Sandra Segal Ikuta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sandra Segal Ikuta
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Assumed office
June 23, 2006
Appointed byGeorge W. Bush
Preceded byJames R. Browning
Personal details
Sandra Caroline Segal[1]

(1954-06-24) June 24, 1954 (age 67)
Los Angeles, California
Spouse(s)Edward D. Ikuta[1]
EducationUniversity of California, Berkeley (AB)
Columbia University (MS)
University of California, Los Angeles (JD)

Sandra Segal Ikuta (born June 24, 1954) is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Ikuta was born and raised in Los Angeles, California. She completed an Artium Baccalaureus degree at the University of California, Berkeley in 1976, having previously attended Stanford University for two years. Ikuta received a Master of Science degree in journalism from Columbia University in 1978, and completed her Juris Doctor at UCLA School of Law in 1988. While there, she served as the editor of the UCLA Law Review.

From 1976 to 1977 she was a research assistant at the University of California, Berkeley. From 1978 to 1985 she was a writer and editor for many magazines and organizations which include Guilford Press, City National Bank, Unique Publications, and Disney Channel Magazine. From 1985 to 1987 she was a library clerk and later summer associate for the law firms of Alschuler, Grossman & Pines and Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP.

Ikuta clerked for Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski from 1988 to 1989 and for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor from 1989 to 1990. She became an associate of the law firm O’Melveny & Myers in 1990 and went on to become a partner in 1997. At the time of her nomination, Ikuta had been general counsel of the California Resources Agency since January 2004, "trying to protect natural resources and open space and preserve agricultural land."[2] She is a former alternate director of the Pacific Forest and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council.

Nomination and confirmation[edit]

Ikuta was nominated to the Ninth Circuit by President George W. Bush on February 8, 2006 to fill the seat vacated by Judge James R. Browning, who took senior status in 2000. Previously, Carolyn Kuhl had been nominated to that position, but she had been filibustered by Senate Democrats for a year until December 2004 when she withdrew her nomination. Ikuta was voted unanimously out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 26, 2006, and confirmed 81–0 by the U.S. Senate on June 19, 2006.[3] She was the sixth judge appointed by Bush to the Ninth Circuit.

Ikuta worked alongside her former boss, Judge Alex Kozinski, for whom she clerked. He testified on her behalf at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on her nomination.

Notable cases[edit]

Ikuta's first published opinion on the Ninth Circuit was United States v. Baldrich, issued on December 27, 2006.

She wrote the Dukes v. Wal-Mart dissent in the Ninth Circuit, with reasoning that largely ended up being adopted by the Supreme Court.[4]

In May 2017, Ikuta dissented when the narrowly divided en banc circuit found that the United States District Court for the Southern District of California's policy of indiscriminately shackling criminal defendants in all pretrial hearings violated the Constitution's Due Process Clause.[5][6] In March 2018, the circuit's judgment was vacated by the unanimous Supreme Court of the United States.[7]

City of Los Angeles v. Barr (Sanctuary Cities)[edit]

On July 12, 2019, in City of Los Angeles V. Barr, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a nationwide injunction issued in 2018, thus upholding preferential treatment in awarding community policing grants to cities that cooperate with immigration authorities. In the opinion, Judge Ikuta wrote, "Cooperation relating to enforcement of federal immigration law is in pursuit of the general welfare, and meets the low bar of being germane to the federal interest in providing the funding to "address crime and disorder problems, and otherwise... enhance public safety... one of the main purposes for which” the grant is intended. In her dissent, Judge Kim Wardlaw wrote, "[The Department of Justice's] decision to implement both the illegal immigration focus area and the Cooperation Certification is foreclosed by the text, structure, and purpose of the Community Policing Act."[8]

State of California v. Alex Azar[edit]

On February 24, 2020, Ikuta wrote the majority opinion upholding the Trump Administration rule withholding Title X funding from health-care providers that perform, promote, or support abortion with patients. The en banc Ninth Circuit sided with the government by a vote of 7 to 4. The majority acknowledged they knew that the gag rule's main purpose was to stop abortions; it nevertheless remained constitutional. The majority relied on the Supreme Court precedent Rust v. Sullivan, which upheld a nearly identical rule during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Ikuta was joined by Senior Judge Edward Leavy and Judges Jay Bybee, Consuelo Callahan, Milan Smith, Eric Miller, and Kenneth K. Lee. Leavy was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Bybee, Callahan, Ikuta, and Smith by President George W. Bush, and Miller and Lee by President Trump.

Federalist Society[edit]

Judge Ikuta is an active member of The Federalist Society, a conservative and libertarian organization which holds panels, debates, and discussions, and she has been known to attend their national events.[9]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Confirmation hearings on federal appointments : hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session. pt.4 (2006) Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  2. ^ "- Confirmation Hearings on Federal Appointments".
  3. ^ "U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress - 2nd Session".
  4. ^ "Setting the Stage for a Potential Supreme Court Battle in Dukes v. Wal-Mart: A Sharply Divided Ninth Circuit Attempts to Articulate New Standards that Could Impact Employers". 7 May 2010.
  5. ^ Note, Recent Case: Ninth Circuit Deems Unconstitutional Routine Shackling in Pretrial Proceedings, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 1163 (2018).
  6. ^ United States v. Sanchez-Gomez, 859 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).
  7. ^ "United States v. Sanchez-Gomez". Oyez Project. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
  8. ^ United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2019-07-12). "Opinion No. 18-55599" (PDF). United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  9. ^ "StackPath". Retrieved 2019-03-05.

External links[edit]

Legal offices
Preceded by
James R. Browning
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit