Sidney Reilly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sidney Reilly
Sidney Reilly German Passport September 1918.jpg
Sidney Reilly's 1918 German passport issued under the alias of George Bergmann.
Born c. 1873[a]
Russian Empire
(now in Ukraine)
Died 5 November 1925
Possibly Moscow, RSFSR,
Soviet Union
Other names "Ace of Spies"
Spying career
Allegiance  United Kingdom
 Germany[1]
 Japan[2]
 Russia[3]
Service United Kingdom Secret Service Bureau
Operation(s) Lockhart Plot[4]
D'Arcy Concession[5]
Zinoviev Letter[6][7]
Codename(s) S.T.I.[8]
Sidney Reilly
Allegiance United Kingdom United Kingdom
Service/branch  Royal Air Force
Rank Second Lieutenant
Unit Royal Flying Corps
Awards Military Cross[b]

Sidney George Reilly MC (c. 1873[a] – 5 November 1925), commonly known as the "Ace of Spies," was a Russian-born adventurer and secret agent employed by Scotland Yard's Special Branch and later by the Foreign Section of the British Secret Service Bureau,[9] the precursor to the modern British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6/SIS).[10][11] During his lifetime, he is alleged to have spied for at least four different great powers.[1] Documentary evidence indicates he was involved in espionage activities in 1890s London among Russian émigré circles, in 1900s Manchuria on the eve of the Russo-Japanese War, and in an abortive 1918 coup d'etat against Vladimir Lenin's Bolshevik government in Moscow.[12]

After his disappearance in Soviet Russia in the mid-1920s, Reilly's friend, British diplomat and journalist Sir Robert Bruce Lockhart, publicised their 1918 operation to overthrow the Bolshevik regime.[13] Lockhart's 1932 book, Memoirs of a British Agent,[14] became an international best-seller and posthumously garnered global fame for Reilly. The memoirs retold the efforts by Reilly, Lockhart, and other conspirators to sabotage the Bolshevik revolution while still in its infancy.

Within five years of his capture and execution by Soviet agents in 1925, the press had turned Reilly into a household name, lauding him as a peerless spy and recounting his many espionage adventures. Contemporary newspapers dubbed him "the greatest spy in history" and "the Scarlet Pimpernel of Red Russia."[15] The London Evening Standard published an illustrated serial in May 1931, headlined "Master Spy," imparting his exploits. Later, writer Ian Fleming used Reilly as a model for James Bond in his novels of the 1950s and 1960s.[16] Today Reilly is considered to be "the dominating figure in the mythology of modern British espionage,"[17] as well as the first 20th-century "super-spy."[18]

Origins and youth[edit]

The true details about Sidney Reilly's origin, identity and exploits have eluded researchers and intelligence agencies for more than 100 years. Reilly himself told several versions of his origins to confuse and mislead investigators.[19] At different times in his life, Reilly claimed to be the diffident son of an Irish merchant seaman,[20] an Irish clergyman, and an aristocratic landowner known to be a habitué of the Imperial court of the Emperor Alexander III of Russia. According to a Soviet secret police dossier compiled in 1925,[21] he was perhaps born Zigmund Markovich Rozenblum (Rosenblum) on 24 March 1874 in Odessa,[a][21] then a Black Sea port of Emperor Alexander II's Russian Empire. His father Markus was a doctor and shipping agent, while his mother came from an impoverished noble family.[21][25]

Other sources claim that Reilly was born Georgy Rosenblum in Odessa on 24 March 1873.[26] In one account,[27] his birth name is given as Salomon (Shlomo) Rosenblum, and the Jewish Kherson gubernia of the Russian Empire is given as his place of nativity.[27] He was the illegitimate son of Polina (or "Perla"), his acknowledged mother, and Dr. Mikhail Abramovich Rosenblum, the trusted first-cousin of Reilly's putative father, Grigory (Hersh) Rosenblum.[27] There is also speculation that he was the son of a merchant marine captain and the aforementioned mother.

Yet another source states that Sigmund Georgievich Rosenblum,[17] the only son of Pauline and Gregory Rosenblum,[28] was born on 24 March 1874 into a wealthy Polish-Jewish family with an estate at Bielsk in the Grodno Province of Imperial Russia. His father was known locally as George rather than Gregory, hence Sigmund's patronymic Georgievich.[28] The family seems to have been well-connected in Polish nationalist circles through Pauline's intimate friendship with Ignacy Jan Paderewski, the famous Polish statesman who later became Prime Minister of Poland and also Poland's foreign minister in 1919.[28]

Travels abroad[edit]

Ethel Voynich, née Boole. In 2016, new evidence surfaced in archived correspondence confirming Boole's relations with Reilly.[29]
Ethel Voynich, née Boole. In 2016, new evidence surfaced in archived correspondence confirming Boole's relations with Reilly.[29]

According to reports of the Okhrana, the tsarist political police, whose archives are preserved at the Hoover Institute, the young Rosenblum was arrested in 1892 for political activities and for being a courier for a revolutionary group known as the Friends of Enlightenment. The ease with which Rosenblum escaped judicial punishment, as well as his later documented friendship with Okhrana agents such as Alexander Nikolaev Grammatikov,[30] may indicate he was a police informant even at this young age.[c][30]

After Reilly's release, his assumed father supposedly told him that his mother was dead and that his biological father was her Jewish doctor Mikhail A. Rosenblum.[19] Distraught by this news, the young man faked his death in Odessa Harbour and stowed away aboard a British ship bound for South America.[31] In Brazil, young Rosenblum adopted the name Pedro and worked odd jobs as a dock worker, a road mender, a plantation labourer and, in 1895, a cook for a British intelligence expedition.[31][19] He allegedly saved both the expedition and the life of Major Charles Fothergill when hostile natives attacked them.[32] Rosenblum seized a British officer's pistol and, with expert marksmanship, killed the attacking natives.[31] Fothergill rewarded his bravery with 1,500 pounds, a British passport, and passage to Britain. There Pedro became Sidney Rosenblum.[31]

However, the record of evidence contradicts this tale of Brazil.[33] Evidence indicates that the arrival of Rosenblum in London in December 1895 was from France, and was prompted by his unscrupulous acquisition of a large sum of money in Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, a residential suburb of Paris, necessitating a hasty flight.[33] According to this account, Rosenblum and Yan Voitek, a Polish accomplice, had waylaid two Italian anarchists on 25 December 1895 and robbed them of a substantial amount of revolutionary funds. One anarchist's throat was cut; the other, Constant Della Cassa, died from knife wounds in Fontainebleau Hospital three days later.[33] The French newspaper L'Union Républicaine de Saône-et-Loire reported the incident on 27 December 1895:

A dramatic event occurred on a train between Paris and Fontainebleau... on opening the door of one of the coaches, the railway staff discovered an unfortunate passenger lying unconscious in the middle of a pool of blood. His throat had been cut and his body bore the marks of numerous knife wounds. Terrified at the sight, the station staff hastened to inform the special investigator who started preliminary enquiries and sent the wounded man to the hospital in Fontainebleau.[34]

By the time Della Cassa's death appeared in the newspapers, police had learned that one of the assailants, whose physical description matched Rosenblum's, was already en route to Britain. Rosenblum's accomplice, Voitek, later related this incident as well as other dealings with Rosenblum to the British intelligence community.[33]

Several months prior to the murder of the Italian anarchists and his flight to the United Kingdom, Reilly had met the young Englishwoman Ethel Lilian Boole.[29][35] At the time, Boole was a budding writer in the late Victorian literature scene and active in Russian émigré circles. As two foreigners in a foreign land, Reilly and Boole developed a rapport and began a sexual liaison.[29] During this dalliance, Reilly recounted his past in Russia to her. After the affair concluded, they continued to correspond.[35] In 1897, Boole published The Gadfly, a critically acclaimed novel whose central character Arthur Burton was allegedly based on Reilly's early life.[36] In the novel, the protagonist Burton is a bastard who feigns his suicide to escape his illegitimate past and voyages to South America.[36] After degradation, he returns to Europe and becomes involved with Italian anarchists and other revolutionaries.[36] However, he inadvertently betrays his comrades after a private conversation is relayed to the police.[36] For decades, certain skeptical biographers—such as Andrew Cook—had dismissed the Reilly-Boole liaison as unsubstantiated.[37] However, in 2016, hitherto unexamined evidence was found among archived correspondence in the extended Boole-Hinton family confirming that a relationship transpired between Reilly and Boole circa 1895 in Florence.[29] Whether Reilly was truly smitten with Boole and sincerely returned her affections is uncertain as he may have been a paid police informant tasked with reporting upon the activities of Boole and other radicals to various authorities.[37]

In London: 1890s[edit]

William Melville purportedly created the cover identity of Sidney Reilly for Rosenblum.[38]
William Melville purportedly created the cover identity of Sidney Reilly for Rosenblum.[38]

