Battle of Marash
The Battle of Marash (Turkish: Maraş Muharebesi) was a battle that took place in the early winter of 1920 between the French forces occupying the city of Maraş in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish National Forces linked to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. It was the first major battle of the Turkish War of Independence, and the three-week-long engagement in the city ultimately forced the French to abandon and retreat from Marash and resulted in a Turkish massacre of Armenian refugees who had just been repatriated to the city following the Armenian Relocation(Tehcir). The controversial retreat, along with the massacre that took place under French watch, was subsequently dubbed the "Marash Affair."
After the surrender of the Ottoman Empire to the Allies in October 1918, the city of Marash had come under the joint-occupation of the British and French armies (the latter largely composed of Armenians from the French Armenian Legion). In February 1919, Field Marshal Edmund Allenby appointed a number of French officers to oversee the administration of the region of Cilicia and the repatriation of tens of thousands of Armenians who had been deported during the war in the course of the Genocide. Within a few months, approximately 150,000 Armenians had been repatriated, including 20,000 natives from Marash.
In the months following the end of the war, Cilicia had also become a source of dispute between the British and French, who both aspired to establish influence in the region. The British government, however, was under strong domestic pressure to withdraw and demobilize its forces in the Middle East and on 15 September 1919, Prime Minister David Lloyd George begrudgingly accepted a proposal by Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau to have the French formally assume control of Cilicia. The transfer of command took place on 4 November, but Field Marshal Ferdinand Foch's promise to reinforce the existing forces in the area with at least 32 infantry battalions, 20 cavalry squadrons and 14 artillery batteries went unfulfilled. The French units were thus deprived of armored cars and air support and lacked automatic weapons, heavy artillery and even wireless transmitters and carrier pigeons.
Turkish Nationalist movements
The Anglo-French rivalry had led to the coalescence and strengthening of the Turkish National Movement under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Kemal had denounced the Allied occupation of Cilicia in November 1919 and the forces loyal to him were tenaciously preparing to launch a major insurrection against the thinly spread French units garrisoned in Marash, Antep and Urfa. Experienced officers, including the Kurdish captain Ali Kılıç, were sent by Mustafa Kemal to organize the tribal units and chete (irregular fighters) bands in the region. The Turkish forces in Marash numbered 2,500. Some of them were armed with old hunting rifles and others with melee weapons. Before the battle, they obtained 850 rifles, 2 machine guns, 2 cannons (not used during the fighting), from the gendarmerie building in Marash.
Those without firearms would arm themselves with rifles acquired from killed French soldiers. By January 1920, French supply convoys and communication lines were regularly coming under attack by the partisans and those Armenians who had been repatriated were being harassed and pressured to leave their homes once more. The French attempted to mollify the minority Muslim elements (Circassians, Alevis, Kurds) in Marash by creating gendarmerie units but this only emboldened the Turkish Nationalists to hoist the Turkish flag over Marash's abandoned citadel and to intimidate those Muslims who cooperated with the French. The French troops in Marash included many Algerians, and also Armenians who had been recently enlisted, and it was stated that the latter had supposedly "annoyed the local population, by their arrogant attitude as they strolled on the streets in their French uniforms."
Seeing all this, Captain Pierre-Jean Daniel André, the head of the Marash detachment, requested additional reinforcements but, due to the indecisiveness of his superior, Lt. Colonel Jean Flye-Sainte-Marie, he was ordered to go to Adana to apprise the division commander, Brigadier General Julien Dufieux, of the situation. Dufieux agreed to send extra men under the command of General Quérette to Marash but by 17 January, when the reinforcements arrived, the French had already lost the initiative: supply convoys in Bel Punar and El-Oghlu had come under attack and a relief column led by battalion commander Major Corneloup had been ambushed. On 21 January, General Quérette summoned the Muslim notables of Marash to his headquarters located at a barracks in the north of the city and presented them with evidence pointing to their complicity in the attacks and demanded that they put an end to the hostilities. As the leaders departed, Turkish police chief Arslan Toğuz drew out his pistol and fired five rounds into the air, signaling the beginning of the uprising.
