Recognition of same-sex unions in Switzerland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Switzerland has allowed registered partnerships for same-sex couples since 1 January 2007, after a 2005 referendum. Legislation to allow same-sex marriage was introduced in 2013 and passed on 18 December 2020 by the Swiss Parliament, but is subject to a referendum scheduled for 26 September 2021. Public opinion strongly supports same-sex marriage, with polls indicating support by about 82% of voters as of November 2020.

Registered partnerships[edit]

Map showing how the Swiss electorate voted in the 2005 registered partnership referendum
  Yes (>60%)
  Yes (50%-59%)
  No

In a nationwide referendum on 5 June 2005, the Swiss people approved by 58% a registered partnership law, granting same-sex couples the same rights and protections as married couples in terms of next of kin status, taxation, social security, insurance, and shared possession of a dwelling. However, same-sex couples would not have the same rights in terms of:

  • Full joint adoption of children.
  • Access to fertility treatments.
  • Facilitated Swiss naturalisation of the foreign partner. Swiss law provides a faster route to citizenship for the spouse of a Swiss citizen, but does not recognise same-sex marriages conducted in foreign countries, instead classing them as registered partnerships.

The official title of the same-sex union is eingetragene Partnerschaft in German, partenariat enregistré in French, unione domestica registrata in Italian and partenadi registrà in Romansh. The bill was passed by the National Council, 118 to 50,[1] on 3 December 2003 and by the Council of States on 3 June 2004 by 33 votes to 5, with minor changes.[2][3] The National Council approved it again on 18 June, by a vote of 112 to 51, but the conservative Federal Democratic Union collected signatures to force a referendum.[4][5] Subsequently, the Swiss people voted 58% in favor of the bill on 5 June 2005.[6] The law came into effect on 1 January 2007.[7] Switzerland was the first nation to pass a same-sex union law by referendum.

Adoption and parenting[edit]

A bill legalizing stepchild adoption for registered partners was approved by Parliament in spring 2016. Opponents unsuccessfully tried to force a referendum on the bill. The law came into effect on 1 January 2018.[8]

Article 27 of the partnership act treats the matter of the partner's child/children. The law states that the partner of the biological/adoptive parent must provide financial support for their partner's child and also possesses the full legal authority to represent the child in every matter as being the parent's partner. It also states that in the case of the dissolution of the partnership, the ex-partner has the right to keep close ties with their ex-partner's child.[9] This article makes Swiss registered partnerships one of the most liberal partnerships, giving the couple a real role in being parents.

In 2010, Swiss LGBT organisations started a petition, "Same Chances For All Families", demanding more adoption rights. On 30 September 2011, the National Council considered the petition but ultimately voted 83–97 against it.[10] However, the debate and close vote provided a view on how attitudes on the issue had evolved, as for example Maja Ingold, MP for the Evangelical People's Party, spoke for more recognition of gay and lesbian parents, while her party campaigned against the registered partnership law back in 2005. It became clear that, while there was no majority for full joint adoption, allowing adoption of the partner's child (i.e. stepchild adoption) could gather majority support in Parliament.

The Council of States accepted the petition and the Legal Affairs Committee approved a motion from openly gay MP Claude Janiak (SP/PS) backing the right to full joint adoption regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. In November 2011, the committee voted unanimously in favour, including members of the conservative Swiss People's Party.[11] In February 2012, the Federal Council responded by informing the Council of States that they were in favour of stepchild adoption but against full joint adoption rights.[12] On 14 March 2012, the Council of States approved (21–19) the complete full extension of adoption rights for same-sex couples regardless of marital status or sexual orientation.[13]

As the National Council had originally voted against it in September 2011, the bill had to be voted on again by the lower chamber, which did so on 13 December 2012, as the National Council voted 113–64 to grant same-sex couples the right to adopt biological or adopted children that the partner had before the start of the relationship.[14] However, the motion giving full adoption rights approved by the Council of States was rejected by the National Council.[15] On 4 March 2013, the new version approved by the National Council on 13 December was accepted by the Council of States by a majority of 26–16.[16]

In November 2014, taking into account the parliamentary votes, the Federal Council approved allowing the adoption of the partner's child as part of a larger adoption reform.[17][18] The bill would permit registered partners and cohabiting couples, whether same-sex or different-sex, to petition to adopt, and would also lower the minimum age to adopt from 35 to 28. The legislation had to be approved by Parliament, though opponents had already announced they would force an optional referendum.[19] For such a referendum, citizens opposing the law have to gather 50,000 signatures within 100 days.

In January 2016, the Council of States' Committee on Legal Affairs voted 7 to 3 with one abstention to approve the bill.[20] On 8 March 2016, the Council of States voted 25–14 in favor.[21][22] Member of the Federal Council Simonetta Sommaruga expressed her support for the bill and argued that it was necessary to legally protect children already raised by same-sex couples. On 13 May 2016, the National Council's Committee on Legal Affairs voted 15–9 to approve the bill.[23] The following day, it was approved by the National Council in a 113–64 vote.[24][25] Differing texts caused the two chambers to agree on a final, slightly modified version of the bill that was passed in Parliament on 17 June 2016 by a vote of 125–68 with 3 abstentions.[26][27] Under Swiss law, opponents of a bill passed by Parliament have one hundred days to collect 50,000 valid signatures. If enough signatures are gathered, a referendum will take place otherwise the bill will become law. Following the final vote in Parliament, a referendum committee was established including members of several different political parties with the aim of forcing a referendum on the bill. No major party supported the committee.[28][29] On 4 October 2016, it was confirmed that the referendum would not take place as only 20,000 signatures had been collected.[30] The law took effect on 1 January 2018.[8][31]

Pension benefits[edit]

At the end of August 2008, the Federal Supreme Court decided that long-term same-sex partners were entitled to the same vested benefits from the pension of the deceased as equivalent opposite-sex partners have. A shared apartment is not necessary.[32]

Statistics[edit]

The first same-sex partnership was registered on 2 January 2007 in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino.[7] By the end of 2019, 10,900 same-sex partnerships had been registered in Switzerland.[33]

Year Female couples Male couples Total
2007 573 1,431 2,004
2008 271 660 931
2009 284 588 872
2010 221 499 720
2011 246 426 672
2012 267 428 695
2013 230 463 693
2014 270 450 720
2015 261 440 701
2016 227 502 729
2017 306 483 789
2018 275 425 700
2019 255 419 674
Total 3,686 7,214 10,900

The canton with the most partnerships is Zürich at 3,370, followed by Vaud (1,218), Bern (1,147), Geneva (996), Aargau (567), Basel-Stadt (432), St. Gallen (370), Basel-Landschaft (368) and Lucerne (368), Fribourg (283), Ticino (281), Solothurn (243), Valais (237), Thurgau (221), Neuchâtel (158), Zug (139), Schwyz (117), Graubünden (113), Schaffhausen (78), Jura (49), Appenzell Ausserrhoden (40), Glarus (27), Nidwalden (24), Obwalden (22), Uri (19), and Appenzell Innerrhoden (13).[34]

Cantonal laws[edit]

"Same-sex partnerships are allowed in Switzerland." Image from a 2016 Lucerne cantonal government publication for refugees.

