Rex v. Scofield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rex v. Scofield (1784)
CourtNot specified
Decided1784
DefendantScofield
Plaintiff(s)Not specified
Citation(s)Cald. 397
Case history
Subsequent action(s)The case involved Scofield placing a lit candle into flammable material in a house with the intent to burn it down, but the larger fire never happened. Lord Mansfield held that the incomplete but intended act of arson constituted a crime, emphasizing that "The intent may make an act, innocent in itself, criminal..."
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingLord Mansfield
Case opinions
The case introduced the concept of attempt in common law, focusing on the intent of the actor rather than the completion of the criminal act.

Rex v. Scofield, Cald. 397 (1784), is a British criminal law case that made attempt part of the common law, emphasizing the intent of an actor over the incomplete criminal act.[1] Scofield lit a candle and placed it into flammable material in a house with the intent to burn it down, but the larger fire never happened.[1]: 669  Finding crime in the incomplete but intended act of arson, Lord Mansfield held that "completion of an act, criminal in itself, [was not] necessary to constitute criminality", and "The intent may make an act, innocent in itself, criminal..."[1]: 669 

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]