Recognition of same-sex unions in Switzerland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Switzerland has allowed registered partnerships for same-sex couples since 1 January 2007, after a 2005 referendum.

A bill to legalize same-sex marriage was drafted by the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council, and was finalized in early 2019. It was sent to the Swiss Parliament for deliberation. A law passed by Parliament can be challenged by opponents in a referendum, if they collect 50,000 valid signatures within 100 days. Opinion polls suggest that the bill has popular support in Switzerland,[1] and a 2019 consultation found large political support. The Swiss Federal Council came out in favor of the proposal in January 2020.[2]

Registered partnerships[edit]

Map showing how the Swiss electorate voted in the 2005 registered partnership referendum
  Yes (>60%)
  Yes (50%-59%)
  No

In a nationwide referendum on 5 June 2005, the Swiss people approved by 58% a registered partnership law, granting same-sex couples the same rights and protections as married couples in terms of next of kin status, taxation, social security, insurance, and shared possession of a dwelling. However, same-sex couples would not have the same rights in terms of:

  • Full joint adoption of children.
  • Access to fertility treatments.
  • Facilitated Swiss naturalisation of the foreign partner. Swiss law provides a faster route to citizenship for the spouse of a Swiss citizen, but does not recognise same-sex marriages conducted in foreign countries, instead classing them as registered partnerships.

The official title of the same-sex union is eingetragene Partnerschaft in German, partenariat enregistré in French, unione domestica registrata in Italian and partenadi registrà in Romansh. The bill was passed by the National Council, 111 to 72, on 3 December 2003 and by the Council of States on 3 June 2004, with minor changes.[3][4] The National Council approved it again on 10 June but the conservative Federal Democratic Union collected signatures to force a referendum.[5][6] Subsequently, the Swiss people voted 58% in favor of the bill on 5 June 2005.[7] The law came into effect on 1 January 2007.[8] Switzerland was the first nation to pass a same-sex union law by referendum.

Adoption and parenting[edit]

Single people, regardless of sexual orientation, may adopt children. A bill legalizing stepchild adoption for same-sex couples was approved by Parliament in spring 2016. Opponents unsuccessfully tried to force a referendum on the bill. The law came into effect on 1 January 2018.[9]

Article 27 of the Registered Partnership Act treats the matter of the partner's child/children. The law states that the partner of the biological/adoptive parent must provide financial support for their partner's child and also possesses the full legal authority to represent the child in every matter as being the parent's partner. It also states that in the case of the dissolution of the partnership, the ex-partner has the right to keep close ties with their ex-partner's child.[10] This article makes Swiss registered partnerships one of the most liberal partnerships, giving the couple a real role in being parents.

In 2010, Swiss LGBT organisations started a petition, "Same Chances For All Families", demanding more adoption rights. On 30 September 2011, the National Council considered the petition but ultimately voted 83–97 against it.[11] However, the debate and close vote provided a view on the MPs' opinions and the evolution of minds, as for example Maja Ingold, MP of the Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland, spoke for more recognition of gay and lesbian parents, while her party campaigned against the Registered Partnership Act back in 2005. It became clear that, while there was no majority for full joint adoption, allowing adoption of the partner's child could gather majority support in Parliament.

The Council of States accepted the petition and the Legal Affairs Committee approved a motion from openly gay MP Claude Janiak (SPS) backing the right to full joint adoption regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. In November 2011, the Committee voted unanimously in favour, including members of the conservative Swiss People's Party.[12] In February 2012, the Federal Council responded by informing the Council of States that they were in favour of stepchild adoption but against full joint adoption rights.[13] On 14 March 2012, the Council of States approved (21–19) the complete full extension of adoption rights for same-sex couples regardless of marital status or sexual orientation.[14]

As the National Council had originally voted against it in September 2011, the bill had to be voted on again by the lower chamber, which did so on 13 December 2012, as the National Council voted 113–64 to grant same-sex couples the right to adopt biological or adopted children that their partner had before the start of their relationship.[15] However, the motion giving full adoption rights approved by the Council of States was rejected by the National Council.[16] On 4 March 2013, the new version approved on 13 December 2012 by the National Council was accepted by the Council of States by a majority of 26–16.[17]

In November 2014, taking into account the parliamentary votes, the Federal Council approved allowing the adoption of the partner's child as part of a larger adoption reform.[18][19] The bill had to be approved by Parliament, though opponents had already announced they would force an optional referendum.[20] For such a referendum, citizens opposing the law have to gather 50,000 signatures within 100 days.

In January 2016, the Council of States Committee on Legal Affairs voted 7 to 3 with one abstention to approve the proposal to allow stepchild adoption by same-sex couples.[21] On 8 March 2016, the Council of States voted 25-14 in favor of the bill. Furthermore, it would apply to unmarried couples, whether same or different sex, and would also lower the minimum age to adopt from 35 to 28.[22][23] Member of the Federal Council Simonetta Sommaruga came out in support of the bill and stated that it is necessary to legally protect children already raised by same-sex couples. On 13 May 2016, the National Council's Committee on Legal Affairs voted 15-9 to approve the bill.[24] The following day, the bill was approved by the National Council in a 113-64 vote.[25][26] Differing texts caused the two chambers to agree on a final, slightly modified version of the bill that was passed in Parliament on 17 June 2016 by a vote of 125-68 with 3 abstentions.[27][28] Under Swiss law, opponents of a bill passed by Parliament have one hundred days to collect 50,000 valid signatures. If enough signatures are gathered, a referendum will take place otherwise the bill will become law. Following the final vote in Parliament, a referendum committee was established including members of several different political parties with the aim of forcing a referendum on the bill. No major party supported the committee.[29][30] On 4 October 2016, it was confirmed that the referendum would not take place as only 20,000 signatures had been collected.[31] The law took effect on 1 January 2018.[9][32]

Facilitated naturalization[edit]

On 14 March 2016, the National Council approved a bill granting facilitated naturalization to couples in registered partnerships. Currently, a foreigner married to a Swiss citizen is eligible for Swiss citizenship within three years of marriage and five years of residency in the country, although this option is not available to couples in registered partnerships.[33] The bill was approved 122 to 62.[34] On 26 September 2016, the Council of States decided that the bill would be voted on simultaneously to the proposed same-sex marriage bill (see below for details).[35]

Pension benefits[edit]

At the end of August 2008, the Federal Court decided that long-term same-sex partners were entitled to the same vested benefits from the pension of the deceased as equivalent opposite-sex partners have. A shared apartment is not necessary.[36]

Blessings of Swiss Reformed Churches[edit]

Some Swiss Reformed Churches allow the blessing of same-sex registered partnerships. These are the Reformed Church of Aargau, the Reformed Churches of the Canton Bern-Jura-Solothurn, the Evangelical Reformed Church of Graubünden, the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of Lucerne, the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of St. Gallen, the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of Schaffhausen, the Evangelical Reformed Church of Ticino, the Evangelical Church of the Canton of Thurgau, the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of Vaud and the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of Zürich.[37][38][39]

Other Reformed Churches, however, have rejected moves to allow such blessings, including the Reformed Church of the Canton of Neuchâtel and the Evangelical Free Church of Geneva.[40]

From November 2012 to July 2017, only 8 same-sex partnerships were blessed in the Vaud Reformed Church.[41]

Several Reformed churches have also begun blessing the marriages of same-sex couples, including the Evangelical Reformed Church of the Canton of Zürich. The Swiss Reformed Church as a whole has not taken a formal decision on the matter, though in August 2019 the Church voted to support the opening of civil marriage to same-sex couples.[42]

Statistics[edit]

The first same-sex partnership was registered on 2 January 2007 in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino.[8]

From 2007 to 2018, 10,226 same-sex partnerships were registered in Switzerland.[43]

Federal[edit]

Year Female couples Male couples Total
2007 573 1,431 2,004
2008 271 660 931
2009 284 588 872
2010 221 499 720
2011 246 426 672
2012 267 428 695
2013 230 463 693
2014 270 450 720
2015 261 440 701
2016 227 502 729
2017 306 483 789
2018 275 425 700
Total 3,431 6,795 10,226

Cantonal[edit]

Canton[44][45] Partnerships Canton Partnerships
Aargau 534 Nidwalden 22
Appenzell Ausserrhoden 38 Obwalden 21
Appenzell Innerrhoden 12 Schaffhausen 72
Basel-Landschaft 344 Schwyz 108
Basel-Stadt 415 Solothurn 222
Bern 1,080 St. Gallen 338
Fribourg 255 Thurgau 209
Geneva 940 Ticino 254
Glarus 23 Uri 17
Graubünden 103 Valais 216
Jura 46 Vaud 1,143
Lucerne 346 Zug 133
Neuchâtel 149 Zürich 3,186

Cantonal laws[edit]

"Same-sex partnerships are allowed in Switzerland." Image from a 2016 Lucerne cantonal government publication for refugees.

Cohabitation[edit]

Certain Swiss cantonal constitutions recognise and guarantee the right to cohabit and to found a family outside of marriage for both different-sex and same-sex couples; these include among others the constitutions of Vaud,[46] Zürich,[47] Appenzell Ausserrhoden,[48] Basel-Stadt,[49] Bern,[50] Geneva,[51] Zug,[52] Schaffhausen,[53] and Fribourg.[54]

Registered partnerships[edit]

The canton of Geneva has had a partnership law on a cantonal level since 2001. It grants unmarried couples, whether same-sex or opposite-sex, many rights, responsibilities and protections that married couples have. However, it does not allow benefits in taxation, social security, or health insurance premiums (unlike the federal law). The law is based on the French civil solidarity pact.[55][56][57][58] In autumn 2016, the Department of Public Instruction of the Canton of Geneva introduced new forms in schools allowing same-sex parents to be recognized; the previous forms with boxes for "father" and "mother" were replaced with two boxes listing "parents".[59]

On 22 September 2002, the canton of Zürich passed a same-sex partnership law by referendum (62.7% in favor) that goes further than Geneva's law, but requires couples to live together for six months before registering.[60]

In July 2004, the Grand Council of Neuchâtel passed, in a 65–38 vote, a law recognizing unmarried couples.[61][62]

Registered partnerships for same-sex couples are included in the Constitution of the canton of Fribourg.[63] In May 2004, voters approved the Constitution with 58.03% in favor and 41.97% against.[64] It took effect on 1 January 2005. Article 14(2) states: "The right to register a partnership for same-sex couples is guaranteed".[a]

Marriage[edit]

On 6 June 2016, the Cantonal Council of Zürich voted by 110–52 to reject a proposal to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman in the Constitution of Zürich. The proposal, put forward by the Federal Democratic Union (EDU), sought to constitutionally ban same-sex marriage in the canton, as a means to counter the 2013 marriage initiative.[65][66] EDU and most members of the Swiss People's Party were in favor of the proposal, while all other parties, including the Christian Democratic People's Party and the Evangelical People's Party, were opposed. The EDU then gathered 6,000 signatures to force a cantonal referendum on the issue. The referendum took place on 27 November 2016, where the proposal was overwhelmingly rejected. 80.9% voted against it, while 19.1% voted in favor.[67] In some parts of the canton, the "No" gained 92% of the votes.[68] All municipalities rejected the proposal.

