Safety of journalists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Journalist wearing a gas mask

Safety of journalists is the ability for journalists and media professionals to receive, produce and share information without facing physical or moral threats.

Journalists can face violence and intimidation for exercising their fundamental right to freedom of expression. The range of threats they are confronted to include murder, kidnapping, hostage-taking, offline and online harassment, intimidation, enforced disappearances, arbitrary detention and torture. Women journalists also face specific dangers and are especially vulnerable to sexual assault, "whether in the form of a targeted sexual violation, often in reprisal for their work; mob-related sexual violence aimed against journalists covering public events; or the sexual abuse of journalists in detention or captivity. Many of these crimes are not reported as a result of powerful cultural and professional stigmas."[1][2]

Increasingly, journalists, and particularly women journalists, are facing abuse and harassment online, such as hate speech, cyber-bullying, cyber-stalking, doxing, trolling, public shaming and intimidation and threats.[2]

Violence against journalists[edit]

Killings of journalists[edit]

Number of journalists killed by year and region. UNESCO's data, World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development 2018.

From 2012 to 2016, UNESCO’s Director-General condemned the killing of 530 journalists, an average of two deaths per week.[3] During the previous five-year period, 2007 to 2011, UNESCO recorded 316 killings. The year 2012 proved to be the deadliest year on record, with 124 journalists killed. The majority of journalists killed between 2012 and 2016[4] occurred in countries experiencing armed conflict, representing 56 per cent of overall killings.[5][2]

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) nearly 50 per cent of those whose death was confirmed to be related to their work as journalist were murdered, while 36 per cent were caught in the crossfire and 14 per cent killed while on dangerous assignment.[6] According to the NGO, political groups were the most likely source of violence (36 per cent) in these killings, followed by military officials (22 per cent) and unknown sources (20 per cent).[6]

Type of media of journalists killed, 2012–2016, World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development.

As the reliance on freelance journalists by news organizations is increasing, a rising proportion of journalists killed have been freelance. UNESCO's study, World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development Global Report 2017/2018, has found that over the past five years, 113 freelance journalists were killed, representing 21 per cent of the total. Freelance journalists are particularly vulnerable, often working alone on stories, in dangerous environments, and without the same level of assistance and protection as staff-journalists.[7]

In the same period, according to UNESCO data, the number of journalists targeted who work primarily online fluctuated significantly, but accounts for 14 per cent of journalists killed overall. Journalists and crew who work primarily in television experienced the most casualties (166), followed by those mainly working for print (142), radio (118), online (75) and those working across multiple platforms (29).[2]

Terrorism and increasing risks[edit]

Terrorism represents a direct and growing threat for journalists, which has taken the form of kidnappings, executions threats or hacking.[8] At the end of the 1970s, the general policy of welcoming journalists into areas of guerrillas control changed. Organizations such as the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, the Red Brigades in Italy, the Shining Path in Peru and the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) in Algeria targeted journalists, considering them as the auxiliaries of the powers they were combating, and thus as enemies.[9] Between 1993 and 1997, more than 100 journalists and media workers were killed in Algeria. During the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), kidnapping international journalists became a common tactic.[10][11]

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), 40% of the journalists murdered in 2015 were killed by groups claiming adherence to radical Islam. International press correspondents, in particular, are considered potential hostages, or sacrificial lambs, whose execution is dramatized to serve terrorist propaganda. This happened to James Foley, Steven Sotloff (United States) and Kenji Goto (Japan), who were beheaded by Daesh.[12][9]

Trauma and the emotional impact of witnessing terrorism is also an issue for journalists, as they may experience anxiety, insomnia, irritation and physical problems such as fatigue or headaches. It can also lead to post-traumatic stress disorder, which can cause incapacitating feelings of horror, fear and despair. According to the study Eyewitness Media Hub of 2015, 40% of the journalists who were interviewed admitted that viewing video testimonies had had negative effects on their personal life.[13]

The protection of sources and surveillance is one of the major issues in the coverage of terrorism in order to protect witnesses and interviewees against reprisals.[9]

