mean, cowardice as the deficit vice. Recklessness has been linked to antisocial personality disorder.
"Reck" is a regard or reckoning, particularly of a situation. A reckless individual would engage in an activity without concern for its after-effects. It can in certain cases be seen as heroic—for example, the soldier fearlessly charging into battle, with no care for his own safety, has a revered status and military rank among some. However, recklessness is more commonly regarded as a vice—this same soldier may be a liability to his own side, or get himself killed for no benefit—and may be the product of a death wish.
Recklessness is often contrasted from bravery.[by whom?] Although the two could sometimes be connected, the latter is usually applied to cases where a person displays a more reasonable reckoning of the inherent danger, rather than none at all.
- Aristotle, Ethics (1976) p. 103; 'In feelings of fear and confidence, courage is the mean ... who exceeds in confidence is reckless ... who exceeds in fear and is deficient in confidence is cowardly.' Nicomachean Ethics, book ii, 1107a/b, trans. Martin Ostwald (1962/1999).
- D, Coon/J. O. Mitterer, Introduction to Psychology (2008) p. 488
- Eric Berne, A Laynan's Guide to Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis (1976) p. 81
- J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 207
- J. Cleese/R. Skynner, Families and how to survive them (1994) p. 35-6
- Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 480
- Erik H. Erikson, Childhood and Society (1973) p. 249
- Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 518 and p. 510
- Aristotle, Ethics (1976) p. 129