Rhinosporidium seeberi is a eukaryotic pathogen responsible for rhinosporidiosis, a disease which affects humans, horses, dogs, and to a lesser extent cattle, cats, foxes, and birds. It is most commonly found in tropical areas, especially India and Sri Lanka.
The pathogen was first identified in 1892, and was comprehensively described in 1900 by Seeber.
There are many aspects of the disease and of the pathogen Rhinosporidium seeberi which remain problematic and enigmatic. These include, the pathogen’s natural habitat, some aspects of its ‘life cycle’, its immunology, some aspects of the epidemiology of the disease in humans and in animals, the reasons for the delay at in vitro culture and establishment of disease in experimental animals and hence paucity of information on its sensitivity to drugs, and the immunology of the pathogen. Thankamani isolated an organism believed to be Rhinosporidium seeberi and gave the name "UMH.48." It was originally isolated from the biopsies and nasal swabs of Rhinosporidiosis patients. The various developmental stages of UMH.48 showed a strong resemblance with the structures seen in hisopathological sections of Rhinosporidiosis in tissue samples. The spores of UMH.48 were found to be viable even after a decade of preservation in the refrigerator without any subculture, resembling the features of Synchytridium endobioticum, a lower aquatic fungus that causes black wart disease in potatoes. However carefully performed molecular studies would show the definitive identity of the organism.
Arseculeratne, Sarath N; Atapattu, Dhammika N. (2011). Rhinosporidiosis in Humans and Animals & Rhinosporidium seeberi. Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya. ISBN 9555891575. discusses recent research developments and clinical associations of this enigmatic disease.
Incompletely resolved aspects of the disease, such as its epidemiology and pathogenesis, are expected to be understood in detail soon.
For most of the 20th century, the classification of R. seeberi was unclear (being considered either a fungus or a protist), but it was shown to be part of a group called the Mesomycetozoea (or "DRIP clade"), which includes a number of well-known fish pathogens such as Dermocystidium and the Rosette Agent. The Mesomycetozoea is neither part of the fungi nor of animals, but diverged from them close to the time when they diverged from each other. On the contrary, recent research by 18S rRNA gene sequencing of UMH.48 and fungal extracts of biopsy from new cases of nasal rhinosporidiosis showed 100% identity. Thus UMH.48 has been tentatively identified as a lower aquatic fungus close to Colletotrichum truncatum, Glomerulla sps and Synchytrium minutum. Based on the absence of a perfect sexual phase and asexual spores, very rare microscopic morphology, life cycle and remarkable resemblance with members of lower aquatic fungi, UMH.48 is identified as a Fungus (unknown) and not an Ascomycete or Protozoan or Mesomycetozoan
Rhinosporidium is generally classified as having a single species, although there is some evidence that different host species may be infected by different strains.
Infection in humans with this organism has been reported from ~70 countries, with the majority of cases (95%) reported from India and Sri Lanka: per capita, Sri Lanka has the highest incidence in the world. The disease is also found in other parts of the world.
An all-India survey conducted in 1957 found that this disease was absent from the states of Jummu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and the North Eastern states of India. In Tamil Nadu, 4 endemic areas were identified in the survey—(Madurai, Ramnad, Rajapalayam and Sivaganga). The common denominator found in these areas was the practice of bathing in common ponds.
Transmission and dissemination
- Demellow's theory of infection
- Karunarathnae's autoinoculation theory
- Haematogenous spread – to distant sites
- Lymphatic spread – causing lymphadenitis (rare)
Demellow postulated that while bathing in common ponds, the nasal mucosa came into contact with infectious material. Karunarathnae proposed that the satellite lesions in skin and conjunctival mucosa arose as a result of autoinoculation.
It is presumed that because of its relationship to fish pathogens, Rhinosporidium evolved from aquatic pathogens similar to the other Mesomycetozoea and evolved to infect mammal and bird hosts. It is not known if this happened once or more than once.
Karunarathnae also proposed that Rhinosporidium existed in a dimorphic state—a saprotroph in soil and water and a yeast form inside living tissues. Recent studies done using Fluorescent in-situ-hybridization techniques provide evidence that its natural habitat is reservoir water, and, perhaps, soil contaminated with this water.
One report indicates that patients with rhinosporidiosis possess anti-R. seeberi IgG to an inner wall antigen expressed only during the mature sporangial stage. This finding suggests that the mapping of antigenic proteins may lead to important antigens with the potential as vaccine candidates.
Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in human patients and in experimental mice have been defined; several mechanisms of immune evasion by R. seeberi have been identified.