Initiative «Schutz der Ehe»
Choice Votes %
Referendum failed No 319,501 80.91
Yes 75,362 19.09
Total votes 394,863 100.00

Same-sex marriage[edit]

Laws regarding same-sex partnerships in Europe¹
  Marriage
  Civil union
  Limited domestic recognition (cohabitation)
  Limited foreign recognition (residency rights)
  Unrecognized
  Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples
¹ May include recent laws or court decisions that have not yet entered into effect.

In 2012, Parliament requested that the executive Swiss Federal Council examine how to update family law to reflect changes in society.[69] In March 2015, the council released its governmental report about marriage and new rights for families, raising the possibility of the introduction of registered partnerships for straight couples and same-sex marriage for gay and lesbian couples.[70] Member of the Federal Council Simonetta Sommaruga, in charge of the Federal Department of Justice and Police, also stated she hoped that gay and lesbian couples would soon be allowed to marry.[71]

Political parties and support[edit]

Same-sex marriage is supported by the Green Party,[72] the Conservative Democratic Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Green Liberal Party, the Swiss Party of Labour,[73] FDP.The Liberals,[74] the Christian Democratic People's Party (CVP/PDC),[75][76][77] and Solidarity.[78] The Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC), the Evangelical People's Party, the Ticino League and the Federal Democratic Union are mostly opposed.

In 2017, CVP president, Gerhard Pfister, said he believed that around two-thirds of CVP lawmakers opposed same-sex marriage. However, a 2019 survey showed that about 83% of CVP candidates running in the October federal election were in favour of same-sex marriage.[79] CVP politicians supportive of same-sex marriage include Andrea Gmür-Schönenberger, member of the National Council for Lucerne, and Ruth Metzler, a former member of the Federal Council.[80] The same survey showed that 48% of SVP candidates were in favour.

In April 2018, the women's wing of the Liberals voted by 56 votes to 2 to support same-sex marriage.[81]

On 26 January 2019, the national Swiss People's Party (SVP) adopted a new party programme. A proposal to strike the party's opposition to same-sex marriage was rejected by the delegates with a vote of 166 to 126.[82]

In June 2019, the governments of Bern,[83] Schaffhausen, St. Gallen and Thurgau expressed support for the opening of marriage to same-sex couples.[84][85][86] Schwyz and Obwalden have expressed opposition to the idea, with the latter instead calling for a referendum.[87][88][89]

On 15 August 2019, Gottfried Locher, president of the Federation of Swiss Protestant Churches, declared his personal support for same-sex marriage.[90][91] In August 2019, the Swiss Reformed Church voted to support the opening of marriage to same-sex couples.[92] This followed a June 2019 statement from the church, "We are created by God. We cannot choose our sexual orientation. We perceive it as an expression of creative fullness."

The Green Liberal Party's parliamentary initiative[edit]

In December 2013, the Green Liberal Party submitted a parliamentary initiative for a constitutional amendment, with the aim of legalising same-sex marriage.[93][94]

On 20 February 2015, the Committee for Legal Affairs of the National Council voted to proceed with the initiative, by 12 votes to 9 with 1 abstention.[95] In May 2015, a petition supporting the bill was launched. The signatures were submitted to the Committee for Legal Affairs of the Council of States before they discussed the bill, hoping to persuade them to support it.[96][97] On 1 September 2015, the committee voted by 7 votes to 5 to proceed with the initiative.[98]

The National Council's Legal Affairs Committee was then tasked to draft an act within two years (per Article 111 of the Constitution), i.e. by 2017. However, due to the complexity of the legal reform, it proposed on 11 May 2017 to extend the initiative's deadline by another two years (i.e. by 2019) and ask the government administration for further study of the issue.[99][100] A minority consisting of the Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC) wanted to block the initiative. On 16 June 2017, the National Council voted by 118-71 in favour of the committee's proposal to extend the deadline to 2019.[101][102][103]

The Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council met on 17 May 2018, the International Day Against Homophobia, to discuss the legal ramifications of legalising same-sex marriage, such as the necessary amendments to other laws, and to begin drafting a marriage law. The committee recommended that the Swiss Civil Code be amended to remove the heterosexual definition of marriage and that a gender-neutral definition be inserted. It also recommended amendments to the 1953 civil registration law, which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Other laws, including laws relating to naturalisation, would also be amended. Additionally, according to the committee and the Justice Ministry, the proposal would automatically legalise joint adoption for married same-sex couples. As such, the committee recommended no changes to adoption law, which allows married couples to adopt without explicitly defining "marriage".[104] On 6 July 2018, the committee voted against rejecting the initiative altogether, by 18-1, and subsequently voted 14-11 in support of the legalisation of same-sex marriage, adoption and facilitated naturalisation. Furthermore, the committee voted by 16-9 to legislate, rather than modify the Constitution. Therefore, the Swiss electorate will not necessarily be called to vote on the initiative (though opponents could still force a referendum on the issue, which would require a simple majority of those voting to succeed). Despite the protests of LGBT groups,[105] the committee decided to leave out assisted reproductive technology for lesbian couples and widow's pension so that the initiative would have a higher chance of approval, and also because legalising sperm donations for lesbian couples would require a constitutional amendment. Those two issues will be discussed in a separate law.[106][107][108] In early July 2018, Operation Libero began collecting signatures in favour of same-sex marriage, to persuade Parliament to legalise it, collecting 30,000 signatures within a week.[105]