Regardless of whether the peripatetic Rosenblum arrived in Britain via Brazil or France, he resided at the Albert Mansions, an apartment block in Rosetta Street, Waterloo, London, in early 1896.[39] Now comfortably settled in Britain, Rosenblum created the Ozone Preparations Company, which peddled patent medicines.[39] Because of his knowledge of languages, he had become a paid informant for the émigré intelligence network of William Melville, superintendent of Scotland Yard's Special Branch, whom official sources identify as later overseeing a Special Section of the British Secret Service Bureau founded in 1909.[11][40]

In 1897 Rosenblum began a torrid affair with Margaret Thomas (née Callaghan), the youthful wife of Reverend Hugh Thomas, shortly before the latter's death.[41][42] Rosenblum first met Thomas in London via his Ozone Preparations Company.[43] Thomas had a kidney inflammation and was intrigued by the miracle cures peddled by Rosenblum. Thomas introduced Rosenblum to his young wife at his manor house, and over the next six months, they began having an affair. On 4 March 1898, Thomas altered his will and appointed Margaret as an executrix. A week after the new will was made, Thomas and his nurse arrived at Newhaven Harbour Station. On 12 March 1898, Thomas was found dead in his hotel room.[44] A mysterious Dr. T. W. Andrew, whose physical description matched that of Rosenblum, appeared to certify Thomas's death as generic influenza and after signing the relevant documents proclaimed that there was no need for an inquest. Records indicate that there was no one by the name of Dr. T. W. Andrew in Great Britain circa 1897.[45]

Margaret insisted that her husband's body be ready for burial 36 hours after his death.[46] She inherited roughly £800,000. The Metropolitan Police did not investigate Dr. T. W. Andrew, nor did they investigate the nurse whom Margaret had hired, who was previously linked to the arsenic poisoning of a former employer.[46] Four months later, on 22 August 1898, Rosenblum married Margaret Thomas at the Holborn Registry Office in London.[28] The two witnesses at the ceremony were Charles Richard Cross, a government official, and Joseph Bell, an Admiralty clerk. Both would eventually marry daughters of Henry Freeman Pannett, an associate of William Melville. The marriage not only brought the wealth which Rosenblum desired but provided a pretext to discard his identity of Sigmund Rosenblum; with Melville's assistance, he crafted a new identity: "Sidney George Reilly." This new identity was key to achieving his desire to return to the Russian Empire and voyage to the Far East.[38] It must be noted that Reilly "obtained his new identity and nationality without taking any legal steps to change his name and without making an official application for British citizenship, all of which suggests some type of official intervention" on his behalf.[47]

Russia and the Far East[edit]

An ukiyo-e print of the night attack on Port Arthur by the Japanese Navy. The surprise attack was made possible by the intelligence gathering of Reilly and Ho Liang Shung.
An ukiyo-e print of the night attack on Port Arthur by the Japanese Navy. The surprise attack was made possible by the intelligence gathering of Reilly and Ho Liang Shung.

In June 1899, the newly endowed Sidney Reilly and his wife Margaret traveled to Emperor Nicholas II's Russian Empire using Reilly's (forged) British passport—a travel document and a cover identity both purportedly created by William Melville.[49] While in St. Petersburg, he was approached by Japanese General Akashi Motojiro to work for the Japanese Secret Intelligence Services. As tensions between Russia and Japan were escalating towards war, Motojiro instructed Reilly to offer financial aid to Russian revolutionaries in exchange for information about the Russian Intelligence Services and, more importantly, to determine the strength of the Russian armed forces particularly in the Far East.[34][2] Accepting Motojiro's recruitment overtures, Reilly now became simultaneously an agent for both the British War Office and the Japanese Empire.[2] While his wife Margaret remained in St. Petersburg, Reilly allegedly reconnoitered the Caucasus for its oil deposits and compiled a resource prospectus as part of "The Great Game." He reported his findings to the British Government which paid him for the assignment.[26]

Shortly before the Russo-Japanese War, Reilly appeared in Port Arthur, Manchuria in the guise of a timber company owner.[50][17] Here he remained for four years, familiarizing himself with political conditions in the Far East and obtaining a degree of personal influence in the ongoing espionage activities in the region.[23] At the time, he was still a double agent for the British and the Japanese governments.[19][50] The Russian-controlled Port Arthur lay under the ever-darkening spectre of a Japanese invasion, and Reilly and his business partner Moisei Akimovich Ginsburg turned the precarious situation to their benefit. By purchasing and reselling enormous amounts of foodstuffs, raw materials, medicine, and coal, they made a small fortune as war profiteers.[51]

Reilly would have an even greater success in January 1904, when he and Chinese engineer acquaintance Ho Liang Shung allegedly stole the Port Arthur harbour defence plans for the Japanese Navy. Guided by these stolen plans, the Japanese Navy navigated by night through the Russian minefield protecting the harbour and launched a surprise attack on Port Arthur on the night of 8–9 February 1904 (Monday 8 February – Tuesday 9 February). However, the stolen plans did not help the Japanese much. Despite ideal conditions for a surprise attack, their combat results were relatively poor. Although more than 31,000 Russians ultimately perished defending Port Arthur, Japanese losses were much higher, and these losses nearly undermined their war effort.[52]

According to writer Winfried Lüdecke,[d] Reilly quickly became an obvious target of suspicion by Russian authorities at Port Arthur.[50] Thereafter, he discovered one of his business subordinates was an agent of Russian counter-espionage and chose to leave the region.[50] Upon departing Port Arthur, Reilly voyaged to Imperial Japan in the company of an unidentified woman where he was handsomely paid by the Japanese government for his prior intelligence services.[50] If he did a detour to Japan, presumably to be paid for his espionage, he could not have stayed very long, for by February 1905 he appeared in Paris, France.[53] By the time he had returned to Europe from the Far East, Reilly "had become a self-confident international adventurer" who was "fluent in several languages" and whose intelligence services were highly desired by various great powers.[17] At the same time, he was described as possessing "a foolhardy adventurous nature" prone to taking unnecessary risks.[20] This latter trait would later result in him being nicknamed "reckless" by other British agents.[6]

D'Arcy concession[edit]

A young William Knox D'Arcy circa the 1890s.
A young William Knox D'Arcy circa the 1890s.

During the brief time Reilly spent in Paris, he renewed his close acquaintance with William Melville[e] whom Reilly had last seen just prior to his 1899 departure from London.[55] While Reilly had been abroad in the Far East, Melville had resigned in November 1903 as Superintendent of Scotland Yard's Special Branch and had become chief of a new intelligence section in the War Office.[56] Working under commercial cover from an unassuming flat in London, Melville now ran both counterintelligence and foreign intelligence operations using his foreign contacts which he had accumulated during his years running Special Branch.[56] Reilly's meeting with Melville in Paris is most significant for within a matter of weeks Melville was to use Reilly's expertise in what would later become known as the D'Arcy Affair.[55]

In 1904 the Board of the Admiralty projected that petroleum would supplant coal as the primary source of fuel for the Royal Navy. During their investigation, the British Admiralty learned that an Australian mining-engineer William Knox D'Arcy—who founded the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC)—had obtained the valuable concession from the Mozaffar al-Din Shah Qajar regarding the oil rights in southern Persia.[15] D'Arcy was negotiating a similar concession from the Ottoman Empire for oil rights in Mesopotamia.[55] The Admiralty initiated efforts to entice D'Arcy to sell his newly acquired oil rights to the British Government rather than to the French de Rothschilds.[55][57]

In Ace of Spies, Robin Bruce Lockhart recounts how Reilly, at the British Admiralty's request, located William D'Arcy at Cannes in the south of France and approached him in disguise. Attiring himself as a Catholic priest, Reilly gate-crashed the private discussions on board the Rothschild yacht on the pretext of collecting donations for a religious charity. He then secretly informed D'Arcy that the British could give him a better financial deal.[15] D'Arcy promptly terminated negotiations with the Rothschilds and returned to London to meet with the British Admiralty.[5] However, biographer Andrew Cook has questioned Reilly's involvement in the D'Arcy Affair since, in February 1904, Reilly might still have been in Port Arthur, Manchuria. Cook speculates that it was Reilly's intelligence chief, William Melville, and a British intelligence officer, Henry Curtis Bennett, who undertook the D'Arcy assignment.[58] Yet another possibility advanced in The Prize by writer Daniel Yergin has the British Admiralty creating a "syndicate of patriots" to keep D'Arcy's concession in British hands, apparently with the full and eager co-operation of D'Arcy himself.[57]

Though the extent of Reilly's involvement in this particular incident is uncertain, it has been verified that he stayed after the incident in the French Riviera on the Côte d'Azur, a location very near the Rothschild yacht.[59] At the conclusion of the D'Arcy Affair, Reilly journeyed to Brussels, and, in January 1905, he arrived in St. Petersburg, Russia.[59]

Frankfurt International Air Show[edit]