The first French units to come under attack were those officers accompanying the local gendarmerie or standing guard. The contingents of the French garrison at Marash, numbering only 2,000 men, were separated from one another in the citywide siege. Direct communications did not exist between Marash and division headquarters and General Dufieux was only informed of the insurrection on 31 January, after several Armenians from the French Armenian Legion managed to disguise themselves as Muslims and cross the battle lines. He immediately appointed Lieutenant Colonel Robert Normand to lead a relief expedition, composed of three infantry battalions and half a squadron of cavalry, to Marash, and dispatched aerial recon flights, giving hope to the besieged French, Armenians and American relief workers who were assisting the local population.
On 7 February, Normand's unit fought its way into the city and began to bombard the Turkish positions with heavy artillery. The following day, he relieved Cornelope's column, which had held its position for two weeks, and broke through to reach General Quérette's headquarters. To Quérette's astonishment, Normand told that he had come with orders from General Dufieux to begin the full evacuation of the French garrison of Marash, followed by the Christian and loyal Muslim population. Quérette was reluctant to carry out such a command but Normand claimed that no more reinforcements or supplies would be sent. With this in mind Quérette agreed to the evacuation. The order to evacuate ironically came at precisely the same moment that the Turkish Nationalists were seeking a ceasefire: no sooner had General Quérette begun negotiations with the Turkish representative, Dr. Mustafa, when he was told by Normand to prepare to evacuate. By 3:00 in the morning of 11 February, Quérette had destroyed the remaining ammunition dumps and was preparing to slip out under the cover of darkness, in order to prevent the terrified Armenian population from hindering his troops' withdrawal. They were, however, unable to do so and 4,000–5,000 Armenians managed to flee with the French troops in a three-day, 75-mile (121 km) long march to İslahiye. Subsequently called the "Marash Affair," many of the Armenian refugees died from exhaustion and from the bitter cold, such that there were only 1,500 of their number when they reached İslahiye on 13 February.
Massacre of Armenians
The three-week siege of Marash was also accompanied by the wholesale massacre of the Armenian repatriates. Roving Turkish bands threw kerosene-doused rags on Armenian homes and laid a constant barrage upon the American relief hospital. The Armenians themselves, as in previous times of trouble, sought refuge in their churches and schools. Women and children found momentary shelter in Marash's six Armenian Apostolic, three Armenian Evangelical churches and in the city's sole Catholic cathedral. The Armenian legionnaires attempted to put up a defense but were ultimately overwhelmed. All the churches and eventually the entire Armenian districts were put to flames. The plight of the Armenians was only exacerbated when the French decided to pull out on 10 February. When the 2,000 Armenians who had taken shelter in the Catholic cathedral attempted to follow the retreat, they were cut down by Turkish rifle and machine gun fire.
Though news of the siege of the French army and the massacre of the Armenians reached Allied and American representatives in Europe, the French High Command did not publicly indicate that anything serious had taken place. Internally, however, they were astonished by this move launched by the Turkish Nationalists. The battle and the massacre were discussed fervently in the European and American press, as well as the British Parliament. Colonel Normand's role in ordering the evacuation, in particular, stirred controversy as members of General Dufieux's staff maintained that no evacuation order had ever been given. Dufieux, however, was inexplicably told by senior commander and General of the Army of the Levant Henri Gouraud that he should let the matter drop. French Colonel Édouard Brémond, the chief administrator of the occupation zone, reflected on the decision in his memoirs:
The decision for the retreat remains a mystery. It was not made in Beirut, nor in Adana, but at Marash. There seems to be no doubt that the order to leave would not have been given if a wireless outfit had been available in Marash permitting unbroken communication with Adana.