On 14 February 2019, the National Council's Legal Affairs Committee approved the bill to allow same-sex marriage by 19 to 4, with one abstention. Another bill that would allow access to sperm donations for lesbian couples was narrowly rejected. The proposal was sent out for public consultation, after which the Federal Council will revisit the legislation and will then present it to the Swiss Parliament for approval. The proposal would also end registered partnerships.[109][110][111][112] The committee started the consultation on 14 March, which lasted until 21 June 2019.[113][114] The consultation showed wide support for the legalisation of same-sex marriage among all political parties,[115] with the exception of the Swiss People's Party. The committee filed a resume of the consultation at the end of August to clarify certain points, such as widow's pension and sperm donations for lesbian couples.[116] It is now up to the Federal Chambers to decide on the text, starting with the National Council.[117][118]

In January 2020, the Federal Council expressed support for the same-sex marriage bill.[2]

The Christian Democrats' popular initiative "For the couple and the family"[edit]

In 2011, the Christian Democratic People's Party of Switzerland (CVP/PDC) began gathering signatures for a popular initiative entitled "For the couple and the family - No to the penalty of marriage" (German: Für Ehe und Familie - gegen die Heiratsstrafe; French: Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage; Italian: Per il matrimonio e la famiglia - No agli svantaggi per le coppie sposate; Romansh: Per la lètg e la famiglia - Na als dischavantatgs per pèrs maridads). This initiative sought to amend article 14 of the Swiss Federal Constitution to equalise fiscal rights and social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples. However, the text would also introduce a definition of marriage for the first time, specifically the "sole union between a man and a woman".[119]

Under Swiss law, cohabiting unmarried couples are entitled to two full pensions. However, the pension of married couples is limited to 150% of the maximum pension per person, meaning that if both partners earn relatively well during their working life, they receive only one and a half times the maximum pension instead of two full pensions.[120]

In November 2012, the gathering of signatures ended and the initiative was submitted. The Swiss Federal Council reviewed the initiative and decided to support it, formally asking Parliament in October 2013 to recommend that voters to approve the initiative.[121] On 10 December 2014, the National Council discussed the initiative. The Greens proposed to amend the bill stating that "any forms of unions" could not be penalised and the Green Liberals proposed to amend the bill so that "marriage and all the other forms of union defined by the law" could not be penalised.[122] The debate was mainly between the Swiss People's Party and the Christian Democrats on one side, and the Green Liberals, the Greens, the Social Democrats and the Conservative Democrats on the other. The Liberals were divided on the issue.[123] The Swiss People's Party and the Christian Democrats stated their opposition to "any form of homophobia". On the other hand, the opposing parties highlighted the discrimination that would be introduced by the initiative and furthermore called for a future definition of marriage that would include same-sex couples. Some MPs called the Christian Democrats a "retrograde" party.[124]

After having rejected both counter-propositions from the Greens and the Green Liberals, the National Council finally approved a suggestion from the Commission for Economic Affairs and Taxation, which retained the spirit of the initiative but removed the definition of marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman. This counter-proposition was approved 102–86, thus rejecting the popular initiative and recommending to the Swiss electorate to reject the initiative and accept the counter-proposition.[125]

The Council of States approved the counter-proposition on 4 March 2015, in a 24–19 vote.[126] The debate in the upper house also mainly focused on the definition of marriage which would introduce discrimination towards same-sex couples, though the idea of equal fiscal rights and equal social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples was unopposed.[127] A few Liberal Party members changed their mind, and the counter-proposal was therefore rejected in the Council of States. A subsequent conciliation conference in June 2015 of both chambers of Parliament decided to recommend rejecting the original initiative.[128] On 19 June 2015, the formal order of Parliament recommending voters to reject the initiative was published.[129]

On 17 November 2015, the Federal Council also recommended rejecting the initiative. It had supported the initiative two years earlier, but now was obliged to change its position because Parliament was opposed.[130][131]

The vote[edit]

The Christian Democrats' proposal was put to a referendum on 28 February 2016,[132] with voters deciding whether to define marriage as a "durable cohabitation of a man and a woman" that "must not be disadvantaged in comparison of other lifestyles",[133] thus prohibiting same-sex marriage in the Swiss Federal Constitution.

Amongst parliamentary parties, the Christian Democrats (apart from the Young Christian Democrats of Zürich and Geneva, which had declared opposition to the initiative of their parent party),[134][135] the national-conservative Swiss People's Party and the conservative Evangelical People's Party campaigned for "Yes". Meanwhile, the Social Democrats, the Liberals, the Greens, the Conservative Democrats and the Green Liberals opposed the text and campaigned for "No" along with Amnesty International Switzerland, Economiesuisse, the Swiss Federation of Trade Unions and Operation Libero.