Impunity for crimes against journalists[edit]

There is a continuing trend of impunity for crimes against journalists, with over 90% of cases of killings of journalists unresolved. The Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Edison Lanza considers impunity as a key obstacle to ensuring journalists' safety.[2] Frank La Rue, UNESCO's former Assistant Director-General for Communication and Information considers that its "root cause has to be attributed to lack of political will to pursue investigations, including for fear of reprisals from criminal networks in addition to inadequate legal frameworks, a weak judicial system, lack of resources allocated to law enforcement, negligence, and corruption".[14]

Status of judicial inquiry into killings of journalists, UNESCO's 2018 World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development.

UNESCO has set up a mechanism to monitor the status of judicial enquiries into the killings of journalists. Each year, UNESCO's Director-General sends a request to Member States[15] in which killings of journalists have occurred asking them to inform UNESCO of the status of ongoing investigations on each killing condemned by the Organization. UNESCO records the responses to these requests[4] in a public report submitted every two years to the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) Council by the Director-General.[16] The IPDC's 2016 Report is summarized in the "Time to break the cycle of violence against journalists" publication which highlights key findings, provides analysis of the killings, and of Member States responses.[17] In 2017, UNESCO sent letters to 62 Member States requesting information on the status of unresolved cases that occurred between 2006 and 2016. Based on Member State responses, the percentage of resolved cases has remained low, at less than 10%. Cumulatively, since UNESCO began requesting information on the judicial follow-up to journalists’ killings condemned by the Director-General, the Organization has received information from 63 out of 75 Member States. The information covers 622 cases out of a total of 930 recorded by UNESCO between 2006 and 2016 (67 per cent).[18]

At its 68th session in 2013, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution A/RES/68/163 proclaiming 2 November as the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists. The day acts to promote understanding of the broader issues that accompany impunity and to strengthen international commitment to ensuring a safe and enabling environment for journalists.[19]

The United Nations Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity supports Member States in the implementation of proactive initiatives to address the prevailing culture of impunity, such as judicial capacity building and the strengthening of monitor and prosecution mechanisms.[20][2]

Other attacks on the safe practice of journalism[edit]

According to data compiled by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), the imprisonment of journalists on charges relating to anti-state activities, criminal defamation, blasphemy, retaliation or on no charge at all, has reportedly continued to rise. In 2016, the CPJ reported that 259 journalists were imprisoned worldwide on a range of charges, the highest number since the non-governmental organization began keeping records in 1990.[21]

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)—which tracks the imprisonment of citizen journalists, Netizens and media contributors, along with professional journalists—reported that 348 journalists were detained in 2016 on a range of charges, an increase of six per cent on 2015 figures. 2016 reportedly saw the proportion of women journalists detained more than double, with nearly half of those detained located in the Asia-Pacific region. The Western Europe and North America region has the highest number of journalists imprisoned, holding 34 per cent of imprisoned journalists worldwide with 73 journalists imprisoned in Turkey in 2017.[22]

RSF Secretary-General Christophe Deloire has stated that "a full-blown hostage industry has developed in certain conflict zones", with a 35 per cent increase in 2015 compared to the previous year of the number of media hostages held worldwide.[22][23]

The Media Institute of Southern Africa has documented incidents of intimidation such as the torching of vehicles, physical assault and death threats.[24] In parts of the Arab region, journalists and prominent writers have reportedly suffered death threats, been severely beaten and had travel restrictions imposed upon them.[25][26] In the Asia Pacific region, the Southeast Asian Press Alliance has noted that in some insecure contexts, physical insecurity is reportedly so tenuous that some journalists have chosen to arm themselves.[27]

Threats and actual cases of violence and imprisonment, as well as harassment, are reported to have forced a large number of local journalists into exile each year. Between 1 June 2012 and 31 May 2015, at least 272 journalists reportedly went into exile for work-related persecution worldwide.[28]