A few years later, he stated frankly, "Colonel Normand did not bring an order for the evacuation; he gave it [emphasis in the original]." In his own analysis of the conflict, the American relief worker Stanley E. Kerr attributes the withdrawal inter alia to the untenable position the French military itself had assumed, its failure to provide adequate supplies to its men, and its inability to carry out intelligence work.
In Constantinople, Allied military representatives pushed to threaten the Ottoman government for the affair, while the French simultaneously explored the possibility of reaching a modus vivendi with Kemal. The Allied Supreme Council, which at the time was working out the details to a peace treaty that it would present to the Ottoman government, deliberated on how best to respond. Some of the delegates present, including Prime Minister David Lloyd-George, insisted that strong pressure should be brought to bear against the Ottoman government to prevent new atrocities, but the other diplomats were skeptical of the idea. The officials also agreed that the Ottoman government should dismiss Kemal from office, although they admitted that such a move was impractical, since the Ottoman government held no control over Kemal, who was leading a counter Turkish government in Anatolia. A decision was finally reached on 10 March. British, French and Italian leaders agreed to authorize the formal occupation of Constantinople, which was carried out by the forces under General George F. Milne's command on the morning of 16 March.
- See Kerr, The Lions of Marash, p. 195
- "Ataturk, Mustafa Kemal". Information about the Armenian Genocide. Armenian National Institute. Retrieved 21 May 2013.
- This is the figure given by French diplomat Philippe Berthelot during the London conference: Great Britain, Foreign Office. Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939. 1st series. Eds. Rohan Butler and J.P.T. Bury. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1958, vol. 7, p. 301.
- (Turkish) Çarpışmaların Başlaması (Beginning of the engagements) Archived 11 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine.. (History of Kahramanmaraş); Kahramanmaraş Official Governor Website.
- King, William C. King's Complete History of the World War 1914–1918. Springfield, MA: The History Associates, 1922, p. 669
- (Turkish) Sarıhan, Zeki. Kurtuluş Savaşı günlüğü: açıklamalı kronoloji. Öğretmen Dünyası, 1982, p. 328. ISBN 975-16-0517-2.
- Hovannisian, Richard G. "The Postwar Contest for Cilicia and the 'Marash Affair' " in Armenian Cilicia, eds. Richard G. Hovannisian and Simon Payaslian. UCLA Armenian History and Culture Series: Historic Armenian Cities and Provinces, 7. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 2008, p. 497.
- See Vahram Shemmassian, "The Repatriation of Armenian Refugees from the Arab Middle East, 1918–1920" in Armenian Cilicia, pp. 419–56.
- The French army was largely made up of Algerian or Senegalese soldiers who were not used to Cilicia's cold winter weather: Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", pp. 499–501.
- Toplumsal tarih (Edition 3), Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı, 1995, page 29
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", pp. 502–06.
- Hovannisian, Richard G. (1996) . The Republic of Armenia: From London to Sevres, February – August 1920, Vol. 3. Berkeley: University of California. p. 37. ISBN 0-520-08803-4.
- See Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939, vol. 7, p. 302.
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", pp. 506–09.
- Kerr, Stanley E. The Lions of Marash: Personal Experiences with American Near East Relief, 1919–1922. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1973, pp. 95–96.
- (Armenian) Sahakyan, Ruben G. (1970). Թուրք-Ֆրանսիական հարաբերությունները և Կիլիկյան, 1919–1921 թթ. [Turkish-French Relations and Cilicia, 1919–1921]. Yerevan: Armenian Academy of Sciences, p. 149.
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", p. 510.
- Colonel Robert Normand has related the account of his campaign in Cilicia, including the campaign of Marash in his book Colonnes dans le Levant. Colonel Robert Normand led a brilliant career in the French army, when he returned to France. He was promoted to the grade of General de brigade, the youngest in the army to reach the grade. He ultimately became Directeur du Génie the highest responsibility in the engineering Corps. As such, he was responsible of the construction of the Ligne Maginot in France. He died, as General de Division, in a train accident in 1932.
