Rules of Decision Act
The Rules of Decision Act mandates that substantive state law be applied in state cases, unless the United States Constitution, Treaties of the United States, or Congress says otherwise. The federal courts' authority to exercise general federal common law in state cases sitting in diversity jurisdiction was made possible by the Rules of Decision Act. This was later overturned in Erie. In significant part, the rule authorizes congress to make rules that must be followed by the federal courts. This later becomes problematic when a collision between substantive state right laws conflict with federal rules of procedure.
As established in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins there is no such thing as Federal General Common Law, so whenever there is no Federal Statute on point, State Law must be used.
It states that:
The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Its interpretation, especially the meaning of "the laws of the several states," was central to the issue in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins.
At this time, the term "State" includes any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. 28 USC § 1338(a), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1652
|This United States federal legislation article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|