Salvator Mundi (Leonardo)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Salvator Mundi
English: Savior of the World
Leonardo da Vinci, Salvator Mundi, c.1500, oil on walnut, 45.4 × 65.6 cm.jpg
2017 restoration
ArtistLeonardo da Vinci
Yearc. 1500
TypeOil on walnut
Dimensions45.4 cm × 65.6 cm (25.8 in × 19.2 in)
OwnerAcquired by Abu Dhabi's Department of Culture and Tourism for Louvre Abu Dhabi[1]

Salvator Mundi is a painting by the workshop of Italian artist Leonardo da Vinci,[2] dated to c. 1500. The painting shows Jesus in Renaissance dress, making the sign of the cross with his right hand, while holding a transparent, non-refracting crystal orb in his left, signaling his role as Salvator Mundi (Latin for 'Savior of the World') and representing the 'celestial sphere' of the heavens.[3][4] Around 20 other versions of the work are known, by students and followers of Leonardo. Preparatory chalk and ink drawings of the drapery by Leonardo are held in the British Royal Collection.

Long thought to be a copy of a lost original, veiled with overpainting, it was restored, rediscovered, and included in a major Leonardo exhibition at the National Gallery, London, in 2011–2012. Although several leading scholars consider it to be an original work by Leonardo da Vinci,[5] the damage left by overpainting and subsequent restoration attempts has made it difficult to analyze, and full attribution has been disputed by many specialists.[6][2]

It is one of fewer than 20 known works by Leonardo, and was the only one to remain in a private collection. It was sold at auction for $450.3 million on 15 November 2017 by Christie's in New York to Prince Badr bin Abdullah, setting a new record for most expensive painting ever sold at public auction.[7] Prince Badr allegedly made the purchase on behalf of Abu Dhabi's Department of Culture and Tourism,[8][9] but it has since been posited that he may have been a stand-in bidder for his close ally and Saudi Arabian crown prince Mohammed bin Salman.[10] This follows late-2017 reports that the painting would be put on display at the Louvre Abu Dhabi[1][11] and the unexplained cancellation of its scheduled September 2018 unveiling.[12] The current location and status of the painting is unknown,[10] but it may be in a storage facility in Geneva.[13]


Leonardo da Vinci's Salvator Mundi may have been painted for Louis XII of France and his consort, Anne of Brittany.[15] It was probably commissioned around 1500, shortly after Louis conquered the Duchy of Milan and took control of Genoa in the Second Italian War. Leonardo himself moved from Milan to Florence in 1500.[16][17]

It may have come to England with Henrietta Maria when she married Charles I of England in 1625, and it seems to have remained in her private chambers at the Queen's House in Greenwich. Wenceslaus Hollar made an engraving of the painting, published in Antwerp in 1650 with the inscription Leonardus da Vinci pinxit (Latin for 'Leonardo da Vinci painted it').[16]

Charles I was executed in 1649 at the end of the English Civil War, and the painting was included in a 1649 inventory of the Royal Collection, valued at £30. Charles’s possessions were sold under the English Commonwealth, and the painting was sold in 1651 to John Stone, a mason, to settle a debt, but it was returned to Charles II after the English Restoration in 1660, and included in an inventory of Charles’s possessions at the Palace of Whitehall in 1666. It was inherited by James II of England and may then have passed to his mistress Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester, whose illegitimate daughter with James became the third wife of John Sheffield, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Normanby. His own illegitimate son, Sir Charles Herbert Sheffield, 1st Baronet, auctioned the painting in 1763 along with other artworks from Buckingham House, when the building was sold to George III. It was likely placed in a gilded frame in the 19th century, which it remained in until 2005.[18]

The painting was bought by a British collector, Francis Cook, 1st Viscount of Monserrate, in 1900, for his collection at Doughty House in Richmond. The painting was damaged from previous restoration attempts, and was attributed to a follower of Leonardo, Bernardino Luini. Cook's great grandson, Sir Francis Cook, 4th Baronet, sold it at auction in 1958 for £45,[4] as a work by Leonardo's pupil Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio.[19] The painting remained attributed to Boltraffio until 2011.[19]

Rediscovery and restoration[edit]

