|A sign warning about the presence of sharks off Salt Rock, South Africa|
|Classification and external resources|
The term shark attack is used to describe an attack on a human by a shark. Every year over 70 attacks are reported worldwide. Despite their relative rarity, many people fear shark attacks after occasional serial attacks, such as the Jersey Shore shark attacks of 1916, and horror fiction and films such as the Jaws series. Out of more than 480 shark species, only three are responsible for a double-digit number of fatal, unprovoked attacks on humans: the great white, tiger, and bull; however, the oceanic whitetip has probably killed many more castaways, not recorded in the statistics.
- 1 Statistics
- 2 Species involved in incidents
- 3 Types of attacks
- 4 Reasons for attacks
- 5 Prevention
- 6 Media impact
- 7 List of notable victims
- 8 See also
- 9 References
- 10 External links
|Pacific Islands / Oceania
|Antilles and Bahamas||70||16||2013|
|Unspecified / Open Ocean||21||7||1995|
|Sources: Australian Shark Attack File for unprovoked attacks in Australia
International Shark Attack File for unprovoked attacks in all other regions
Since 1791 to the end of 2015, Australia recorded a total of 1,032 shark attacks and is, therefore, ranked as one of the highest shark attack countries worldwide. Globally, Australia is ranked the highest country in terms of shark attack fatalities, recording a total of 236 fatalities since 1791. Western Australia is also referred to as the world's deadliest waters, as the highest number of deaths have occurred in Western Australia, which has experienced 11 fatal shark attacks since 2000. In 2000, there were 79 shark attacks reported worldwide, 11 of them fatal. In 2005 and 2006 this number decreased to 61 and 62 respectively, while the number of fatalities dropped to only four per year. Of these attacks, the majority occurred in the United States (53 in 2000, 40 in 2005, and 39 in 2006). The New York Times reported in July 2008 that there had been only one fatal attack in the previous year. On average, there are 16 shark attacks per year in the United States, with one fatality every two years. Despite these reports, however, the actual number of fatal shark attacks worldwide remains uncertain. For the majority of Third World coastal nations, there exists no method of reporting suspected shark attacks; therefore, losses and fatalities near-shore or at sea there often remain unsolved or unpublicized.
Australia has the highest number of fatal shark attacks in the world, with Western Australia recently becoming the deadliest place in the world for shark attacks, which subsequently prompted a shark cull by state authorities. However, WA's 'Bait and Kill' policy was not implemented as the WA's EPA reported that the policy breached the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development; the precautionary principle, conservation of biodiversity and inter-generational equity. Less than one in every three million scuba dives in Western Australia resulted in a fatal shark attack. This statistic is changing, however, after the increased popularity in personal shark deterrent devices. Nonetheless, Australia and South Africa's fatality rate for shark attacks stabilised at approximately 30 percent. The United States has the highest reported number of shark attacks but has the lowest fatality rate, with only around 4 percent of those attacked dying. The United States has had a total of 1,085 attacks (44 fatal) during the past 342 years (1670–2012). According to the ISAF, the US states in which the most attacks have occurred are Florida, Hawaii, California, Texas and the Carolinas, though attacks have occurred in almost every coastal state. South Africa has a high number of shark attacks along with a high fatality rate of 27 percent.
The location with the most recorded shark attacks is New Smyrna Beach, Florida. Developed nations such as the United States, Australia and, to some extent, South Africa, facilitate more thorough documentation of shark attacks on humans than developing coastal nations. The increased use of technology has enabled Australia and the United States to record more data than other nations, which could somewhat bias the results recorded. In addition to this, individuals and institutions in South Africa, the US and Australia keep a file which is regularly updated by an entire research team, the International Shark Attack File, and the Australian Shark Attack File.
The Florida Museum of Natural History compares these statistics with the much higher rate of deaths from other causes. For example, an average of more than 38 people die annually from lightning strikes in coastal states, while less than 1 person per year is killed by a shark in Florida.
Even considering only people who go to beaches, a person's chance of getting attacked by a shark in the United States is 1 in 11.5 million, and a person's chance of getting killed by a shark is less than 1 in 264.1 million. In Australia on average one in every 5 million people is attacked by a shark, with only 1/4 of those attacked dying. In the United States, the annual number of people who drown is 3,306, whereas the annual number of shark fatalities is 1.