Cohabitation[edit]

Certain Swiss cantonal constitutions recognise and guarantee the right to cohabit and to found a family outside of marriage for both different-sex and same-sex couples; these include among others the constitutions of Vaud,[35] Zürich,[36] Appenzell Ausserrhoden,[37] Basel-Stadt,[38] Bern,[39] Geneva,[40] Zug,[41] Schaffhausen,[42] and Fribourg.[43]

Registered partnerships[edit]

The canton of Geneva has had a partnership law on a cantonal level since 2001. It grants unmarried couples, whether same-sex or opposite-sex, many of the same rights, responsibilities and protections as married couples. However, it does not allow benefits in taxation, social security, or health insurance premiums (unlike the federal law). The law is based on the French civil solidarity pact.[44][45][46][47] In autumn 2016, the Department of Public Instruction of the Canton of Geneva introduced new forms in schools allowing same-sex parents to be recognized; the previous forms with boxes for "father" and "mother" were replaced with two boxes listing "parents".[48]

On 22 September 2002, the canton of Zürich passed a same-sex partnership law by referendum (62.7% in favor) that goes further than Geneva's law, but requires couples to live together for six months before registering.[49]

In July 2004, the Grand Council of Neuchâtel passed a law recognizing unmarried couples, with 65 votes to 38.[50][51]

Registered partnerships for same-sex couples are included in the Constitution of the canton of Fribourg.[52] In May 2004, voters approved the Constitution with 58.03% in favor and 41.97% against.[53] It took effect on 1 January 2005. Article 14(2) states: "The right to register a partnership for same-sex couples is guaranteed".[a]

Marriage[edit]

On 6 June 2016, the Cantonal Council of Zürich rejected by a vote of 110–52 a proposal that would have defined marriage as "a union between one man and one woman" in the Constitution of Zürich. The proposal, sponsored by the Federal Democratic Union (EDU), sought to constitutionally ban same-sex marriage in the canton.[54][55] EDU and most members of the Swiss People's Party were in favor of the proposal, while all other parties, including the Christian Democratic People's Party and the Evangelical People's Party, were opposed. The EDU subsequently gathered 6,000 signatures to force a cantonal referendum on the issue. The referendum took place on 27 November 2016, where the proposal was overwhelmingly rejected; 80.9% voted against it, while 19.1% voted in favor.[56] In some parts of the canton, the "No" gained 92% of the votes.[57] All municipalities rejected the proposal.

Initiative «Schutz der Ehe»
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 319,501 80.91
Yes 75,362 19.09
Total votes 394,863 100.00
Breakdown of voting by district
District Yes (%) No (%) Formal votes Participation rate (%)
Affoltern 18.02% 81.98% 16,222 48.34%
Andelfingen 23.94% 76.06% 10,843 51.77%
Bülach 22.27% 77.73% 33,331 39.73%
Dielsdorf 23.29% 76.71% 19,697 38.63%
Dietikon 20.24% 79.76% 18,558 39.82%
Hinwil 24.47% 75.53% 26,316 43.80%
Horgen 17.81% 82.19% 33,837 46.98%
Meilen 18.69% 81.31% 32,497 50.88%
Pfäffikon 24.50% 75.50% 17,813 46.99%
Uster 20.09% 79.91% 33,974 44.24%
Winterthur 20.04% 79.96% 50,981 48.81%
Zürich 14.02% 85.98% 100,794 45.42%
Canton of Zürich 19.09% 80.91% 394,863 45.23%

Same-sex marriage[edit]

Laws regarding same-sex partnerships in Europe¹
  Marriage
  Civil union
  Limited domestic recognition (cohabitation)
  Limited foreign recognition (residency rights)
  Unrecognized
  Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples
¹ May include recent laws or court decisions that have not yet entered into effect.

In 2012, Parliament requested that the executive Swiss Federal Council examine how to update family law to reflect changes in society.[58] In March 2015, the council released its governmental report about marriage and new rights for families, raising the possibility of the introduction of registered partnerships for straight couples and marriage for gay and lesbian couples.[59] Member of the Federal Council Simonetta Sommaruga, in charge of the Federal Department of Justice and Police, also stated she hoped that gay and lesbian couples would soon be allowed to marry.[60]

Political parties and support[edit]

Same-sex marriage is supported by the Green Party (GPS/PES),[61] the Conservative Democratic Party (BDP/PBD), the Social Democratic Party (SP/PS), the Green Liberal Party (glp/pvl), the Swiss Party of Labour (PdA/PST-POP),[62] The Liberals (FDP/PLR),[63] the Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP/PDC),[64][65][66] and Solidarity.[67] The Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC), the Evangelical People's Party (EVP/PEV), the Ticino League and the Federal Democratic Union (EDU/UDF) are mostly opposed.

In 2017, CVP president, Gerhard Pfister, said he believed that around two-thirds of CVP lawmakers opposed same-sex marriage. However, a 2019 survey showed that about 83% of CVP candidates running in the October federal election were in favour of same-sex marriage.[68] The same survey showed that 48% of SVP candidates were in favour.

In April 2018, the women's wing of The Liberals voted by 56 votes to 2 to support same-sex marriage.[69]

On 26 January 2019, the national Swiss People's Party (SVP) adopted a new party programme. A proposal to strike the party's opposition to same-sex marriage was rejected by the delegates with a vote of 166 to 126.[70]

During the 2019 public consultation on the legalisation of same-sex marriage, the governments of Geneva, Vaud, Zürich, Bern,[71] Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft, Aargau, Luzern, Valais, Schaffhausen, Graubünden, Ticino, Fribourg, Neuchâtel, St. Gallen, Solothurn, Jura, Glarus, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Zug, Uri and Thurgau expressed support for the opening of marriage to same-sex couples.[72][73][74][75][76] Schwyz, Nidwalden, Appenzell Innerrhoden and Obwalden expressed opposition.[77][78][79] Several organisations and associations also expressed support, including LGBT and feminist groups, Operation Libero, the National Ethics Committee, ProFamilia CH, the Swiss Psychological Society, and religious groups such as the Old Catholic Church, the Federation of Swiss Protestant Churches and the Swiss Federation of Jewish Communities. Opposition was found mainly among pro-life and religious groups, including the Episcopal Conference of Switzerland.[80]

On 15 August 2019, Gottfried Locher, president of the Protestant Church of Switzerland, declared his personal support for same-sex marriage.[81][82] In November 2019, the Swiss Reformed Church voted to support the opening of marriage to same-sex couples.[83][84] This followed a June 2019 statement from the church, "We are created by God. We cannot choose our sexual orientation. We perceive it as an expression of creative fullness."