In Ace of Spies, biographer Robin Bruce Lockhart recounts Reilly's alleged involvement in obtaining a newly developed German magneto at the first Frankfurt International Air Show ("Internationale Luftschiffahrt-Ausstellung") in 1909.[60] According to Lockhart, on the fifth day of the air show in Frankfurt am Main, a German plane lost control and crashed, killing the pilot. The plane's engine was alleged to have used a new type of magneto that was far ahead of other designs.[60]

Reilly and a British SIS agent posing as one of the exhibition pilots diverted the attention of spectators while they removed the magneto from the wreck and substituted another.[60] The SIS agent quickly made detailed drawings of the German magneto, and when the airplane had been removed to a hangar, the agent and Reilly managed to restore the original magneto.[60][61][58] However, later biographers such as Spence and Cook have countered that this incident is unsubstantiated.[61] There is no documentary evidence of any plane crashes occurring during the event.[58]

Stealing weapon plans[edit]

In 1909, when the German Kaiser was expanding the war machine of Imperial Germany, British intelligence had scant knowledge regarding the types of weapons being forged inside Germany's war plants. At the behest of British intelligence, Reilly was sent to obtain the plans for the weapons.[62] Reilly arrived in Essen, Germany, disguised as a Baltic shipyard worker by the name of Karl Hahn. Having prepared his cover identity by learning to weld at a Sheffield engineering firm,[63] Reilly obtained a low-level position as a welder at the Essen plant. Soon he joined the plant fire brigade and persuaded its foreman that a set of plant schematics were needed to indicate the position of fire extinguishers and hydrants. These schematics were soon lodged in the foreman's office for members of the fire brigade to consult, and Reilly set about using them to locate the plans.[62]

In the early morning hours, Reilly picked the lock of the office where the plans were kept and was discovered by the foreman whom he then strangled before completing the theft. From Essen, Reilly took a train to a safe house in Dortmund. Tearing the plans into four pieces, he mailed each separately so that if one were lost, the other three would still reveal the gist of the plans.[62] Biographer Cook questions the veracity of this incident but concedes that German factory records show a Karl Hahn was indeed employed by the Essen plant during this time and that a plant fire brigade existed.[64]

In April 1912 Reilly returned to St. Petersburg where he assumed the role of a wealthy businessman and helped to form the Wings Aviation Club. He resumed his friendship with Alexander Grammatikov who was an Okhrana agent and a fellow member of the club.[30] Writers Richard Deacon and Edward Van Der Rhoer assert that Reilly was an Ochrana double agent at this point.[3][65] Deacon claims he was tasked with befriending and profiling Sir Basil Zaharoff, the international arms salesman and representative of Vickers-Armstrong Munitions Ltd.[3] Another Reilly biographer, Richard B. Spence, claims that during this assignment Reilly learned "le systeme" from Zaharoff—the strategy of playing all sides against each other in order to maximise financial profit.[66] However, biographer Andrew Cook asserts there is scant evidence of any relationship between Reilly and Zaharoff.[67]

First World War activity[edit]

In earlier biographies by Winfried Lüdecke and Pepita Bobadilla, Reilly is inaccurately described as living in Germany, as a spy, from 1917 till the end of 1918.[50][23] Likewise, drawing upon the latter sources, Richard Deacon wrongly asserted that Reilly had operated behind German lines on a number of occasions. Once, disguised as a German officer, he spent three weeks inside the German Empire gathering information about the next planned thrust against the Allies.[68] However, most later biographies concur that Reilly's peculiar activities in the United States between 1915 and 1918 precluded any such escapades on the European Front.[69] Instead later biographers believe that, while lucratively engaged in the munitions business in New York City, Reilly was covertly employed in British intelligence, in which role he may well have participated in several acts of so-called "German sabotage" deliberately calculated to provoke the United States to enter the war against the Central Powers.[70]

Historian Christopher Andrew notes that "Reilly spent most of the first two and a half years of the war in the United States."[69] Likewise, author Richard B. Spence states that Reilly lived in New York City for at least a year, 1914–15, where he engaged in arranging munitions sales to the Imperial German Army and its enemy the Imperial Russian Army.[71] However, when the United States entered the war in April 1917, Reilly's business became less profitable since his company was now prohibited from selling ammunition to the Germans and, after the Russian revolution occurred in October 1917, the Russians were no longer buying munitions. Faced with unexpected financial hardship, Reilly sought to resume his paid intelligence work for the British government while in New York City.[72]

This is confirmed by papers of Norman Thwaites, MI1(c) Head of Station in New York,[73] which contain evidence that Reilly approached Thwaites seeking espionage-related work in 1917–1918.[74] Formerly a private secretary to newspaper magnate Joseph Pulitzer and a police reporter for Pulitzer's The New York World,[73] Thwaites was keen on obtaining information concerning radical activities in the United States; in particular, any connections between American socialists with Soviet Russia.[73] Consequently, under Thwaites' direction, Reilly presumably worked alongside a dozen other British intelligence operatives attached to the British mission at 44 Whitehall Street in New York City.[74][73] Although their ostensible mission was to coordinate with the U.S. government in regards to intelligence about the German Empire and Soviet Russia, the British agents also focused upon obtaining trade secrets and other commercial information related to American industrial companies for their British rivals.[73]

Thwaites was sufficiently impressed with Reilly's intelligence work in New York that he wrote a letter of recommendation to Mansfield Cumming, head of MI1(c). It was also Thwaites who recommended that Reilly first visit Toronto to obtain a military commission which is why Reilly enlisted the Royal Canadian Flying Corps.[75] On 19 October 1917, Reilly formally received a commission as a temporary 2nd Lieutenant.[f] After receiving this commission, Reilly voyaged to London in 1918 where Cumming formally swore Lieutenant Reilly into service as a staff Case Officer in His Majesty's Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), prior to dispatching Reilly on counter-Bolshevik operations in Germany and Russia.[75] According to Reilly's wife Pepita Bobadilla, Reilly was sent to Russia to "counter the work being done there by German agents" who were supporting radical factions and "to discover and report on the general feeling."[9]

Thus Reilly arrived on Russian soil via Murmansk prior to 5 April 1918.[76] Reilly contacted the former Okhrana agent Alexander Grammatikov, who believed the Soviet government "was in the hands of the criminal classes and of lunatics released from the asylums."[30] Grammatikov arranged for Reilly to receive a private interview with either Reilly's longtime friend[77] General Mikhail Bonch-Bruyevich[78] or Vladimir Bonch-Bruyevich,[79] secretary of the Council of People's Commissars.[g] With the clandestine aid of Bonch-Bruyevich,[78] he assumed the role of a Bolshevik sympathizer.[76] Grammatikov further instructed his niece Dagmara Karozus[82]—a dancer in the Moscow Art Theatre—to allow Reilly to use her apartment as a "safe house," and through Vladimir Orlov, a former Okhrana associate turned Cheka official, Reilly obtained travel permits as Cheka agent.[83][84]

Ambassadors' Plot[edit]

The attempt to assassinate Vladimir Lenin and to depose the Bolshevik government is considered by biographers to be Reilly's most daring exploit.[86][87] The Ambassadors' Plot, later misnamed in the press as the Lockhart-Reilly Plot,[88][89] has sparked considerable debate over the years: Did the Allies launch a clandestine operation to overthrow the Bolsheviks in the later summer of 1918 and, if so, did Felix Dzerzhinsky's Cheka uncover the plot at the eleventh hour or did they know of the conspiracy from the outset?[90][86] At the time, the dissembling American Consul-General DeWitt Clinton Poole publicly insisted the Cheka orchestrated the conspiracy from beginning to end and that Reilly was a Bolshevik agent provocateur.[h][91][12] Later, Robert Bruce Lockhart would state that he was "not to this day sure of the extent of Reilly's responsibility for the disastrous turn of events."[9]

In January 1918, the youthful Lockhart—a mere junior member of the British Foreign office—had been personally handpicked by British Prime Minister David Lloyd George to undertake a sensitive diplomatic mission to Soviet Russia.[92] Lockhart's assigned objectives were: to liaison with the Soviet authorities, to subvert Soviet-German relations, to bolster Soviet resistance to German peace overtures, and to push Soviet authorities into recreating the Eastern Theater.[92] By April, however, Lockhart had hopelessly failed to achieve any of these objectives. He began to agitate in diplomatic cables for an immediate full-scale Allied military intervention in Russia.[92] Concurrently, Lockhart ordered Sidney Reilly to pursue contacts within anti-Bolshevik circles in order to sow the seeds for an armed uprising in Moscow.[93][92]

In May 1918, Lockhart, Reilly, and various agents of the Allied Powers repeatedly met with Boris Savinkov,[10] head of the counter-revolutionary Union for the Defence of the Motherland and Freedom (UDMF).[94] Savinkov had been Deputy War Minister in the Provisional Government of Alexander Fyodorovich Kerensky, and a key opponent of the Bolsheviks.[95] A former Socialist Revolutionary Party member, Savinkov had formed the UDMF consisting of several thousand Russian fighters, and he was receptive to Allied overtures to depose the Soviet government.[95] Lockhart, Reilly, and others then contacted anti-Bolshevik groups linked to Savinkov and Socialist Revolutionary Party cells affiliated with Savinkov's friend Maximilian Filonenko. Lockhart and Reilly supported these factions with SIS funds.[10] They also liaised with DeWitt Clinton Poole and Fernand Grenard,[70] the Consul-Generals of the United States and France respectively.[70] They also coordinated their activities with intelligence operatives affiliated with the French and U.S. consuls in Moscow.[24][96]

