Road collision types

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Road traffic collisions generally fall into one of four common types:

A Mercury Tracer that was damaged by colliding with a white-tailed deer in Wisconsin.

Other types of collision may occur. Rollovers are not very common, but lead to greater rates of severe injury and death. Some of these are secondary events that occur after a collision with a run-off-road crash or a collision with another vehicle.

If several vehicles are involved, the term 'serial crash' may be used. If many vehicles are involved, the term 'major incident' may be used rather than 'pile up'.

Head-on collisions[edit]

Head-on collisions often have poor outcomes because of the speed involved when the collision takes place. The typical cause of head-on collisions is when one vehicle inadvertently strays into the path of an oncoming vehicle. However, the root cause sometimes lies in a steering overcorrection after veering to the side of the road as opposed to the centre.[1]

Risk of head-on collisions[edit]

The likelihood of head-on collision is at its greatest on roads with narrow lanes, sharp curves, no separation of lanes of opposing traffic and high volumes of traffic. Crash severity, measured as risk of death and injury, and repair costs to vehicles, increases as speed increases.

Therefore the roads with the greatest risk of head-on collision are busy single-carriageway roads outside urban areas where speeds are highest.[2]

Contrast this with motorways, which rarely have a high risk of head-on collision in spite of the high speeds involved,[3] because of the median separation treatments such as cable barriers, concrete step barriers, Jersey barriers, metal crash barriers, and wide medians.

Countermeasures[edit]

The greatest risk reduction in terms of head-on collision comes through the separation of oncoming traffic, also known as median separation or median treatment, which can reduce road collisions in the order of 70%.[4] Indeed both Ireland and Sweden have undertaken large programmes of safety fencing on 2+1 roads.

Median barriers can be divided into three basic categories: rigid barrier systems, semi-rigid barrier systems, and flexible barrier systems. Rigid barrier systems are made up of concrete and are the most common barrier type in use today[5] (e.g. Jersey barrier or concrete step barrier). They are the most costly to install, but have relatively low life-cycle costs, making them economically viable over time. The second barrier type, semi-rigid, is commonly known as guardrail or guiderail barriers. The initial installation of this type can reach as much as $100,000 per mile.[6] These more forgiving barriers are meant to absorb the impact of an accident, and as a result, increase the cost of their life-cycle with each crash and each repair. The third median barrier type is the flexible barrier systems (e.g. cable barriers). Cable barriers are the most forgiving and the least expensive to install, but have high life-cycle costs due to repair needs after crashes. On the other hand, they have been shown to have calculated cost benefits calculating to as much as $420,000 per mile annually.[7] Much cheaper collision reduction methods are to improve road markings, to reduce speeds and to separate traffic with wide central hatching.[1]

Sealing of safety zones along the side of the road (also known as a hard-shoulder) can also reduce the risk of head-on collisions caused by steering over-correction.[8]

Where a hard shoulder cannot be provided, a "safety edge" can reduce the chances of steering overcorrection. An attachment is added to the paving machine to provide a beveled edge at 30 to 35-degree angle to horizontal, rather than the usual near-vertical edge. This works by reducing the steering angle needed for the tire to climb up the pavement edge. For a vertical edge, the steering angle needed to mount the pavement edge is sharp enough to cause loss of control once the vehicle is back on top of the pavement. If the driver cannot correct this in time, the vehicle may veer into oncoming traffic, or off the opposite side of the road.[9]

Collisions involving pedestrians[edit]

Pedestrian fatalities are much more common in accident situations in the European Union than in the USA. In the European Union countries, more than 200,000 pedestrians and cyclists are injured annually.[10]

Most of pedestrians are killed by a frontal impact. In such a situation, a pedestrian is struck by a car front; for instance the bumper touch either the leg or knee-joint area; then, the lower part of the body is accelerated forwards, while the upper part of the body rotates and accelerated to the car; this will likely cause dammage to pelvis and thorax. Then th head hit the windscreen with the velocity of the striking car. Finally, the victim falls to the ground[11].

Collisions involving pedestrians in the USA[edit]

The pedestrian traffic fatalities ratio is 11% of the traffic deaths in the U.S.A. according to a March 2004 study by the NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis.[10] In the USA, 14.5% of all deaths on the roads are pedestrians, while this ratio varies from 0.7% in North-Dakota to 45% in the District of Columbia, in 2013; this same year, 0.14 pedestrian per million inhabitant were killed in North-Dakota against 2.70 in Delaware[12]

In cities of over 500,000 inhabitants, the score varied from 6.10 pedestrian deaths per million inhabitants for Detroit (Michigan), to a safer score of 0.85 for Columbus, Ohio, in 2013.[12]

Some well known fatal collision conditions in the United States include vehicle speed, urban zone, intersection absence and night, according to the NHTSA.[13] According to the GHSA, in the USA, 74% of pedestrian deaths occur at night time, and 72% of the deaths involve pedestrians not crossing at provided road crossing areas.[14]

According to a law professor at the University of South Carolina, pedestrians and bicyclists often get blamed in these cases because the pedestrians are the dead ones, and they are not there to defend themselves.[15] At the same time he says that what would lessen those fatalities would be not speeding, not drinking, not texting, and not being distracted.