The Christian Democrats' popular initiative "For the couple and the family"[edit]

In 2011, the Christian Democratic People's Party of Switzerland (CVP/PDC) began gathering signatures for a popular initiative entitled "For the couple and the family - No to the penalty of marriage" (German: Für Ehe und Familie - gegen die Heiratsstrafe; French: Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage; Italian: Per il matrimonio e la famiglia - No agli svantaggi per le coppie sposate; Romansh: Per la lètg e la famiglia - Na als dischavantatgs per pèrs maridads). This initiative sought to amend article 14 of the Swiss Federal Constitution to equalise fiscal rights and social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples. However, the text would also introduce a definition of marriage for the first time, specifically the "sole union between a man and a woman".[85]

Under Swiss law, cohabiting unmarried couples are entitled to two full pensions. However, the pension of married couples is limited to 150% of the maximum pension per person, meaning that if both partners earn relatively well during their working life, they receive only one and a half times the maximum pension instead of two full pensions.[86]

In November 2012, signature gathering ended and the initiative was submitted. The Swiss Federal Council reviewed the initiative and decided to support it, formally asking Parliament in October 2013 to recommend that voters approve the initiative.[87] On 10 December 2014, the National Council discussed the initiative. The Greens proposed to amend the bill stating that "any forms of unions" could not be penalised and the Green Liberals proposed to amend the bill so that "marriage and all the other forms of union defined by the law" could not be penalised.[88] The debate was mainly between the Swiss People's Party and the Christian Democrats on one side, and the Green Liberals, the Greens, the Social Democrats and the Conservative Democrats on the other. The Liberals were divided on the issue.[89] The Swiss People's Party and the Christian Democrats stated their opposition to "any form of homophobia". On the other hand, the opposing parties highlighted the discrimination that would be introduced by the initiative and called for a future definition of marriage that would include same-sex couples. Some MPs called the Christian Democrats a "retrograde" party.[90]

After having rejected both counter-propositions from the Greens and the Green Liberals, the National Council finally approved a suggestion from the Commission for Economic Affairs and Taxation, which retained the spirit of the initiative but removed the definition of marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman. This counter-proposition was approved 102–86, thus rejecting the popular initiative and recommending to the Swiss electorate to reject the initiative and accept the counter-proposition.[91]

The Council of States approved the counter-proposition on 4 March 2015 in a 24–19 vote.[92] The debate in the upper house also mainly focused on the definition of marriage which would introduce discrimination towards same-sex couples, though the idea of equal fiscal rights and equal social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples was unopposed.[93] A few Liberal Party members changed their mind, and the counter-proposal was rejected in the Council of States. A subsequent conciliation conference in June 2015 of both chambers of Parliament decided to recommend rejecting the original initiative.[94] On 19 June 2015, the formal order of Parliament recommending voters to reject the initiative was published.[95]

On 17 November 2015, the Federal Council also recommended rejecting the initiative. It had supported the initiative two years earlier, but now was obliged to change its position because Parliament was opposed.[96][97]

Referendum[edit]

The Christian Democrats' proposal was put to a referendum on 28 February 2016,[98] with voters deciding whether to define marriage as a "durable cohabitation of a man and a woman" that "must not be disadvantaged in comparison of other lifestyles",[99] thus prohibiting same-sex marriage in the Swiss Federal Constitution.

Amongst parliamentary parties, the Christian Democrats (apart from the Young Christian Democrats of Zürich and Geneva, which had declared opposition to the initiative of their parent party),[100][101] the national-conservative Swiss People's Party and the conservative Evangelical People's Party campaigned for "Yes". Meanwhile, the Social Democrats, the Liberals, the Greens, the Conservative Democrats and the Green Liberals opposed the text and campaigned for "No" along with Amnesty International Switzerland, Economiesuisse, the Swiss Federation of Trade Unions and Operation Libero.

A month before the vote, various polls showed 67% support (22 January 2016) and 53% support (17 February 2016).[102] On 28 February 2016, the initiative was rejected by 50.8% of voters with 1,609,328 in favor and 1,664,217 against, a margin of 54,979 votes. The majority of the cantons approved the initiative (16.5 to 6.5), with the cantons of Geneva, Vaud, Bern, Zürich, Grisons, Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft and Appenzell Ausserrhoden rejecting the initiative.[103]

During the referendum campaign, the Swiss Government informed voters that about 80,000 married couples were paying more tax than unmarried cohabiting couples,[104] but later admitted that the true figure was almost half a million. The Christian Democratic Party filed a complaint against the result in June 2018.[105] On 10 April 2019, the referendum was declared invalid by the Federal Supreme Court, which ordered a re-vote.[106] Days later, it was reported that a majority of the parliamentary bloc of the Christian Democratic Party opposed the initiative in its current form and wanted the definition of marriage to be removed. According to the Tages-Anzeiger, the party was hoping that the Parliament would propose an alternative measure to eliminate the tax discrimination against married couples, so the party could withdraw its initiative without losing face.[107][108][109][110][111][112]

It was subsequently reported that the referendum may not be rerun as the Federal Council now had two options: to set a date for a new referendum, or establish a new law to go through the Federal Parliament. In the latter scenario, the Christian Democrats would have had the opportunity to withdraw their initiative, which was the party's preferred option. The vice-president of the party, Charles Juillard, said, "The party is ready to withdraw its initiative if the Federal Council puts an end to the tax penalty of marriage and the discrimination of spouses vis-à-vis l'Assurance-vieillesse et survivants [AVS, Old-age and survivors' insurance]."[113][114] In early January 2020, the party chose to withdraw its initiative and announced it would begin collecting signatures for a second popular initiative. This initiative would again seek to equalise fiscal rights and social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples, but, unlike the previous one, it would not introduce a specific definition of marriage.[115]

The Green Liberals' parliamentary initiative "Civil Marriage for All"[edit]

Parliamentary deliberations[edit]

The first legislative proposal to legalise same-sex marriage was introduced by Greens MP Ruth Genner in December 1998. The National Council tabled the measure in December 1999.[116]

In December 2013, the Green Liberal Party submitted a parliamentary initiative, "Civil Marriage for All", for a constitutional amendment to legalise same-sex marriage.[117][118] On 20 February 2015, the Committee for Legal Affairs of the National Council voted to proceed with the initiative, by 12 votes to 9 with 1 abstention.[119] A petition supporting the measure was launched in May 2015. The signatures were submitted to the Committee for Legal Affairs of the Council of States before it discussed the proposal, hoping to persuade the committee members to support it.[120][121] On 1 September 2015, the committee voted by 7 votes to 5 to proceed with the initiative.[122]

The National Council's Legal Affairs Committee was then tasked to draft an act within two years (per Article 111 of the Constitution), i.e. by 2017. However, due to the complexity of the legal reform, it proposed on 11 May 2017 to extend the initiative's deadline by another two years (i.e. by 2019) and ask the government administration for further study of the issue.[123][124] A minority consisting of the Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC) wanted to block the initiative. On 16 June 2017, the National Council voted by 118–71 in favour of the committee's proposal to extend the deadline to 2019.[125][126][127]