A month before the vote, various polls showed 67% support (22 January 2016) and 53% support (17 February 2016).[136]

On 28 February 2016, the initiative was rejected by 50.8% of voters with 1,609,328 in favor and 1,664,217 against, a margin of 54,979 votes. The majority of the cantons approved the initiative (16.5 to 6.5), with the cantons of Geneva, Vaud, Bern, Zürich, Grisons, Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft and Appenzell Ausserrhoden rejecting the initiative.[137]

Referendum overturned[edit]

During the referendum campaign, the Swiss Government told voters that about 80,000 married couples were paying more tax than unmarried cohabiting couples,[138] but later admitted that the true figure was almost half a million. The Christian Democratic Party filed a complaint against the result in June 2018, disputing the accuracy of the statistics.[139] On 10 April 2019, the referendum was declared invalid by the Federal Supreme Court, which ordered a re-vote.[140] Days later, it was reported that a majority of the parliamentary bloc of the Christian Democratic Party opposed the initiative in its current form and wanted the definition of marriage to be removed. According to the Tages-Anzeiger, the party now hopes that the Parliament will propose an alternative measure to eliminate the tax discrimination against married couples, so that the party can withdraw its initiative without losing face.[141][142][143][144][145][146]

It was subsequently reported that the referendum may not be rerun as the Federal Council now has two options: to set a date for a new referendum, or establish a new law to go through the Federal Parliament. In the latter scenario, the Christian Democrats would have the opportunity to withdraw their initiative, which is the party's preferred option. The vice-president of the party, Charles Juillard, said, "The party is ready to withdraw its initiative if the Federal Council puts an end to the tax penalty of marriage and the discrimination of spouses vis-à-vis l'Assurance-vieillesse et survivants [AVS, Old-age and survivors' insurance]."[147][148] In early January 2020, the party chose to withdraw its initiative and announced it would begin collecting signatures for a second popular initiative. This initiative would again seek to equalise fiscal rights and equal social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples, but, unlike the previous one, it would not introduce a specific definition of marriage.[149]

Public opinion[edit]

According to an Ifop poll conducted in May 2013, 63% of the Swiss public supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.[150]

After the Legal Affairs Committee's decision to approve same-sex marriage, two opinion polls released on 22 February 2015 showed support of 54% (Léger Marketing for Blick)[151] and 71% (GfS Zurich for SonntagsZeitung)[152] for allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.

A poll carried out between April and May 2016 showed that 69% of the Swiss population supported same-sex marriage, 25% opposed and 6% were unsure. 94% of Green voters supported its legalization. 59% of voters from the Swiss People's Party and 63% of Christian Democratic voters supported it, respectively.[153][154]

A poll by Tamedia, conducted on 5 and 6 December 2017, found that 45% of the Swiss population supported both same-sex marriage and adoption, 27% supported only same-sex marriage, 3% supported only same-sex adoption and 24% were against both.[155] The poll thus found a 72% majority in favour of same-sex marriage. Green, Social Democrats and Green Liberal voters were the most supportive: 88% in favour, 9% against and 3% undecided. 76% of Liberal voters supported the legalisation of same-sex marriage, while 22% opposed it. 66% of Christian Democrat voters and 56% of Swiss People's Party voters supported same-sex marriage, respectively.[156]

A Pew Research Center poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 75% of Swiss people supported same-sex marriage, 24% were opposed and 1% didn't know or refused to answer.[1] When divided by religion, 89% of religiously unaffiliated people, 80% of non-practicing Christians and 58% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage.[157] Opposition was 16% among 18-34-year-olds.[158]

A public consultation held between March and June 2019 showed wide societal and political support for same-sex marriage in Switzerland. 83% of the participants to the consultation expressed support, and 63% expressed support for sperm donations and access to artificial insemination for lesbian couples.[159]