Species involved in incidents
Only a few types of sharks are dangerous to humans. Out of more than 480 shark species, only three are responsible for two-digit numbers of fatal unprovoked attacks on humans: the great white, tiger and bull; however, the oceanic whitetip has probably killed many more castaways which have not been recorded in the statistics. These sharks, being large, powerful predators, may sometimes attack and kill people; however, they have all been filmed in open water by unprotected divers. The 2010 French film Oceans shows footage of humans swimming next to sharks in the ocean. It is possible that the sharks are able to sense the presence of unnatural elements on or about the divers, such as polyurethane diving suits and air tanks, which may lead them to accept temporary outsiders as more of a curiosity than prey. Uncostumed humans, however, such as those surfboarding, light snorkeling or swimming, present a much greater area of exposed skin surface to sharks. In addition, the presence of even small traces of blood, recent minor abrasions, cuts, scrapes or bruises, may lead sharks to attack a human in their environment. Sharks seek out prey through electroreception, sensing the electric fields that are generated by all animals due to the activity of their nerves and muscles.
Most of the oceanic whitetip shark's attacks have not been recorded, unlike the other three species mentioned above. Famed oceanographic researcher Jacques Cousteau described the oceanic whitetip as "the most dangerous of all sharks".
Modern-day statistics show the oceanic whitetip shark as seldom being involved in unprovoked attacks. However, there have been a number of attacks involving this species, particularly during World War I and World War II. The oceanic whitetip lives in the open sea and rarely shows up near coasts, where most recorded incidents occur. During the world wars, many ship and aircraft disasters happened in the open ocean, and because of its former abundance, the oceanic whitetip was often the first species on site when such a disaster happened.
Infamous examples of oceanic whitetip attacks include the sinking of the Nova Scotia, a British steamship carrying 1,000 people that was torpedoed by a German submarine on November 18, 1942, near South Africa. Only 192 people survived, with many deaths attributed to the oceanic whitetip shark. The same species is believed to have been responsible for many of the 60–80 or more shark casualties following the torpedoing of the USS Indianapolis on July 30, 1945.
Black December refers to at least nine shark attacks on humans, causing six deaths, that occurred along the coast of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, from December 18, 1957, to April 5, 1958.
In addition to the four species responsible for a significant number of fatal attacks on humans, a number of other species have attacked humans without being provoked, and have on extremely rare occasions been responsible for a human death. This group includes the shortfin mako, hammerhead, Galapagos, gray reef, blacktip, lemon, silky shark and blue sharks. These sharks are also large, powerful predators which can be provoked simply by being in the water at the wrong time and place, but they are normally considered less dangerous to humans than the previous group.
On the evening of 16 March 2009, a new addition was made to the list of sharks known to have attacked human beings. In a painful but not directly life-threatening incident, a long-distance swimmer crossing the Alenuihaha Channel between the islands of Hawai'i and Maui was attacked by a cookiecutter shark. The two bites, delivered about 15 seconds apart, were not immediately life-threatening.
A great white shark is believed to be responsible for an attack on a swimmer at Muriwai Beach in Auckland, New Zealand in February 2013. It was the first confirmed shark attack fatality in the country since 1976.
Types of attacks
Shark attack indices use different criteria to determine if an attack was "provoked" or "unprovoked." When considered from the shark's point of view, attacks on humans who are perceived as a threat to the shark or a competitor to its food source are all "provoked" attacks. Neither the International Shark Attack File (ISAF) nor the Global Shark Attack File (GSAF) accord casualties of air/sea disasters "provoked" or "unprovoked" status; these incidents are considered to be a separate category. Postmortem scavenging of human remains (typically drowning victims) are also not accorded "provoked" or "unprovoked" status. The GSAF categorizes scavenging bites on humans as "questionable incidents." The most common criteria for determining "provoked" and "unprovoked" attacks are discussed below:
Provoked attacks occur when a human touches a shark, pokes it, teases it, spears, hooks or nets it, or otherwise aggravates/provokes the animal in a certain manner. Incidents that occur outside of a shark's natural habitat, e.g., aquariums and research holding-pens, are considered provoked, as are all incidents involving captured sharks. Sometimes humans inadvertently "provoke" an attack, such as when a surfer accidentally hits a shark with a surf board.
