# Regular matroid

In mathematics, a regular matroid is a matroid that can be represented over all fields.

## Definition

A matroid is defined to be a family of subsets of a finite set, satisfying certain axioms. The sets in the family are called "independent sets". One of the ways of constructing a matroid is to select a finite set of vectors in a vector space, and to define a subset of the vectors to be independent in the matroid when it is linearly independent in the vector space. Every family of sets constructed in this way is a matroid, but not every matroid can be constructed in this way, and the vector spaces over different fields lead to different sets of matroids that can be constructed from them.

A matroid ${\displaystyle M}$ is regular when, for every field ${\displaystyle F}$, ${\displaystyle M}$ can be represented by a system of vectors over ${\displaystyle F}$.[1][2]

## Properties

If a matroid is regular, so is its dual matroid,[1] and so is every one of its minors.[3] Every direct sum of regular matroids remains regular.[4]

Every graphic matroid (and every co-graphic matroid) is regular.[5] Conversely, every regular matroid may be constructed by combining graphic matroids, co-graphic matroids, and a certain ten-element matroid that is neither graphic nor co-graphic, using an operation for combining matroids that generalizes the clique-sum operation on graphs.[6]

The number of bases in a regular matroid may be computed as the determinant of an associated matrix, generalizing Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem for graphic matroids.[7]

## Characterizations

The uniform matroid ${\displaystyle U{}_{4}^{2}}$ (the four-point line) is not regular: it cannot be realized over the two-element finite field GF(2), so it is not a binary matroid, although it can be realized over all other fields. The matroid of the Fano plane (a rank-three matroid in which seven of the triples of points are dependent) and its dual are also not regular: they can be realized over GF(2), and over all fields of characteristic two, but not over any other fields than those. As Tutte (1958) showed, these three examples are fundamental to the theory of regular matroids: every non-regular matroid has at least one of these three as a minor. Thus, the regular matroids are exactly the matroids that do not have one of the three forbidden minors ${\displaystyle U{}_{4}^{2}}$, the Fano plane, or its dual.[8]

If a matroid is regular, it must clearly be realizable over the two fields GF(2) and GF(3). The converse is true: every matroid that is realizable over both of these two fields is regular. The result follows from a forbidden minor characterization of the matroids realizable over these fields, part of a family of results codified by Rota's conjecture.[9]

The regular matroids are the matroids that can be defined from a totally unimodular matrix, a matrix in which every square submatrix has determinant 0, 1, or −1. The vectors realizing the matroid may be taken as the rows of the matrix. For this reason, regular matroids are sometimes also called unimodular matroids.[10] The equivalence of regular matroids and unimodular matrices, and their characterization by forbidden minors, are deep results of W. T. Tutte, originally proved by him using the Tutte homotopy theorem.[8] Gerards (1989) later published an alternative and simpler proof of the characterization of unimodular matrices by forbidden minors.[11]

## Algorithms

There is a polynomial time algorithm for testing whether a matroid is regular, given access to the matroid through an independence oracle.[12]

## References

1. ^ a b Fujishige, Satoru (2005), Submodular Functions and Optimization, Annals of Discrete Mathematics, Elsevier, p. 24, ISBN 9780444520869.
2. ^ Oxley, James G. (2006), Matroid Theory, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 3, Oxford University Press, p. 209, ISBN 9780199202508.
3. ^ Oxley (2006), p. 112.
4. ^ Oxley (2006), p. 131.
5. ^ Tutte, W. T. (1965), "Lectures on matroids", Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 69B: 1–47, MR 0179781, doi:10.6028/jres.069b.001.
6. ^ Seymour, P. D. (1980), "Decomposition of regular matroids", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 28 (3): 305–359, MR 579077, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(80)90075-1.
7. ^ Maurer, Stephen B. (1976), "Matrix generalizations of some theorems on trees, cycles and cocycles in graphs", SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 30 (1): 143–148, MR 0392635, doi:10.1137/0130017.
8. ^ a b Tutte, W. T. (1958), "A homotopy theorem for matroids. I, II", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 88: 144–174, MR 0101526, doi:10.2307/1993244.
9. ^ Seymour, P. D. (1979), "Matroid representation over GF(3)", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 26 (2): 159–173, MR 532586, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(79)90055-8.
10. ^ Oxley (2006), p. 20.
11. ^ Gerards, A. M. H. (1989), "A short proof of Tutte's characterization of totally unimodular matrices", Linear Algebra and its Applications, 114/115: 207–212, doi:10.1016/0024-3795(89)90461-8.
12. ^ Truemper, K. (1982), "On the efficiency of representability tests for matroids", European Journal of Combinatorics, 3 (3): 275–291, MR 679212, doi:10.1016/s0195-6698(82)80039-5.