Sanbo Kyodan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sanbo Kyodan
D'Orschy und Yasutani Roshi.jpg
Hakuun Yasutani (right)
Formation 1954
Type Zen
Headquarters Japan Kamakura, Kanagawa
Website Sanbo-Zen.org

Sanbo Kyodan (三宝教団 Sanbō Kyōdan?, literally "Three Treasures Religious Organization") is a lay Zen sect derived from both the Soto (Caodong) and the Rinzai (Linji) traditions. It was renamed Sanbo-Zen International in 2014. The term Sanbo Kyodan has often been used to refer to the Harada-Yasutani zen lineage. However, a number of Yasutani’s students have started their own teaching lines that are independent from Sanbo Kyodan. Strictly speaking, Sanbo Kyodan refers only to the organization that is now known as Sanbo-Zen International [1].

History[edit]

Sanbō Kyōdan was founded by Hakuun Yasutani in 1954. It is rooted in the thinking of Harada Daiun Sogaku, a Sōtō priest who also studied with Rinzai priests. Some details of the background and early history of Sanbo Zen can be found in a paper [2] delivered at a Buddhist conference in Tiantong Temple, China in 2014. Both Harada Roshi and Yasutani Roshi were strong promoters of Zen practice for lay practitioners, and for people of other (non-Buddhist, non-Asian) faith communities and cultures. Their openness to lay practitioners was in line with the modernizing tendency of the Meiji Restoration, which began in 1868. [1] Starting in this period, various Zen institutions began to give permission to lay followers to practice Zen.[note 1]

The leaders of the Sanbo Kyodan were involved in the contemporary social and cultural developments in Japan, which followed the abandonment of the medieval feudal system and its opening up to foreign influences and modern western technology and culture. The association of some of them with the fierce militaristic nationalism of the mid-20th century Empire of Japan has become controversial.[2] Among Yamada Koun's friends and associates were Soen Nakagawa,[3] a strong supporter of Japanese imperialism,[4] and Yasutani Roshi's own position has been the subject of arguments. Within Japanese Buddhism, there was a development of Buddhist modernism,[5][6] but also a tendency to support the autocratic regime in the interest of survival.[2][6]

Influence[edit]

Western influence[edit]

Although the membership of Sanbō Kyōdan is small (3,790 registered followers and 24 instructors in 1988[6]), "the Sanbõ Kyõdan has had an inordinate influence on Zen in the West".[6]

Westerners involved with Sanbō Kyōdan, including a number of Roman Catholics, promoted its teachings in North America and Europe in the latter half of the 20th century and early 21st century. One early American Zen member was Philip Kapleau, author of The Three Pillars of Zen, or so it has been maintained in all editions of the book. In fact, The Three Pillars of Zen , a work of compilation, was largely constructed by Yamada Koun, with help from Kubota Jiun, who together provided rough translations that were later polished by Philip Kapleau, who also wrote some introductions to sections. The three men together edited the book, which appeared in 1965 under Kapleau's name.[7] Kapleau studied under Harada Sōgaku in Obama and Yasutani Haku'un in greater Tokyo in the 1950s and 1960s, but never received formal dharma transmission, and started his own lineage. Other influential teachers who studied with Yasutani and started their own organizations included Taizan Maezumi and Robert Baker Aitken, although most of Aitken's training was under Koun Yamada. In Europe, the Sanbō Kyōdan was associated particularly with Roman Catholic practitioners such as Hugo Enomiya-Lassalle and others.

Yasutani Lineage[edit]

Yasutani's lineage has grown rapidly, constituting one of the largest Zen networks in the USA, although some of Yasutani's disciples, and of his successor Yamada Koun, have left the Sanbo Kyodan and started their own organisations.[8]

The Harada-Yasutani line has not been immune from controversies concerning the immoral behavior of Zen teachers, including Eido Tai Shimano. However, it must be pointed out that Shimano never belonged to the Sanbo Kyodan organization [3] or the Harada-Yasutani lineage. He was a student of Nakagawa Soen, who was an associate of Yasutani and a schoolmate of Yamada. But Nakagawa Roshi was a Rinzai master and was not part of the Sanbo Kyodan lineage. Shimano has been accused of sexually abusing lay American practitioners. [9] The validity of Shimano’s dharma transmission from Nakagawa Roshi is also in question.[4] On the other hand, Taizan Maezumi, also implicated in immoral behavior in the USA, did study under Yasutani, as well as under two other masters, Koryu Roshi and his own father Baian Hakujun Kuroda.