The Legal Affairs Committee published its report on 17 May 2018, the International Day Against Homophobia. The committee recommended that the Swiss Civil Code be amended to remove the heterosexual definition of marriage and that a gender-neutral definition be inserted. It also recommended amendments to the 1953 civil registration law, which defined marriage as being between a man and a woman, as well as to other laws, including laws relating to naturalisation.[128][129][130] Additionally, according to the committee and the Federal Department of Justice and Police, the proposal would automatically legalise joint adoption for married same-sex couples. As such, the committee recommended no changes to adoption law, which allows married couples to adopt without explicitly defining the term "marriage".[131] On 6 July 2018, the committee voted against rejecting the initiative altogether, by 18–1, and subsequently voted to recommend the Federal Parliament to approve the initiative by 14 votes to 11. The committee concluded that the legalisation of same-sex marriage did not require amending the Swiss Federal Constitution, and that it could be achieved through changes to statutory law. Therefore, the Swiss electorate will not necessarily be called to vote on the initiative (though opponents could still force a referendum on the issue, which would require a simple majority of those voting to succeed). Despite the protests of LGBT groups,[132] the committee decided to leave out assisted reproductive technology for lesbian couples and widow's pension so that the initiative would have a higher chance of approval.[133][134][135] In early July 2018, Operation Libero began collecting signatures in favour of same-sex marriage to persuade Parliament to legalise it, collecting 30,000 signatures within a week.[132]

On 14 February 2019, the National Council's Legal Affairs Committee approved the bill to allow same-sex marriage by 19 to 4 with one abstention. It was sent out for public consultation. The bill would also end registered partnerships, and couples would be able to convert their partnership into marriage.[136][137][138][139] The consultation started on 14 March and lasted until 21 June 2019.[140][141] It showed wide support for the legalisation of same-sex marriage among all main political parties,[142] with the exception of the Swiss People's Party, and among 22 of the 26 cantonal governments.[143]

In January 2020, the Federal Council expressed its support for the same-sex marriage bill.[144] On 11 June 2020, the National Council approved the bill, with amendments allowing access to fertility treatments for lesbian couples, in a 132–52 vote.[145][146][147][148][149] The bill was supported by the Social Democrats, the Liberals, the Greens, the Green Liberals and the Conservative Democrats, while the Swiss People's Party was mostly opposed. The Christian Democrats announced they would support the bill if access to fertility treatments for lesbian couples was excluded.[150]

The bill passed the Council of States on 1 December 2020 with some minor amendments concerning fertility treatments, by a vote of 22–15 with 7 abstentions. It narrowly defeated, 22 to 20, a motion that would have required a constitutional amendment (which would have delayed the bill by years and mandated a referendum requiring a double majority of the people and the cantons).[151] On 9 December, the National Council approved the changes made by the Council of States by 133 votes to 57 with 1 abstention.[152][153][154] The final vote in both chambers took place on 18 December 2020. The Council of States approved the bill by 24 votes to 11 with 7 abstentions,[155] and the National Council approved it by 136 votes to 48 with 9 abstentions.[156]

18 December 2020 vote in the National Council (final vote)[157]
Party Voted for Voted against Abstained Absent (Did not vote)
  Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC)
14
  • Céline Amaudruz
  • Martina Bircher
  • Lars Guggisberg
  • Diana Gutjahr
  • Thomas Hurter
  • Christian Imark
  • Jacques Nicolet
  • Pierre-André Page
  • Nadja Pieren
  • Lukas Reimann
  • Sandra Sollberger-Muff
  • Barbara Steinemann
  • Hans-Ueli Vogt
  • Walter Wobmann
33
  • Jean-Luc Addor
  • Thomas Aeschi
  • Roland Büchel
  • Thomas Burgherr
  • Thomas de Courten
  • Marcel Dettling
  • Yvette Estermann
  • Andrea Geissbühler
  • Benjamin Giezendanner
  • Andreas Glarner
  • Jean-Pierre Grin-Hofmann
  • Frank Grüter
  • Martin Haab
  • Stefanie Heimgartner
  • Verena Herzog
  • Erich Hess
  • Alois Huber
  • Peter Keller
  • Roger Köppel
  • Piero Marchesi
  • Thomas Matter
  • Yves Nidegger
  • Albert Rösti
  • Monika Rüegger
  • Franz Ruppen
  • Gregor Rutz
  • Therese Schläpfer
  • Pirmin Schwander
  • Manuel Strupler
  • Mauro Tuena
  • Erich von Siebenthal
  • Bruno Walliser
  • David Zuberbühler
5
  • Michaël Buffat
  • Mike Egger
  • Esther Friedli
  • Alfred Heer
  • Magdalena Martullo-Blocher
  Social Democratic Party (SP/PS)
36
  • Matthias Aebischer
  • Mustafa Atici
  • Jacqueline Badran
  • Samuel Bendahan
  • Prisca Birrer-Heimo
  • Brigitte Crottaz
  • Christian Dandrès
  • Laurence Fehlmann Rielle
  • Yvonne Feri
  • Pierre-Alain Fridez
  • Claudia Friedl
  • Edith Graf-Litscher
  • Barbara Gysi
  • Baptiste Hurni
  • Beat Jans
  • Sandra Locher Benguerel
  • Pierre-Yves Maillard
  • Ada Marra
  • Min Li Marti
  • Samira Marti
  • Mattea Meyer
  • Fabian Molina
  • Martina Munz
  • Roger Nordmann
  • Eric Nussbaumer
  • Valérie Piller Carrard
  • Jon Pult
  • Mathias Reynard
  • Franziska Roth
  • Ursula Schneider Schüttel
  • Prisca Seiler Graf
  • Bruno Storni
  • Gabriela Suter
  • Flavia Wasserfallen
  • Cédric Wermuth
  • Céline Widmer
- -
3
  FDP.The Liberals (FDP/PLR)
29
  • Frédéric Borloz
  • Jacques Bourgeois
  • Rocco Cattaneo
  • Damien Cottier
  • Simone de Montmollin
  • Jacqueline de Quattro
  • Marcel Dobler
  • Christoph Eymann
  • Alex Farinelli
  • Olivier Feller
  • Doris Fiala
  • Kurt Fluri
  • Anna Giacometti
  • Petra Gössi
  • Matthias Jauslin
  • Christian Lüscher
  • Christa Markwalder
  • Isabelle Moret
  • Philippe Nantermod
  • Hans-Peter Portmann
  • Maja Riniker
  • Regine Sauter
  • Daniela Schneeberger
  • Andri Silberschmidt
  • Susanne Vincenz-Stauffacher
  • Albert Vitali
  • Beat Walti
  • Christian Wassfallen
  • Laurent Wehrli
- - -
  Green Party (GPS/PES)
28
  • Gerhard Andrey
  • Sibel Arslan
  • Christine Badertscher
  • Kilian Baumann
  • Daniel Brélaz
  • Florence Brenzikofer
  • Christophe Clivaz
  • Kurt Egger
  • Fabien Fivaz
  • Bastien Girod
  • Balthasar Glättli
  • Greta Gysin
  • Irène Kälin
  • Delphine Klopfenstein Broggini
  • Sophie Michaud Gigon
  • Isabelle Pasquier-Eichenberger
  • Léonore Porchet
  • Katharina Precliz-Huber
  • Valentine Python
  • Franziska Ryser
  • Regula Rytz
  • Marionna Schlatter
  • Meret Schneider
  • Michael Töngi
  • Aline Trede
  • Nicolas Walder
  • Manuela Weichelt-Picard
  • Felix Wettstein
- - -
  Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP/PDC)
9
  • Marianne Binder-Keller
  • Ida Glanzmann-Hunkeler
  • Philipp Kutter
  • Vincent Maitre
  • Stefan Müller-Altermatt
  • Marie-France Roth Pasquier
  • Elisabeth Schneider-Schneiter
  • Simon Stadler
  • Priska Wismer-Felder
11
  • Philipp Matthias Bregy
  • Martin Candinas
  • Alois Gmür
  • Jean-Paul Gschwind
  • Sidney Kamerzin
  • Christian Lohr
  • Leo Müller
  • Thomas Rechsteiner
  • Fabio Regazzi
  • Benjamin Roduit
  • Marco Romano
4
1
  • Christine Bulliard-Marbach
  Green Liberal Party (glp/pvl)
15
  • Martin Bäumle
  • Judith Bellaïche
  • Kathrin Bertschy
  • Thomas Brunner
  • Isabelle Chevalley
  • Katja Christ
  • Roland Fischer
  • Beat Flach
  • Corina Gredig
  • Jörg Mäder
  • Michel Matter
  • Melanie Mettler
  • Tiana Angelina Moser
  • François Pointet
  • Barbara Schaffner
- -
1
  • Jürg Grossen
  Conservative Democratic Party (BDP/PBD)
3
- - -
  Evangelical People's Party (EVP/PEV) -
3
- -
  Ticino League (Lega)
1
  • Lorenzo Quadri
- - -
  Solidarity (solidaritéS) - - -
1
  • Stefania Prezioso
  Swiss Party of Labour (PdA/PST-POP)
1
  • Denis de la Reussille
- - -
  Federal Democratic Union (EDU/UDF) -
1
  • Andreas Gafner
- -
Total 136 48 9 7
18 December 2020 vote in the Council of States (final vote)[158]
Party Voted for Voted against Abstained Absent (Did not vote)
  Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP/PDC)
4
  • Erich Ettlin (OW)
  • Andrea Gmür-Schönenberger (LU)
  • Brigitte Häberli-Koller (TG)
  • Charles Juillard (JU)
5
  • Stefan Engler (GR)
  • Daniel Fässler (AI)
  • Peter Hegglin (ZG)
  • Marianne Maret (VS)
  • Beat Rieder (VS)
3
  • Pirmin Bischof (SO)
  • Benedikt Würth (SG)
  • Heidi Z'graggen (UR)
1
  • Othmar Reichmuth (SZ)
  FDP.The Liberals (FDP/PLR)
7
  • Philippe Bauer (NE)
  • Thierry Burkart (AG)
  • Andrea Caroni (AR)
  • Olivier Français (VD)
  • Johanna Gapany (FR)
  • Matthias Michel (ZG)
  • Damian Müller (LU)
-
4
  • Josef Dittli (UR)
  • Thomas Hefti (GL)
  • Martin Schmid (GR)
  • Hans Wicki (NW)
  Social Democratic Party (SP/PS)
9
- - -
  Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC) -
5
-
  Green Party (GPS/PES) - -
1
  • Céline Vara (NE)
  Independent - - -
Total 24 11 7 4

