Selective school (New South Wales)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Selective High Schools Test)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Selective schools in New South Wales, Australia are government high schools operated by the New South Wales Department of Education that accept their students based upon their academic merit.[1]

Each year, approximately 15,000 Year 6 students across the state of New South Wales optionally undertake the Selective High Schools Test to seek one of the 3,600 places offered for first-year entry into selective high schools. For Year 8 to Year 12 entry into selective schools, students do not take an external test, however they can apply directly to a school for entry. The application package is standard to all government selective schools, with internal selection committees considering applications each year in August–September.[2]

History[edit]

The first government selective high schools in NSW were established in the twentieth century. They included Bathurst High School, Fort Street High School, Goulburn High School, St. George Girls High School, Sydney Technical High School, Penrith High School and Sydney High School (now Sydney Boys High School and Sydney Girls High School).

In 2010, 14 more comprehensive high schools became partially selective, with one or more classes of selective students, and a "virtual school" bringing together a single class of students from regional NSW.[3]

As of 2019 there are 47 fully or partially selective government high schools, including 17 fully selective high schools (some of which are co-educational and other provide a single-sex educational environment; 25 partially selective high schools (high schools with both selective and comprehensive classes); four selective agricultural high schools; and one virtual selective high school.[4] Of the 47 school, 34 are located in greater metropolitan Sydney.

The Aurora College is a virtual selective high school that caters for students enrolled in government high schools in rural or remote areas in New South Wales.[4] Virtual classes commenced in January 2015 with over 160 students. The school is managed from administrative offices based in Lane Cove North. Aurora allows students in rural and remote areas to remain in their local school and community while studying specialist subjects which their home school cannot currently offer. The College uses a range of technologies to access more fast-paced lessons delivered by video and interact with each other, and attend a residential program held twice per year.[5]

Partially selective schools[edit]

A number of schools have been designated as "partially selective", in that they have self-contained classes to provide for gifted and talented[6] students in the junior years of high school. Often, schools combine selective and comprehensive streams as students enter the senior years,[7] however, in practice, selective students tend to "self-select" into more advanced classes, such as extension units in Mathematics and English.

How the profile score is calculated[edit]

In general, entry into a government selective school is determined by a profile score, which is derived by combining school marks in English and mathematics with the marks received in the Selective High Schools Test in reading, writing, mathematics and general ability.

The profile score is computed simply by adding the English, mathematics and general ability component scores which are marks out of 100 to form the profile score out of 300.[8]

As of 2019 the component scores are computed as follows:[8]

  • In general ability the test marks are scaled on a statewide basis to a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 12 to form the component general ability score out of 100;
  • In mathematics the test marks are likewise scaled on a statewide basis to a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 12 to form the scaled mathematics test marks out of 100. However, in mathematics the process of determining the component score is slightly more complex because in mathematics there is a school mark to consider in addition to the test mark. To include the school mark the next step of the process is to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the scaled mathematics test marks for each school. Then, school at a time, the mathematics school marks for each student are moderated (or scaled) to the same mean and standard deviation as the scaled test marks for students for that school. The scores formed from this process are called the moderated school marks and are also out of 100. The reason for scaling the school marks and test marks to the same mean and standard deviation is to ensure that both school and test marks have the same value in the final component score. Next, the scaled test marks and moderated school marks for each student are averaged and then re-scaled on a statewide basis to the mean of 60 and standard deviation of 12 to form the final component score out of 100. The reason for scaling all component scores to the same mean and standard deviation is to ensure that each component is given an equal value in the profile score. If this were not to occur then the component with the highest standard deviation would have the greatest value; and
  • In English this process is even more complex because there are two test marks (reading and writing) and only one school mark (English). However, the school mark contains both reading and writing components so the process is fair and valid. Put briefly, the procedure described above for mathematics is repeated twice in English. The school English mark is moderated first for reading and then again for writing. The resultant scores for reading are then given a weighting of two thirds and the resultant scores for writing are given a weighting of one third. These two scores are then added and re-scaled on a statewide basis to a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 12 to form the final component score in English out of 100.

Scaling and moderating school and tests marks ensure that:[8]

  • school and test marks have the same value;
  • school marks from each school are placed on the same scale as the test marks achieved by students from those same schools thereby making it possible to fairly compare school marks from one school with school marks from each other school; and
  • each component (English, mathematics and general ability) has the same value.

The process also includes 'wild-score' processing which identifies students who, based on their school performance, may have done much worse than expected in the test. Where such students have been identified the moderating process takes this into account and adjusts scores accordingly. This ensures that students will not be disadvantaged by other students who attend the same school and may have done much worse than expected because of serious illness, misadventure or other cause.