A novel method for the determination of the viability of rhinosporidial endospores by MTT-reduction led to the study of the sensitivity of endospores to biocides and anti-microbial drugs (paper in preparation for submission).
This organism infects the mucosa of the nasal cavity producing a mass like lesion. This mass appears to be polypoidal in nature with a granular surface speckled with whitish spores. The rhinosporidial mass has been classically described as a strawberry like mulberry mass. This mass may extend from the nasal cavity into the nasopharynx and present itself in the oral cavity. These lesions commonly cause bleeding from the nasal cavity.
Rhinosporidium seeberi can also affect the lacrimal gland and also rarely the skin and genitalia.
Common sites affected:
- Nose – 78%
- Nasopharynx – 68%
- Tonsil – 3%
- Eye – 1%
- Skin – very rare
Treatment is generally by surgical removal of the infected tissues.
- Alexis Berrocal & Alfonso López (March 2007), "Nasal rhinosporidiosis in a mule", Can Vet J., 48 (3): 305–6, PMC , PMID 17436910
- Morelli, L; Polce, M; Piscioli, F; Del, Nonno, F; Covello, R; Brenna, A; Cione, A; Licci, S (Aug 2006). "Human nasal rhinosporidiosis: an Italian case report." (Free full text). Diagnostic pathology. 1 (1): 25. PMC . PMID 16945122. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-1-25.
- V, Thankamani (June 2005). "Rhinosporidium Seeberi Grown in Culture" (PDF). SAJOSPS: 118–123.
- V, Thankamani; Lipin Dev M S (2011). "Demonstration of viability & developmental stages of 10 year old refrigerated culture of Rhinosporidium seeberi (?) UMH.48 first ever isolated from nasal Rhinosporidiosis- Yet another milestone, a tribute to Guillermo Seeber". IJPI’s Journal of Biotechnology and Biotherapeutics. 1 (3): 11–21.
- Raquel, Vilela; Leonel Mendoza (October 2012). "The taxonomy and phylogenetics of the human and animal pathogen Rhinosporidium seeberi: A critical review". Revista Iberoamericana de Micología. 29 (4): 185–199 . PMID 22504725. doi:10.1016/j.riam.2012.03.012.
- Arseculeratne SN (April 2005), "Rhinosporidiosis: what is the cause?", Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis., 18 (2): 113–8, PMID 15735413, doi:10.1097/01.qco.0000160898.82115.e8.
- Arseculeratne SN (2002), "Recent advances in rhinosporidiosis and rhinosporidium seeberi", Indian J Med Microbiol, 20 (3): 119–31, PMID 17657050.
- Roger A. Herr, Libero Ajello, John W. Taylor, Sarath N. Arseculeratne, and Leonel Mendoza1 (September 1999), "Phylogenetic Analysis of Rhinosporidium seeberi’s 18S Small-Subunit Ribosomal DNA Groups This Pathogen among Members of the Protoctistan Mesomycetozoa Clade", J Clin Microbiol, 37 (9): 2750–2754, PMC , PMID 10449446
- V, Thankamani; Lipin Dev M S (2012). "Rhinosporidium seeberi proven as a fungus for the first time after a century since its discovery". Research in Biotechnology. 3 (1): 41–46.
- Silva, V; Pereira, Cn; Ajello, L; Mendoza, L (Apr 2005). "Molecular evidence for multiple host-specific strains in the genus Rhinosporidium.". Journal of clinical microbiology. 43 (4): 1865–8. PMC . PMID 15815010. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1865-1868.2005.
- Carl Vernon Weller & Aaron D. Riker (November 1930). "Rhinosporidium Seeberi: Pathological Histology and Report of the Third Case from the United States". Am J Pathol. 6 (6): 721–732. PMC . PMID 19969938.
- B. Hoff & D. A. Hall (June 1986), "Rhinosporidiosis in a Dog", Can Vet J., 27 (6): 231–232, PMC , PMID 17422665
- Kumara Kaluarachchi; Saranga Sumathipala; Navaratne Eriyagama; Dhammika Atapattu; Sarath Arseculeratne (2008). "The Identification of the Natural Habitat of Rhinosporidium seeberi with R. seeberi—Specific in situ Hybridization Probes" (PDF). J Infect Dis Antimicrob Agents. Infectious Disease Association of Thailand. 25 (1): 25–32.
- Arseculeratne SN, Atapattu DN, Balasooriya P, Fernando R (April 2006), "The effects of biocides (antiseptics and disinfectants) on the endospores of Rhinosporidium seeberi", Indian J Med Microbiol, 24 (2): 85–91, PMID 16687856, doi:10.4103/0255-0857.25176.