Referendum[edit]

In Switzerland's system of semi-direct democracy, a statute is subject to a popular referendum if opponents collect 50,000 signatures demanding one within three months. The right-wing Federal Democratic Union (EDU), supported by politicians from the Swiss People's Party and the Christian Democratic People's Party,[159] collected 61,027 signatures with the slogan "Yes to marriage and family, no to marriage for everyone".[160] In response, Operation Libero collected more than 100,000 signatures in support of same-sex marriage by late April 2021.[161]

The referendum, in which passage of the bill requires a simple majority of the popular vote,[162] is scheduled for 26 September 2021.[163][164]

Religious performance[edit]

The largest religious organisations in Switzerland are the Roman Catholic Church and the Swiss Reformed Church. A survey from 2016-2018 showed that about 36% of Swiss citizens were Catholic, 24% were members of the Reformed Church and 26% had no religious affiliation; the remaining were members of other Christian churches or adhered to non-Christian faiths, including Islam, Hinduism and Judaism.

Public opinion[edit]

According to an Ifop poll conducted in May 2013, 63% of the Swiss public supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.[176]

After the Legal Affairs Committee's decision to approve same-sex marriage, two opinion polls released on 22 February 2015 showed support of 54% (Léger Marketing for Blick)[177] and 71% (GfS Zurich for SonntagsZeitung)[178] for allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.

A poll carried out between April and May 2016 showed that 69% of the Swiss population supported same-sex marriage, 25% opposed and 6% were unsure. 94% of Green voters, 59% of voters from the Swiss People's Party and 63% of Christian Democratic voters supported it.[179][180]

A poll by Tamedia conducted on 5 and 6 December 2017 found that 45% of the Swiss population supported both same-sex marriage and adoption, 27% supported only same-sex marriage, 3% supported only same-sex adoption and 24% were against both.[181] The poll thus found a 72% majority in favour of same-sex marriage. Green, Social Democratic and Green Liberal voters were the most supportive: 88% in favour, 9% against and 3% undecided. 76% of Liberal voters supported the legalisation of same-sex marriage, while 22% opposed it. 66% of Christian Democratic voters and 56% of Swiss People's Party voters supported same-sex marriage.[182]

A Pew Research Center poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 75% of Swiss people supported same-sex marriage, 24% were opposed and 1% didn't know or refused to answer.[183] When divided by religion, 89% of religiously unaffiliated people, 80% of non-practicing Christians and 58% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage.[184] Opposition was 16% among 18–34-year-olds.[185]

A public consultation held between March and June 2019 showed wide societal and political support for same-sex marriage in Switzerland. 83% of the participants to the consultation expressed support, and 63% expressed support for sperm donation and access to artificial insemination for lesbian couples.[186]

A February 2020 survey, conducted by the gfs group and requested by Pink Cross, found a 81% majority in favour of same-sex marriage (63% "strongly" supporting and 18% "somewhat" supporting), whereas 18% were opposed (10% "strongly" and 8% "somewhat"). 1% was undecided. By party, 96% of Greens, 92% of Social Democrats and Green Liberals, 77% of Liberals and 67% of Swiss People's Party voters supported same-sex marriage.[187] Adoption was supported by 67% of respondents and access to fertility treatments for lesbian couples by 66%.[188]

