Romans 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Romans 13
Codex Guelferbytanus 64 Weissenburgensis, page 00507.JPG
Folio 256 verso of Codex Guelferbytanus 64 Weissenburgensis, page 507, showing palimpsest with Romans 12:17–13:1 of Codex Carolinus at the lower layer; and Isidore of Seville's writings at the upper layer in reverse.
BookEpistle to the Romans
CategoryPauline epistles
Christian Bible partNew Testament
Order in the Christian part6

Romans 13 is the thirteenth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It is authored by Paul the Apostle, while he was in Corinth in the mid 50s CE,[1] with the help of an amanuensis (secretary), Tertius, who adds his own greeting in Romans 16:22.[2] Paul wrote to the Roman Christians because he was "eager to preach the gospel"[3] to them, so as to remind them on "certain subjects".[4] Although he had been hindered from coming to them many times, he longed to encourage the Roman church by reminding them of the gospel, because of his calling to the Gentiles as well as to the Jews.[5]

In this chapter, Paul reminds his readers that they should honour and obey the secular authorities. Reformer Martin Luther suggested that "he includes this, not because it makes people virtuous in the sight of God, but because it does insure that the virtuous have outward peace and protection and that the wicked cannot do evil without fear and in undisturbed peace".[6]

Text[edit]

Manuscripts[edit]

Some ancient manuscripts containing this chapter are:

This chapter is divided into 14 verses.

Context[edit]

Love Your Neighbour (verse 9)[edit]

The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery; You shall not murder; You shall not steal; You shall not covet”; and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

— Romans 13:9 (New Revised Standard Version)

This verse alludes to Exodus 20:13–15; Deuteronomy 5:17–19, 21; and Leviticus 19:18. The King James Bible includes "You shall not bear false witness" in the verse because of its presence in the Textus Receptus. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges suggests that it is "perhaps to be omitted, on documentary evidence".[7]

The day is at hand (verses 11–14)[edit]

Besides this, you know what time it is, how it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers; 12 the night is far gone, the day is near. Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light; 13 let us live honorably as in the day, not in reveling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarreling and jealousy. 14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

— Romans 13:9 (New Revised Standard Version)

Non-conformist theologian Matthew Henry calls these verses "a Christian's directory for his day's work".[8] According to the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges, "Paul enforces all the preceding precepts (of chapters 12 and 13) by the solemn assertion of the approach of the eternal Day of Resurrection and Glory",[9] "for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed" (King James Version).[10] Many translations, such as the New King James Version and Revised Standard Version, refer to "when we first believed".

Political meaning and use[edit]

Many interpreters have claimed that Romans 13 implies that Christians are to obey all public officials under all circumstances. Some interpreters and biblical scholars dispute this view, however. Thomas Aquinas interprets Paul's derivation of authority from God as conditional on the circumstances in which authority is obtained and the manner in which it is used:

The order of authority derives from God, as the Apostle says [in Romans 13:1-7]. For this reason, the duty of obedience is, for the Christian, a consequence of this derivation of authority from God, and ceases when that ceases. But, as we have already said, authority may fail to derive from God for two reasons: either because of the way in which authority has been obtained, or in consequence of the use which is made of it.[11]

According to biblical scholars John Barton and John Muddiman:

Few if any passages in the Pauline corpus have been more subject to abuse than w. 1–7. Paul does not indicate that one is required to obey public officials under all circumstances, nor does he say that every exercise of civil authority is sanctioned by God. No particular government is authorized; no universal autarchy is legitimated. Instead, Paul reiterates the common Jewish view that human governance operates under God's superintendency (Jn 19:11; Dan 2:21; Prov 8:15—16; Isa 45:1—3; Wis 6:3), that it is part of the divine order and so is meant for human good (i Pet 2:13–14; Ep. Arist. 291–2).[12]

Romans 13 is from time to time employed in civil discourse and by politicians and philiosophers in support of or against political issues. Two conflicting arguments are made: that the passage mandates obedience to civil law; and that there are limits to authority beyond which obedience is not required. John Calvin, in Institutes of the Christian Religion[13] took the latter position: "that we might not yield a slavish obedience to the depraved wishes of men". Martin Luther employed Romans 13 in Against the Robbing and Murdering Hordes of Peasants[14] to advocate that it would be sinful for a prince or lord not to use force, including violent force, to fulfil the duties of their office.[15]

Theologian Paul Tillich is critical of an interpretation that would cast Romans 13:1-7 in opposition to revolutionary movements:

One of the many politico-theological abuses of biblical statements is the understanding of Paul’s words [Romans 13:1-7] as justifying the anti-revolutionary bias of some churches, particularly the Lutheran. But neither these words nor any other New Testament statement deals with the methods of gaining political power. In Romans, Paul is addressing eschatological enthusiasts, not a revolutionary political movement.[16]

Romans 13 was used during the period of the American Revolution, by loyalists who preached obedience to the Crown; and by revolutionaries who argued for elimination of the unjust authority of the King. Later in US history, Romans 13 was employed by anti-abolitionists to justify and legitimise the keeping of slaves; notably around the time of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 which precipitated debate as to whether the law should be obeyed or resisted.[15] It was also used by the Dutch Reformed Church to justify apartheid rule in South Africa.[17][18]

In June 2018, Romans 13 was used by Jeff Sessions to justify the Trump administration family separation policy, saying:[15][19][20]

I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13 to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order. Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves and protect the weak and lawful.[21]

Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, echoed Sessions' use of Romans 13, stating:

I’m not aware of the attorney general’s comments or what he would be referencing, [but] I can say that it is very biblical to enforce the law. That is repeated throughout the Bible.[21]

Commenting on the fight to define Romans 13, Lincoln Mullen argues that "what the attorney general actually has on his side is the thread of American history that justifies oppression and domination in the name of law and order."[15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Hill 2007, p. 1084.
  2. ^ Hill 2007, p. 1077.
  3. ^ Romans 1:15
  4. ^ Romans 15:15
  5. ^ Romans 1:13
  6. ^ Luther, M., Preface to the Letter of St. Paul to the Romans, translated by Andrew Thornton, OSB
  7. ^ Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges on Romans 13, accessed 30 September 2016
  8. ^ Matthew Henry's Commentary on Romans 13, accessed 1 October 2016
  9. ^ Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges on Romans 13, accessed 30 September 2016
  10. ^ Romans 13:11
  11. ^ Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard
  12. ^ Barton, John, and John Muddiman, eds. The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2007, 1104.
  13. ^ Calvin, John (1536). "20". Institutes of the Christian Religion.
  14. ^ Luther, Martin (1525). Against the Robbing and Murdering Hordes of Peasants.
  15. ^ a b c d Mullen, Lincoln. "The Fight to Define Romans 13". The Atlantic. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  16. ^ Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, Volume 3 (1963), p. 389
  17. ^ W. Munro (1990-11-01). "Romans 13:1–7 Apartheid's Last Biblical Refuge". Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture. 20 (4): 161–168. doi:10.1177/014610799002000405.
  18. ^ Joel A. Nichols & James W McCarty III (2014). "When the State is Evil: Biblical Civil (Dis)Obedience in South Africa". St John's Law Review.
  19. ^ Zauzmer, Julie; McMillan, Keith (15 June 2018). "Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families". The Washington Post. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  20. ^ Swenson, Kyle (15 June 2018). "Sessions says the Bible justifies separating immigrant families. The verses he cited are infamous". The Washington Post. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  21. ^ a b Jacobs, Ben (15 June 2018). "Sanders uses Bible to defend Trump's separation of children from families at border". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 June 2018.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]