A shape-memory alloy (SMA, smart metal, memory metal, memory alloy, muscle wire, smart alloy) is an alloy that "remembers" its original shape and that when deformed returns to its pre-deformed shape when heated. This material is a lightweight, solid-state alternative to conventional actuators such as hydraulic, pneumatic, and motor-based systems. Shape-memory alloys have applications in robotics and automotive, aerospace and biomedical industries.
- 1 Overview
- 2 One-way vs. two-way shape memory
- 3 Superelasticity
- 4 History
- 5 Crystal structures
- 6 Manufacture
- 7 Properties
- 8 Practical limitations
- 9 Applications
- 10 Materials
- 11 References
- 12 External links
||This section needs attention from an expert in Technology or Engineering. (February 2009)|
The two main types of shape-memory alloys are copper-aluminium-nickel, and nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys but SMAs can also be created by alloying zinc, copper, gold and iron. Although iron-based and copper-based SMAs, such as Fe-Mn-Si, Cu-Zn-Al and Cu-Al-Ni, are commercially available and cheaper than NiTi, NiTi based SMAs are preferable for most applications due to their stability, practicability and superior thermo-mechanic performance. SMAs can exist in two different phases, with three different crystal structures (i.e. twinned martensite, detwinned martensite and austenite) and six possible transformations.
NiTi alloys change from austenite to martensite upon cooling; Mf is the temperature at which the transition to martensite completes upon cooling. Accordingly, during heating As and Af are the temperatures at which the transformation from martensite to austenite starts and finishes. Repeated use of the shape-memory effect may lead to a shift of the characteristic transformation temperatures (this effect is known as functional fatigue, as it is closely related with a change of microstructural and functional properties of the material). The maximum temperature at which SMAs can no longer be stress induced is called Md, where the SMAs are permanently deformed.
The transition from the martensite phase to the austenite phase is only dependent on temperature and stress, not time, as most phase changes are, as there is no diffusion involved. Similarly, the austenite structure receives its name from steel alloys of a similar structure. It is the reversible diffusionless transition between these two phases that results in special properties. While martensite can be formed from austenite by rapidly cooling carbon-steel, this process is not reversible, so steel does not have shape-memory properties.
In this figure, ξ(T) represents the martensite fraction. The difference between the heating transition and the cooling transition gives rise to hysteresis where some of the mechanical energy is lost in the process. The shape of the curve depends on the material properties of the shape-memory alloy, such as the alloying. and work hardening.
One-way vs. two-way shape memory
Shape-memory alloys have different shape-memory effects. Two common effects are one-way and two-way shape memory. A schematic of the effects is shown below.
The procedures are very similar: starting from martensite (a), adding a reversible deformation for the one-way effect or severe deformation with an irreversible amount for the two-way (b), heating the sample (c) and cooling it again (d).
One-way memory effect
When a shape-memory alloy is in its cold state (below As), the metal can be bent or stretched and will hold those shapes until heated above the transition temperature. Upon heating, the shape changes to its original. When the metal cools again it will remain in the hot shape, until deformed again.
With the one-way effect, cooling from high temperatures does not cause a macroscopic shape change. A deformation is necessary to create the low-temperature shape. On heating, transformation starts at As and is completed at Af (typically 2 to 20 °C or hotter, depending on the alloy or the loading conditions). As is determined by the alloy type and composition and can vary between and −150 °C. 200 °C
Two-way memory effect
The two-way shape-memory effect is the effect that the material remembers two different shapes: one at low temperatures, and one at the high-temperature shape. A material that shows a shape-memory effect during both heating and cooling is said to have two-way shape memory. This can also be obtained without the application of an external force (intrinsic two-way effect). The reason the material behaves so differently in these situations lies in training. Training implies that a shape memory can "learn" to behave in a certain way. Under normal circumstances, a shape-memory alloy "remembers" its low-temperature shape, but upon heating to recover the high-temperature shape, immediately "forgets" the low-temperature shape. However, it can be "trained" to "remember" to leave some reminders of the deformed low-temperature condition in the high-temperature phases. There are several ways of doing this. A shaped, trained object heated beyond a certain point will lose the two-way memory effect.