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", p. 510–11.
- Sahakyan. Turkish-French Relations, p. 153.
- "Armenian Refugees Perish in Blizzard." New York Times. 27 February 1920.
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", p. 511.
- See also Mabel E. Elliot (1924), Beginning Again at Ararat. New York, Chicago: Fleming H. Revell Company, pp. 115–31.
- Hovannisian. Republic of Armenia, p. 41.
- "The Massacre Of Armenians." The Times. 28 February 1920.
- "Eyewitness Tells How Armenians were Massacred." The New York Times. 29 February 1920.
- Hovannisian. "Postwar Contest for Cilicia", p. 509.
- (French) Muré, Materne (1921). Un épisode de la tragédie arménienne: le massacre de Marache (février 1920). Brussels: Société Belge de Libraire.
- Kerr. The Lions of Marash, pp. 95–142.
- Sahakyan. Turkish-French Relations, pp. 150–52.
- Documents on British Foreign Policy, vol. 7, p. 303.
- Kerr. The Lions of Marash, p. 196.
- Hovannisian. Republic of Armenia, p. 42.
- Parliament, House of Commons. The Parliamentary Debates. vol. 125. 5th series. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1918–20, cols. 1958–71, 2060–62.
- Hovannisian. Republic of Armenia, pp. 41–42.
- Sahakyan. Turkish-French Relations, pp. 153–56.
- Quoted in Kerr, The Lions of Marash, p. 193.
- See Kerr, The Lions of Marash, pp. 193–95.
- Documents on British Foreign Policy, vol. 7, pp. 291–99, 306.
- Documents on British Foreign Policy, vol. 7, pp. 411–23.
- The decision was carried out despite objections made by the British War Office: Hovannisian. Republic of Armenia, pp. 42–48.
- (Turkish) Kemal, Mustafa. Atatürk'ün bütün eserleri [The Complete Works of Atatürk]. Istanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 1998, vol. xvii, p. 219.
- (Armenian) Boyajian, Dickran H. (1965). Հայկական Լէգիոնը, Պատմական Հուշագրութիւն [The Armenian Legion: A Historical Memoir]. Watertown, MA: Baikar Press.
- Brémond, Édouard, "The Bremond Mission: Cilicia in 1919–1920, Part 1," Armenian Review 29/4 (Winter 1976), pp. 339–72.
- _______________, "The Bremond Mission: Cilicia in 1919–1920, Part 2," Armenian Review 30/1 (Spring 1977), pp. 34–72.
- (Turkish) Genelkurmay Başkanlığı Harb Tarihi Dairesi (1966). Türk Istiklal Harbi (The Turkish War of Independence). vol. iv. Ankara: Gnkur. Basimevi.
- Hovannisian, Richard G. and Simon Payaslian (eds.) (2008). Armenian Cilicia. UCLA Armenian History and Culture Series: Historic Armenian Cities and Provinces, 7. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.
- Kerr, Stanley E. (1973). The Lions of Marash: Personal Experiences with American Near East Relief, 1919–1922. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- (French) Muré, Materne (1921). Un épisode de la tragédie arménienne: le massacre de Marache (février 1920). Brussels: Société Belge de Libraire.
- (Armenian) Sahakyan, Ruben G. (1970). Թուրք-Ֆրանսիական հարաբերությունները և Կիլիկյան, 1919–1921 թթ. [Turkish-French Relations and Cilicia, 1919–1921]. Yerevan: Armenian Academy of Sciences.
- (Turkish) Söylemzoğlu, Galip Kemali (1939). Başımıza gelenler: yakın bir mazinin hatıraları, Mondorosdan Mudanyaya 1918–1922 [The Tribulations We Faced: Memories of the Recent Past, From Mudros to Mundaya]. Istanbul: Kanaat Kitabevi.
- Varadian, Sarkis, "Memoirs of an Armenian Legionaire," Armenian Weekly, June 11, 1977, pp. 8–9.