By early July students receive letters informing them of one of three outcomes concerning their application to each school:

  • offer – the student can apply immediately for enrolment in the certain school;
  • reserve list – the student is placed on a waiting list, with the possibility of entry if their place on the list is reached; or
  • unsuccessful – the student will not be considered for a place.

In some cases, an application can be placed on 'hold', meaning it is awaiting the result of further enquiries by the Department of Education.[9]

Other criteria include age and grade, and current residency status in Australia. This usually requires students to be between 11 years and 5 months and 13 years at the start of the year they wish to commence Year 7, be in Year 6 the year before they wish to enter, and be either a citizen or permanent resident of Australia or a citizen of New Zealand. However, exemptions to some of these requirements may be given in special circumstances or through consultation with the Department of Education.[10]

Debate[edit]

The existence of government selective schools in NSW, which also exist in Victoria,[11] Queensland[12] and Western Australia, has not been without controversy, with much of it centred on the discrepancies between selective high schools and comprehensive high schools.

A significant dismantling of the selective schools system was proposed by an inquiry in 2002 that was funded by the NSW Parents and Citizens Association and the NSW Teachers Federation.[13] At that time, the report called for the changing of 12 of the state's 19 selective high schools to partially selective high schools, retaining only the seven most established schools: Fort Street, North Sydney Boys', North Sydney Girls', Sydney Boys', Sydney Girls', Sydney Technical, and St George Girls'.[13] The recommendation were justified, from the viewpoint of the inquiry's chair UNSW Professor Tony Vinson, by the fact that 'wherever possible, talented students should be able to remain within mainstream schools to maximise social cohesion and "an inclusive school community"'.[13]

However, although the report had the backing of the then NSW Education Minister John Watkins,[13] most of the Vinson enquiry's recommendations, including most of the recommendations concerning the status of selective schools, were not implemented by the NSW Government. Another report commissioned by the Department of Education, in 2005, drew on consultation with the public across the entire state school system and found that opinions are still polarised on whether they should continue to exist.[14]

The debate has been reignited recently[when?] due to a string of articles from The Sydney Morning Herald criticising selective schools, with the main argument purporting that they are the cause of much socio-economic divide within Sydney.[citation needed]

In December 2018, the then NSW Minister for Education, Rob Stokes, announced the findings of the Review of Selective Education Access[15] that outlined changes that aim to increase the number of girls, poor, disabled and English students in selective schools.[16][17] The review found that:[15][18]

  • The existing selection process is no longer fit for purpose and needs updating for the coming decades;
  • Students from disadvantaged groups face unintended barriers to entry in the selective education system;
  • Shortcomings in the assessment process mean it is not capturing all students’ true ability and so may not identify all the students it is intended to; and
  • A number of gaps in the selection system constrain its effectiveness.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Selective high schools and opportunity classes: General information". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  2. ^ "Selective high schools and opportunity classes: Selective high schools - Years 8 to 12". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  3. ^ "630 New Selective places at high schools". New South Wales Department of Education. 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2008.
  4. ^ a b "List of Selective high schools". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  5. ^ "Our School". Aurora College. New South Wales Department of Education. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  6. ^ "Selective high schools and opportunity classes: Selective high schools – Year 7: What are selective high schools?". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 21 April 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  7. ^ "Selective high schools and opportunity classes: Selective high schools – Year 7". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. n.d. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  8. ^ a b c "Selective high schools and opportunity classes: Selective high schools – Year 7: Selection process". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 31 July 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  9. ^ "Placement outcome information" (PDF). New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  10. ^ "Selective high schools – Year 7: Information for applicants". New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. 1 July 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  11. ^ Fifield, Mitch (12 May 2004). First speech (Speech). Hansard. Australian Senate, Canberra, ACT: Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  12. ^ "Homepage". Queensland Academies. Department of Education; Queensland Government. n.d. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  13. ^ a b c d "Axe hovers over selective high schools". The Sydney Morning Herald. 24 July 2002. Retrieved 2 August 2006.
  14. ^ Secondary School Years. NSW Department of Education and Training. June 2005. Retrieved 2 August 2006. (pdf 125kb)
  15. ^ a b "Review of Selective Education Access: Findings and Action Plan" (PDF). New South Wales Department of Education. Government of New South Wales. December 2018. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  16. ^ Baker, Jordan (17 December 2018). "Making selective schools entry test coach-proof". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  17. ^ Peters, Scott (18 December 2018). "Practical steps will make the selective schools test fairer". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  18. ^ "How the 2020 NSW selective school placement test has changed". Global Education Academy. 8 May 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.

External links[edit]