In November 2020, another poll conducted by the gfs group found that 82% of respondents "strongly" or "somewhat" supported same-sex marriage, 17% were opposed and 1% were undecided, 72% supported adoption and 70% supported access to fertility treatments for lesbian couples.[189]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ French: Le droit d'enregistrer un partenariat pour les couples de même sexe est garanti.
    German: Das Recht zur Eintragung einer Partnerschaft für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare ist gewährleistet.
  2. ^ a b The presidents of the National Council and the Council of States vote only in case of a tied vote in the chamber.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Vote sur la loi fédérale sur le partenariat enregistré entre personnes du même sexe, Conseil national, Session d'hiver 2003". Swiss Parliament (in French).
  2. ^ "Parliament gives green light to "gay marriages"". swissinfo.ch. 3 December 2003.
  3. ^ "Parliament gives its blessing to gay couples". swissinfo.ch. 3 June 2004.
  4. ^ "Fight goes on for gay couples". swissinfo.ch. 10 June 2004.
  5. ^ "Government presses for gay-couple rights". swissinfo.ch. 22 April 2005.
  6. ^ "Gay couples win partnership rights". swissinfo.ch. 5 June 2005.
  7. ^ a b "First same-sex union registered in Switzerland". SWI swissinfo.ch. 2 January 2007.
  8. ^ a b "Stepchild adoption will be possible from 2018". Swissinfo. 10 July 2017. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  9. ^ (in French) Article 27: «Partner's children»
  10. ^ (in French) Le National ne veut pas voir les couples homosexuels adopter, Swissinfo, accessed on 15 December 2012
  11. ^ (in French) Coup de pouce des Sénateurs à l'adoption, 360, accessed on 15 December 2012
  12. ^ "Schweizer Regierung gegen Adoptionsrecht für Homo-Paare". Queer.de. 22 February 2012.
  13. ^ (in French) Le Conseil des Etats accepte l'adoption des couples homosexuels, Le Matin
  14. ^ Swiss lawmakers vote to allow some gays to adopt, France24, 15 December 2012
  15. ^ Rainbow families: Gays granted more adoption rights, Swissinfo, 15 December 2012
  16. ^ Motion CAJ-CE. Droit de l'adoption. Mêmes chances pour toutes les familles, Council of States, retrieved on 21 April 2013
  17. ^ "Suisse: Le gouvernement propose d'ouvrir l'adoption aux couples de même sexe". Yagg. 2 December 2014.
  18. ^ "Bundesrat will Stiefkindadoption ermöglichen". Queer.ch. 28 November 2014.
  19. ^ "Adoption: les opposants en ordre de bataille". 360.ch. 7 September 2014.
  20. ^ "Ständeratskommission befürwortet Adoptionen". Queer.ch. 12 January 2016.
  21. ^ "Switzerland takes step towards adoption equality". The Local. 9 March 2016.
  22. ^ "Homosexuelle sollen Stiefkinder adoptieren dürfen". Tages-Anzeiger (in German). 8 March 2016.
  23. ^ "Nationalratskommission für Adoptionsrecht". Queer.de. 13 May 2016.
  24. ^ "Schweiz: Stiefkindadoption wird Gesetz". Männer. 14 May 2016.
  25. ^ "Oui à l'adoption par le conjoint de même sexe" (in French). 360°. 14 May 2016.
  26. ^ Swiss Parliament votes in favor of stepchild adoption
  27. ^ Touzain, François (17 June 2016). ""Oui" final à la réforme de l'adoption" (in French). 360°.
  28. ^ (in French) Le référendum contre la réforme du droit d'adoption n'aboutira pas
  29. ^ Goumaz, Magalie (8 June 2016). "Le référendum se précise contre l'adoption par les couples homosexuels". Le Temps (in French).
  30. ^ (in French) Echec du référendum contre l'homoparentalité
  31. ^ "Le nouveau droit de l'adoption entrera en vigueur le 1er janvier 2018". www.admin.ch (in French). Retrieved 12 July 2017.
  32. ^ sda: Auch Homosexuelle können Pensionskasse erben, NZZ online, 4. September 2008 (über das Urteil 9 C 874/2007 vom 20. August 2008; keine BGE-Publikation).
  33. ^ "Registered same-sex partnerships". Swiss Confederation. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
  34. ^ "Partenariats enregistrés et dissous selon le sexe et le canton, 2007-2019". Office fédéral de la statistique (in French).
  35. ^ (in French) Constitution du canton de Vaud
  36. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Zürich
  37. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Appenzell Ausserrhoden
  38. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Basel-Stadt
  39. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Bern
  40. ^ (in French) Constitution de la République et canton de Genève
  41. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Zug
  42. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Schaffhausen
  43. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Freiburg
  44. ^ "Homosexuals a step closer to equal rights". swissinfo.ch. 16 February 2001.
  45. ^ "Switzerland's first "gay marriages" take place in Geneva". swissinfo.ch. 8 May 2001.
  46. ^ "Registered partnerships and same-sex marriage in Switzerland". Religious Tolerance.
  47. ^ "Loi sur le partenariat". ge.ch (in French).
  48. ^ "Fiches Inclusives Pour Les Familles Arc-en-ciel". 360.ch (in French). 4 October 2016.
  49. ^ "Zurich grants gay couples more rights". swissinfo.ch. 22 September 2002.
  50. ^ "Loi sur le partenariat enregistré". rsn.ne.ch (in French).
  51. ^ (in French) Le pacs gagne du terrain Archived 2015-09-06 at the Wayback Machine
  52. ^ "Constitution du canton de Fribourg" (PDF) (in French). Canton of Fribourg. 16 May 2004. Article 14
  53. ^ "La nouvelle Constitution du canton de Fribourg a été adoptée par le peuple fribourgeois". fr.ch (in French).
  54. ^ Touzain, François (7 June 2016). ""Défense du mariage" fait un flop au Parlement zurichois" (in French). 360°.
  55. ^ Chatain, Jean-Baptiste (7 June 2016). "CANTON DE ZURICH - Rejet d'une initiative contre le mariage homosexuel" (in French). Lepetitjournal.com.
  56. ^ (in German) Keine Definition der Ehe zwischen Mann und Frau in der Verfassung
  57. ^ (in French) Mariage pour tous: "non" à la contre-attaque de l'UDF zurichoise
  58. ^ 12.3607 Postulat: Code civil. Pour un droit de la famille moderne et cohérent, Swiss Parliament
  59. ^ (in French) Rapport du Conseil fédéral - Modernisation du droit de la famille, Federal Department of Justice and Police, retrieved on 27 May 2015
  60. ^ (in French) Sommaruga espère que les homosexuels pourront bientôt se marier, L'Hebdo, retrieved on 27 May 2015
  61. ^ (in French) Green Party - Equality Policy Archived 2011-06-12 at the Wayback Machine
  62. ^ Les positions du PST/POP par rapport aux votations du 28 février 2016 Dans son programme électoral de 2015, le PST/POP revendique le droit de mariage pour tous les couples.
  63. ^ "FDP begrüsst die Öffnung der Ehe für alle". Presseportal Schweiz (in German). 15 June 2019.