Black and white photograph (c. 1908–10) before restoration
2006–07 photograph after cleaning; fragmentation caused by removal of worm-eaten auxiliary panel[18]

In 2005, the painting was acquired at an auction for less than $10,000 (€8,450) by a consortium of art dealers that included Alexander Parrish and Robert Simon,[20] a specialist in Old Masters.[21][22] It was sold from the estate of Baton Rouge businessman Basil Clovis Hendry, Sr.,[23] at a St. Charles Gallery auction house in New Orleans. It had been heavily overpainted so it looked like a copy, and was, before restoration, described as "a wreck, dark and gloomy".[24]

The painting after its 2011 restoration

The consortium believed there was a possibility that the low-quality mess (with its excessive overpainting) might actually be the long-missing da Vinci original. They commissioned Dianne Dwyer Modestini at New York University to oversee the restoration. She began by removing the overpainting with acetone, leading her to discover that at some point, a stepped area of unevenness near Christ's face had been shaved down with a sharp object, and also leveled with a mixture of gesso paint and glue.[18] Using infrared photographs Simon had taken of the painting, Modestini discovered a pentimento (earlier draft) of the painting which had the blessing hand's thumb in a straight, rather than curved, position.[18] She proceded to have panel specialist Monica Griesbach chisel off a marouflaged wood panel which had been tunnelled through by worms, causing the painting to break into seven pieces. Griesbach reassembled the painting with adhesive and wood slivers.[18]

In late 2006, Modestini began her restoration effort.[18] Art historian Martin Kemp was critical of the result: "Both thumbs" of the painting's raw state "are rather better than the one painted by Dianne."[25] The work was subsequently authenticated as a painting by Leonardo.[22][24] From November 2011 through February 2012, the painting was exhibited at the National Gallery as a work by Leonardo da Vinci, after authentication by that facility. In 2012, it was also authenticated by the Dallas Museum of Art.[26][22][27][a]

In May 2013, the Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier purchased the painting for just over US$75 million (in a private sale brokered by Sotheby's, New York). The painting was then sold to Russian collector Dmitry Rybolovlev for US$127.5 million.[29][30][31] This sale—along with several other sales Bouvier made to Rybolovlev—created a legal dispute between Rybolovlev and Bouvier,[32] as well as between the original dealers of the painting and Sotheby's. In 2016, the dealers sued Sotheby's for the difference of the sale, arguing they were shortchanged. The auction house has denied knowing that Rybolovlev was the intended buyer, and sought to dismiss the lawsuit.[33] In 2018, Rybolovlev also sued Sotheby's for $380 million, alleging the auction house knowingly participated in a defrauding scheme by Bouvier, in which the painting played a part.[34]

It was exhibited in Hong Kong, London, San Francisco and New York in 2017, and then sold at auction at Christie's in New York on 15 November 2017 for $450,312,500, a new record price for an artwork (hammer price $400 million plus $50.3 million in fees).[35][36] The purchaser was identified as Saudi Arabian prince Badr bin Abdullah.[7][37] In December 2017, the Wall Street Journal reported that Prince Badr was in fact an intermediary for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the true buyer.[38] However, Christie's confirmed that Prince Badr acted on behalf of Abu Dhabi's Department of Culture and Tourism for display at the Louvre Abu Dhabi.[8][b] In September 2018, the exhibition was indefinitely postponed[42] and a January 2019 news report indicated that "no one knows where it is, and there are grave concerns for its physical safety."[43] Georgina Adam, editor at large of The Art Newspaper, dismissed these reports, stating that "We believe it's in storage in Geneva."[13]


The framed painting after its modern restoration

About a year into her restoration effort, Dianne Dwyer Modestini noted that color transitions in the subject's lips were "perfect" and that "no other artist could have done that." Upon studying the Mona Lisa for comparison, she concluded that "The artist who painted her was the same hand that had painted the Salvator Mundi."[18]

In 2006, National Gallery director Nicholas Penny wrote that he and some of his colleagues considered the work a Leonardo original, but that "some of us consider that there may be [parts] which are by the workshop."[18] Penny conducted a side-by-side study of the Salvator Mundi and Virgin of the Rocks in 2008. Martin Kemp later said of the meeting, "I left the studio thinking Leonardo must be heavily involved," and that "No one in the assembly was openly expressing doubt that Leonardo was responsible for the painting."[18] In 2011, by a consensus decision facilitated by Penny, the attribution of Leonardo da Vinci was confirmed.[19] By July 2011, separate press release documents were issued by the owners' publicity representative and the National Gallery, officially announcing the "new discovery".[19][44]