- Hit-and-run attack – Usually non-fatal, the shark bites and then leaves; most victims do not see the shark. This is the most common type of attack and typically occurs in the surf zone or in murky water. Most hit-and-run attacks are believed to be the result of mistaken identity.
- Sneak attack – The victim will not usually see the shark, and may sustain multiple deep bites. This kind of attack is predatory in nature and is often carried out with the intention of consuming the victim. It is extraordinarily rare for this to occur, and it is known to happen more often in places such as South Africa, where sharks have become acclimated to human presence due primarily to cage-diving activities; the sharks have learned to associate human presence in the water with food due to "chumming" to lure sharks closer to the cages. Sneak attacks are the most fatal kind of attack and are not believed to be the result of mistaken identity.
- Bump-and-bite attack – The shark circles and bumps the victim before biting. Great whites are known to do this on occasion, referred to as a "test bite", in which the great white is attempting to identify what is being bitten. Repeated bites are not uncommon, depending on the reaction of the victim (thrashing or panicking may lead the shark to believe the victim is prey), and can be severe or fatal. Bump-and-bite attacks are not believed to be the result of mistaken identity.
An incident occurred in 2011 when a 3-meter long great white shark jumped onto a 7-person research vessel off Seal Island, South Africa. The crew were undertaking a population study using sardines as bait, and the incident was judged to be an accident.
Reasons for attacks
Large sharks species are apex predators in their environment, and thus have little fear of any creature (other than orcas) with which they cross paths. Like most sophisticated hunters, they are curious when they encounter something unusual in their territories. Lacking any limbs with sensitive digits such as hands or feet, the only way they can explore an object or organism is to bite it; these bites are known as test bites. Generally, shark bites are exploratory, and the animal will swim away after one bite. For example, exploratory bites on surfers are thought to be caused by the shark mistaking the surfer and surfboard for the shape of prey. Nonetheless, a single bite can grievously injure a human if the animal involved is a powerful predator such as a great white or tiger shark.
Feeding is not the reason sharks attack humans. In fact, humans do not provide enough high-fat meat for sharks, which need a lot of energy to power their large, muscular bodies.
A shark will normally make one swift attack and then retreat to wait for the victim to die or weaken from shock and blood loss, before returning to feed. This protects the shark from injury from a wounded and aggressive target; however, it also allows humans time to get out of the water and survive. Shark attacks may also occur due to territorial reasons or as dominance over another shark species, resulting in an attack.
Sharks are equipped with sensory organs called the Ampullae of Lorenzini that detect the electricity generated by muscle movement. The shark's electrical receptors, which pick up movement, detect signals like those emitted from fish wounded, for example, by someone who is spearfishing, leading the shark to attack the person by mistake.
George H. Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File, said the following regarding why people are attacked: "Attacks are basically an odds game based on how many hours you are in the water".
In Australia and South Africa shark nets are used to reduce the risk of shark attack. Since 1936 sharks nets have been utilsed off Sydney beaches. Nowadays they are employed on both NSW and Queensland beaches; 83 beaches are meshed in Queensland compared with NSW's current 51. Since 1952 numerous beaches in South Africa are protected by the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board.
Shark nets do not offer complete protection but work on the principle of "fewer sharks, fewer attacks". They reduce occurrence via shark mortality. Reducing the local shark populations is believed to reduce the chance of an attack. Historical shark attack figures suggest that the use of shark nets and drumlines does markedly reduce the incidence of shark attack when implemented on a regular and consistent basis.
The downside with sharknets is that they do result in bycatch, including threatened and endangered species.
A drum line is an unmanned aquatic trap used to lure and capture large sharks using baited hooks. They are typically deployed near popular swimming beaches with the intention of reducing the number of sharks in the vicinity and therefore the probability of shark attack. Drum lines were first deployed to protect users of the marine environment from sharks in Queensland, Australia in 1962. During this time, they were just as successful in reducing the frequency of shark attacks as the shark nets More recently, drumlines have also been used with great success in Recife, Brazil where the number of attacks has been shown to have reduced by 97% when the drumlines are deployed. While shark nets and drum lines share the same purpose, drum lines are more effective at targeting the three sharks that are considered most dangerous to swimmers: the bull shark, tiger shark and great white shark.
Other protection methods
Beach patrols and spotter aircraft are commonly used to protect popular swimming beaches. Other methods include shark tagging efforts and associated tracking and notification systems, capture and translocation of sharks to offshore waters, research into shark feeding and foraging behaviour, public shark threat education programs and encouraging higher risk user groups (surfers, spear-fishers and divers) to use personal shark protection technology.