In June, disillusioned elements of Colonel Eduard Berzin's Latvian Rifle Division (Latdiviziya) began appearing in anti-Bolshevik circles in Petrograd and were eventually directed to a British naval attaché Captain Francis Cromie and his assistant Mr. Constantine, a Turkish merchant who was actually Reilly.[96] In contrast to his previous espionage operations which had been independent of other agents, Reilly worked closely while in Petrograd with Cromie in joint efforts to recruit Berzin's Latvians and to equip anti-Bolshevik armed forces.[97] At the time, Cromie purportedly represented the British Naval Intelligence Division and oversaw its operations in northern Russia.[98] Cromie operated in loose coordination with the ineffectual Commander Ernest Boyce, the MI1(c) station chief in Petrograd.[98] As Berzin's Latvians were deemed the Praetorian Guard of the Bolsheviks and entrusted with the security of both Lenin and the Kremlin, the Allied plotters believed their participation in the pending coup to be vital. With the aid of the Latvian Rifleman, the Allied agents hoped to "seize both Lenin and Trotsky at a meeting to take place in the first week of September."[9]

Reilly arranged a meeting between Lockhart and the Latvians at the British mission in Moscow. Reilly purportedly expended "over a million rubles" to bribe the Red Army troops guarding the Kremlin.[89] At this stage, Cromie,[98] Boyce,[70] Reilly,[99] Lockhart, and other Allied agents allegedly planned a full-scale coup against the Bolshevik government and drew up a list of Soviet military leaders ready to assume responsibilities on its demise.[100] Their objective was to capture or kill Lenin and Trotsky, to establish a provisional government, and to extinguish Bolshevism.[9] Lenin and Trotsky, they reasoned, "were Bolshevism," and nothing else in their movement had "substance or permanence."[9] Consequently, "if he could get them into [their] hands there would be nothing of consequence left of Sovietism."[9]

As Lockhart's diplomatic status hindered his open engagement in clandestine activities, he chose to supervise such activities from afar and to delegate the actual direction of the coup to Reilly.[101] To facilitate this work, Reilly allegedly obtained a position as a sinecure within the criminal branch of the Petrograd Cheka.[101] It was during this chaotic time of plots and counter-plots that Reilly and Lockhart became further acquainted.[12] Lockhart later posthumously described him as "a man of great energy and personal charm, very attractive to women and very ambitious. I had not a very high opinion of his intelligence. His knowledge covered many subjects, from politics to art, but it was superficial. On the other hand, his courage and indifference to danger were superb."[12] Throughout their backroom intrigues in Moscow, Lockhart never openly questioned Reilly's loyalty to the Allies, although he privately wondered if Reilly had made a secret bargain with Colonel Berzin and his Latvian Riflemen to later seize power for themselves.[12] In Lockhart's estimation, Reilly was a limitless "man cast in the Napoleonic mold" and, if their counter-revolutionary coup had succeeded, "the prospect of playing a lone hand [using Berzin's Latvian Riflemen] may have inspired him with a Napoleonic design" to become the head of any new government.[12] However, unbeknownst to the Allied conspirators, Berzin was "an honest commander" and "devoted to the Soviet government."[102] Although not a Chekist, he nonetheless informed Dzerzhinsky's Cheka that he had been approached by Reilly and that Allied agents had attempted to recruit him into a possible coup.[102] This information did not surprise Dzerzhinsky as the Cheka had gained access to the British diplomatic codes in May and were closely monitoring the anti-Bolshevik activities.[97] Dzerzhinsky instructed Berzin and other Latvian officers to pretend to be receptive to the Allied plotters and to meticuously report on every detail of their pending operation.[102]

While Allied agents militated against the Soviet regime in Petrograd and Moscow, persistent rumors swirled of an impending Allied military intervention in Russia which would overthrow the fledgling Soviet government in favor of a new regime willing to rejoin the ongoing war against the Central Powers.[89] On 4 August 1918, an Allied force landed at Arkhangelsk, Russia, beginning a famous military expedition dubbed Operation Archangel. Its professed objective was to prevent the German Empire from obtaining Allied military supplies stored in the region. In retaliation for this incursion, the Bolsheviks raided the British diplomatic mission on 5 August, disrupting a meeting Reilly had arranged between the anti-Bolshevik Latvians, UDMF officials, and Lockhart.[100] Unperturbed by these raids, Reilly conducted meetings on 17 August 1918 between Latvian regimental leaders and liaised with Captain George Alexander Hill, a multilingual British agent operating in Russia on behalf of the Military Intelligence Directorate.[103][104]

Hill later described Reilly as "a dark, well-groomed, very foreign-looking man" who had "an amazing grasp of the actualities of the situation" and was "a man of action."[8] They agreed the coup would occur in the first week of September during a meeting of the Council of People's Commissars and the Moscow Soviet at the Bolshoi Theatre.[100] On 25 August, yet another meeting of Allied conspirators allegedly occurred at DeWitt C. Poole's American Consulate in Moscow.[89] By this time, the Allied conspirators had organized a broad network of agents and saboteurs throughout Soviet Russia whose overarching ambition was to disrupt the nation's food supplies. Coupled with the planned military uprising in Moscow, they believed a chronic food shortage would trigger popular unrest and further undermine the Soviet authorities. In turn, the Soviets would be overthrown by a new government friendly to the Allied Powers which would renew hostilities against Kaiser Wilhelm II's German Reich.[90] On August 28, Reilly informed Hill that he was immediately leaving Moscow for Petrograd where he would discuss final details related to the coup with Commander Francis Cromie at the British consulate.[105] That night, Reilly had no difficulty in traveling through picket lines between Moscow and Petrograd due to his identification as a member of the Petrograd Cheka and his possession of Cheka travel permits.[105]

On 30 August, Boris Savinkov and Maximilian Filonenko ordered a military cadet named Leonid Kannegisser—Filonenko's cousin—to shoot and kill Moisei Uritsky, head of the Petrograd Cheka.[106] Uritsky had been the second most powerful man in the city after Grigory Zinoviev, the leader of the Petrograd Soviet, and his murder was seen as a blow to both the Cheka and the entire Bolshevik leadership.[98] After killing Uritsky, a panicked Kannegisser sought refuge either at the English Club[98] or at the British mission where Cromie resided and where Savinkov and Filonenko may have been temporarily in hiding.[107][108] Regardless of whether he fled to the English Club or to the British consulate, Kannegisser was compelled to leave the premises. After donning a long overcoat, he fled into the city streets where he was apprehended by Red Guards after a violent shootout.

Artist Vladimir Pchelin's depiction of the 30 August 1918 assassination attempt on Vladimir Lenin by Fanya Kaplan.[i]
Artist Vladimir Pchelin's depiction of the 30 August 1918 assassination attempt on Vladimir Lenin by Fanya Kaplan.[i]

On the same day, Fanya Kaplan—a former anarchist who was now a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party[109]—shot and wounded Lenin as he departed the Michelson arms factory in Moscow.[109] As Lenin exited the building and before he entered his motor car, Kaplan called out to him. When Lenin turned towards her, she fired three shots with a Browning pistol.[110] One bullet narrowly missed Lenin's heart and penetrated his lung, while the other bullet lodged in his neck near the jugular vein.[106] Due to the severity of these wounds, Lenin was not expected to survive.[106][98] The attack was widely covered in the Russian press, generating much sympathy for Lenin and boosting his popularity.[111] As a consequence of this assassination attempt, however, the meeting between Lenin and Trotsky—where the bribed soldiery would seize them on behalf of the Allies—was postponed.[9] At this point, Reilly was notified by fellow conspirator Alexander Grammatikov that "the [Socialist Revolutionary Party] fools have struck too early."[80]

Although it is unknown if Kaplan either was part of the Ambassadors' Plot or was even responsible for the assassination attempt on Lenin,[i] the murder of Uritsky and the failed assassination of Lenin were used by Dzerzhinsky's Cheka to implicate any malcontents and foreigners in a grand conspiracy that warranted a full-scale reprisal campaign: the "Red Terror."[113] Thousands of political opponents were seized and "mass executions took place across the city, at Khodynskoe field, Petrovsky Park and the Butyrki prison, all in the north of the city, as well as in the Cheka headquarters at Lubyanka."[113] The extent of the Chekist reprisal likely foiled much of the inchoate plans by Cromie, Boyce, Lockhart, Reilly, Savinkov, Filonenko, and other conspirators.[100][98]