Once it was cleaned and restored, the painting was compared with, and found superior to, twenty other versions of Salvator Mundi. It was exhibited by London's National Gallery during the Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan from November 2011 to February 2012.[16][24][45][46] Several features in the painting have led to the positive attribution: a number of pentimenti are evident, most notably the position of the right thumb. The sfumato effect of the face—evidently achieved in part by manipulating the paint using the heel of the hand—is typical of many Leonardo works.[47] The way the ringlets of hair and the knotwork across the stole have been handled is also seen as indicative of Leonardo's style. Furthermore, the pigments and the walnut panel upon which the work was executed are consistent with other Leonardo paintings.[48] Additionally, the hands in the painting are very detailed, something that Leonardo is known for: he would dissect the limbs of the deceased in order to study them and render body parts in an extremely lifelike manner.[49]

One of the world's leading Leonardo experts, Martin Kemp,[50][51] who helped authenticate the work, said that he knew immediately upon first viewing the restored painting that it was the work of Leonardo: "It had that kind of presence that Leonardos have ... that uncanny strangeness that the later Leonardo paintings manifest." Of the better-preserved parts, such as the hair, Kemp notes: "It's got that kind of uncanny vortex, as if the hair is a living, moving substance, or like water, which is what Leonardo said hair was like."[47] Kemp also states:

However skilled Leonardo's followers and imitators might have been, none of them reached out into such realms of "philosophical and subtle speculation". We cannot reasonably doubt that here, we are in the presence of the painter from Vinci.[52]

Pentimenti visible in the palm of the left hand shown through the transparent orb may be evidence of Leonardo's authorship.[4]

Walter Isaacson in his biography of Leonardo wrote that the orb that Christ is holding does not correspond to the way an orb would realistically look:

In one respect, it is rendered with beautiful scientific precision, but Leonardo failed to paint the distortion that would occur when looking through a solid clear orb at objects that are not touching the orb. Solid glass or crystal, whether shaped like an orb or a lens, produces magnified, inverted, and reversed images. Instead, Leonardo painted the orb as if it were a hollow glass bubble that does not refract or distort the light passing through it.[53]

Isaacson believes that this was "a conscious decision on Leonardo's part",[54] and speculates that either Leonardo felt a more accurate portrayal would be distracting, or that "he was subtly trying to impart a miraculous quality to Christ and his orb."[53]

Kemp, on the other hand, says the doubled outline of the heel of the hand holding the sphere—which the restorer described as a pentimento—is an accurate rendering of the refraction produced by a calcite (or rock crystal) sphere.[47] Kemp further notes evidence supporting the solid nature of the orb, citing "sparkles with a series of internal inclusions (or pockets of air)" visible in 'within' the orb.[3] Kemp notes the double refraction is typical of the type produced by a transparent calcite sphere. None of the copyists had likely noticed or reproduced this crystalline orb with a double refraction.[47]

Other versions or copies of Salvator Mundi often portray a brass, solid spherical orb, terrestrial globe, or globus cruciger. Occasionally, they appear to be made of translucent glass, or show landscapes within them. Leonardo's painting, Kemp says, has "an amazing series of glistening little apertures—they're like bubbles, but they're not round—painted very delicately, with just a touch of impasto, a touch of dark, and these little sort of glistening things, particularly around the part where you get the back reflections." These are the characteristic features of rock crystal. Leonardo was an avid expert on rock crystal. He had been asked to evaluate vases that Isabella d'Este had thought of purchasing, and greatly admired the properties of the mineral.[47] (Isabella d’Este has been proposed as a plausible candidate for the subject of Leonardo’s Mona Lisa).[55]

Iconographically, the crystal sphere relates to the heavens. In Ptolemaic cosmology, the stars were embedded in a fixed celestial crystalline sphere (composed of aether), with the spherical Earth at the center of the universe. "So what you've got in the Salvator Mundi", Kemp states, "is really 'a savior of the cosmos', and this is a very Leonardesque transformation."[47]

