|Part of a series on|
|Learning to read|
|Scientific Theories & Models|
|Reading differences & disabilities|
High frequency sight words (also known simply as sight words) are commonly used words that young children are encouraged to memorize as a whole by sight, so that they can automatically recognize these words in print without having to use any strategies to decode. Sight words were introduced after Whole language (a similar method) fell out of favor with the education establishment.
The term sight words is often confused with sight vocabulary, which is defined as each person's own vocabulary that the person recognizes from memory without the need to decode for understanding.
However, some researchers say that two of the most significant problems with sight words are 1) memorizing sight words is labour intensive, requiring on average about 35 trials per word, and 2) teachers who withhold phonics instruction and instead rely on teaching sight words are making it harder for children to "gain basic word-recognition skills" that are critically needed by the end of grade three and can be used over a lifetime of reading.
Sight words account for a large percentage (up to 75%) of the words used in beginning children's print materials. The advantage for children being able to recognize sight words automatically is that a beginning reader will be able to identify the majority of words in a beginning text before they even attempt to read it; therefore, allowing the child to concentrate on meaning and comprehension as they read without having to stop and decode every single word. Advocates of whole-word instruction believe that being able to recognize a large number of sight words gives students a better start to learning to read.
Recognizing sight words automatically is said to be advantageous for beginning readers because many of these words have unusual spelling patterns, cannot be sounded out using basic phonics knowledge and cannot be represented using pictures. For example, the word "was" does not follow a usual spelling pattern, as the middle letter "a" makes an /ɒ~ʌ/ sound and the final letter "s" makes a /z/ sound, nor can the word be associated with a picture clue since it denotes an abstract state (existence). Another example, is the word "said", it breaks the phonetic rule of ai normally makes the long a sound, ay. In this word it makes the short e sound of eh. The word "said" is pronounced as /s/ /e/ /d/. The word "has" also breaks the phonetic rule of s normally making the sss sound, in this word the s makes the z sound, /z/." The word is then pronounced /h/ /a/ /z/.
However, a 2017 study in England compared teaching with phonics vs. teaching whole written words and concluded that phonics is more effective, saying "our findings suggest that interventions aiming to improve the accuracy of reading aloud and/or comprehension in the early stages of learning should focus on the systematicities present in print-to-sound relationships, rather than attempting to teach direct access to the meanings of whole written words".
Most advocates of sight-words believe children should memorize the words. However, some educators say a more efficient method is to teach them by using an explicit phonics approach, perhaps by using a tool such as Elkonin boxes. As a result, the words form part of the students sight vocabulary, are readily accessible and aid in learning other words containing similar sounds.
Other phonics advocates such as the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI-USA) and the Departments of Education in England and the State of Victoria in Australia, recommend that teachers first begin by teaching children the frequent sounds and the simple spellings, then introduce the less frequent sounds and more complex spellings later (e.g. the sounds /s/ and /t/ before /v/ and /w/; and the spellings cake before eight and cat before duck). The following are samples of the lists that are available on the CCSSI-USA site:
|Phoneme||Sample only - Word Examples (Consonants) (CCSSI-USA)||Common Graphemes (Spellings)|
|/m/||mitt, comb, hymn||m, mb, mn|
|/t/||tickle, mitt, sipped||t, tt, ed|
|/n/||nice, knight, gnat||n, kn, gn|
|/k/||cup, kite, duck, chorus, folk, quiet||k, c, ck, ch, lk, q|
|/f/||fluff, sphere, tough, calf||f, ff, gh, ph, lf|
|/s/||sit, pass, science, psychic||s, ss, sc, ps|
|/z/||zoo, jazz, nose, as, xylophone||z, zz, se, s, x|
|/sh/||shoe, mission, sure, charade, precious, notion, mission, special||sh, ss, s, ch, sc, ti, si, ci|
|/zh/||measure, azure||s, z|
|/r/||reach, wrap, her, fur, stir||r, wr, er/ur/ir|
|/h/||house, whole||h, wh|
|Phoneme||Sample only - Word Examples (Vowels) (CCSSI-USA)||Common Graphemes (Spellings)|
|/ā/||make, rain, play, great, baby, eight, vein, they||a_e, ai, ay, ea, -y, eigh, ei, ey|
|/ē/||see, these, me, eat, key, happy, chief, either||ee, e_e, -e, ea, ey, -y, ie, ei|
|/ī/||time, pie, cry, right, rifle||i_e, ie, -y, igh, -I|
|/ō/||vote, boat, toe, snow, open||o_e, oa, oe, ow, o-|
|/ū/||use, few, cute||u, ew, u_e|
|/ĕ/||bed, breath||e, ea|
|/ĭ/||sit, gym||i, y|
|/ŏ/||fox, swap, palm||o, (w)a, al|
|/ŭ/||cup, cover, flood, tough||u, o, oo, ou|
|/aw/||saw, pause, call, water, bought||aw, au, al, (w)a, ough|
|/er/||her, fur, sir||er, ur, ir|
A number of sight word lists have been compiled and published; among the most popular are the Dolch sight words (first published in 1936) and the 1000 Instant Word list prepared in 1979 by Edward Fry, professor of Education and Director of the Reading Center at Rutgers University and Loyola University in Los Angeles. Many commercial products are also available. These lists have similar attributes, as they all aim to divide words into levels which are prioritized and introduced to children according to frequency of appearance in beginning readers' texts. Although many of the lists have overlapping content, the order of frequency of sight words varies and can be disputed, as they depend on contexts such as geographical location, empirical data, samples used, and year of publication.