Using lists supplied by undercover agents, the Cheka proceeded to clear out the "nests of conspirators" in the foreign embassies and, in doing so, they arrested key figures vital to the impending coup.[98][9] On 31 August 1918, believing Savinkov and Filonenko were hiding in the British consulate,[107][108] a Cheka detachment raided the British consulate in Petrograd and killed Cromie who put up an armed resistance.[114][107][108] Immediately prior to his death, it is possible that Cromie may have been trying to communicate with other conspirators and to give instructions to accelerate their planned coup.[98] Before the Cheka detachment stormed the consulate, Cromie burned key correspondence pertaining to the coup.[98] According to press reports, he made a valiant last stand on the first floor of the consulate armed only with a revolver.[114] In close quarters combat, he dispatched three Chekist soldiers before he was in turn killed and his corpse mutilated.[114][107] Eyewitnesses, such as the sister-in-law of Red Cross nurse Mary Britnieva, asserted that Cromie was shot by the Cheka while retreating down the consulate's grand staircase.[115] The Cheka detachment searched the building and, with their rifle butts, repelled the diplomatic staff from getting close to the corpse of Captain Cromie which the Chekist soldiers had looted and trampled.[98] The Cheka detachment then arrested over forty persons who had sought refuge within the British consulate, as well as seized weapon caches and compromising documents which they claimed implicated the consular staff in the forthcoming coup attempt.[114][24] Cromie's death was publicly "depicted as a measure of self-defence by the Bolshevik agents, who had been forced to return his fire."[24]

From the Evening Standard's Master Spy serial: Reilly, attired as a Cheka officer, bluffs through a Red Army checkpoint.
From the Evening Standard's Master Spy serial: Reilly, attired as a Cheka officer, bluffs through a Red Army checkpoint.

Meanwhile, Lockhart was arrested by Dzerzhinsky's Cheka and transported under guard to Lubyanka Prison.[106] During a tense interview with a pistol-wielding Cheka officer, he was asked "Do you know the Kaplan woman?" and "Where is Reilly?"[106] When queried about the coup, Lockhart and other British nationals dismissed the mere idea as nonsense.[10] Afterwards, Lockhart was placed in the same holding cell as Fanya Kaplan whom their watchful Chekist jailers hoped might betray some sign of recognizing Lockhart or other British agents.[116] However, while confined together, Kaplan showed no sign of recognition towards Lockhart or anyone else.[116] When it became clear that Kaplan would not implicate any accomplices, she was executed in the Kremlin's Alexander Garden on 3 September 1918, with a bullet to the back of the head.[110] Her corpse was bundled into a rusted iron barrel and set alight.[110] Lockhart was later released and deported in exchange for Maxim Litvinov, an unofficial Soviet attaché in London who had been arrested by the British government as a form of diplomatic reprisal.[117] In stark contrast to Lockhart's good fortune, "imprisonment, torture to compel confession, [and] death were the swift rewards of many who had been implicated" in the prospective coup against Lenin's government.[9] Yelizaveta Otten, Reilly's chief courier "with whom he was romantically involved,"[118] was arrested as well as his other mistress Olga Starzheskaya.[76] After interrogation, Starzheskaya was imprisoned for five years.[76] Yet another courier, Mariya Fride, likewise was arrested at Otten's flat with an intelligence communiqué that she was carrying for Reilly.[119][120][100]

On 3 September 1918, the Pravda and Izvestiya newspapers sensationalized the aborted coup on their front pages.[89][24] Outraged headlines denounced the Allied representatives and other foreigners in Moscow as "Anglo-French Bandits."[24] The papers arrogated credit for the coup to Reilly and, when he was identified as a key suspect, a dragnet ensued.[89] Reilly "was hunted through days and nights as he had never been hunted before,"[9] and "his photograph with a full description and a reward was placarded" throughout the area.[121] The Cheka raided his assumed refuge, but the elusive Reilly avoided capture and met with Captain Hill while in hiding.[121] Hill later wrote that Reilly, despite narrowly escaping his pursuers in both Moscow and Petrograd, "was absolutely cool, calm and collected, not in the least downhearted and only concerned in gathering together the broken threads and starting afresh."[121] Hill proposed that Reilly exfiltrate Russia via the Ukraine to Baku using their network of British agents for safe houses and assistance.[121] However, Reilly instead chose a shorter, more dangerous route north through Petrograd and the Baltic Provinces to Finland in order to get their reports to London as early as possible.[121] With the Cheka closing in, Reilly, carrying a Baltic German passport supplied by Hill, posed as a legation secretary and departed the region in a railway car reserved for the German Embassy. In Kronstadt, Reilly sailed by ship to Helsinki and reached Stockholm with the aid of local Baltic smugglers.[122] He arrived unscathed in London on 8 November.[122]

While safely in England, Reilly, Lockhart, and other agents were tried in absentia before the Supreme Revolutionary Tribunal in a proceeding which opened 25 November 1918.[123] Approximately twenty defendants faced charges in the trial, most of whom had worked for the Americans or the British in Moscow. The case was prosecuted by Nikolai Krylenko,[j] an exponent of the theory that political considerations rather than criminal guilt should decide a case's outcome.[124][123] Krylenko's case concluded on 3 December 1918, with two defendants sentenced to be shot and various others sentenced to terms of prison or forced labor for terms up to five years.[123] Thus, the day before Reilly met Sir Mansfield Smith-Cumming ("C") in London for debriefing, the Russian Izvestia newspaper reported that both Reilly and Lockhart had been sentenced to death in absentia by a Revolutionary Tribunal for their roles in the attempted coup of the Bolshevik government.[123][126] The sentence was to be carried out immediately should either of them be apprehended on Soviet soil. This sentence would later be served on Reilly when he was caught by Dzerzhinsky's OGPU in 1925.[123][127]

Activities from 1919 to 1924[edit]

Within a week of their return debriefing, the British Secret Intelligence Service and the Foreign Office again sent Reilly and Hill to South Russia under the cover of British trade delegates. Their assignment was to uncover information about the Black Sea coast needed for the Paris Peace Conference of 1919.[128] At that time, the region was home to a variety of anti-Bolsheviks. They travelled in the guise of British merchants, with appropriate credentials provided by the Department of Overseas Trade. Over the next six weeks or so, Reilly prepared twelve dispatches which reported on various aspects of the situation in South Russia (now Ukraine) and were delivered personally by Hill to the Foreign Office in London. Reilly identified four principal factors in the affairs of South Russia at this time: the Volunteer Army; the territorial or provincial governments in the Kuban, Don, and Crimea; the Petlyura movement in Ukraine; and the economic situation. In his opinion, the future course of events in this region would depend not only on the interaction of these factors with each other, but 'above all upon Allied attitude towards them...'. Reilly advocated Allied assistance to organise South Russia (now Ukraine) into a suitable "'placed'armes" for decisive advance against Petlurism and Bolshevism'. In his opinion: "The military Allied assistance required for this would be comparatively small as proved by recent events in Odessa. Landing parties in the ports and detachments assisting Volunteer Army on lines of communication would probably be sufficient."[129]

Reilly's reference to events in Odessa concerned the successful landing there on 18 December 1918 of troops from the French 156th Division commanded by General Borius, who managed to wrest control of the city from the Petlyurists with the assistance of a small contingent of Volunteers.[129]

Urgent as the need for Allied military assistance to the Volunteer Army was in Reilly's estimation, he regarded economic assistance for South Russia as 'even more pressing ...'. Manufactured goods were so scarce in this region that he considered any moderate contribution from the Allies would have a most beneficial effect. Otherwise, apart from echoing a certain General Poole's suggestion for a British or Anglo-French Commission to control merchant shipping engaged in trading activities in the Black Sea, Reilly did not offer any solutions to what he called a state of 'general economic chaos' in South Russia. Reilly found White officials, who had been given the job of helping the Russian economy get better, 'helpless' in coming to terms with 'the colossal disaster which has overtaken Russia's finances, ... and unable to frame anything, approaching even an outline, of a financial policy'. But he supported their request for the Allies to print '500 Million roubles of Nicholas money of all denominations' for the Special Council as a matter of urgency, with the justification that 'although one realizes the fundamental futility of this remedy, one must agree with them that for the moment this is the only remedy'. Lack of funds was one reason offered by Reilly to explain the Whites' blatant inactivity in the propaganda field. They were also said to be lacking paper and printing presses needed for the preparation of propaganda material. Reilly claimed that the Special Council had come to appreciate fully the benefits of propaganda.[129]

On 18 May 1923, Nelly "Pepita" Burton—known professionally as Pepita Bobadilla, the widow of playwright Haddon Chambers[130]—married Sidney Reilly at a civil Registry Office on Henrietta Street, in Covent Garden, Central London, with Captain Hill acting as a witness.[131][9] As Reilly was already married at the time, their union was bigamous. Bobadilla later described Reilly as a sombre individual and found it strange that he never entertained guests at their home. Except for two or three acquaintances, hardly anyone could boast of being his friend.[23] Nevertheless, their marriage was reportedly happy as Bobadilla believed Reilly to be "romantic," "a good companion," "a man of infinite courage," and "the ideal husband."[23] (Their union would last merely thirty months before Reilly's disappearance and execution.)