Leonardo's Paris Manuscript D, 1508–09[56]

Another aspect of Leonardo's painting Kemp studied was depth of field, or shallow focus. Christ's blessing hand appears to be in sharp focus, whereas his face—though altered or damaged to some extent—is in soft focus. Leonardo's Manuscript D of 1508–1509,[57] explored theories of vision, optics of the eye, and theories relating to shadow, light and color. In Salvator Mundi, the artist deliberately placed an emphasis on parts of the picture over others. Elements in the foreground are seen with a sense of focus, while elements further removed are barely in focus, such as the subjects face. Manuscript D shows Leonardo was investigating this particular phenomenon around the turn of the century. Combined, the intellectual aspects, optical aspects, and the use of semi-precious minerals, are distinctive of Leonardo's oeuvres.[47]

"There is extraordinary consensus it is by Leonardo," said the former co-chairman of old master paintings at Christie's, Nicholas Hall: "This is the most important old master painting to have been sold at auction in my lifetime."[58] Christie's lists the ways scholars confirmed the attribution to Leonardo da Vinci:

Two studies of drapery by Leonardo, Royal Collection[59]

The reasons for the unusually uniform scholarly consensus that the painting is an autograph work by Leonardo are several, including the previously mentioned relationship of the painting to the two autograph preparatory drawings in Windsor Castle; its correspondence to the composition of the 'Salvator Mundi' documented in Wenceslaus Hollar's etching of 1650; and its manifest superiority to the more than 20 known painted versions of the composition.

Furthermore, the extraordinary quality of the picture, especially evident in its best-preserved areas, and its close adherence in style to Leonardo’s known paintings from circa 1500, solidifies this consensus.[16][60]

Partial attribution[edit]

Christ's hands, rendered curls of his hair, and drapery are well preserved, close to their original state.[4]

There are some respected experts on Renaissance art who question the full attribution of the painting to Leonardo.[61][54][62] Jacques Franck, a Paris-based art historian and Leonardo specialist who has studied the Mona Lisa out of the frame multiple times, stated: "The composition doesn't come from Leonardo, he preferred twisted movement. It's a good studio work with a little Leonardo at best, and it's very damaged. It's been called 'the male Mona Lisa', but it doesn't look like it at all."[58]

Michael Daley, the director of ArtWatch UK, doubts the Salvator Mundi's authenticity and theorizes that it may be the prototype of a subject painted by Leonardo:[63][64] "This quest for an autograph prototype Leonardo painting might seem moot or vain: not only do the two drapery studies comprise the only accepted Leonardo material that might be associated with the group, but within the Leonardo literature there is no documentary record of the artist ever having been involved in such a painting project."[63]

Dr. Carmen Bambach, specialist in Italian Renaissance art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, questioned full attribution to Leonardo: "having studied and followed the picture during its conservation treatment, and seeing it in context in the National Gallery exhibition, much of the original painting surface may be by Boltraffio, but with passages done by Leonardo himself, namely Christ's proper right blessing hand, portions of the sleeve, his left hand and the crystal orb he holds."[65][66] Matthew Landrus, an art historian at the University of Oxford agreed with the concept of parts of the painting being executed by Leonardo ("between 5 and 20%"), but attributes the painting to Leonardo's studio assistant Bernardino Luini, noting Luini's ability in painting gold tracery.[67]

Frank Zöllner, the author of the catalogue raisonné Leonardo da Vinci. The Complete Paintings and Drawings.[68] writes:

Over-cleaning resulted in abrasion over the entire painting, especially in the face and hair.[58] Above Christ's left eye (right) are visible marks that the artist made to soften the flesh with the heel of his hand.[4]

This attribution is controversial primarily on two grounds. Firstly, the badly damaged painting had to undergo very extensive restoration, which makes its original quality extremely difficult to assess. Secondly, the Salvator Mundi in its present state exhibits a strongly developed sfumato technique that corresponds more closely to the manner of a talented Leonardo pupil active in the 1520s than to the style of the master himself. The way in which the painting was placed on the market also gave rise to concern.[63][68][69]

Zöllner also explains that the quality of Salvator Mundi surpasses other known versions, however,