Research shows that the alphabetic principle is seen as "the primary driver" of development of all aspects of printed word recognition including phonic rules and sight vocabulary." In addition, the use of sight words as a reading instructional strategy is not consistent with the dual route theory as it involves out-of-context memorization rather than the development of phonological skills. Instead, it is suggested that children first learn to identify individual letter-sound correspondences before blending and segmenting letter combinations.
Proponents of systematic phonics and synthetic phonics argue that children must first learn to associate the sounds of their language with the letter(s) that are used to represent them, and then to blends those sounds into words, and that children should never memorize words as visual designs. Using sight words as a method of teaching reading in English is seen as being at odds with the alphabetic principle and treating English as though it was a logographic language (e.g. Chinese or Japanese).
Some notable researchers have clearly stated their disapproval of whole language and whole-word teaching. In his 2009 book, Reading in the brain, French cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene wrote, "cognitive psychology directly refutes any notion of teaching via a 'global' or 'whole language' method." He goes on to talk about "the myth of whole-word reading", saying it has been refuted by recent experiments. "We do not recognize a printed word through a holistic grasping of its contours, because our brain breaks it down into letters and graphemes." Another cognitive neuroscientist, Mark Seidenberg, says that learning to sound-out atypical words such as have (/h/-/a/-/v/) helps the student to read other words such as had, has, having, hive, haven't, etc. because of the sounds they have in common.
- Dolch word list
- Dual-route hypothesis to reading aloud
- Fry readability formula
- Learning to read
- Most common words in English
- Reading comprehension
- Reading education in the United States
- Reading (process)
- Teaching reading: whole language and phonics
- Whole language
- Writing system
- "What Are Sight Words?". WeAreTeachers. 2018-04-25. Retrieved 2018-11-30.
- Ravitch, Diane. (2007). EdSpeak: A Glossary of Education Terms, Phrases, Buzzwords, and Jargon. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, ISBN 1416605754.
- Rapp, S. (1999-09-29). Recognizing words on sight; activity. The Baltimore Sun
- Murray, Bruce; McIlwain, Jane (2019). "How do beginners learn to read irregular words as sight words". Journal of Research in Reading. 42 (1): 123–136. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12250. ISSN 0141-0423.
- Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of sight. New York, NY: Basic Books. p. 147. ISBN 978-1-5416-1715-5.
- Kear, D. J., & Gladhart, M. A. (1983). "Comparative Study to Identify High-Frequency Words in Printed Materials". Perceptual and Motor Skills. 57 (3): 807–810. doi:10.2466/pms.19126.96.36.1997. S2CID 144675331.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- "Teaching Sight Words as a Part of Comprehensive Reading Instruction, Iowa reading research centre, 2018-06-12".
- "Phonological Ability", The SAGE Encyclopedia of Contemporary Early Childhood Education, SAGE Publications, Inc, 2016, doi:10.4135/9781483340333.n296, ISBN 9781483340357
- "Sight Words". www.thephonicspage.org. Retrieved 2018-11-30.
- "Comparing and Validating Methods of Reading Instruction Using Behavioural and Neural Findings in an Artificial Orthography" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, volume 146, No. 6, 826–858. 2017.
- "Sight Words: An Evidence-Based Literacy Strategy, Understood.org".
- "A New Model for Teaching High-Frequency Words, reading rockets.org".
- "Complete report - National Reading Panel, England" (PDF).
- "Sample phonics lessons, The State Government of Victoria".
- "Foundation skills, The State Government of Victoria, AU".
- "English Appendix 1: Spelling, Government of England" (PDF).
- "Common Core Standards, Appendix A, USA" (PDF).
- "Dolch Words 220, Utah Education Network in partnership with the Utah State Board of Education and Utah System of Higher Education" (PDF).
- Edward Fry (1979). 1000 Instant Words: The Most Common Words for Teaching Reading, Writing, and Spelling. ISBN 0809208806.
- "McGraw-Hill Education Acknowledges Enduring Contributions of Reading and Language Arts Scholar, Author and Innovator Ed Fry, McGraw-Hill Education, Sep 15, 2010".
- "Edward B. Fry, PH.D, Published in Los Angeles Times on Sep. 12, 2010".
- "Fry Instant Words, UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK".
- Otto, W. & cester, R. (1972). "Sight words for beginning readers". The Journal of Educational Research. 65 (10): 435–443. doi:10.1080/00220671.1972.10884372. JSTOR /27536333.
- "Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum: Final Report, page 87" (PDF).
- Ehri, Linnea C. (2017). "Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding". Reading Acquisition. London: Routledge. pp. 107–143. ISBN 9781351236898.
- Literacy teaching guide : phonics. New South Wales. Department of Education and Training. [Sydney, N.S.W.]: New South Wales Dept. of Education and Training. 2009. ISBN 9780731386093. OCLC 590631697.CS1 maint: others (link)
- Findings and Determinations of the National Reading Panel by Topic Areas
- McGuinness, Diane (1997). Why Our Children Can't Read. New York, NY: The Free Press. ISBN 0684831619.
- Gatto, John Taylor (2006). "Eyless in Gaza". The Underground History of American Education. Oxford, NY: The Oxford Village Press. pp. 70–72. ISBN 0945700040.
- Stanislas Dehaene (2010-10-26). Reading in the brain. Penquin Books. pp. 222–228. ISBN 9780143118053.
- Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of light. pp. 143–144=author=Mark Seidenberg. ISBN 9780465080656.