SMAs also display superelasticity, which is characterized by recovery of unusually large strains. Instead of transforming between the martensite and austenite phases in response to temperature, this phase transformation can be induced in response to mechanical stress. When SMAs are loaded in the austenite phase, the material will transform to the martensite phase above a critical stress, proportional to the transformation temperatures. Upon continued loading, the twinned martensite will begin to detwin, allowing the material to undergo large deformations. Once the stress is released, the martensite transforms back to austenite, and the material recovers its original shape. As a result, these materials can reversibly deform to very high strains – up to 8 percent. A more thorough discussion of the mechanisms of superelasticity and the shape-memory effect is presented by Ma et al.
The first reported steps towards the discovery of the shape-memory effect were taken in the 1930s. According to Otsuka and Wayman, A. Ölander discovered the pseudoelastic behavior of the Au-Cd alloy in 1932. Greninger and Mooradian (1938) observed the formation and disappearance of a martensitic phase by decreasing and increasing the temperature of a Cu-Zn alloy. The basic phenomenon of the memory effect governed by the thermoelastic behavior of the martensite phase was widely reported a decade later by Kurdjumov and Khandros (1949) and also by Chang and Read (1951).
The nickel-titanium alloys were first developed in 1962–1963 by the United States Naval Ordnance Laboratory and commercialized under the trade name Nitinol (an acronym for Nickel Titanium Naval Ordnance Laboratories). Their remarkable properties were discovered by accident. A sample that was bent out of shape many times was presented at a laboratory management meeting. One of the associate technical directors, Dr. David S. Muzzey, decided to see what would happen if the sample was subjected to heat and held his pipe lighter underneath it. To everyone's amazement the sample stretched back to its original shape.
There is another type of SMA, called a ferromagnetic shape-memory alloy (FSMA), that changes shape under strong magnetic fields. These materials are of particular interest as the magnetic response tends to be faster and more efficient than temperature-induced responses.
Metal alloys are not the only thermally-responsive materials; shape-memory polymers have also been developed, and became commercially available in the late 1990s.
Many metals have several different crystal structures at the same composition, but most metals do not show this shape-memory effect. The special property that allows shape-memory alloys to revert to their original shape after heating is that their crystal transformation is fully reversible. In most crystal transformations, the atoms in the structure will travel through the metal by diffusion, changing the composition locally, even though the metal as a whole is made of the same atoms. A reversible transformation does not involve this diffusion of atoms, instead all the atoms shift at the same time to form a new structure, much in the way a parallelogram can be made out of a square by pushing on two opposing sides. At different temperatures, different structures are preferred and when the structure is cooled through the transition temperature, the martensitic structure forms from the austenitic phase.
Shape-memory alloys are typically made by casting, using vacuum arc melting or induction melting. These are specialist techniques used to keep impurities in the alloy to a minimum and ensure the metals are well mixed. The ingot is then hot rolled into longer sections and then drawn to turn it into wire.
The way in which the alloys are "trained" depends on the properties wanted. The "training" dictates the shape that the alloy will remember when it is heated. This occurs by heating the alloy so that the dislocations re-order into stable positions, but not so hot that the material recrystallizes. They are heated to between and 400 °C for 30 minutes, shaped while hot, and then are cooled rapidly by quenching in water or by cooling with air. 500 °C
The copper-based and NiTi-based shape-memory alloys are considered to be engineering materials. These compositions can be manufactured to almost any shape and size.
The yield strength of shape-memory alloys is lower than that of conventional steel, but some compositions have a higher yield strength than plastic or aluminum. The yield stress for Ni Ti can reach MPa. The high cost of the metal itself and the processing requirements make it difficult and expensive to implement SMAs into a design. As a result, these materials are used in applications where the super elastic properties or the shape-memory effect can be exploited. The most common application is in actuation. 500
One of the advantages to using shape-memory alloys is the high level of recoverable plastic strain that can be induced. The maximum recoverable strain these materials can hold without permanent damage is up to for some alloys. This compares with a maximum strain 8% for conventional steels. 0.5%
SMA have many advantages over traditional actuators, but do suffer from a series of limitations that may impede practical application.
Response time and response symmetry
SMA actuators are typically actuated electrically, where an electric current results in Joule heating. Deactivation typically occurs by free convective heat transfer to the ambient environment. Consequently, SMA actuation is typically asymmetric, with a relatively fast actuation time and a slow deactuation time. A number of methods have been proposed to reduce SMA deactivation time, including forced convection, and lagging the SMA with a conductive material in order to manipulate the heat transfer rate.
Novel methods to enhance the feasibility of SMA actuators include the use of a conductive "lagging". this method uses a thermal paste to rapidly transfer heat from the SMA by conduction. This heat is then more readily transferred to the environment by convection as the outer radii (and heat transfer area) is significantly greater than for the bare wire. This method results in a significant reduction in deactivation time and a symmetric activation profile. As a consequence of the increased heat transfer rate, the required current to achieve a given actuation force is increased.