Dane Gifford, a graduate student of Philip Kapleau and abbot of the Toronto Zen Centre, lost his recognition as a teacher due to his improper sexual conduct with students at both the Toronto and Polish centres at which he taught.[10][need quotation to verify]

Charismatic authority[edit]

The Sanbō Kyōdan was also influential in introducing charismatic authority in Western Zen, by its dependency on the authority of Yasutani,[11] while simultaneously standing outside the mainstream of Japanese Zen. It was transplanted into a culture that is unaware of the specific characteristics of Japanese culture regarding authority.[12][13] The stress on kenshō as means of authority, coupled to the primacy of maintaining the correct dharma transmission, led to institutional problems when Yasutani's heir Yamada Koun died,[11] in the view of some disaffected former members. Shortly before his death in 1989 Yamada Koun passed on the leadership of the Sanbo Kyodan directly to Kubota Jiun Roshi, who was its abbot until 2004, whereupon the abbacy passed to Yamada Ryoun Roshi.[5] While a handful of Western teachers authorized by Sanbo-Zen left the organization, some 40 or so remain within it, and the institution itself has evolved and shows signs of growing strength and resilience. The direct lineage of the “Three Clouds” (Harada, Yasutani and Yamada) maintains a strong core and trunk in today's Sanbo-Zen. Seeing one's nature gives an autonomous confirmation of Zen's ultimate truth, which may conflict with the need to maintain institutions and traditions.[note 2] On the other hand, it may foster a renewal and revitalization of the core of Zen teaching, and allow for styles of Zen practice to emerge that are more relevant to non-Japanese contexts.

Yasutani and Japanese imperialism[edit]

Yasutani's support for the Pacific War was criticised after World War II. The publication of Brian Victoria's Zen at War[2] led to a public apology by Kubota Jiun, the third Abbot of Sanbō Kyōdan.[web 1] However, Victoria has also been criticized for “a lack of accuracy in his citation and translation of texts from the persons he accuses.”

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Another example of this openness to lay practitioners is the Ningen Zen Kyodan.
  2. ^ See Sharf (1995-C) [14] for an exposition of the problems that the Sanbo Kyodan faced, after the death of Yamada Koun. As Sharf notes:
    • "[C]harisma can spread too widely, and the resulting centripetal forces pull the organisation apart, with new sects spinning off in several directions".[15]
    • "[T]he Sanbō Kyōdan would not survive long were it to elevate every student with kensho to the status of master".[15]
    • "The institution would have little chance of survival were it not to balance claims concerning the ultimacy and autonomy of kensho with a course of training that inspires obedience and loyalty to the tradition".[15]
    These remarks also seem to apply to USA-zen, which lacks central authority, despite the formal ties to Soto-shu of many groups.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Ford 2006, p. 148.
  2. ^ a b c Victoria 2006.
  3. ^ Shimano 1996, p. 20-21.
  4. ^ Victoria 2003, p. 96-97.
  5. ^ mcMahan 2008.
  6. ^ a b c d Sharf 1993.
  7. ^ Yamada (2004), The Gateless Gate, page xi.
  8. ^ Ford 2006.
  9. ^ Lachs 2009.
  10. ^ Laughing Cloud, Zen Master (2013). Taking The Buddha's Teaching. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. 
  11. ^ a b Sharf 1995-C.
  12. ^ Lachs 1999.
  13. ^ Lachs 2006.
  14. ^ Sharf 1995-C, p. 444-452.
  15. ^ a b c Sharf 1995-C, p. 445.

Bibliography[edit]

Published sources[edit]

Web sources[edit]

  1. <http://www.zendo.dentangles.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Sanbo-Zen-final.pdf />
  2. <http://www.shimanoarchive.com/PDFs/19841120_Aitken_Kiefer.pdf />

Further reading[edit]

  • Koun Yamada (2004) ‘ ‘The Gateless Gate’ ‘, Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-382-0
  • Koun Yamada (2015) ‘ ‘Zen: The Authentic Gate’ ‘, Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-1-61429-250-0
  • Philip Kapleau, The Three Pillars of Zen
  • Peter Matthissen, Nine-headed Dragon River
  • Brian Daizen Victoria (2006), Zen at War. Lanham e.a.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (Second Edition)

External links[edit]