[it] also exhibits a number of weaknesses. The flesh tones of the blessing hand, for example, appear pallid and waxen as in a number of workshop paintings. Christ's ringlets also seem to me too schematic in their execution, the larger drapery folds too undifferentiated, especially on the right-hand side. ... It will probably only be possible to arrive at a more informed verdict on this question after the results of the painting's technical analyses have been published in full (Dalivalle/Kemp/Simon 2017).[63][68][70]

The results of the painting's technical analyses by Dalivalle/Kemp/Simon were scheduled to be released in 2018.[63][needs update]


The rediscovered painting by Leonardo generated considerable interest within the media and general public amid its pre-auction viewings in Hong Kong, London, San Francisco and New York. Over 27,000 people saw the work in person before the auction: the highest number of pre-sale viewers for an individual work of art, according to Christie's.[61] Never before had Christie’s used an outside agency to advertise an artwork. Around 4,500 stood in line to preview the work in New York the weekend prior to the sale. Emotions were heightened as observers stood in front of the painting.[61]

Referred to as the "Last da Vinci", Salvator Mundi was the only known painting by Leonardo still in private hands. Fewer than twenty other known works by Leonardo are held in museums around the world, including the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper. The only work by Leonardo in North America, Ginevra de' Benci, is held at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.[61] The museum purchased Ginevra in 1967 for $5 million in a private sale (equivalent to approximately $36.4 million in 2017), a world record at the time. Salvator Mundi is the first painting by the artist to appear in a public sale for 100 years.[61]

Copies or other versions[edit]

Possibly influenced[edit]

See also[edit]



  1. ^ The last Leonardo to be discovered was the Benois Madonna, found in 1909.[28]
  2. ^ The highest price previously paid for an artwork at auction was for Pablo Picasso's Les Femmes d'Alger, which sold for $179.4 million in May 2015 at Christie's New York. Willem de Kooning's Interchange was sold privately by the David Geffen Foundation to hedge fund manager Kenneth C. Griffin in September 2015 for $300 million, formerly the highest known sale price for any artwork.[39][40][41]