Structural fatigue and functional fatigue
SMA is subject to structural fatigue – a failure mode by which cyclic loading results in the initiation and propagation of a crack that eventually results in catastrophic loss of function by fracture. The physics behind this fatigue mode is accumulation of microstructural damage during cyclic loading. This failure mode is observed in most engineering materials, not just SMAs.
SMAs are also subject to functional fatigue, a failure mode not typical of most engineering materials, whereby the SMA does not fail structurally but loses its shape-memory/superelastic characteristics over time. As a result of cyclic loading (both mechanical and thermal), the material loses its ability to undergo a reversible phase transformation. For example, the working displacement in an actuator decreases with increasing cycle numbers. The physics behind this is gradual change in microstructure—more specifically, the buildup of accommodation slip dislocations. This is often accompanied by a significant change in transformation temperatures.
SMA actuators are typically actuated electrically by Joule heating. If the SMA is used in an environment where the ambient temperature is uncontrolled, unintentional actuation by ambient heating may occur.
Aircraft and spacecraft
Boeing, General Electric Aircraft Engines, Goodrich Corporation, NASA, Texas A&M University and All Nippon Airways developed the Variable Geometry Chevron using a NiTi SMA. Such a variable area fan nozzle (VAFN) design would allow for quieter and more efficient jet engines in the future. In 2005 and 2006, Boeing conducted successful flight testing of this technology.
SMAs are being explored as vibration dampers for launch vehicles and commercial jet engines. The large amount of hysteresis observed during the superelastic effect allow SMAs to dissipate energy and dampen vibrations. These materials show promise for reducing the high vibration loads on payloads during launch as well as on fan blades in commercial jet engines, allowing for more lightweight and efficient designs. SMAs also exhibit potential for other high shock applications such as ball bearings and landing gear.
There is also strong interest in using SMAs for a variety of actuator applications in commercial jet engines, which would significantly reduce their weight and boost efficiency. Further research needs to be conducted in this area, however, to increase the transformation temperatures and improve the mechanical properties of these materials before they can be successfully implemented. A review of recent advances in high-temperature shape-memory alloys (HTSMAs) is presented by Ma et al.
A variety of wing-morphing technologies are also being explored.
The first high-volume product (> 5Mio actuators / year) is an automotive valve used to control low pressure pneumatic bladders in a car seat that adjust the contour of the lumbar support / bolsters. The overall benefits of SMA over traditionally-used solenoids in this application (lower noise/EMC/weight/form factor/power consumption) were the crucial factor in the decision to replace the old standard technology with SMA.
The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette became the first vehicle to incorporate SMA actuators, which replaced heavier motorized actuators to open and close the hatch vent that releases air from the trunk, making it easier to close. A variety of other applications are also being targeted, including electric generators to generate electricity from exhaust heat and on-demand air dams to optimize aerodynamics at various speeds.
There have also been limited studies on using these materials in robotics, for example the hobbyist robot Stiquito (and "Roboterfrau Lara"), as they make it possible to create very lightweight robots. Recently, a prosthetic hand was introduced by Loh et al. that can almost replicate the motions of a human hand [Loh2005]. Other biomimetic applications are also being explored. Weak points of the technology are energy inefficiency, slow response times, and large hysteresis.
SMAs find a variety of applications in civil structures such as bridges and buildings. One such application is Intelligent Reinforced Concrete (IRC), which incorporates SMA wires embedded within the concrete. These wires can sense cracks and contract to heal macro-sized cracks. Another application is active tuning of structural natural frequency using SMA wires to dampen vibrations.
The first consumer commercial application was a shape-memory coupling for piping, e.g. oil line pipes for industrial applications, water pipes and similar types of piping for consumer/commercial applications.
The second high volume application was an autofocus (AF) actuator for a smart phone. There are currently several companies working on an optical image stabilisation (OIS) module driven by SMA wires.
The late 1980s saw the commercial introduction of Nitinol as an enabling technology in a number of minimally invasive endovascular medical applications. While more costly than stainless steel, the self expanding properties of Nitinol alloys manufactured to BTR (Body Temperature Response), have provided an attractive alternative to balloon expandable devices in stent grafts where it gives the ability to adapt to the shape of certain blood vessels when exposed to body temperature. On average, of all peripheral vascular 50%stents currently available on the worldwide market are manufactured with Nitinol.
