Self-archiving is the act of (the author's) depositing a free copy of an electronic document online in order to provide open access to it. The term usually refers to the self-archiving of peer-reviewed research journal and conference articles, as well as theses and book chapters, deposited in the author's own institutional repository or open archive for the purpose of maximizing its accessibility, usage and citation impact. The term green open access has become common in recent years, distinguishing this approach from gold open access, where the journal itself makes the articles publicly available without charge to the reader.
Self-archiving was first explicitly proposed as a universal practice by Stevan Harnad in his 1994 online posting "Subversive Proposal" (later published in Association of Research Libraries) although computer scientists had been practicing self-archiving in anonymous FTP archives since at least the 1980s (see CiteSeer) and physicists had been doing it since the early 1990s on the web (see arXiv).
A majority of journals endorse unembargoed self-archiving of the postprint, immediately upon acceptance for publication. Other journals impose an embargo of 6–12 months or more on making the article open access.
Whereas the right to self-archive postprints is often a copyright matter (if the rights have been transferred to the publisher), the right to self-archive preprints is merely a question of journal policy.
Locations for self-archiving include institutional repositories, subject-based repositories, personal websites, and social networking websites that target researchers. Publishers often offer more favorable self-archiving policies for institutional and subject repositories with shorter embargo periods.
Social reference management software websites such as Mendeley, Academia.edu, and ResearchGate facilitate sharing between researchers; however, these services are often subject to criticism for using scholars' contributions for commercial purposes as well as for copyright violation. They are also targeted by publishers for copyright compliance, such as when Elsevier (which purchased Mendeley) issued Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notices to Academia.edu for hosting scientific papers. Social networking services also do not fulfill the requirements of many self-archiving policies from grant funders, journals, and institutions.
- Open access mandate
- Open access
- Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR)
- Subversive Proposal
- List of academic journals by preprint policy
- Harnad, S. (2001). "The Self-Archiving Initiative". Nature. 410 (6832): 1024–1025. doi:10.1038/35074210.
- Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004) The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. Serials Review 30.
- Okerson, A. S. & O'Donnell, J. J. eds. (1995). Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/sc/subversive/
- "Statistics for the 2107 publishers in the RoMEO database". Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- Cambridge University Press. "Cambridge Journals Online: Open Access Options".
- American Geophysical Union. "Usage Permissions".
- Self-Archiving FAQ
- "A social networking site is not an open access repository". Office of Scholarly Communication. 2015-12-01. Retrieved 2017-02-24.
- "Do academic social networks share academics' interests?". Times Higher Education (THE). 2016-04-07. Retrieved 2017-02-24.
- Jamali, Hamid R. (2017-02-16). "Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles". Scientometrics: 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4. ISSN 0138-9130.
- Clarke, Michael. "The End of an Era for Academia.edu and Other Academic Networks?". The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved 2016-03-24.
||This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. (August 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
- "Self-Archiving FAQ for the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI)".
- "Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving". SHERPA/RoMEO.
- "ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies".
- Harnad, Stevan (1991). "Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Revolution in the Means of Production of Knowledge". The Public-Access Computer Systems Review. 2 (1): 39–53. Retrieved 2013-12-19.
- Harnad, Stevan (1995). "The Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: How to Get There from Here". The Information Society. 11 (4): 285–291. doi:10.1080/01972243.1995.9960203. Retrieved 2013-12-19.
- Stevan Harnad (2003). "Online Archives for Peer-Reviewed Journal Publications". In John Feather & Paul Sturges. International Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Routledge.
- Harnad,Stevan (2005). "Fast-Forward on the Green Road to Open Access: The Case Against Mixing Up Green and Gold". Ariadne. 42 (2005). arXiv: [cs.IR]. Bibcode:2005cs........3021H.
- Harnad, Stevan (2005). "Making the case for web-based self-archiving". Research Money. 19 (16).
- Harnad, Stevan; Brody, T. (2004). "Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals". D-Lib Magazine. 10 (6). Japanese translation
- Swan, A. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An Introduction. (Report). JISC, HEFCE.
- Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., Oppenheim, C., O’Brien, A., Hardy, R., Rowland, F. and Brown, S. (2005). "Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further and higher education". Learned Publishing. 18 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1087/0953151052801479.