A year later, according to journalist Samuel T. Williamson of The New York Times,[6] Reilly was involved (possibly alongside Sir Stewart Graham Menzies[132]) in the international scandal known as the Zinoviev Letter.[6][7][132] Four days before the British general election on 8 October 1924, a Tory newspaper printed a letter purporting to originate from Grigory Zinoviev, head of the Third Communist International.[6] The letter claimed the planned resumption of diplomatic and trade relations by the Labour party with Soviet Russia would indirectly hasten the overthrow of the British government.[133] Mere hours later the British Foreign Office incorporated this letter in a stiff note of protest to the Soviet government.[6] Soviet Russia and British Communists denounced the letter as a forgery by British intelligence agents, while Conservative politicians and newspapers maintained the document was genuine. Amid this uproar, Ramsay MacDonald's Labor Government lost the 1924 general election.[6] Reflecting upon these events, the journalist Winfried Lüdecke[d] grandiosely posited in 1929 that Reilly's role in "the famous Zinoviev letter assumed a world-wide political importance, for its publication in the British press brought about the fall of the [Ramsay] Macdonald ministry, frustrated the realization of the proposed Anglo-Russian commercial treaty, and, as a final result, led to the signing of the treaties of Locarno, in virtue of which the other states of Europe presented, under the leadership of Britain, a united front against Soviet Russia."[7]

Alleged execution[edit]

Toivo Vähä (middle) pictured with other Soviet guards. Vähä brought Reilly across the Soviet-Finnish border and delivered him to OGPU officers.
Toivo Vähä (middle) pictured with other Soviet guards. Vähä brought Reilly across the Soviet-Finnish border and delivered him to OGPU officers.

According to Reilly's wife Pepita Bobadilla, Reilly was perpetually determined "to return to Russia to see if he could not find and succor some of his friends whom he believed to be still alive. This he did in 1925—and never came back."[9] In September 1925 in Paris, Reilly met with Alexander Grammatikov, White Russian General Alexander Kutepov, counter-espionage expert Vladimir Burtsev, and the ineffectual Commander Ernest Boyce from British Intelligence.[134] This assembly discussed how they could make contact with a supposedly pro-Monarchist, anti-Bolshevik organization known as "The Trust" in Moscow.[134] The assembly agreed that Reilly should journey to Finland to explore the feasibility of yet another uprising in Russia using The Trust apparatus.[134] However, in actuality, The Trust was an elaborate counter-espionage deception created by the OGPU, the intelligence successor of the Cheka.[135][136]

Thus undercover agents of the OGPU lured Reilly into Bolshevik Russia, ostensibly to meet with supposed anti-Communist revolutionaries. At the Soviet-Finnish border Reilly was introduced to undercover OGPU agents posing as senior Trust representatives from Moscow. One of these undercover Soviet agents, Alexander Alexandrovich Yakushev, later recalled the meeting:

The first impression of [Sidney Reilly] is unpleasant. His dark eyes expressed something biting and cruel; his lower lip drooped deeply and was too slick—the neat black hair, the demonstratively elegant suit. [...] Everything in his manner expressed something haughtily indifferent to his surroundings.[137]

Reilly was brought across the border by Toivo Vähä, a former Finnish Red Guard fighter who now served the OGPU. Vähä took Reilly over the Sestra River to the Soviet side and handed him to the OGPU officers.[138][139] (In the 1973 book The Gulag Archipelago, Russian novelist and historian Alexandr Solzhenitsyn states that Richard Ohola, a Finnish Red Guard, was "a participant in the capture of British agent Sidney Reilly."[140] In the biographical glossary appended to the latter work, Solzhenitsyn incorrectly speculates that Reilly was "killed while crossing the Soviet-Finnish border."[140])

After Reilly crossed the Finnish border, the Soviets captured, transported, and interrogated him at Lubyanka Prison. On arrival Reilly was taken to the office of Roman Pilar, a Soviet official who the previous year had arrested and ordered the execution of Boris Savinkov, a close friend of Reilly. Pilar reminded Reilly that he had been sentenced to death by a 1918 Soviet tribunal for his participation in a counter-revolutionary plot against the Bolshevik government. While Reilly was being interrogated the Soviets publicly claimed that he had been shot trying to cross the Finnish border. Historians debate whether Reilly was tortured while in OGPU custody. Cook contends that Reilly was not tortured other than psychologically by mock execution scenarios designed to shake the resolve of prisoners.

After execution, the alleged corpse of Reilly was photographed in OGPU headquarters circa 5 November 1925.

During OGPU interrogation Reilly prevaricated about his personal background and maintained his charade of being a British subject born in Clonmel, Ireland. Although he did not abjure his allegiance to the United Kingdom, he also did not reveal any intelligence matters.[141] While facing such daily interrogation, Reilly kept a diary in his cell of tiny handwritten notes on cigarette papers which he hid in the plasterwork of a cell wall. While his Soviet captors were interrogating Reilly he in turn was analysing and documenting their techniques. The diary was a detailed record of OGPU interrogation techniques, and Reilly was understandably confident that such unique documentation would, if he escaped, be of interest to the British SIS. After Reilly's death, Soviet guards discovered the diary in Reilly's cell, and photographic enhancements were made by OGPU technicians.[142]

Reilly was executed in a forest near Moscow on Thursday, 5 November 1925.[143] Eyewitness Boris Gudz claimed the execution was supervised by an OGPU officer, Grigory Feduleev; while another OGPU officer, George Syroezhkin, fired the final shot into Reilly's chest. Gudz also confirmed that the order to kill Reilly came from Stalin directly. Within months after his execution, various outlets of the British and American press carried an obituary notice: "REILLY—On the 28th of September, killed near the village of Allekul, Russia, by S. R. U. Troops. Captain Sidney George Reilly, M. C., beloved husband of Pepita Reilly."[130] Two months later, on 17 January 1926, The New York Times reprinted this obituary notice and, citing unnamed sources in the intelligence community, the paper asserted that Reilly had been somehow involved in the still ongoing scandal of the Zinoviev Letter,[6] a fraudulent document published by the British Daily Mail newspaper a year prior during the general election in 1924.[132]

After Reilly's death, there were various rumours about his survival. Reilly's wife Pepita Bobadilla claimed to possess evidence indicating that Reilly was still alive as late as 1932.[9][15] Others speculated that the unscrupulous Reilly had defected[h] to the opposition and became an adviser to Soviet intelligence.[12][145] Despite such unfavorable rumors, the international press quickly turned Reilly into a household name, lauding him as a masterful spy and chronicling his many espionage adventures with numerous embellishments. Contemporary newspapers dubbed him "the greatest spy in history" and "the Scarlet Pimpernel of Red Russia."[15] In May 1931, The London Evening Standard published an illustrated serial headlined "Master Spy" which sensationalized his many exploits as well as outright invented others.

Career with British intelligence[edit]

Reilly in later years.

[Mansfield] Cumming's most remarkable, though not his most reliable, agent was Sidney Reilly, the dominating figure in the mythology of modern British espionage. Reilly, it has been claimed, 'wielded more power, authority and influence than any other spy,' was an expert assassin 'by poisoning, stabbing, shooting and throttling,' and possessed eleven passports and a wife to go with each.[17]

Throughout his life, Sidney Reilly maintained a close yet tempestuous relationship with the British intelligence community. In 1896, Reilly was recruited by Superintendent William Melville for the émigré intelligence network of Scotland Yard's Special Branch. Through his close relationship with Melville, Reilly would be employed as a secret agent for the Secret Service Bureau, which the Foreign Office created in October 1909.[11] In 1918, Reilly began to work for MI1(c), an early designation[11] for the British Secret Intelligence Service, under Sir Mansfield Smith-Cumming. Reilly was allegedly trained by the latter organization and sent to Moscow in March 1918 to assassinate Vladimir Ilyich Lenin or attempt to overthrow the Bolsheviks.[10] He had to escape after the Cheka unraveled the so-called Lockhart Plot against the Bolshevik government. Later biographies contain numerous tales about his espionage deeds. It has been claimed that:

  • In the Boer War he masqueraded as a Russian arms merchant to spy on Dutch weapons shipments to the Boers.[146]
  • He obtained intelligence on Russian military defenses in Manchuria for the Kempeitai, the Japanese secret police.[17]
  • He procured Persian oil concessions for the British Admiralty in events surrounding the D'Arcy Concession.[5]
  • He infiltrated a Krupp armaments plant in prewar Germany and stole weapon plans for the Entente Powers.[146]
  • He seduced the wife of a Russian minister to glean information about German weapons shipments to Russia.[15]
  • He participated in missions of so-called "German sabotage" designed to draw the United States into World War I.[70]
  • He attempted to overthrow the Russian Bolshevik government and to rescue the imprisoned Romanov family.[4]
  • Prior to his demise, he served as a courier to transport the forged Zinoviev letter into the United Kingdom.[6][132]