Eyeglass frames made from titanium-containing SMAs are marketed under the trademarks Flexon and TITANflex. These frames are usually made out of shape-memory alloys that have their transition temperature set below the expected room temperature. This allows the frames to undergo large deformation under stress, yet regain their intended shape once the metal is unloaded again. The very large apparently elastic strains are due to the stress-induced martensitic effect, where the crystal structure can transform under loading, allowing the shape to change temporarily under load. This means that eyeglasses made of shape-memory alloys are more robust against being accidentally damaged.
||This section needs attention from an expert in Medicine. (February 2009)|
Memory metal has been utilized in orthopedic surgery as a fixation-compression device for osteotomies, typically for lower extremity procedures. The device, usually in the form of a large staple, is stored in a refrigerator in its malleable form and is implanted into pre-drilled holes in the bone across an osteotomy. As the staple warms it returns to its non-malleable state and compresses the bony surfaces together to promote bone union.
The range of applications for SMAs has grown over the years, a major area of development being dentistry. One example is the prevalence of dental braces using SMA technology to exert constant tooth-moving forces on the teeth; the nitinol archwire was developed in 1972 by orthodontist George Andreasen. This revolutionized clinical orthodontics. Andreasen's alloy has a patterned shape memory, expanding and contracting within given temperature ranges because of its geometric programming.
Experimental solid state heat engines, operating from the relatively small temperature differences in cold and hot water reservoirs, have been developed since the 1970s, including the Banks Engine, developed by Ridgway Banks.
Sold in small round lengths for use in affixment-free bracelets.
A variety of alloys exhibit the shape-memory effect. Alloying constituents can be adjusted to control the transformation temperatures of the SMA. Some common systems include the following (by no means an exhaustive list):
- Ag-Cd 44/49 at.% Cd
- Au-Cd 46.5/50 at.% Cd
- Cu-Al-Ni 14/14.5 wt% Al and 3/4.5 wt% Ni
- Cu-Sn approx. 15 at% Sn
- Cu-Zn 38.5/41.5 wt.% Zn
- Cu-Zn-X (X = Si, Al, Sn)
- Fe-Pt approx. 25 at.% Pt
- Mn-Cu 5/35 at% Cu
- Ni-Ti approx. 55–60 wt% Ni
- Wilkes, K. E.; Liaw, P. K.; Wilkes, K. E. (2000). "The fatigue behavior of shape-memory alloys". JOM 52 (10): 45. doi:10.1007/s11837-000-0083-3.
- Cederström, J.; Van Humbeeck, J. (1995). "Relationship Between Shape Memory Material Properties and Applications" (PDF). Le Journal de Physique IV 05: C2–335. doi:10.1051/jp4:1995251.
- Hodgson DE, Wu MH, Biermann RJ. (1990) "Shape memory alloys", pp. 897–902 in ASM Handbook Volume 2, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose. ASM International. ISBN 0871703785
- Huang, W. (2002). "On the selection of shape memory alloys for actuators". Materials & Design 23: 11–19. doi:10.1016/S0261-3069(01)00039-5.
- Sun, L.; Huang, W. M. (2010). "Nature of the multistage transformation in shape memory alloys upon heating". Metal Science and Heat Treatment 51 (11–12): 573. doi:10.1007/s11041-010-9213-x.
- Mihálcz I. (2001). "Fundamental characteristics and design method for nickel-titanium shape memory alloy". Periodica Polytechnica Ser Mech Eng. 45: 75–86.
- Shape Memory Materials, K Otsuka, CM Wayman, Cambridge University Press, 1999 ISBN 0-521-66384-9
- Duerig TW, Pelton AR. (1994) "Ti-Ni shape memory alloys". in Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, Gerhard Welsch, Rodney Boyer, E. W. Collings (eds.) American Society for Metals. pp. 1035–48. ISBN 0871704811.
- Wu, S; Wayman, C (1987). "Martensitic transformations and the shape-memory effect in Ti50Ni10Au40 and Ti50Au50 alloys". Metallography 20 (3): 359. doi:10.1016/0026-0800(87)90045-0.
- Filip, P (1995). "Influence of work hardening and heat treatment on the substructure and deformation behaviour of TiNi shape memory alloys". Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 32 (9): 1375. doi:10.1016/0956-716X(95)00174-T.
- Shape Memory Alloy Shape Training Tutorial. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2011-12-04.
