Regular singular point
This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
In mathematics, in the theory of ordinary differential equations in the complex plane , the points of are classified into ordinary points, at which the equation's coefficients are analytic functions, and singular points, at which some coefficient has a singularity. Then amongst singular points, an important distinction is made between a regular singular point, where the growth of solutions is bounded (in any small sector) by an algebraic function, and an irregular singular point, where the full solution set requires functions with higher growth rates. This distinction occurs, for example, between the hypergeometric equation, with three regular singular points, and the Bessel equation which is in a sense a limiting case, but where the analytic properties are substantially different.
More precisely, consider an ordinary linear differential equation of n-th order
with pi (z) meromorphic functions. One can assume that
If this is not the case the equation above has to be divided by pn(x). This may introduce singular points to consider.
The equation should be studied on the Riemann sphere to include the point at infinity as a possible singular point. A Möbius transformation may be applied to move ∞ into the finite part of the complex plane if required, see example on Bessel differential equation below.
Then the Frobenius method based on the indicial equation may be applied to find possible solutions that are power series times complex powers (z − a)r near any given a in the complex plane where r need not be an integer; this function may exist, therefore, only thanks to a branch cut extending out from a, or on a Riemann surface of some punctured disc around a. This presents no difficulty for a an ordinary point (Lazarus Fuchs 1866). When a is a regular singular point, which by definition means that
Otherwise the point a is an irregular singularity. In that case the monodromy group relating solutions by analytic continuation has less to say in general, and the solutions are harder to study, except in terms of their asymptotic expansions.
The regularity condition is a kind of Newton polygon condition, in the sense that the allowed poles are in a region, when plotted against i, bounded by a line at 45° to the axes.
An ordinary differential equation whose only singular points, including the point at infinity, are regular singular points is called a Fuchsian ordinary differential equation.
Examples for second order differential equations
In this case the equation above is reduced to:
One distinguishes the following cases:
- Point a is an ordinary point when functions p1(x) and p0(x) are analytic at x = a.
- Point a is a regular singular point if p1(x) has a pole up to order 1 at x = a and p0 has a pole of order up to 2 at x = a.
- Otherwise point a is an irregular singular point.
We can check whether there is an irregular singular point at infinity by using the substitution and the relations:
We can thus transform the equation to an equation in w, and check what happens at w=0. If and are quotients of polynomials, then there will be an irregular singular point at infinite x unless the polynomial in the denominator of is of degree at least one more than the degree of its numerator and the denominator of is of degree at least two more than the degree of its numerator.
Listed below are several examples from ordinary differential equations from mathematical physics that have singular points and known solutions.
Bessel differential equation
Dividing this equation by x2 gives:
In this case p1(x) = 1/x has a pole of first order at x = 0. When α ≠ 0 p0(x) = (1 − α2/x2) has a pole of second order at x = 0. Thus this equation has a regular singularity at 0.
To see what happens when x → ∞ one has to use a Möbius transformation, for example . After performing the algebra:
Now at ,
has a pole of first order, but
has a pole of fourth order. Thus, this equation has an irregular singularity at corresponding to x at ∞.
Legendre differential equation
Opening the square bracket gives:
And dividing by (1 − x2):
This differential equation has regular singular points at ±1 and ∞.
Hermite differential equation
One encounters this ordinary second order differential equation in solving the one-dimensional time independent Schrödinger equation
for a harmonic oscillator. In this case the potential energy V(x) is:
This leads to the following ordinary second order differential equation:
This differential equation has an irregular singularity at ∞. Its solutions are Hermite polynomials.
The equation may be defined as
Dividing both sides by z(1 − z) gives:
This differential equation has regular singular points at 0, 1 and ∞. A solution is the hypergeometric function.
- Coddington, Earl A.; Levinson, Norman (1955). Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- E. T. Copson, An Introduction to the Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable (1935)
- Fedoryuk, M.V. (2001) , "Fuchsian equation", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- A. R. Forsyth Theory of Differential Equations Vol. IV: Ordinary Linear Equations (Cambridge University Press, 1906)
- Édouard Goursat, A Course in Mathematical Analysis, Volume II, Part II: Differential Equations pp. 128−ff. (Ginn & co., Boston, 1917)
- Il'yashenko, Yu.S. (2001) , "r/r080870", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- E. L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations, Dover Publications (1944)
- T. M. MacRobert Functions of a Complex Variable p. 243 (MacMillan, London, 1917)
- Teschl, Gerald (2012). Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-8328-0.
- E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson A course of modern analysis pp. 188−ff. (Cambridge University Press, 1915)