British intelligence adhered to its policy of publicly saying nothing about anything.[1] Yet Reilly's espionage successes did garner indirect recognition. After a formal recommendation by Sir Mansfield "C" Smith-Cumming, Reilly, who had been commissioned into the Royal Flying Corps in 1917, was awarded the Military Cross on 22 January 1919, "for distinguished services rendered in connection with military operations in the field."[147] Most later biographers agree the medal was bestowed due to Reilly's anti-Bolshevik operations in southern Russia.[b]

Reilly's most skeptical biographer, Andrew Cook, asserts that Reilly's SIS-specific career has been greatly embellished as he wasn't accepted as an agent until 15 March 1918. He was then discharged in 1921 because of his tendency to be a rogue operative. Nevertheless, Cook concedes that Reilly previously had been a renowned operative for Scotland Yard's Special Branch and the Secret Service Bureau which were the early forerunners of the British intelligence community. In stark contrast to Cook's harsh assessment, historian Christopher Andrew, a professor at University of Cambridge with a focus on the history of the intelligence services, described Reilly's secret service career overall as "remarkable, though largely ineffective."[148][28]

Fictional portrayals[edit]

Soviet Cinema[edit]

As one of the principal suspects in the Ambassador's Plot and a key figure in the counter-revolutionary activities of White Russian émigrés, Reilly accordingly became a recurring villain in Soviet cinema. In the latter half of the 20th century, he frequently appeared as a historical character in films and television shows produced by the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc countries. He was portrayed by many different actors of various nationalities including: Vadim Medvedev in The Conspiracy of Ambassadors (Zagovor Poslov) (1966); Vsevolod Yakut in Operation Trust (Operatsiya Trest) (1968); Aleksandr Shirvindt in Crash (Krakh) (1969); Vladimir Tatosov in Trust (1976), Sergei Yursky in Coasts in the Mist (Mglistye Berega) (1986), and Harijs Liepins in Syndicate II (Sindikat-2) (1981).

Reilly: Ace of Spies[edit]

Sam Neill portraying Reilly in the TV miniseries Reilly, Ace of Spies (1983).
Sam Neill portraying Reilly in the TV miniseries Reilly, Ace of Spies (1983).

In 1983, a television miniseries, Reilly, Ace of Spies, dramatised the historical adventures of Reilly. Directed by Martin Campbell and Jim Goddard, the program won the 1984 BAFTA TV Award. Reilly was portrayed by actor Sam Neill. Leo McKern portrayed Sir Basil Zaharoff. The series was based on Robin Bruce Lockhart's book, Ace of Spies, which was adapted by Troy Kennedy Martin. In a review of the program, Michael Billington of The New York Times noted that "pinning Reilly down in 12 hours of television is difficult precisely because he was such an enigma: an alleged radical, yet one who helped to bring down Britain's first Labor government in 1924 by means of a forged letter, supposedly from the Bolshevik leader Zinoviev, instructing the British Communists to form cells in the armed forces; a Lothario and two-time bigamist who was yet never betrayed by any of the women he was involved with; an avid collector of Napoleona who wanted to be the power behind the throne rather than to rule himself."[15]

James Bond[edit]

In Ian Fleming, The Man Behind James Bond by Andrew Lycett, Sidney Reilly is listed as an inspiration for James Bond.[149] Reilly's friend, former diplomat and journalist Sir Robert Bruce Lockhart, was a close acquaintance of Ian Fleming for many years and recounted to Fleming many of Reilly's espionage adventures.[150] Lockhart had worked with Reilly in Russia in 1918, where they became embroiled in an SIS-backed plot to overthrow Lenin's Bolshevik government.[69] Within five years of his disappearance in Soviet Russia in 1925, the press had turned Reilly into a household name, lauding him as a master spy and recounting his many espionage adventures. Fleming had therefore long been aware of Reilly's mythical reputation and had listened to Lockhart's recollections. Like Fleming's fictional creation, Reilly was multi-lingual, fascinated by the Far East, fond of fine living, and a compulsive gambler.[150] When queried on whether Reilly's colorful life had directly inspired Bond, Ian Fleming replied: "James Bond is just a piece of nonsense I dreamed up. He's not a Sidney Reilly, you know."[15]

The Gadfly[edit]