The effect the media has on the population's view of shark attacks has generally been negative. Starting with the effects generated from news broadcasts, a shark attack is quickly broadcast across the country, particularly if fatal, even though more people die from random occurrences such as lightning strikes than from a shark attack.
The Jersey Shore shark attacks of 1916 killed 4 people in the first 2 weeks of July 1916 along the New Jersey shore and Matawan Creek in New Jersey. They are generally credited as the beginning of media attention on shark attacks in the United States of America.
In 2010 nine Australian survivors of shark attacks banded together to promote a more positive view of sharks. The survivors made particular note of the role of the media in distorting the fear of sharks. Films such as Jaws were the cause of large-scale hunting and killing of thousands of sharks. There are some television shows, such as the famous Shark Week, that are dedicated to the preservation of these animals. They are able to prove through scientific studies that sharks are not interested in attacking humans and generally mistake humans as prey.
List of notable victims
- George Coulthard (1856–1883), Australian cricketer and Australian rules footballer
- Mick Fanning (1981–), Australian surfer
- Rodney Fox (1940–), Australian filmmaker and conservationist
- Bethany Hamilton (1990–), American surfer
- Brook Watson (1735–1807), British soldier and mayor
Notable fatal victims
- Shirley Ann Durdin, torn in half, killed and consumed by a great white shark in 1985 in South Australia
- Nick Peterson, killed and eaten by two great white sharks on December 16, 2004 in South Australia
- Lloyd Skinner, eaten alive by a great white shark on January 12, 2010 in Fish Hoek, Western Cape, South Africa.
- Mathieu Schiller (1979-2011), French bodyboarder who was killed at Saint-Gilles, Réunion in 2011; he was killed by a shark believed to be a tiger shark or a bull shark, and his body was not recovered.
- Sam Kellett, eaten alive by a great white shark in 2014 in South Australia; after his death his family said he would've opposed the Western Australian shark cull if he had lived
- ISAF Statistics on Attacking Species of Shark
- Edmonds, Molly. "HowStuffWorks "Dangerous Shark 4: Oceanic Whitetip Shark"". Animals.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "World's Confirmed Unprovoked Shark Attacks". International Shark Attack File. 25 August 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
- "Latest Figures". Taronga Conservation Society Australia. 10 September 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- "Fatal shark attacks in wa since 2000". Perth Now. 23 Nov 2013. Retrieved 10 Sep 2014.
- "ISAF Statistics for the Top Ten Worldwide Locations with the Highest Shark Attack Activity (1999–2009)". Florida Museum of Natural History Flmnh.ufl.edu. 25 March 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "ISAF Statistics for the USA Locations with the Highest Shark Attack Activity Since 1999". Flmnh.ufl.edu. 3 May 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Tierney, John (29 July 2008). "10 Things to Scratch From Your Worry List". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
- "Shark Facts: Attack Stats, Record Swims, More". News.nationalgeographic.com. 28 October 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- "WA 'deadiest' for shark attacks – The West Australian". Au.news.yahoo.com. 1 April 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- Buzzacott, Peter (2005). "An estimate of the risk of fatal shark attack whilst diving in Western Australia.". Journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society. 35 (2). Retrieved 6 April 2013.
- "Map of United States (incl. Hawaii) Confirmed Unprovoked Shark Attacks". Flmnh.ufl.edu. 26 August 2010. Retrieved 16 February 2012.
- "Map of World's Confirmed Unprovoked Shark Attacks". Flmnh.ufl.edu. 6 January 2011. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- Regenold, Stephen (21 April 2008). "North America's top shark-attack beaches". USA Today. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
- "The Relative Risk of Shark Attacks to Humans". Flmnh.ufl.edu. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida. A Comparison with the Number of Lightning Fatalities in Coastal United States: 1959–2006
- "Year 2000 USA Beach Injuries and Fatalities Compared To Shark Attacks and Fatalities". Flmnh.ufl.edu. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "Attack Stats | Oceana – Protecting the World's Oceans". Oceana.org. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "A Comparison of Shark Attack and Bicycle-Related Fatalities 1990–2005". Flmnh.ufl.edu. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "Hawaiian newspaper article". Honoluluadvertiser.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- The 1992 Cageless shark-diving expedition by Ron and Valerie Taylor.
