Royal Commission on the Electoral System
|This article is part of a series on the|
politics and government of
|New Zealand portal|
The Royal Commission on the Electoral System was formed in New Zealand in 1985, and reported in 1986. The decision to form the Royal Commission was taken by the Fourth Labour government, after the Labour party had received more votes, yet won fewer seats than the National Party in both the 1978 and 1981 elections. It was also a reaction to the power displayed by Prime Minister Robert Muldoon, whose action of illegally abolishing the Superannuation scheme in 1975 without any repercussions highlighted the need to distribute power in a more democratic way. The Royal Commission's report Towards a Better Democracy was instrumental in effecting New Zealand to change its electoral system from first-past-the-post to mixed member proportional.
The Royal Commission consisted of
- John Wallace (Chairman)
- John Darwin
- Kenneth Keith
- Richard Mulgan
- Whetumarama Wereta (Māori representative)
The Royal Commission established ten criteria for choosing an electoral system. The criteria were not weighed equally by the commission, and a balance was sought.
1. Fairness between political parties
- The number of seats in the House should roughly reflect the number of votes received
2. Effective representation of minority and special interest groups
- The membership of Parliament should reflect the divisions of society
3. Effective Māori representation
- Māori should be fairly and effectively represented in House
- Treaty of Waitangi & aboriginal rights should be respected
4. Political Integration
- All groups should respect views taken by others in society
5. Effective representation of constituents
- An electoral system should encourage close links and accountability to the community
6. Effective voter participation
- The voting system should be understandable
- Power should be hands of voters to make/unmake governments
7. Effective government
- Governments should be able to act decisively and fulfil their responsibilities to their voters
8. Effective Parliament
- Parliament should be independent from government control
- Parliament should be able to authorise spending and taxation as well as legislate
9. Effective parties
- Political parties should be formulating policy and providing representation
- Fair and reasonable to the community
- The Commission unanimously recommended the adoption of mixed member proportional, with a threshold of 4% and that a referendum be held before or at the 1987 election.
- They also recommended that the Māori seats be abolished, with Māori parties instead receiving representation if they did not pass the threshold.
- That the number of MPs raise to 120 (although they considered 140 would be ideal, they realised that it would receive too much public backlash).
- The term of Parliament be raised to four years.
- The Commission recommended that citizens initiated referendums not be implemented. However, they were in 1993.
In 1992 and 1993, two referendums were held, resulting in the adoption of MMP. The threshold was changed to 5% and the Māori seats were retained instead of allowing Māori parties to avoid the threshold. The number of MPs was increased to 120.
A referendum was held on increasing the term of Parliament to four years in 1990. It failed to pass; Parliament continues operating under a three-year term.
- Electoral reform in New Zealand
- Electoral system of New Zealand
- Royal Commission on the Electoral System, Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy, Wellington: Government Printers, 1986
- Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (British Columbia)
- Palmer, G. W. R. (1987). Unbridled Power: An Interpretation of New Zealand's Constitution & Government. Oxford University Press.