A February 2020 survey, conducted by the gfs group and requested by Pink Cross, found a 81% majority in favour of same-sex marriage (63% "strongly" supporting and 18% "somewhat" supporting), whereas 18% were opposed (10% "strongly" and 8% "somewhat"). 1% was undecided. By party, 96% of Greens, 92% of Social Democrats and Green Liberals, 77% of Liberals and 67% of Swiss People's Party voters supported same-sex marriage.[160] Adoption was supported by 67% of respondents and sperm donation for lesbian couples by 66%.[161]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ French: Le droit d'enregistrer un partenariat pour les couples de même sexe est garanti.
    German: Das Recht zur Eintragung einer Partnerschaft für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare ist gewährleistet.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Religion and society, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
  2. ^ a b "Swiss government supports 'marriage for all'". swissinfo.ch. 29 January 2020.
  3. ^ "Parliament gives green light to "gay marriages"". swissinfo.ch. 3 December 2003.
  4. ^ "Parliament gives its blessing to gay couples". swissinfo.ch. 3 June 2004.
  5. ^ "Fight goes on for gay couples". swissinfo.ch. 10 June 2004.
  6. ^ "Government presses for gay-couple rights". swissinfo.ch. 22 April 2005.
  7. ^ "Gay couples win partnership rights". swissinfo.ch. 5 June 2005.
  8. ^ a b "First same-sex union registered in Switzerland". SWI swissinfo.ch. 2 January 2007.
  9. ^ a b "Stepchild adoption will be possible from 2018". Swissinfo. 10 July 2017. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
  10. ^ (in French) Article 27: «Partner's children»
  11. ^ (in French) Le National ne veut pas voir les couples homosexuels adopter, Swissinfo, accessed on 15 December 2012
  12. ^ (in French) Coup de pouce des Sénateurs à l'adoption, 360, accessed on 15 December 2012
  13. ^ "Schweizer Regierung gegen Adoptionsrecht für Homo-Paare". Queer.de. 22 February 2012.
  14. ^ (in French) Le Conseil des Etats accepte l'adoption des couples homosexuels, Le Matin
  15. ^ Swiss lawmakers vote to allow some gays to adopt, France24, 15 December 2012
  16. ^ Rainbow families: Gays granted more adoption rights, Swissinfo, 15 December 2012
  17. ^ Motion CAJ-CE. Droit de l'adoption. Mêmes chances pour toutes les familles, Council of States, retrieved on 21 April 2013
  18. ^ "Suisse: Le gouvernement propose d'ouvrir l'adoption aux couples de même sexe". Yagg. 2 December 2014.
  19. ^ "Bundesrat will Stiefkindadoption ermöglichen". Queer.ch. 28 November 2014.
  20. ^ "Adoption: les opposants en ordre de bataille". 360.ch. 7 September 2014.
  21. ^ "Ständeratskommission befürwortet Adoptionen". Queer.ch. 12 January 2016.
  22. ^ "Switzerland takes step towards adoption equality". The Local. 9 March 2016.
  23. ^ "Homosexuelle sollen Stiefkinder adoptieren dürfen". Tages-Anzeiger (in German). 8 March 2016.
  24. ^ "Nationalratskommission für Adoptionsrecht". Queer.de. 13 May 2016.
  25. ^ "Schweiz: Stiefkindadoption wird Gesetz". Männer. 14 May 2016.
  26. ^ "Oui à l'adoption par le conjoint de même sexe" (in French). 360°. 14 May 2016.
  27. ^ Swiss Parliament votes in favor of stepchild adoption
  28. ^ Touzain, François (17 June 2016). ""Oui" final à la réforme de l'adoption" (in French). 360°.
  29. ^ (in French) Le référendum contre la réforme du droit d'adoption n'aboutira pas
  30. ^ Goumaz, Magalie (8 June 2016). "Le référendum se précise contre l'adoption par les couples homosexuels". Le Temps (in French).
  31. ^ (in French) Echec du référendum contre l'homoparentalité
  32. ^ "Le nouveau droit de l'adoption entrera en vigueur le 1er janvier 2018". www.admin.ch (in French). Retrieved 12 July 2017.
  33. ^ "Un pas vers la naturalisation facilitée pour les partenaires enregistrés". 24 heures (Switzerland) (in French). 14 March 2016.
  34. ^ "Schweiz will ausländischen Lebenspartnern die Einbürgerung erleichtern" (in German). queer.de. 15 March 2016.
  35. ^ (in French) SUISSE MARIAGE GAY ET NATURALISATION TRAITÉS EN PARALLÈLE
  36. ^ sda: Auch Homosexuelle können Pensionskasse erben, NZZ online, 4. September 2008 (über das Urteil 9 C 874/2007 vom 20. August 2008; keine BGE-Publikation).
  37. ^ (in German) Kirchenordnung der Evangelisch-Reformierten Kirche des Kantons Luzern, § 37
  38. ^ (in German) ref.ch: TI, Synode spricht sich für Segnung homosexueller Paare aus
  39. ^ (in French) L'Eglise protestante vaudoise dit oui à un rite pour les couples gays
  40. ^ (in French) Couples homosexuels devant le pasteur
  41. ^ (in French) L’Eglise réformée vaudoise a célébré huit unions de couples homosexuels
  42. ^ "Eine reformierte Landeskirche outet sich, «Ehe für alle» sorgt kirchenintern für Unmut". SRF (in German). 8 August 2019.
  43. ^ "Registered same-sex partnerships". Swiss Confederation. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
  44. ^ Partenariats enregistrés et dissous selon le sexe et le canton, 2007-2018
  45. ^ (in French) Partenariats enregistrés et dissous selon le sexe et le canton
  46. ^ (in French) Constitution du canton de Vaud
  47. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Zürich
  48. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Appenzell Ausserrhoden
  49. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Basel-Stadt
  50. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Bern
  51. ^ (in French) Constitution de la République et canton de Genève
  52. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Zug
  53. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Schaffhausen
