Rendon Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Universal North Building (foreground) in Washington, D.C. and Rendon Group headquarters.

The Rendon Group is a public relations firm headed by John Rendon.


John Rendon[edit]

John Rendon began his career in Democratic Party politics with George McGovern’s 1972 presidential campaign. He later served as the Executive Director and Political Director of the Democratic National Committee; managed President Carter’s 1980 Democratic convention in New York; and subsequently worked as Director of Scheduling and Advance for President Carter's reelection campaign.[1] In 1985, Rendon began working for clients internationally.[1] The company was founded in 1981 and offers consulting and training in Strategic Communications, Crisis Communications, Public Affairs, Political Consulting, Media Monitoring and Analysis, Media Training, Media Relations, Opinion Polling, Social Media, and New Business Risk Analysis.[2] According to the Rendon Group website, the company has worked in over 98 countries to date.[2]


A number of publications have reported on The Rendon Group’s work with the CIA in the 1990s. After allegation of inflated staff salaries, the CIA conducted an audit in 1995. ABC reported that the company spent $23 million in the first year of work. The CIA has not commented as to whether the claims were accurate.[3][4]


The Office of Strategic Influence, or OSI, was a department created by the United States Department of Defense on October 30, 2001.[5] According to a DOD IG Report, The Rendon Group never had any connection to OSI aside from a 60-day deployment.[6] In February 2002, OSI provided a government contracting technical representative to assist in managing a work order given to The Rendon Group that was funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence for the Joint Information Operation Task Force. This Task Order funded a 60-day deployment of two media advisors to Indonesia to support the embassy’s public diplomacy and opinion research. Later, DOD publicly disbanded the OSI following a backlash when Pentagon officials said the new office would engage in "black" disinformation campaigns, of which The Rendon Group was not a part.[7][8]


In December, 2005, the Chicago Tribune reported that the Rendon Group received $1.4 million in 2004 to help the Afghan government with media relations.[9] According to the paper, President Karzai and Zalmay Khalilzad, then the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, were unhappy with the work.[9] The article quoted Jeff Raleigh, who helped oversee Rendon in Kabul for the U.S. Embassy and later left the U.S. Embassy in September, as saying the contract was "a rip-off of the U.S. taxpayer".[9] Later Jeff Raleigh's Afghan supervisor said Jeff wanted full control of The Rendon Group and was out of his bound. Furthermore, the same official, Ambassador Daod, in a signed letter said that The Rendon Group did a great job and really helped his office. Former Pentagon spokesman Richard McGraw said, "I think they did an excellent job in a tough circumstance."[9] The company continued its working relationship with the Pentagon, who funded an additional $3.9 million project to create a media team for anti-narcotics programs.[9] Advocates say Rendon helps fight propaganda from Islamic fundamentalists and strategize messaging for their clients.[citation needed] Critics say the Pentagon's use of media firms such as Rendon blurs the line between public relations and propaganda.[citation needed]

In late August 2009 Stars and Stripes reported that the Rendon Group was employed by US Forces Afghanistan to provide “news analysis and media assessment”, including profiling journalists writing on the war.[5] Stars and Stripes alleged that one of their reporters had been denied embedding access for refusing to highlight positive coverage. According to Air Force Capt. Elizabeth Mathias, a public affairs officer with U.S. Forces Afghanistan in Kabul, the reports were designed so that, “We know with whom we’re working.” She said that [DOD] had not “denied access to anyone because of what may or may not come out of their biography.” However DOD has moved from a “positive”, “neutral”, “negative” scale to one of accuracy. The work was intended to analyze how effectively the military is communicating its message and familiarize US Forces with the journalists covering the war.[10] [10]

Further reading[edit]


  1. ^ a b
  2. ^ a b
  3. ^ Franklin Foer. "Flacks Americana". New Republic. Archived from the original on 2014-08-13. Retrieved 4 October 2014. 
  4. ^ Mar 11, 2002 (2002-03-11). "The Debate Within". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2014-10-04. 
  5. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-04-15. Retrieved 2012-05-15. 
  6. ^
  7. ^ Dao, James; Schmitt, Eric (February 19, 2002). "A NATION CHALLENGED: HEARTS AND MINDS; PENTAGON READIES EFFORTS TO SWAY SENTIMENT ABROAD". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 13, 2011. Retrieved May 22, 2010. 
  8. ^ Dao, James. "New Agency Will Not Lie, Top Pentagon Officials Say". The New York Times. 
  9. ^ a b c d e
  10. ^ a b Graff, Peter (2009-08-31). "U.S. military ends journalist profiling contract". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2009-09-01. 
  11. ^ The Rendon Group (2005-11-18). "Letter to Editor Of RollingStone Magazine". Archived from the original on 2008-08-20. Retrieved 4 October 2014. 

External links[edit]