- Cousteau, Jacques-Yves & Cousteau, Philippe (1970). The Shark: Splendid Savage of the Sea. Doubleday & Company, Inc.
- Bass, A.J., J.D. D'Aubrey & N. Kistnasamy. 1973. "Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. 1. The genus Carcharhinus (Carcharhinidae)." Invest. Rep. Oceanogr. Res. Inst., Durban, no. 33, 168 pp.
- Martin, R. Aidan. "Elasmo Research". ReefQuest. Retrieved 6 February 2006.
- National Geographic: South Africa Rethinks Use of Shark Nets
- University of Florida News New study documents first cookiecutter shark attack on a live human
- "Muriwai shark most likely a great white". 3 News NZ. 28 February 2013.
- "Sharks and rays". Te Ara, the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. 27 February 2013.
- "Swimmer dies after shark attack". 3 News NZ. 27 February 2013.
- Burgess, George H. "ISAF 2011 Worldwide Shark Attack Summary". Global Shark Attack File. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- "Incident Log". Global Shark Attack File. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- "ISAF Statistics on Attacking Species of Shark". Global Shark Attack File. 30 January 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- Burgess, George H. "How, When, & Where Sharks Attack". International Shark Attack File. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- Rice, Xan (19 July 2011). "Great white shark jumps from sea into research boat". The Guardian. London: Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
Marine researchers in South Africa had a narrow escape after a three-metre-long great white shark breached the surface of the sea and leaped into their boat, becoming trapped on deck for more than an hour. [...] Enrico Gennari, an expert on great white sharks, [...] said it was almost certainly an accident rather than an attack on the boat.
- "Apex Predators Program". Na.nefsc.noaa.gov. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Turner, Pamela S. (Oct–Nov 2004). "Showdown at Sea: What happens when great white sharks go fin-to-fin with killer whales?". National Wildlife. National Wildlife Federation. 42 (6). Retrieved 21 August 2012.
- "What To Expect On Your Great White Shark Diving Tour". Romow.com. 7 August 2009. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Grabianowski, Ed. "HowStuffWorks "How Shark Attacks Work"". Adventure.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Grabianowski, Ed. "HowStuffWorks "Shark Attack Damage"". Adventure.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "Great White Shark". Extremescience.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- Grabianowski, Ed. "HowStuffWorks "Shark Sensory System"". Adventure.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "Ampullae of Lorenzini". Marinebiodiversity.ca. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
- "Shark attacks at record high". BBC News. 9 February 2001. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
- Curtis, Tobey. "Bull shark". Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- Carroll Nick. "Nick Carroll On-Beyond the Panic, The Facts about Shark Nets". Coastal Watch. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- Dudley, Haestier; Cox, Murray. "Shark control: experimental fishing with baited drumlines" (PDf). Retrieved January 22, 2010.
- Bester, Cathleen. "Oceanic whitetip shark". Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
- Thousands protest over shark cull in Australia, UK: The Telegraph, 1 February 2014, retrieved 5 January 2017
- Open letter to WA Government re: Proposal to use drum lines for shark population control and targeting of sharks entering protected beach (PDF), Support Our Sharks, 2013, retrieved 5 January 2017
- "FLMNH Ichthyology Department: The Relative Risk of Shark Attacks". Flmnh.ufl.edu. 18 July 2003. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- McCall, Matt; 02, National Geographic PUBLISHED July. "2 Weeks, 4 Deaths, and the Beginning of America's Fear of Sharks". National Geographic News. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
- attack survivors unite to save sharks, Australian Geographic, 14 September 2010
- Choi, Charles Q. "How 'Jaws' Forever Changed Our View of Great White Sharks". Web. Live Science. Retrieved 29 August 2013.
- "Shark Week : Discovery Channel". Dsc.discovery.com. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- International Shark Attack File
- Global Shark Attack File — Open database
- Peoples Shark Attack File — Online Searchable Open database
- Australian Shark Attack File
- Australasian Shark Attack File — Open database
- Shark Attack Survivors — Shark attack education and prevention
- Shark attack information, statistics, and pictures
- Swim At Your Own Risk — Shark attack news and photos
- Shark Attack News — Shark news, videos & pics
- Shark Attack Data — Database of shark attacks, based on the Shark Research Institute's Global Shark Attack File