  54. ^ (in German) Verfassung des Kantons Freiburg
  55. ^ "Homosexuals a step closer to equal rights". swissinfo.ch. 16 February 2001.
  56. ^ "Switzerland's first "gay marriages" take place in Geneva". swissinfo.ch. 8 May 2001.
  57. ^ "Registered partnerships and same-sex marriage in Switzerland". Religious Tolerance.
  58. ^ "Loi sur le partenariat". ge.ch (in French).
  59. ^ "Fiches Inclusives Pour Les Familles Arc-en-ciel". 360.ch (in French). 4 October 2016.
  60. ^ "Zurich grants gay couples more rights". swissinfo.ch. 22 September 2002.
  61. ^ "Loi sur le partenariat enregistré". rsn.ne.ch (in French).
  62. ^ (in French) Le pacs gagne du terrain Archived 2015-09-06 at the Wayback Machine
  63. ^ "Constitution du canton de Fribourg" (PDF) (in French). Canton of Fribourg. 16 May 2004. Article 14
  64. ^ "La nouvelle Constitution du canton de Fribourg a été adoptée par le peuple fribourgeois". fr.ch (in French).
  65. ^ Touzain, François (7 June 2016). ""Défense du mariage" fait un flop au Parlement zurichois" (in French). 360°.
  66. ^ Chatain, Jean-Baptiste (7 June 2016). "CANTON DE ZURICH - Rejet d'une initiative contre le mariage homosexuel" (in French). Lepetitjournal.com.
  67. ^ (in German) Keine Definition der Ehe zwischen Mann und Frau in der Verfassung
  68. ^ (in French) Mariage pour tous: "non" à la contre-attaque de l'UDF zurichoise
  69. ^ 12.3607 Postulat: Code civil. Pour un droit de la famille moderne et cohérent, Swiss Parliament
  70. ^ (in French) Rapport du Conseil fédéral - Modernisation du droit de la famille, Federal Department of Justice and Police, retrieved on 27 May 2015
  71. ^ (in French) Sommaruga espère que les homosexuels pourront bientôt se marier, L'Hebdo, retrieved on 27 May 2015
  72. ^ (in French) Green Party - Equality Policy Archived 2011-06-12 at the Wayback Machine
  73. ^ Les positions du PST/POP par rapport aux votations du 28 février 2016 Dans son programme électoral de 2015, le PST/POP revendique le droit de mariage pour tous les couples.
  74. ^ "FDP begrüsst die Öffnung der Ehe für alle". Presseportal Schweiz (in German). 15 June 2019.
  75. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". 20 Minuten (in German). Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  76. ^ "CVP befürwortet Homo-Ehe". www.telezueri.ch. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  77. ^ "So tickt der neue Nationalrat". SRF (in German). 21 October 2019.
  78. ^ "L'ÉGALITÉ MAINTENANT! Le premier mariage homo de Suisse a été célébré par soliaritéS!". solidarites.ch (in French). 18 May 2018.
  79. ^ "Mehrheit der CVP-Politiker für Ehe für alle". toponline.ch (in German). 25 August 2019.
  80. ^ 'Man plus man doesn't go': Swiss politician's gay marriage tweet
  81. ^ (in German) FDP-Frauen für "Ehe für alle", Luzerner Zeitung, 21 April 2018
  82. ^ "SVP verabschiedet neues Parteiprogramm". Bluewin. 26 January 2019.
  83. ^ "Berner Regierung begrüsst "Ehe für alle"". Bluewin.ch (in German). 20 June 2019.
  84. ^ "St.Galler Regierung will Ehe für alle". FM1 Today (in German). 5 June 2019.
  85. ^ "Schaffhausen sagt Ja zur Ehe für alle". Schaffhauser Nachrichten (in German). 4 June 2019.
  86. ^ "Thurgauer Regierungsrat befürwortet Ehe für alle". St. Galler Tagblatt (in German). 20 June 2019.
  87. ^ "Ehe für alle: Obwaldner Regierung lehnt Initiative ab". Luzerner Zeitung (in German). 24 June 2019.
  88. ^ "Ehe für alle: Obwaldner Regierung lehnt Initiative ab". St. Galler Tagblatt (in German). 24 June 2019.
  89. ^ Aschwanden, Erich (5 July 2019). "Die Gleichstellung von Lesben und Schwulen könnte unerwünschte Folgen haben". Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German).
  90. ^ "Le président des Eglises protestantes favorable au mariage pour tous". RTS.ch (in French). 16 August 2019.
  91. ^ "Oberster Protestant befürwortet Homo-Ehe". SRF (in German). 16 August 2019.
  92. ^ "Rat des Kirchenbundes befürwortet die Öffnung der Ehe für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare". Schweizerischer Evangelischer Kirchenbund (in German). 29 August 2018.
  93. ^ 13.468 Initiative parlementaire: Mariage civil pour tous, Swiss Parliament
  94. ^ Swiss Greens pushing for gay marriage and tax equality
  95. ^ (in French) Entrée en matière sur le projet de loi sur les avoirs de potentats, National Council, retrieved 20 February 2015
  96. ^ Ehe für Alle
  97. ^ When will the Swiss vote on same-sex marriage?
  98. ^ "Ständerat sagt Ja zur Homo-Ehe". Blick.ch. 1 September 2015.
  99. ^ "Müsste die Verfassung geändert werden?". Neuze Zürcher Zeitung. 12 May 2017.
  100. ^ Committee report, Swiss Parliament
  101. ^ "Gay marriage back on the discussion table in Swiss parliament". thelocal.ch. 16 June 2017.
  102. ^ "Débat sur le mariage pour tous prolongé jusqu'en 2019". 360.ch. 17 June 2017.
  103. ^ "Warum sich das Parlament vor dem Entscheid zur Homo-Ehe drückt". Watson. 16 June 2017.
  104. ^ «Ehe für alle» bringt volles Adoptionsrecht, Luzerner Zeitung, 3 June 2018
  105. ^ a b (in French) UN MARIAGE PAS SI ÉGALITAIRE DANS LES PLANS DU PARLEMENT
  106. ^ (in French) L'IDÉE D'UN MARIAGE GAY PROGRESSE EN SUISSE, Le Matin, 6 July 2018
  107. ^ (in German) Nationalratskommission will «Ehe für alle», Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 6 July 2018
  108. ^ (in German) Die «Ehe für alle» könnte schon 2021 Realität sein, Basler Zeitung, 4 July 2018
  109. ^ Mills, George (15 February 2019). "Why same-sex marriage just got a big step closer to reality in Switzerland". thelocal.ch. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  110. ^ Le mariage homo patine sur le don du sperme, 14 February 2019, Tribune de Genève