In 1895, Reilly encountered noted author Ethel Lilian Voynich, née Boole.[29] Boole was a well-known figure in the late Victorian literary scene and later married to Polish revolutionary Wilfrid Voynich. She and Reilly had a sexual liaison in Italy together.[29] During their affair, Reilly supposedly "bared his soul" to Ethel and revealed to her the peculiar story of his revolutionary past in the Russian Empire. After their affair had concluded, Voynich published in 1897 The Gadfly, a critically acclaimed novel whose central character is allegedly based on Reilly's early life.[36] For years, the existence of this purported relationship was doubted by skeptical historians until confirmed by new evidence in 2016.[29] Archived communication between Anne Fremantle—who attempted a biography of Ethel Voynich—and a relative of Ethel's on the Hinton side demonstrates that a liaison did occur.[29] The theme music for the 1983 television mini-series is essentially a piece of The Gadfly Suite (Op. 97a) by Dmitri Shostakovich.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Reilly's birth year is disputed. Before 1917, he listed 1873 as his birth year in all documents.[22] Then, after 1917, he listed 1874 as his birth year.[22] In the Evening Standard serialization of Reilly's life, his wife Pepita Bobadilla speculated he was born in 1872.[22] But, in her 1931 memoir, Bobadilla revised this to 1874.[23] R. H. Bruce Lockhart believed he was born in 1873,[24] while the Soviet OGPU posited 1874.[21]
  2. ^ a b The official announcement that Sidney Reilly had been awarded the Military Cross (MC) was published in The London Gazette on 11/12 February 1919: "His Majesty the KING (George V) has been graciously pleased to approve the undermentioned rewards for distinguished services rendered in connection with Military operations in the Field:—Awarded the Military Cross. Lieutenant. George Alexander Hill, 4th Bn; Manch. R.; attend. R.A.F., 2nd Lt. Sidney George Reilly, R.A.F." See "No. 31176". The London Gazette (1st supplement). 11 February 1919. p. 2238.  This vaguely-worded citation misled later biographers such as Richard Deacon to wrongly conclude that Reilly's medal was bestowed for valorous military feats against the Imperial German Army during the Great War of 1914-1918.[68]
  3. ^ Switching one's political allegiances—from anti-Tsarist revolutionary activist to pro-Tsarist police informant—as a result of Okhrana blackmail was quite frequent in the final decade of the Russian Empire.[30] For examples of Okhrana informants similar to Sidney Reilly and Alexander Grammatikov, see R. C. Elwood, Russian Social Democracy in the Underground: A Study of the RSDRP in the Ukraine, 1907-1914 (Assen, 1974), pp. 51-58.
  4. ^ a b Winfried Lüdecke's 1929 mini-biography of Reilly was criticized as highly erroneous by Pepita Bobadilla, Reilly's last wife. Bobadilla wrote in 1931: "The section devoted to [Reilly] in Winfried Ludecke's standard work Behind the Scenes of Espionage abounds in inaccuracies." See Bobadilla's foreword to Adventures of a British Master Spy.[23]
  5. ^ William Melville is inaccurately described by writer Andrew Cook as the first director general of MI5.[54] In contrast, MI5's authorized biographer Christopher Andrew describes Melville as the informal chief of a separate Special Section of the British Secret Service Bureau,[40] the antiquated forerunner to the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS).[11]
  6. ^ For the printed announcement of Sidney George Reilly's commission as a temporary 2nd Lieutenant (on probation), see "No. 30497". The London Gazette (1st supplement). 25 January 1918. p. 1363. 
  7. ^ Confusion exists regarding whom Reilly initially contacted upon his April 1918 arrival in Moscow.[80] Pepita Bobadilla's 1931 book claims that Reilly saw General Mikhail Bonch-Bruyevich. However, General Bonch-Bruyevich's memoirs state that—while his old acquaintance Reilly had spoken with him in Petrograd during Spring 1918—Reilly "never came to see me in Moscow."[81] Edward Van Der Rhoer posits that Reilly instead contacted Vladimir Bonch-Bruyevich, Vladimir Lenin's friend and secretary of the Council of People's Commissars.[79]
  8. ^ a b The persistent myth that Sidney Reilly was a Soviet agent originates in speculative remarks made at Oslo on 30 September 1918 by Dewitt C. Poole, the former U.S. Consul-General in Russia.[12] Both R. H. Bruce Lockhart and George Hill later rejected Poole's remarks as risible. Their confidence in Reilly's anti-Bolshevism was confirmed in 1992 following access to OGPU interrogation reports preceding Reilly's execution.[144]
  9. ^ a b In 1993, Russia's Security Ministry raised doubts about the participation of Fanya Kaplan in the 30 August 1918 assassination attempt on Vladimir Lenin. See UPI press release in the Bibliography section.[112]
  10. ^ In 1938, Reilly's resolute prosecutor Nikolai Krylenko was ultimately arrested himself during Joseph Stalin's Great Purge.[124] Following interrogation and torture by the NKVD, Krylenko confessed to extensive involvement in anti-Soviet agitation. After a twenty-minute trial, Krylenko was sentenced to death by the Military Collegium of the Soviet Supreme Court and executed immediately afterwards.[124] In Memoirs of a British Agent (1932), R. H. Bruce Lockhart described Krylenko as "an epileptic degenerate . . . and the most repulsive type I came across in all my connections with the Bolsheviks."[125]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Deacon 1987, pp. 133–136.
  2. ^ a b c Deacon 1987, p. 77.
  3. ^ a b c Deacon 1972, pp. 144,175.
  4. ^ a b c McNeal 2002, p. 137.
  5. ^ a b c Spence 2002, pp. 57-59.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i Williamson 1926.
  7. ^ a b c Ludecke 1929, p. 107.
  8. ^ a b Hill 1932, p. 201.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n New York Times 1933.
  10. ^ a b c d e Thomson 2011.
  11. ^ a b c d e SIS Website 2007.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h Lockhart 1932, pp. 277, 322-323.
  13. ^ Spence 2002, Chapter 8: The Russian Question.
  14. ^ Lockhart 1932.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Billington 1984.
  16. ^ Lycett 1996, pp. 118,132.
  17. ^ a b c d e f Andrew 1986, p. 83.
  18. ^ Robin Bruce Lockhart, Reilly: Ace of Spies; 1986, Hippocrene Books, ISBN 0-88029-072-2.
  19. ^ a b c d Deacon 1987, p. 134.
  20. ^ a b Ludecke 1929, p. 105.
  21. ^ a b c d Spence 2002, p. 2.
  22. ^ a b c Cook 2002, p. 24, 292.
  23. ^ a b c d e f Bobadilla & Reilly 1931, Foreword.
  24. ^ a b c d e f Lockhart 1932, p. 322.
  25. ^ Segodnya 2007.
  26. ^ a b Lockhart 1986
  27. ^ a b c Cook 2004, p. 28.
  28. ^ a b c d e Ainsworth 1998, p. 1447.
  29. ^ a b c d e f g h Kennedy 2016, pp. 274-276.
  30. ^ a b c d e Elwood 1986, p. 310.
  31. ^ a b c d Lockhart 1967, pp. 25-26.
  32. ^ Spence 2002, p. 12.
  33. ^ a b c d Cook 2004, pp. 32-33.
  34. ^ a b c Cook 2004, p. 56.
  35. ^ a b Lockhart 1967, p. 27.
  36. ^ a b c d e Ramm 2017.
  37. ^ a b Cook 2004, p. 39.
  38. ^ a b Cook 2004, p. 44.
  39. ^ a b Cook 2004, p. 34.
  40. ^ a b Andrew 2009, p. 81.
  41. ^ Spence 2002, pp. 28-39.
  42. ^ Lockhart 1967, pp. 29-30.
  43. ^ Spence 2002, p. 24.
  44. ^ Spence 2002, p. 30.
  45. ^ Spence 2002, p. 37.
  46. ^ a b Cook 2004, pp. 15-18.
  47. ^ Spence 1995, p. 92.
  48. ^ Nish 2014.
  49. ^ Cook 2004, pp. 44-50.
  50. ^ a b c d e f Ludecke 1929, p. 106.
  51. ^ Spence 2002, pp. 40-55.
  52. ^ Cook 2004, pp. 59-60.
  53. ^ Spence 2002, p. 61.
  54. ^ Cook 2002, p. 6.
  55. ^ a b c d Spence 2002, pp. 56-59.
  56. ^ a b Andrew 2009, p. 6.
  57. ^ a b Yergin 1991, p. 140.
  58. ^ a b c Cook 2004, p. 78.
  59. ^ a b Cook 2004, pp. 64-68.
  60. ^ a b c d Lockhart 1967, p. 47.
  61. ^ a b Spence 2002, p. 92.
  62. ^ a b c Lockhart 1967, pp. 36-38.
  63. ^ Lockhart 1967, p. 36.
  64. ^ Cook 2004, pp. 276-277.
  65. ^ Van Der Rhoer 1981, pp. 5-6.
  66. ^ Spence 2002, pp. 25-26.
  67. ^ Cook 2004, pp. 104.
  68. ^ a b Deacon 1987, p. 135.
  69. ^ a b c Andrew 1986, p. 214.
  70. ^ a b c d e Long 1995, p. 1228.
  71. ^ Spence 2002, Chapter 6: War on the Manhattan Front.
  72. ^ Andrew 1986.
  73. ^ a b c d e Hicks 1920.
  74. ^ a b Spence 2002, pp. 150-151.
  75. ^ a b Spence 2002, pp. 172-173, 185-186.
  76. ^ a b c d McNeal 2002, p. 81.
  77. ^ Bonch-Bruyevich 1966, p. 303.
  78. ^ a b Spence 2002, pp. 195.
  79. ^ a b Van Der Rhoer 1981, p. 2.
  80. ^ a b Elwood 1986, p. 311.
  81. ^ Bonch-Bruyevich 1966, p. 265.
  82. ^ Milton 2014, p. 112.
  83. ^ Van Der Rhoer 1981, pp. 26-28.
  84. ^ Elwood 1986, pp. 310-311.
  85. ^ McNeal 2018.
  86. ^ a b Spence 2002, pp. 187-191.
  87. ^ McNeal 2002, p. 121.
  88. ^ Hill 1932, p. 241-242.
  89. ^ a b c d e f Long 1995, p. 1225.
  90. ^ a b Long 1995, p. 1226.
  91. ^ Debo 1971.
  92. ^ a b c d Long 1995, p. 1227.
  93. ^ Hill 1932, pp. 237-238.
  94. ^ McNeal 2002, pp. 105-106.
  95. ^ a b McNeal 2002, p. 234.
  96. ^ a b Cook 2004, pp. 162-164.
  97. ^ a b Long 1995, p. 1230.
  98. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Ferguson 2010, pp. 1-5, Prologue.
  99. ^ Hill 1932, p. 238.
  100. ^ a b c d e Cook 2004, pp. 166-169.
  101. ^ a b Long 1995, p. 1229.
  102. ^ a b c Long 1995, p. 1231.
  103. ^ Ainsworth 1998, p. 1448.
  104. ^ Kitchen: "Hill, George Alexander (1892–1968). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography."
  105. ^ a b Hill 1932, p. 239.
  106. ^ a b c d e Lockhart 1932, p. 317-318.
  107. ^ a b c d Brooklyn Eagle 1918.
  108. ^ a b c Washington Post 1918.
  109. ^ a b Brooke 2006, p. 74.
  110. ^ a b c Donaldson & Donaldson 1980, p. 221.
  111. ^ Volkogonov 1994, pp. 222, 231.
  112. ^ Gransden 1993.
  113. ^ a b Brooke 2006, p. 75.
  114. ^ a b c d New York Times 1918, pp. 1,6.
  115. ^ Britnieva 1934, pp. 77-86.
  116. ^ a b Lockhart 1932, p. 320.
  117. ^ Lockhart 1932, p. 330.
  118. ^ Spence 2002, p. 209.
  119. ^ Hill 1932, pp. 242-244.
  120. ^ Spence 2002, p. 234.
  121. ^ a b c d e Hill 1932, pp. 244-245.
  122. ^ a b Spence 2002, p. 240.
  123. ^ a b c d e Service 2012, pp. 164-165.
  124. ^ a b c Feofanov & Barry 1995, pp. 3, 5, 10-12.
  125. ^ Lockhart 1932, p. 257.
  126. ^ Spence 2002, p. 236.
  127. ^ Spence 2002, p. 453.
  128. ^ Spence 2002, pp. 247-251.
  129. ^ a b c Ainsworth 1998, pp. 1447-1470.
  130. ^ a b New York Times 1925.
  131. ^ Bobadilla & Reilly 1931, p. 110.
  132. ^ a b c d Kettle 1986, p. 121.
  133. ^ Madeira 2014, p. 124.
  134. ^ a b c Elwood 1986, p. 312.
  135. ^ Deacon 1987, p. 136.
  136. ^ Grant 1986, pp. 51-77.
  137. ^ Cook 2004, p. 238.
  138. ^ Ristolainen 2009.
  139. ^ Kotakallio 2016, p. 142.
  140. ^ a b Solzhenitsyn 1974, pp. 127, 631.
  141. ^ Spence 2002, pp. 455-456.
  142. ^ Cook 2004, p. 250.
  143. ^ Cook 2004, pp. 258-259.
  144. ^ Ainsworth 1998, p. 1466.
  145. ^ Van Der Rhoer 1981, pp. 186-235.
  146. ^ a b Corry 1984.
  147. ^ Cook 2004, p. 188.
  148. ^ Andrew 1986, pp. 433,448.
  149. ^ Lycett 1996, pp. 118, 132.
  150. ^ a b Cook 2004, p. 12.

Bibliography[edit]

Book sources


Online sources

External links[edit]