  64. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". 20 Minuten (in German). Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  65. ^ "CVP befürwortet Homo-Ehe". www.telezueri.ch. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  66. ^ "So tickt der neue Nationalrat". SRF (in German). 21 October 2019.
  67. ^ "L'ÉGALITÉ MAINTENANT! Le premier mariage homo de Suisse a été célébré par soliaritéS!". solidarites.ch (in French). 18 May 2018.
  68. ^ "Mehrheit der CVP-Politiker für Ehe für alle". toponline.ch (in German). 25 August 2019.
  69. ^ (in German) FDP-Frauen für "Ehe für alle", Luzerner Zeitung, 21 April 2018
  70. ^ "SVP verabschiedet neues Parteiprogramm". Bluewin. 26 January 2019.
  71. ^ "Berner Regierung begrüsst "Ehe für alle"". Bluewin.ch (in German). 20 June 2019.
  72. ^ "13.468 n Parlamentarische Initiative Fraktion GL. Ehe für alle; Vernehmlassung" (PDF). parliamen.ch.
  73. ^ "Positions of the Swiss cantons on same-sex marriage" (in French).
  74. ^ "St.Galler Regierung will Ehe für alle". FM1 Today (in German). 5 June 2019.
  75. ^ "Schaffhausen sagt Ja zur Ehe für alle". Schaffhauser Nachrichten (in German). 4 June 2019.
  76. ^ "Thurgauer Regierungsrat befürwortet Ehe für alle". St. Galler Tagblatt (in German). 20 June 2019.
  77. ^ "Ehe für alle: Obwaldner Regierung lehnt Initiative ab". Luzerner Zeitung (in German). 24 June 2019.
  78. ^ "Ehe für alle: Obwaldner Regierung lehnt Initiative ab". St. Galler Tagblatt (in German). 24 June 2019.
  79. ^ Aschwanden, Erich (5 July 2019). "Die Gleichstellung von Lesben und Schwulen könnte unerwünschte Folgen haben". Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German).
  80. ^ a b "Position of Swiss associations on same-sex marriage" (in French).
  81. ^ "Le président des Eglises protestantes favorable au mariage pour tous". RTS.ch (in French). 16 August 2019.
  82. ^ "Oberster Protestant befürwortet Homo-Ehe". SRF (in German). 16 August 2019.
  83. ^ a b "Les Eglises protestantes favorables au mariage civil pour tous". RTS (in French). 5 November 2019.
  84. ^ "Rat des Kirchenbundes befürwortet die Öffnung der Ehe für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare". Schweizerischer Evangelischer Kirchenbund (in German). 29 August 2018.
  85. ^ Eidgenössische Volksinitiative 'Für Ehe und Familie - gegen die Heiratsstrafe'
  86. ^ "Se marier en Suisse: avantages et inconvénients financiers". moneyland.ch (in French).
  87. ^ Schweiz: Ehe-Verbot für Schwule und Lesben geplant, 25 October 2013, queer.de
  88. ^ (in French) 13.085 n Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage. Initiative populaire, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 16 January 2015
  89. ^ "Swiss Political Parties Reveal Their Colours". Swissinfo. 11 September 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  90. ^ (in French) Sur l’imposition des couples, le PDC est taxé de rétrograde, Tribune de Genève, retrieved 16 January 2015
  91. ^ (in French) Vote n° 49.11275 Archived 2015-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 16 January 2015
  92. ^ (in French) Conseil des États - Procès-verbal de vote 13.085-2, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 5 March 2015
  93. ^ (in French) Le Conseil des États en bref (4 mars 2015) Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 5 March 2015
  94. ^ Einigungskonferenz sagt Nein zur CVP-Initative [sic], 13 June 2015, queer.ch
  95. ^ Arrêté fédéral concernant l’initiative populaire «Pour le couple et la famille – Non à la pénalisation du mariage», admin.ch
  96. ^ Bundesrat gegen CVP-Initiative, 18 November 2015, queer.ch
  97. ^ Bundesrat lanciert Abstimmungskampf zur Volksinitiative gegen die «Heiratsstrafe», 17 November 2015, admin.ch
  98. ^ Kriminelle Ausländer, Gotthard und Heiratsstrafe, 7 October 2014, NZZ
  99. ^ (in German) Bundesbeschluss über die Volksinitiative «Für Ehe und Familie – gegen die Heiratsstrafe», retrieved on 10 October 2015
  100. ^ JCVP Kanton Zürich: Nein zur Ehedefinition, 6. November 2015, queer.ch
  101. ^ (in French) Le PDC genevois ne défendra pas son initiative, Le Courrier, retrieved on 28 February 2016
  102. ^ (in French) Les Suisses plutôt défavorables au texte UDC, selon le 2ème sondage SSR, SRG SSR, retrieved on 28 February 2016
  103. ^ (in French) Initiative populaire du 05.11.2012 «Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage»
  104. ^ "Et vous, gagneriez-vous à être mariés d'un point de vue fiscal?". rts.ch (in French). 12 March 2015.
  105. ^ Karin Aebischer (29 June 2018). "Heiratsstrafe: CVP zieht Beschwerde vor Bundesgericht". nau.ch (in German).
  106. ^ "Swiss court orders historic referendum re-run". BBC News. 10 April 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
  107. ^ Denise Brechbühl (14 April 2019). "Ehe: CVP beharrt nicht auf der alten Definition". nau.ch (in German).
  108. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". Blick (in German). 14 April 2019.
  109. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Ehe für alle". Tages-Anzeiger (in German). 14 April 2019.
  110. ^ Julien Bangerter (14 April 2019). "La plupart des élus fédéraux PDC contre une définition restrictive du mariage". rts.ch (in French).
  111. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". 20 Minuten (in German). 14 April 2019.
  112. ^ Eric Felley (15 April 2019). "Mariage: le cadeau empoisonné du Tribunal fédéral au PDC". Le Matin (in French).
  113. ^ "L'initiative PDC ne sera peut-être pas revotée". Le Matin (in French). 21 April 2019.
  114. ^ "L'initiative PDC ne sera peut-être pas revotée". Tribune de Genève (in French). 21 April 2019.
  115. ^ "Le PDC revient sur l'imposition du mariage, et s'ouvre aux couples homosexuels". Le Temps (in French). 5 January 2020.
  116. ^ "98.453 INITIATIVE PARLEMENTAIRE Union de couples du même sexe". www.parlament.ch (in French).
  117. ^ 13.468 Initiative parlementaire: Mariage civil pour tous, Swiss Parliament
  118. ^ Swiss Greens pushing for gay marriage and tax equality
  119. ^ (in French) Entrée en matière sur le projet de loi sur les avoirs de potentats, National Council, retrieved 20 February 2015
  120. ^ Ehe für Alle
  121. ^ When will the Swiss vote on same-sex marriage?
  122. ^ "Ständerat sagt Ja zur Homo-Ehe". Blick.ch. 1 September 2015.
  123. ^ "Müsste die Verfassung geändert werden?". Neuze Zürcher Zeitung. 12 May 2017.
  124. ^ Committee report, Swiss Parliament
  125. ^ "Gay marriage back on the discussion table in Swiss parliament". thelocal.ch. 16 June 2017.
  126. ^ "Débat sur le mariage pour tous prolongé jusqu'en 2019". 360.ch. 17 June 2017.
  127. ^ "Warum sich das Parlament vor dem Entscheid zur Homo-Ehe drückt". Watson. 16 June 2017.
  128. ^ "Un pas vers la naturalisation facilitée pour les partenaires enregistrés". 24 heures (Switzerland) (in French). 14 March 2016.
  129. ^ "Schweiz will ausländischen Lebenspartnern die Einbürgerung erleichtern" (in German). queer.de. 15 March 2016.