One survey conducted by PEN America of over 520 writers found that the majority reported concerns about government surveillance, which led to a reluctance to write, research or speak about certain topics.[29] Almost a quarter of the writers had deliberately avoided certain topics in phone and email conversations, while 16 per cent had avoided writing or speaking about a certain topic and another 11 per cent had seriously considered it.[30] A 2017 survey conducted by the Council of Europe of 940 journalists throughout 47 Member States found that in the face of physical violence or coercion, 15 per cent of journalists abandon covering sensitive, critical stories, while 31 per cent tone down their coverage and 23 per cent opt to withhold information in Europe.[31][2]

Digital safety for journalists[edit]

Types of threats to the digital safety of journalism

Surveillance, data storage capabilities and digital attack technologies are becoming more sophisticated, less expensive and more pervasive, making journalists increasingly vulnerable to digital attacks from both state and Non-state actors.[32]

With the widespread availability of surveillance software and hardware,[33] in a number of states across multiple regions, broadly defined legislative acts have been seen by some as working to silence digital dissent, prosecute whistle blowers and expand arbitrary surveillance across multiple digital platforms.


In late 2016, the International Press Institute launched the OnTheLine database, a project that aims to systematically monitor online harassment of journalists as a response to their reporting. As of July 2017, the project had collected 1,065 instances of online harassment in the two countries (Turkey and Austria) in which the project collected data. In Pakistan, the Digital Rights Foundation has launched the country's first cyber harassment helpline for journalists, which aims to provide legal advice, digital security support, psychological counselling and a referral system to victims.[34] As of May 2017, the helpline handled a total of 563 cases since its launch six months earlier, with 63 per cent of calls received from women and 37 per cent from men.[35][2] Research undertaken by Pew Research Center indicated that 73 per cent of adult internet users in the United States had seen someone be harassed in some way online and 40 per cent had personally experienced it, with young women being particularly vulnerable to sexual harassment and stalking.[36]

Gender equality and the safety of journalists[edit]

Threats on women journalists[edit]

Similar to their male counterparts, women journalists, whether they are working in an insecure context, or in a newsroom, face risks of attacks while exercising their profession but are also particularly vulnerable to attacks of a sexual nature such as, sexual harassment, sexual assault, or even rape. Such attacks can come from those attempting to silence their coverage but also from sources, colleagues and others.[37] A 2014 global survey of nearly 1,000 women journalists, initiated by the International News Safety Institute (INSI) in partnership with the International Women's Media Foundation (IWMF) and with the support of UNESCO, found that nearly two-thirds of women who took part in the survey had experienced intimidation, threats or abuse in the workplace.[38]

In the period from 2012 through 2016, UNESCO's Director-General denounced the killing of 38 women journalists, representing 7 per cent of all journalists killed.[39] The percentage of journalists killed who are women is significantly lower than their overall representation in the media workforce. This large gender gap is likely partly the result of the persistent under-representation of women reporting from war-zones or insurgencies or on topics such as politics and crime.[40]

The September 2017 report of the United Nations Secretary-General on the safety of journalists outlines a way forward for a gender-sensitive approach to strengthening the safety of women journalists.[41] In 2016, the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers adopted Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors, in particular noting the gender-specific threats that many journalists face and calling for urgent, resolute and systematic responses.[42][2] The same year, the IPDC Council requested the UNESCO Director-General's report to include gender-related information.[43]

Online harassment of women journalists[edit]

Online harassment of women journalists, UNESCO's World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development 2018.

An analysis of more than two million tweets performed by the think tank Demos found that women journalists experienced approximately three times as many abusive comments as their male counterparts on Twitter.[44]

The Guardian surveyed the 70 million comments recorded on its website between 1999 and 2016 (only 22,000 of which were recorded before 2006). Of these comments, approximately 1.4 million (approximately two per cent) were blocked for abusive or disruptive behavior. Of the 10 staff journalists who received the highest levels of abuse and ‘dismissive trolling’, eight were women.[45]

The INSI and IWMF survey found that more than 25 per cent of ‘verbal, written and/or physical intimidation including threats to family and friends’ took place online.[46]