In the USA, in 2013, pedestrian fatalities were higher for the 40+ age group.[12]

The U.S. does not tests vehicles for pedestrian safety and the NHTSA dropped efforts to impose pedestrian safety standards on U.S. automakers more than a decade ago.[10]

Pedestrian Fatality Probability per Crash by Posted Speed Limit
Nota: 30 mph ~ 48 km/h ; 40 mph ~ 64 km/h ; 50 mph ~ 80 km/h ;
Source: FARS 1997-2005 (Final), 2006 (ARF) and GES 1997-2006.[16]

Nonetheless, for crosswalk safety, in the USA there is not much clarity regarding the need for a crosswalk to be marked or unmarked due to advantages and disadvantages of both approaches, although each city might have its own rules.[17]

Collisions involving pedestrians in European Union and Japan[edit]

In the European Union, 22% of all killed on the roads are pedestrians, while this ratio varies from 11% in the Netherlands to 39% in Latvia and Romania. UK is close to the EU mean with a 23% score. Of all those European pedestrian fatalities, 69% are killed inside urban areas.[18]

In the European Union, 8% of all killed on the roads are cyclists, while this ratio varies from 2% in Greece to 24% in the Netherlands. UK is close to the EU mean with a 9% score. Of all European cyclist fatalities, 57% are killed inside urban areas.[18]

In Europe, the majority of victims were children and elderly persons involving "low-speed" crashes in urban and residential areas.[10]

In France, in 2014, 499 pedestrians have been killed and 4 323 injured. 47% of pedestrians are killed by night (233 pedestrians). This rate is 32% in urban zones, 73% in rural zone (83 death by night) and 91 % on motorways (40 death by night).[19].

In Japan, the pedestrian fatality rate is 30% of all road related deaths.[10]

Single-vehicle collisions[edit]

A single-vehicle collision is when a single road vehicle has a collision without involving any other vehicle.[20]

They usually have similar root causes as head-on collisions, but no other vehicle happened to be in the path of the vehicle leaving its lane. Severe collisions of this type can happen on motorways, since speeds are extra high, increasing the severity.[21]

Intersection collisions[edit]

Crashes at intersections (road junctions) are a very common type of road collision types. Collisions may involve head-on impact when one vehicle crosses an opposing lane of traffic to turn at an intersection, or side impacts when one vehicle crosses the path of an adjoining vehicle at an intersection.

Risk of intersection collisions[edit]

The risk of intersection collisions differs on rural and urban roads, with around 50% of urban crashes and 30% of rural crashes occurring at junctions.[22] In urban areas the likelihood of an intersection collision occurring is high as they typically have a higher density of junctions. On rural roads while the likelihood of a collision may be lower (because of fewer intersections), but the outcome of the collision is often significantly worse because of the increased speeds involved.[23]

Because intersection collisions often result in side-impacts they are therefore often fatal because people are seated close to the part of the car that provides little protection.[2]

Countermeasures[edit]

Although expensive to implement, roundabouts are an effective way of reducing the speed of traffic at intersections and dramatically reducing the likelihood of high speed right-angle collisions.[24] Clear road markings and signing are low cost methods of improving safety at intersections.[25]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Head on Crashes". International Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  2. ^ a b "Accidents on European Roads". European Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  3. ^ "Great Britain Risk Rate Map". Road Safety Foundation. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  4. ^ "Practical Ways to Save Lives". European Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  5. ^ "U.S. Department of Transportation" "Median Barriers"
  6. ^ "Predicting the Cost-Effectiveness of Highway Median Barriers" Minnesota Department of Transportation
  7. ^ "U.S. Department of Transportation""Cable Median Barriers"
  8. ^ "Shoulder Sealing". International Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  9. ^ http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/pavement/safedge/fhwasa09023/
  10. ^ a b c d e http://www.safetyresearch.net/blog/articles/european-pedestrian-crash-standards-will-make-global-changes-car-design-inevitable
  11. ^ http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/79753/9789241505352_eng.pdf
  12. ^ a b c https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812124
  13. ^ https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/pedestrian_safety/index.html
  14. ^ https://www.npr.org/2017/03/30/522085503/2016-saw-a-record-increase-in-pedestrian-deaths
  15. ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/after-driverless-uber-hits-and-kills-pedestrian-probe-looks-for-broader-safety-insights/2018/03/20/2fe3af6e-2c5e-11e8-b0b0-f706877db618_story.html
  16. ^ https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/810968
  17. ^ https://www.nevadadot.com/home/showdocument?id=9057
  18. ^ a b https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/road_safety/pdf/vademecum_2015.pdf
  19. ^ http://www.lagazettedescommunes.com/501821/que-faire-pour-ameliorer-la-securite-des-pietons-circulant-de-nuit-hors-agglomeration
  20. ^ "Vehicle Collisions in Australia". NSWCL. 9 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014. 
  21. ^ "Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2011" (PDF). European Road Safety Observatory. Retrieved 10 July 2014. 
  22. ^ "A Guide for Addressing Unsignalized Intersection Collisions" (PDF). National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  23. ^ "Intersection Accidents". International Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  24. ^ "Intersection - Roundabouts". International Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26. 
  25. ^ "Intersection - Delineation". International Road Assessment Programme. Retrieved 2008-09-26.