  1. ^ a b "Salvator Mundi". Abu Dhabi Department of Culture and Tourism on Twitter. 8 December 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2019.
  2. ^ a b Nicholl 2019.
  3. ^ a b Martin Kemp, Christ to Coke: How Image Becomes Icon, Oxford University Press (OPU), 2012, p. 37, ISBN 0199581118
  4. ^ a b c d e "Video: The Last da Vinci – Christie's". Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  5. ^ Hartley-Parkinson, Richard (16 November 2017). "Leonardo Da Vinci portrait of Jesus Christ 'Salvator Mundi' sells for $450,000,000".
  6. ^ "Mystery over Christ's orb in $100m Leonardo da Vinci painting". The Guardian. 19 October 2017.
  7. ^ a b David D. Kirkpatrick (6 December 2017). "Mystery Buyer of $450 Million 'Salvator Mundi' Was a Saudi Prince". New York Times. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  8. ^ a b Yara Bayoumy (8 December 2017). "Abu Dhabi to acquire Leonardo da Vinci's 'Salvator Mundi': Christie's". Retrieved 9 December 2017 – via Reuters.
  9. ^ "Bought a $450M painting? In NY, don't worry about the tax". Retrieved 9 December 2017.
  10. ^ a b Kirkpatrick, David D. (30 March 2019). "A Leonardo Made a $450 Million Splash. Now There's No Sign of It". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  11. ^ Jones, Jonathan (14 October 2018). "The Da Vinci mystery: why is his $450m masterpiece really being kept under wraps?". the Guardian. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
  12. ^ "Postponement of the unveiling of Salvator Mundi". Abu Dhabi Department of Culture and Tourism on Twitter. 2 September 2018. Retrieved 2 April 2019.
  13. ^ a b Valle, Gaby Del (22 January 2019). "How a long-lost Leonardo da Vinci painting got dragged into a Trump-Russia conspiracy theory". Vox. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  14. ^ "Jesus, after Leonardo - The Wenceslaus Hollar Digital Collection".
  15. ^ "Salvator Mundi". Christie's. Retrieved 27 November 2017.
  16. ^ a b c d "Salvator Mundi — The rediscovery of a masterpiece: Chronology, conservation, and authentication – Christie's'". Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  17. ^ correspondent, Mark Brown Arts (10 October 2017). "Only Leonardo da Vinci in private hands set to fetch £75m at auction". Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h i Shaer 2019.
  19. ^ a b c d e f H. Niyazi, "Platonic receptacles, Leonardo and the Salvator Mundi", iconographic and provenance details of the painting, 18 July 2011
  20. ^ "Where in the world is Salvator Mundi, the most expensive painting ever sold?". National Post. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  21. ^ Lost Leonardo painting had tangled path to $450 million sale, LA Times, 16 November 2017
  22. ^ a b c Greene, Kerima (19 November 2017). "An art dealer explains how a da Vinci went from less than $200 to breaking the bank at $450M". CNBC. Retrieved 20 November 2017.
  23. ^ Michael Daley, Two developments in the no-show Louvre Abu Dhabi Leonardo Salvator Mundi saga, Artwatch UK, 11 October 2018
  24. ^ a b c Esterow, Milton (June 2011). "A Long Lost Leonardo". ARTnews. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
  25. ^ "Where in the world is Salvator Mundi, the most expensive painting ever sold?". The Guardina. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  26. ^ "Where in the world is Salvator Mundi, the most expensive painting ever sold?". National Post. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  27. ^ "Leonardo da Vinci, Painter at the Court of Milan, Leonardo da Vinci, Christ as Salvator Mundi, exhibition catalogue, n.71, National Gallery, 9 November 2011–5 February 2012" (PDF). Retrieved 9 December 2017.
  28. ^ Travis M. Andrews and Fred Barbash, "Long-lost da Vinci painting fetches $450.3 million, an auction record for art", The Washington Post, 16 November 2017
  29. ^ Reyburn, Scott (3 March 2014). "Recently Attributed Leonardo Painting Was Sold Privately for Over $75 Million". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  30. ^ Grosvenor, Bendor. "Salvator Mundi at heart of art fraud case". Bendor Grosvenor. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  31. ^ Clémençon, Gilles. Accusé d'escroquerie, le "roi des ports francs" Yves Bouvier riposte. RTS Info. 22 March 2015 (French)
  32. ^ Sam Knight, "The Bouvier Affair, How an art-world insider made a fortune by being discreet" The New Yorker, 8 & 15 February 2016
  33. ^ Kazakina, Katya (22 November 2016). "Dispute Over $127.5 Million Leonardo Painting Draws in Sotheby's". Bloomberg.
  34. ^ Kazakina, Katya (3 October 2018). "Billionaire Slaps Sotheby's With $380 Million Lawsuit". Bloomberg.
  35. ^ "Post-War & Contemporary Art Evening Sale Lot 9B". Auction Catalog (Results). Christie's Auction House. 15 November 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  36. ^ Angel Au-Yeung, At Auction, Billionaire Sells Da Vinci Painting For A New World Record Price,, 15 November 2017
  37. ^ Meixler, Eli (7 December 2017). "The Mystery Buyer of a $450 Million Leonardo da Vinci Painting Was a Saudi Prince". Fortune. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  38. ^ Harris, Shane; Crow, Kelly; Said, Summer (7 December 2017). "Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Identified as Buyer of Record-Breaking da Vinci". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  39. ^ Leonardo da Vinci painting 'Salvator Mundi' sold for record $450.3 million, Fox News, 16 November 2017
  40. ^ "Da Vinci-maleri slår salgsrekord med pris på 2,8 milliarder". (in Danish). 16 November 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  41. ^ "'Leonardo da Vinci artwork' sells for record $450m". BBC News. 16 November 2017.
  42. ^ "Louvre Abu Dhabi postpones display of Leonardo's Salvator Mundi". The Guardian. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019. Delayed unveiling of world’s most expensive painting adds to mystery shrouding its acquisition and authenticity
  43. ^ "Where in the world is Salvator Mundi, the most expensive painting ever sold?". National Post. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  44. ^ "Bendor Grosvenor, Salvator Mundi, National Gallery statement, Art History News". 13 July 2011. Retrieved 27 November 2017.
  45. ^ BBC News (12 July 2011). "Lost Leonardo Da Vinci painting to go on show". BBC. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
  46. ^ "Scholars authenticate a painting that was missing for centuries". Archived from the original on 26 May 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
  47. ^ a b c d e f g Goldstein, Andrew M. (17 November 2011). "The Male "Mona Lisa"?: Art Historian Martin Kemp on Leonardo da Vinci's Mysterious "Salvator Mundi"". Blouin Artinfo.
  48. ^ "Salvator Mundi – Newly Attributed da Vinci Painting". Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  49. ^ "Leonardo da Vinci's 'Male Mona Lisa' can be yours for just $100M (or more)". USA Today. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  50. ^ Fisher, Ian (9 February 2007). "A Real-Life Mystery: The Hunt for the Lost Leonardo". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  51. ^ Charney, Noah (6 November 2011). "The lost Leonardo". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  52. ^ Martin Kemp, Art history: Sight and salvation, Martin Kemp sifts the evidence that Leonardo da Vinci painted the newly emerged work Salvator Mundi, Nature, International Journal of Science, 479, 174–175, 10 November 2011. doi:10.1038/479174a,
  53. ^ a b Isaacson, Walter (17 October 2017). Leonardo da Vinci. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781501139178.
  54. ^ a b Kinsella, Eileen. "Doubters (Including Jerry Saltz) Love to Hate Leonardo's 'Salvator Mundi. Here's What the Experts Think". Artnet News. 14 November 2017
  55. ^ Zöllner, Frank: Leonardo da Vinci – Sämtliche Werke. Taschen Verlag (Cologne) 2007, p. 241 (effective catalogue raisonné)
  56. ^ "Réunion des Musées Nationaux-Grand Palais | Leonardo da Vinci, Manuscript D, 1508–09, Bibliothèque de l'Institut, Paris". Retrieved 27 November 2017.
  57. ^ "Paris Manuscript D". Universal Leonardo. University of the Arts, London. Retrieved 3 November 2012.
  58. ^ a b c Pogrebin, Robin; Reyburn, Scott (15 November 2017). "Leonardo da Vinci Painting Sells for $450.3 Million, Shattering Auction Highs". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
  59. ^ Leonardo da Vinci, A study of drapery for a Salvator Mundi, c. 1504–8 The Royal Collection
  60. ^ Merrit Kennedy, Last Da Vinci Painting In Private Hands Will Be Auctioned Next Month, 11 October 2017)
  61. ^ a b c d e Scott Teyburn, "Get in Line: The $100 Million da Vinci Is in Town", The New York Times, 13 November 2017
  62. ^ Saltz, Jerry. "Christie’s Is Selling This Painting for $100 Million. They Say It's by Leonardo. I Have Doubts. Big Doubts." Vulture. 14 November 2017
  63. ^ a b c d e Michael Daley, Problems with the New York Leonardo Salvator Mundi Part I: Provenance and Presentation, ArtWatch UK, 14 November 2017
  64. ^ Shamsian, Jacob (16 November 2017). "A lost Leonardo da Vinci painting just sold for a record $450 million — but critics have spotted an unusual flaw". Business Insider. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  65. ^ Some dispute authenticity of $450 million Leonardo da Vinci painting, Fox News, 17 November 2017
  66. ^ Bambach, Carmen C. (2012). "Seeking the universal painter: Carmen C. Bambach appraises the National Gallery's once-in-a-lifetime exhibition dedicated to Leonardo da Vinci". Apollo Magazine.
  67. ^ Alberge, Dalya (6 August 2018). "Leonardo scholar challenges attribution of $450m painting". the Guardian. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  68. ^ a b c Johannes Nathan, Frank Zöllner, Leonardo da Vinci. The Complete Paintings and Drawings, Taschen, 2017, ISBN 978-3-8365-2701-9
  69. ^ Zöllner, Frank (2017). "Preface to the 2017 Edition" (PDF). Leonardo da Vinci. The Complete Paintings and Drawings, Köln 2017: 15–17.
  70. ^ Zöllner, Frank (2017). "Catalogue Raisonné of the Paintings, No. XXXIII, Salvator Mundi" (PDF). Leonardo da Vinci. The Complete Paintings and Drawings, Köln 2017: 440–445.


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]