Countering online abuse is a significant challenge, and few legislative and policy frameworks exist on the international or national level to protect journalists from digital harassment.[47]

The International Federation of Journalists and the South Asia Media Solidarity Network launched the Byte Back campaign to raise awareness and combat online harassment of women journalists in the Asia-Pacific region.[48]

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) organized an expert meeting titled ‘New Challenges to Freedom of Expression: Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists’ which produced a publication of the same title that includes the voices of journalists and academics on the realities of online abuse of women journalists and how it can be combated.[49][2]

Actions taken to enhance the safety of journalists[edit]

International organizations[edit]

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

International instruments[edit]

International legal instruments represent one of the key tools that can support the creation of an enabling environment for the safety of journalists. These include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the Geneva Conventions; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the United Nations Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2005/81;[50] the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1738 (2006).[51]

United Nations[edit]

UN resolutions on the safety of journalists adopted since 2012, UNESCO's World Trends Report

The safety of journalists and their role in promoting inclusive and sustainable societies has been recognized by the United Nations in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Goal 16 outlines the promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective and inclusive institutions at all levels.[52]

Since 2012 there has been a total of 12 UN resolutions on safety of journalists adopted by several UN organs.

In December 2015, Resolution A/70/125 of the General Assembly recognized serious threats to freedom of expression in the context of reviewing progress since the 2005 World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). The Resolution called for the protection of journalists and media workers.[53]

The United Nations Secretary General also produces reports on the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity (in 2014 A/69/268,[54] 2015 A/HRC/30/68[55] respectively, 2017 A/72/290[56]).[2]

SDG 16.10.1 relates to the number of verified cases of killings, kidnapping, enforced disappearance, arbitrary detention and torture of journalists, associated media personnel, trade unionists and human rights defenders. The indicator was decided upon by the United Nations Statistical Commission for tracking progress in the achievement of target 10.

The UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists[edit]

The United Nations (UN) Plan of Action, coordinated by UNESCO, was elaborated to provide a comprehensive, coherent, and action-oriented UN-wide approach to the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity. Since its launch, it has become a guiding framework for activities in this area. Following its endorsement by the UN System Chief Executives Board for Coordination in 2012, the UN Plan of Action has been welcomed by the UN General Assembly, UNESCO and the Human Rights Council. Outside of the UN, it has been referred to by various regional bodies, and it has given impetus to and fostered a spirit of cooperation between the UN and various stakeholders in many countries.


World Press Freedom day
UNESCO-Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize, World Press Freedom Day

UNESCO celebrates World Press Freedom Day every year on 3 May during which the Guillermo Cano Prize[57] is attributed to honor the work of an individual or an organization defending or promoting freedom of expression.

UNESCO main activities on Safety of Journalists[edit]
  • Following a request from the Office of the UN Secretary General, UNESCO coordinated together with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) the formal establishment of a focal points system for the safety of journalists in relevant United Nations entities.
  • UNESCO's work on the safety of journalists focuses on six areas: public awareness; standards creation and policy development; monitoring and reporting; capacity building; academic research; and strengthening coalitions.
  • The Organization is intensifying its efforts to strengthen the capacity of Member States to implement, on a voluntary basis, mechanisms to prevent attacks against journalists, to protect journalists, and to prosecute the perpetrators of these attacks.
  • UNESCO also focuses on activities to raise awareness and train representatives of the judiciary, law enforcement agencies and parliaments on the importance of freedom of the press and the safety of journalists.
  • UNESCO is also placing increased emphasis on tackling the specific threats faced by women journalists, both online and offline.
UNESCO's Journalists Safety Indicators[edit]

UNESCO's IPDC developed the Journalists Safety Indicators (JSI) to "pinpoint significant matters that show, or impact upon, the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity".[58] These indicators map the key features that can help assess safety of journalists, and determine whether adequate follow-up is given to crimes committed against them.[59] Analysis based on the Journalists Safety indicators have been conducted in Guatemala (2013), Kenya (2016), Nepal (2016), Pakistan (2013–2014).[58]