  130. ^ (in French) Suisse: Mariage gay et naturalisation traités en parallèle
  131. ^ «Ehe für alle» bringt volles Adoptionsrecht, Luzerner Zeitung, 3 June 2018
  132. ^ a b (in French) UN MARIAGE PAS SI ÉGALITAIRE DANS LES PLANS DU PARLEMENT
  133. ^ (in French) L'IDÉE D'UN MARIAGE GAY PROGRESSE EN SUISSE, Le Matin, 6 July 2018
  134. ^ (in German) Nationalratskommission will «Ehe für alle», Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 6 July 2018
  135. ^ (in German) Die «Ehe für alle» könnte schon 2021 Realität sein, Basler Zeitung, 4 July 2018
  136. ^ Mills, George (15 February 2019). "Why same-sex marriage just got a big step closer to reality in Switzerland". thelocal.ch. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  137. ^ Le mariage homo patine sur le don du sperme, 14 February 2019, Tribune de Genève
  138. ^ "Ehe für alle" ist einen Schritt weiter, 14 February 2019, Liechtensteiner Vaterland
  139. ^ Ehe für alle: Schlanke Kernvorlage mit Zugang zur Samenspende als Variante, 14 February 2019, Swiss Parliament
  140. ^ Le mariage pour tous mis en consultation
  141. ^ 13.468 n Iv.pa. Groupe GL. Mariage civil pour tous
  142. ^ Matthias Bärlocher (21 June 2019). "Nach Heiratsstrafe Erfolg: CVP will jetzt Ehe für alle". Nau.ch (in German).
  143. ^ "Homoparentalité: oui au mariage pour tous, mais non au don de sperme pour les lesbiennes". Le Nouvelliste (in French). 30 August 2019.
  144. ^ "Swiss government supports 'marriage for all'". swissinfo.ch. 29 January 2020.
  145. ^ Shields, Michael (11 June 2020). ""Finally" say activists as Swiss same-sex marriage bill advances". Reuters. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
  146. ^ "Le National veut ouvrir le mariage aux couples homosexuels" (in French). La Liberté. 11 June 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
  147. ^ Touzain, François (11 June 2020). "Premier «oui» à un mariage pleinement égalitaire en Suisse" (in French). 360.ch. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
  148. ^ Wighton, Daniel (11 June 2020). "Same-sex marriage referendum on the horizon in Switzerland". The Local. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
  149. ^ "Gesamtabstimmung - Vote sur l'ensemble" (PDF) (in German and French). Parliament of Switzerland. 11 June 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
  150. ^ "Le National entre en matière sur le mariage pour tous". Le Nouvelliste (in French). 11 June 2020.
  151. ^ Rhyn, Larissa (1 December 2020). "Ehe für alle: Konservative können die Heirat für homosexuelle Paare nicht mit dem Ständemehr verhindern". NZZ.
  152. ^ "Le marriage doit également être accessibles aux couples homosexuels". parlement.ch (in French). 2 December 2020.
  153. ^ "Mariage civil pour tous - 13.468 - Initiative parlementaire - Vote n° 21969 du mer, 09. déc 2020". Parlement.ch (in French). 9 December 2020.
  154. ^ "Gesamtabstimmung - Vote sur l'ensemble" (PDF) (in German and French). Parliament of Switzerland. 9 December 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
  155. ^ "Vote final" (PDF). Parlement.ch (in German and French). 18 December 2020.
  156. ^ "Vote final" (PDF). Parlement.ch (in German and French). 18 December 2020.
  157. ^ "Schlussabstimmung" (PDF) (in German and French). Parliament of Switzerland. 18 December 2020. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  158. ^ "Schlussabstimmung" (PDF) (in German and French). Parliament of Switzerland. 18 December 2020. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  159. ^ "Swiss referendum launched against same sex marriage". Le News. 14 January 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  160. ^ "Switzerland to hold referendum on same-sex marriage". The Guardian. 28 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
  161. ^ "Mariage pour toutes et tous: Operation Libero est prête". operation-libero.ch (in French).
  162. ^ "Le parlement accepte le mariage pour tous". Le Temps (in French). 1 December 2020.
  163. ^ https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-83585.html
  164. ^ https://m.bote.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/emotionen-garantiert-bevoelkerung-stimmt-im-september-ueber-ehe-fuer-alle-ab;art177490,1316728
  165. ^ "Eine reformierte Landeskirche outet sich, «Ehe für alle» sorgt kirchenintern für Unmut". SRF (in German). 8 August 2019.
  166. ^ (in French) L’Eglise réformée vaudoise a célébré huit unions de couples homosexuels
  167. ^ (in German) Kirchenordnung der Evangelisch-Reformierten Kirche des Kantons Luzern, § 37
  168. ^ (in German) ref.ch: TI, Synode spricht sich für Segnung homosexueller Paare aus
  169. ^ (in French) L'Eglise protestante vaudoise dit oui à un rite pour les couples gays
  170. ^ (in French) Couples homosexuels devant le pasteur
  171. ^ Luzerner Zeitung.de: Christkatholische Kirche will gleichgeschlechtliche Paare vor dem Altar trauen (german), August 2020
  172. ^ "Switzerland's Christian Catholic church votes in favour of same-sex marriage". Le News. 28 August 2020.
  173. ^ "Ehe für alle – Ja klar!". Frauenbund (in German). June 2019.
  174. ^ Parrott, Jeff (11 May 2021). "German Catholics defy the Vatican, bless the unions of same-sex couples". Deseret News. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
  175. ^ "Vernehmlassung Pa. Iv. Fraktion GL. Ehe für alle" (PDF). swissjews.ch (in German).
  176. ^ (in French) Enquête sur la droitisation des opinions publiques européennes
  177. ^ (in German) Mehrheit der Schweizer für Ehe zwischen Homosexuellen, blick.ch, retrieved on 22 February 2015
  178. ^ (in German) 71 Prozent der Schweizer für Homo-Ehe, sonntagszeitung.ch, retrieved on 22 February 20152015
  179. ^ (in French) LARGE CONSENSUS POUR LES DROITS DES LGBT
  180. ^ (in French) Les Suisses pour l'introduction du mariage pour tous, selon un sondage
  181. ^ On voit plus de musulmans qu'il y en a réellement
  182. ^ Baumann, Bastian (21 December 2017). "Tamedia-Umfrage: 72% für Ehe für alle" (in German). Mannschaft Magazine.
  183. ^ Religion and society, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
  184. ^ Being Christian in Western Europe, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
  185. ^ Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues, Pew Research Center, 2017
  186. ^ "L'avenir du "mariage pour tous" se jouera cet automne". 24 heures (in French). 30 August 2019.
  187. ^ "Plus de 80% des Suisses sont favorables au mariage pour les couples de même sexe". Le Temps (in French). 10 February 2020.
  188. ^ "Survey shows widespread Swiss support for same-sex marriage". Swissinfo. 10 February 2020.
  189. ^ Repic, Aleksandar (9 November 2020). "Sondage téléphonique omnibus au sujet du mariage civil pour toutes et tous, de l'adoption et de la procréation médicalement assistée (PMA) (2019 & 2020)" (PDF). pinkcross.ch.

External links[edit]