Sifting and winnowing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Sifting and winnowing" commemorative plaque

Sifting and winnowing is a metaphor for the academic pursuit of truth associated—at least in theory—with the University of Wisconsin. It was coined by UW President Charles Kendall Adams in an 1894 final report from a committee exonerating economics professor Richard T. Ely of censurable charges from state education superintendent Oliver Elwin Wells. [1][2][3]

History[edit]

Professor Richard T. Ely, whose work sparked a state challenge to academic freedom

In the 1890s, University of Wisconsin economics professor Richard T. Ely's philosophy and radical practice came under fire from state education superintendent Oliver Elwin Wells.[4] Ely was known to be liberal and pro-union, having published a book on socialism.[4] Wells protested Ely's socialist beliefs, teaching, and public speaking to UW president Charles Kendall Adams and the Board of Regents, who did not censure Ely.[4] A committee appointed to address the charges produced a report that exonerated Ely upon acceptance by the regents.[4] The report introduced the idea of "sifting and winnowing":[4]

UW–Madison President Adams, who coined the phrase

Ely later referred to the report as the "Wisconsin Magna Charta" for its guarantees of academic freedom in pursuit of truth.[6] In Decades of Chaos and Revolution, Stephen J. Nelson contends that UW's sentiment on academic freedom had been set "well before" the 1890s.[4] He added that the 1894 statement "sounds the trumpet of the fundamental principles of the academy: an unending, unlimited belief in the creed of academic freedom and inquiry."[4]

The "sifting and winnowing" construction was coined by Adams, the UW president, who had defended Ely publicly and read his book.[6] It was later invoked by UW–Madison Chancellor Robben Wright Fleming when responding to protestors during his tenure.[7]

In a later incident, sociology professor Edward Alsworth Ross was censured upon inviting anarchist Emma Goldman to address his class.[8] He did not share her beliefs, but supported her free speech.[8] In memorial of the incident, the Class of 1910 created a commemorative "sifting and winnowing" plaque of the phrase in its context, which the regents rejected.[8] After the Class appealed to area newspapers, the regents relented.[8] The plaque was installed on Bascom Hall in 1915, where it remains.[8] It was rededicated in 1957.[8]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Kevin Barrett criticism by provost". University of Wisconsin–Madison. Archived from the original on October 11, 2006. Retrieved March 31, 2017. 
  2. ^ "Professor criticized for expressing opinion". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on July 16, 2015. Retrieved March 31, 2017. 
  3. ^ "UW-Madison profs no longer get tenure". slate dot com. Archived from the original on April 2, 2017. Retrieved April 2, 2017. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Nelson 2012, p. 45.
  5. ^ Herfurth 1949, ch. 1.
  6. ^ a b Nelson 2012, p. 46.
  7. ^ Nelson 2012, p. 44.
  8. ^ a b c d e f "Letters & Science 101 - Traditions: Sifting and Winnowing". University of Wisconsin–Madison College of Letters and Science. February 16, 2012. Archived from the original on November 8, 2013. Retrieved November 8, 2013. 

Further reading[edit]