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe[edit]

The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media performs an early warning function and provides rapid response to serious noncompliance with regard to free media and free expression. The Representative maintains direct contacts with authorities, media and civil society representatives and other parties and shares his/ her observations and recommendations with the OSCE participating States twice a year.[2]

Regional organizations[edit]

The Council of Europe[edit]

In May 2014, the Council of the European Union adopted the European Union Human Rights Guidelines on Freedom of Expression Online and Offline,[60] which stated that the European Union would ‘take all appropriate steps to ensure the protection of journalists, both in terms of preventive measures and by urging effective investigations when violations occur’. In April 2014, the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers adopted a resolution on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors, which called for concerted international efforts and led to the creation of an online platform for monitoring infringements of freedom of expression.[61]

The Organization of American States[edit]

The Organization of American States (OAS) has played a proactive role in promoting the safety of journalists. In June 2017, the General Assembly of the OAS passed Resolution R86/17,[54] which urged States ‘to implement comprehensive measures for prevention, protection, investigation and punishment of those responsible, as well as to put into action strategies to end impunity for crimes against journalists and share good practices'.[62]

The Commonwealth[edit]

The Secretary-General of the Commonwealth has pledged support for the United Nations Plan of Action, working to promote journalist safety and institutional mechanisms that foster freedom of expression within member states across different regions.[63]

Academia, civil society and media[edit]

The Centre for Freedom of the Media at the University of Sheffield launched the Journalists’ Safety Research Network (JSRN). The JSRN contributes to advancing academic cooperation on the safety of journalists by increasing research capacity, collaboration and knowledge sharing within the academic community.[64]

In 2014, Columbia University, United States, established Columbia Global Freedom of Expression, which brings together international experts and activists with the university's faculty and students, in order to ‘survey, document and strengthen free expression’.[65]

In 2015, the International Press Institute, Al Jazeera Media Network, Geneva Global Media and the Geneva Press Club presented the International Declaration and Best Practices on the Promotion of Journalists Safety.[66] The declaration aims to reinforce and promote existing international obligations and mechanisms associated with the safety of journalists and contribute to the protection of their rights.[67]

The same year, news media organizations joined forces with press freedom NGOs and journalists to launch the A Culture of Safety (ACOS) Alliance. The ACOS Alliance's Freelance Journalist Safety Principles, a set of practices for newsrooms and journalists on dangerous assignments, have been endorsed by 90 organizations around the world. In addition, a network of safety officers in media companies expanded following the meeting ‘Media Organizations Standing Up for the Safety of Journalists’ held at UNESCO in February 2016.[68][2]

Reporters without Borders (RSF) is an international non-governmental organization recognized as being of public utility in France. It aims to defend press freedom and the protection of journalism sources.[69] It is mainly known for its annual ranking on the status of press freedom worldwide[70] and monitoring of the crimes committed against journalists.[71]

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) is a non-governmental organization that aims to "defend the right of journalists to report the news without fear of reprisal" and promote freedom of expression.[72] The NGO monitors the imprisonment, disappearances and killings of journalists worldwide. The Organization informs on the status of freedom of the press and journalists safety in conflict countries and others, and helps journalists through services such as the emergencies response teams,[73] the safety advisories[74] and the security guide.[75] CPJ's annual International Press Freedom Awards recognizes bravery for journalists from all around the world.[76]


Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg This article incorporates text derived from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY SA 3.0 IGO License statement/permission. Licensed text taken from World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development, Global report 2017/2018, 200, UNESCO. To learn how to add open license text to Wikipedia articles, please see this how-to page. For information on reusing text from Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia's terms of use.