- Ma, J.; Karaman, I.; Noebe, R. D. (2010). "High temperature shape memory alloys". International Materials Reviews 55 (5): 257. doi:10.1179/095066010x12646898728363.
- Kauffman, George & Isaac Mayo (October 1993). "Memory Metal" (PDF). Chem Matters: 4–7.
- Oral history by William J. Buehler. wolaa.org.
- Lara-Quintanilla, A.; Hulskamp, A. W.; Bersee, H. E. (October 2013). "A high-rate shape memory alloy actuator for aerodynamic load control on wind turbines". Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 24 (15): 1834–1845. doi:10.1177/1045389X13478271. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
- Huang, S; Leary, Martin; Attalla, Tamer; Probst, K; Subic, A (2012). "Optimisation of Ni–Ti shape memory alloy response time by transient heat transfer analysis". Materials & Design 35: 655–663. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.043.
- Leary, M; Schiavone, F; Subic, A (2010). "Lagging for control of shape memory alloy actuator response time". Materials & Design 31 (4): 2124–2128. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.010.
- Miyazaki, S.; Kim, H. Y.; Hosoda, H. (2006). "Development and characterization of Ni-free Ti-base shape memory and superelastic alloys". Materials Science and Engineering: A. 438-440: 18. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.054.
- Mabe, J. H.; Calkins, F. T.; Alkislar, M. B. (2008). "Variable area jet nozzle using shape memory alloy actuators in an antagonistic design". Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies 2008. Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies 2008 6930. pp. 69300T. doi:10.1117/12.776816.
- Lagoudas, D. C.; Hartl, D. J. (2007). "Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 221 (4): 535. doi:10.1243/09544100jaero211.
- DellaCorte, C. (2014) Novel Super-Elastic Materials for Advanced Bearing Applications.
- Webster, J. (2006). "High integrity adaptive SMA components for gas turbine applications". Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies. Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies 6171. pp. 61710F. doi:10.1117/12.669027.
- The Lara Project – G1 and G2. Lararobot.de. Retrieved on 2011-12-04.
- Song, G.; Ma, N.; Li, H. -N. (2006). "Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures". Engineering Structures 28 (9): 1266. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010.
- Mereau, TM; Ford, TC (2006). "Nitinol compression staples for bone fixation in foot surgery". Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 96 (2): 102–6. doi:10.7547/0960102. PMID 16546946.
- Obituary of Dr. Andreasen. New York Times (1989-08-15). Retrieved on 2011-12-04.
- Dilibal, S.; Sehitoglu, H.; Hamilton, R. F.; Maier, H. J.; Chumlyakov, Y. (2011). "On the volume change in Co–Ni–Al during pseudoelasticity" (PDF). Materials Science and Engineering: A 528 (6): 2875. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.056.
- Hamilton, R. F.; Dilibal, S.; Sehitoglu, H.; Maier, H. J. (2011). "Underlying mechanism of dual hysteresis in Ni Mn Ga single crystals". Materials Science and Engineering: A 528 (3): 1877. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.042.
Media related to Memory effect at Wikimedia Commons
- Shape Memory Alloys and Their Applications – Introductory information on shape-memory alloys
- Lagging for control of shape memory alloy actuator response time – Materials & Design, M. Leary, F. Schiavone, A. Subic
- Optimisation of Ni–Ti shape memory alloy response time by transient heat transfer analysis – Materials & Design, S. Huang, M.Leary, T.Ataalla, K.Probst, A.Subic
- A high-rate shape memory alloy actuator for aerodynamic load control on wind turbines – Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Adrian Lara-Quintanilla, Anton W Hulskamp and Harald EN Bersee
- Nitinol Technical Information (from Johnson Matthey, Inc.)
- BBC report on medical applications of Nitinol
- SFB 459: A German research center for shape-memory alloys
- A German company that develops and produce SMA-Materials
- SMAterial.com – phenomena, crystallography, model, simulation and applications of SMA – Has .gif animations demonstrating the effect.
- Main site for the Consortium for the Advancement of SMA Research and Technology – Introduction to government, academic, and industrial research partners.
- Texas A&M University's Shape Memory Alloy Research Team – SMA overview, publications, etc.
- Institute of Physics, ASCR – Research Projects, publications, events & conferences, functional materials
- SMST Proceedings
- Fundamentals and applications of shape memory alloys (German)
- DoITPoMS Teaching and Learning Package: "Superelasticity and Shape Memory Alloys"
- Dr.Savas Dilibal`s webpage – SMA based applications, publications, etc.