  111. ^ "Ehe für alle" ist einen Schritt weiter, 14 February 2019, Liechtensteiner Vaterland
  112. ^ Ehe für alle: Schlanke Kernvorlage mit Zugang zur Samenspende als Variante, 14 February 2019, Swiss Parliament
  113. ^ Le mariage pour tous mis en consultation
  114. ^ 13.468 n Iv.pa. Groupe GL. Mariage civil pour tous
  115. ^ Matthias Bärlocher (21 June 2019). "Nach Heiratsstrafe Erfolg: CVP will jetzt Ehe für alle". Nau.ch (in German).
  116. ^ "Homoparentalité: oui au mariage pour tous, mais non au don de sperme pour les lesbiennes". Le Nouvelliste (in French). 30 August 2019.
  117. ^ "Le mariage pour tous séduit tous les partis, à l'exception de l'UDC". RTS.ch (in French). 21 June 2019.
  118. ^ "Entre rente-pont, CO2 et mariage pour tous, menu chargé pour les élus neuchâtelois". arcinfo.ch (in French). 1 March 2020.
  119. ^ Eidgenössische Volksinitiative 'Für Ehe und Familie - gegen die Heiratsstrafe'
  120. ^ "Se marier en Suisse: avantages et inconvénients financiers". moneyland.ch (in French).
  121. ^ Schweiz: Ehe-Verbot für Schwule und Lesben geplant, 25 October 2013, queer.de
  122. ^ (in French) 13.085 n Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage. Initiative populaire, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 16 January 2015
  123. ^ "Swiss Political Parties Reveal Their Colours". Swissinfo. 11 September 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  124. ^ (in French) Sur l’imposition des couples, le PDC est taxé de rétrograde, Tribune de Genève, retrieved 16 January 2015
  125. ^ (in French) Vote n° 49.11275 Archived 2015-02-26 at the Wayback Machine, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 16 January 2015
  126. ^ (in French) Conseil des États - Procès-verbal de vote 13.085-2, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 5 March 2015
  127. ^ (in French) Le Conseil des États en bref (4 mars 2015) Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine, Swiss Parliament, retrieved on 5 March 2015
  128. ^ Einigungskonferenz sagt Nein zur CVP-Initative [sic], 13 June 2015, queer.ch
  129. ^ Arrêté fédéral concernant l’initiative populaire «Pour le couple et la famille – Non à la pénalisation du mariage», admin.ch
  130. ^ Bundesrat gegen CVP-Initiative, 18 November 2015, queer.ch
  131. ^ Bundesrat lanciert Abstimmungskampf zur Volksinitiative gegen die «Heiratsstrafe», 17 November 2015, admin.ch
  132. ^ Kriminelle Ausländer, Gotthard und Heiratsstrafe, 7 October 2014, NZZ
  133. ^ (in German) Bundesbeschluss über die Volksinitiative «Für Ehe und Familie – gegen die Heiratsstrafe», retrieved on 10 October 2015
  134. ^ JCVP Kanton Zürich: Nein zur Ehedefinition, 6. November 2015, queer.ch
  135. ^ (in French) Le PDC genevois ne défendra pas son initiative, Le Courrier, retrieved on 28 February 2016
  136. ^ (in French) Les Suisses plutôt défavorables au texte UDC, selon le 2ème sondage SSR, SRG SSR, retrieved on 28 February 2016
  137. ^ (in French) Initiative populaire du 05.11.2012 «Pour le couple et la famille - Non à la pénalisation du mariage»
  138. ^ "Et vous, gagneriez-vous à être mariés d'un point de vue fiscal?". rts.ch (in French). 12 March 2015.
  139. ^ Karin Aebischer (29 June 2018). "Heiratsstrafe: CVP zieht Beschwerde vor Bundesgericht". nau.ch (in German).
  140. ^ "Swiss court orders historic referendum re-run". BBC News. 10 April 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
  141. ^ Denise Brechbühl (14 April 2019). "Ehe: CVP beharrt nicht auf der alten Definition". nau.ch (in German).
  142. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". Blick (in German). 14 April 2019.
  143. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Ehe für alle". Tages-Anzeiger (in German). 14 April 2019.
  144. ^ Julien Bangerter (14 April 2019). "La plupart des élus fédéraux PDC contre une définition restrictive du mariage". rts.ch (in French).
  145. ^ "CVP öffnet sich für die Homo-Ehe". 20 Minuten (in German). 14 April 2019.
  146. ^ Eric Felley (15 April 2019). "Mariage: le cadeau empoisonné du Tribunal fédéral au PDC". Le Matin (in French).
  147. ^ "L'initiative PDC ne sera peut-être pas revotée". Le Matin (in French). 21 April 2019.
  148. ^ "L'initiative PDC ne sera peut-être pas revotée". Tribune de Genève (in French). 21 April 2019.
  149. ^ "Le PDC revient sur l'imposition du mariage, et s'ouvre aux couples homosexuels". Le Temps (in French). 5 January 2020.
  150. ^ (in French) Enquête sur la droitisation des opinions publiques européennes
  151. ^ (in German) Mehrheit der Schweizer für Ehe zwischen Homosexuellen, blick.ch, retrieved on 22 February 2015
  152. ^ (in German) 71 Prozent der Schweizer für Homo-Ehe, sonntagszeitung.ch, retrieved on 22 February 20152015
  153. ^ (in French) LARGE CONSENSUS POUR LES DROITS DES LGBT
  154. ^ (in French) Les Suisses pour l'introduction du mariage pour tous, selon un sondage
  155. ^ On voit plus de musulmans qu'il y en a réellement
  156. ^ Baumann, Bastian (21 December 2017). "Tamedia-Umfrage: 72% für Ehe für alle" (in German). Mannschaft Magazine.
  157. ^ Being Christian in Western Europe, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
  158. ^ Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues, Pew Research Center, 2017
  159. ^ "L'avenir du "mariage pour tous" se jouera cet automne". 24 heures (in French). 30 August 2019.
  160. ^ "Plus de 80% des Suisses sont favorables au mariage pour les couples de même sexe". Le Temps (in French). 10 February 2020.
  161. ^ "Survey shows widespread Swiss support for same-sex marriage". Swissinfo. 10 February 2020.

External links[edit]