  1. ^ "UN PLAN OF ACTION ON THE SAFETY OF JOURNALISTS AND THE ISSUE OF IMPUNITY" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m World Trends Report in Freedom of Expression and Media Development Global Report 2017/2018 (PDF). UNESCO. 2018.
  3. ^ "UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists". UNESCO. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 10 December 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. ^ a b See, Time to break the cycle of violence against journalists, highlights from the UNESCO Director-General's 2016 report on the Safety of Journalists and Dangers of Impunity: Archived 9 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ Countries were considered to be in armed conflict if listed in the annual reports of the UN Secretary-General on the protection of civilians in armed conflict.
  6. ^ "Committee to Protect Journalists – Defending Journalists Worldwide". Committee to Protect Journalists. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  7. ^ UNESCO Director-General. 2016. The Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity: Report by the Director-General to the Intergovernmental Council of the IPDC (Thirtieth Session). Paris: UNESCO. Available at <>.
  8. ^ "How 'war on terror' unleashed a war on journalists".
  9. ^ a b c Marthoz, Jean-Paul (2017). Terrorism and the Media. A Handbook for Journalists (PDF). UNESCO. p. 110.
  10. ^ Act for the Disappeared: Archived 9 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ Barnett, Brooke, and Reynolds, Amy, Terrorism and The Press. An Uneasy Relationship, Peter Lang, 2009, 208 pages.
  12. ^ Correspondent, Nadia Massih/CPJ Middle East (8 June 2016). "Infographic: Islamic State's assault on the press".
  13. ^ "Home Eyewitness Media".
  14. ^ "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue" (PDF). Retrieved 10 December 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  15. ^ "Intergovernmental Council and Bureau of IPDC". UNESCO. 21 April 2017.
  16. ^[bare URL]
  17. ^ Time to break the cycle of violence against journalists (PDF). UNESCO. 2016.
  18. ^ This represents the status of judicial inquiries as of 9 October 2017 for killings that occurred between 2006 and 2016. See also:
  19. ^ See resolution A/RES/68/163:
  20. ^ UNESCO. 2017c. Strengthening the Implementation of the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity: Consultation outcome document. Available at
  21. ^ Committee to Protect Journalists. 2016. 2016 prison census: 259 journalists jailed worldwide.
  22. ^ a b RSF. 2016. Worldwide Round-Up of journalists who are detained, held hostage or missing 2016. Available at
  23. ^ Tlakula, Pansy. 2016. Inter-Session Activity Report of Advocate. Pansy Tlakula, Chairperson and Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa. Banjul: African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Available at
  24. ^ Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA). 2016. So This Is Democracy? State of media freedom in Southern Africa 2016. Windhoek. Available at
  25. ^ Gulf Center for Human Rights. 2017. See their Struggle, Realise their Rights: Human Rights Defenders at Imminent Risk in the Gulf Region and Neighbouring Countries. Gulf Center for Human Rights. Available at <>.
  26. ^ Zayadin, Hiba. 2017. No August reprieve for journalists and activists in the Middle East and North Africa. IFEX. Available at
  27. ^ Lynn, Kyaw Ye. 2014. A gun for self-protection, anyone?. Southeast Asian Press Alliance. Available at
  28. ^ Committee to Protect Journalists. n.d. Journalists Forced Into Exile Since 2010. Available at
  29. ^ Pen America. 2013. Chilling Effects. Pen America and The FDR Group. Available at
  30. ^ Pen America. 2013. Chilling Effects. Pen America and The FDR Group. Available at
  31. ^ Clark, Marilyn, and Anna Grech. 2017. Journalists under pressure: Unwarranted interference, fear and self-censorship in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  32. ^ Marquis-Boire, Morgan. 2015. How governments are using spyware to attack free speech. Amnesty International. Available at
  33. ^ "The Global Surveillance Industry". Privacy International. Retrieved 19 October 2019.
  34. ^ Digital Rights Foundation. n.d. Cyber Harassment Helpline. Digital Rights Foundation. Available at
  35. ^ Digital Rights Foundation. 2017. Cyber Harassment Helpline: Six Month Report, December 2016-May2017. Digital Rights Foundation. Available at
  36. ^ Duggan, Maeve, Lee Rainie, Aaron Smith, Cary Funk, Amanda Lenhart, and Mary Madden. 2014. Online Harassment. Pew Research Center. Available at
