Rule of 1/1000 common ancestry
|This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from ; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (February 2009)|
The Rule of 1/1000 common ancestry is a criterion used to create meaningful family groupings. It was first adopted by Lawrence Kestenbaum to determine which individuals should be included with specific political families on the Political Graveyard website. The rule can be made applicable to other genealogy projects.
The rule states that only persons sharing 1/1000 common ancestry should be grouped together as an extended family.
For lineal ancestors, this can be approximated by 10th degree consanguinity. The reason this is approximate, and not exact, is that common ancestry is halved every time the degree of consanguinity is increased by one. For example the degree of consanguinity of a parent is one. This means that a parent provides 1/21 or 1/2 of a persons ancestry (the other parent provides the other half). A 7th great-grandparent has a 9th degree consanguinity, and therefore providing 1/29 or 1/512 common ancestry. An 8th great-grandparent provides 1/1024 common ancestry which is as close as one can come to 1/1000, and so this is the cut-off used.
For collateral relatives, 1/1000 common ancestry can be approximated by 10th degree consanguinity for relationships derived through half-siblings and 11th degree consanguinity for relationships derived through full siblings. For example, siblings share 100% common ancestry, as they share 2 common parents (1/2^1 + 1/2^1 = 1). Half siblings share 50% common ancestry.
8th great-aunt/uncles (can also be called 7th great-grand aunt/uncles); 1st cousins 7x removed; 2nd cousins 5x removed; 3rd cousins 3x removed; and 4th cousins once removed are all at the 1/1024 common ancestry levels, and therefore used as the cut-offs.
Complicating factors such as pedigree collapse can increase the percentage of common ancestry to a higher number than it would be otherwise.
- The Political Graveyard Q&A # 11