  37. ^ Lanza, Edison. 2017. Silenced Zones: Highly Dangerous Areas for the Exercise of Freedom of Expression. Office for the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Available at
  38. ^ International Media Women's Foundation and International News Safety Institute 2013, Available at
  39. ^ "UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists". UNESCO. 9 November 2016.
  40. ^ Harris, Janet, Nick Mosdell, and James Griffiths. 2016. Gender, Risk and Journalism. Journalism Practice 10 (7): 902–916
  41. ^ UN General Assembly. 2017. The safety of journalists and the issue of impunity: Report of the Secretary-General. Available at
  42. ^ Council of Europe. 2016. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors. CM/REC(2016)4. Available at
  43. ^ "IPDC Resources". UNESCO. 21 March 2017.
  44. ^ Demos. 2014. Demos: male celebrities receive more abuse on Twitter than women. Demos. Available
  45. ^ Gardiner, Becky; Mansfield, Mahana; Anderson, Ian; Holder, Josh; Louter, Daan; Ulmanu, Monica (12 April 2016). "The dark side of Guardian comments". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  46. ^ Barton, Alana, and Hannah Storm. 2014. Violence and Harassment Against Women in the News Media: A Global Picture. International Women’s Media Foundation & International News Safety Institute. Available at Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  47. ^ International Women's Media Foundation. 2016. An Overview of the Current Challenges to the Safety and Protection of Journalists. Available at
  48. ^ International Federation of Journalists. 2017. Byte Back: IFJ launches guide to combat cyber harassment in South Asia. Available at
  49. ^ Mijatović, Dunja. 2016. New Challenges to Freedom of Expression: Countering Online Abuse of Female Journalists. Edited by Becky Gardiner. Vienna: Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Available at
  50. ^ "Human Rights Documents".
  52. ^ "Peace, justice and strong institutions". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  53. ^ UN General Assembly. 2015. Outcome document of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society. A/70/L.33. Available at: Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  54. ^ a b "ODS HOME PAGE" (PDF).
  55. ^ "OHCHR - Session30 List of reports".
  56. ^ "Info" (PDF).
  57. ^ "UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize". UNESCO. 16 February 2017.
  58. ^ a b "UNESCO Journalists' Safety Indicators". UNESCO. 4 January 2018.
  59. ^ For international-level indicators see: For national-level indicators see:
  60. ^ "Human rights guidelines" (PDF).
  61. ^ Council of Europe. 2016. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors. CM/REC(2016)4. Available at
  62. ^ General Assembly of the Organization of American States. 2017. Draft Resolution Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Vol. AG/doc.5580/17. Available at
  63. ^ UNESCO. 2017. Commonwealth leader pledges support for UN Plan on journalists’ safety. Available at
  64. ^ "Journalists' Safety Research Network will increase research capacity and knowledge exchange among the community of journalism safety experts". Retrieved 23 July 2018.
  65. ^ "You searched for". Global Freedom of Expression. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
  66. ^ "International Declaration and Best Practices for journalist safety launched – International Press Institute". Retrieved 5 March 2019.
  67. ^ International Press Institute. 2015. International Declaration and Best Practices for journalist safety launched. International Press Institute. Available at <https://ipi. media/international-declaration-and-bestpractices-to-promote-journalists-safetylaunched/>.
  68. ^ "THE PRINCIPLES - ACOS Alliance". acosalliance.
  69. ^ "Présentation | Reporters sans frontières". RSF (in French). 22 January 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  70. ^ "2018 World Press Freedom Index | Reporters Without Borders". RSF. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  71. ^ "2016 Violations of press freedom barometer | Reporters without borders". RSF. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  72. ^ Avenue, Committee to Protect Journalists 330 7th; York, 11th Floor New; Ny 10001. "What We Do".
  73. ^ "Emergency Response - Emergency Response". Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  74. ^ "Safety Advisories". Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  75. ^ "CPJ Journalist Security Guide". Retrieved 19 July 2018.
  76. ^ "Awards". Retrieved 19 July 2018.