In the United States, a sit-lie ordinance (also sometimes referred to as sit-lie law) is a municipal ordinance which prohibits sitting or lying on the sidewalk or in other public spaces.
Proponents argue that such ordinances are useful or necessary in keeping sidewalks free from obstruction, particularly for use by mobility-impaired persons, and that they are a useful tool in fighting undesirable behavior, while opponents argue that they are instead veiled attacks on vagrants and homeless persons, and, further, unnecessary and overbroad.
Sit-lie ordinances are most notably found in West Coast cities, since the 2000s, with Seattle, Washington, Portland, Oregon, and several San Francisco Bay Area cities – Santa Cruz, Palo Alto, and San Francisco itself – having passed such ordinances.
In some cases sit-lie ordinances, such as in Portland, are part of a package of reforms, also providing services for vagrants, such as restrooms, benches, and day shelters, and in this context are supported as a tool to ensure that such resources are used.
Critics argue that such ordinances are a criminalization of homelessness, a criminalization of ordinary activities – hence prone to selective enforcement – and unnecessary, since existing, narrowly targeted laws ban the undesirable activities such as aggressive begging, obstruction of sidewalks, loitering, and aggressive pursuit.
Certain aspects of some ordinances have been ruled overbroad; Portland's ordinance prohibited having possessions more than two feet from one's person, which was ruled unconstitutional by Judge Michael McShane in 2009, stating that he "found that an ordinary person would not understand from the statute that mundane and everyday behavior would be prohibited by the law," and that "the ordinance encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement."
Critics in Honolulu[who?] argue that such ordinances are a waste of taxpayer money in a futile effort to clear city streets. Each sweep costs state taxpayers around $15,000. In the weeks after the cleanups, homeless encampments can be found blocks away from the previous cleanups. Most of Hawaii's homeless are stuck on the island with no close relatives. With the sit lie ban in place, homeless are forced from city park to city park in order to avoid fines or confiscation of items. Most city parks in Honolulu are being forced to close down earlier in order to prevent the homeless from using them.
Portland passed multiple sit-lie and anti-camping ordinances in the 2000s, which have all either been struck down or expired, and as of May 2010[update] was working on related ordinances that would allow sitting and lying.
In San Francisco, a sit-lie ordinance was proposed in March 2010 by Mayor Gavin Newsom, but generated strong opposition under the banners of "Sidewalks Are for People" and "Stand Against Sit/Lie". It was placed on the November general election ballot as "Proposition L," and was approved by voters on November 2, 2010. In November 2012, however, voters in nearby Berkeley decided not to make it a crime to sit on sidewalks in the city's commercial districts between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
In Hawaii, a sit-lie ban and city ordinance law was put into effect December 2, 2014 by Mayor Kirk Caldwell. An extension to the sit-lie ban was vetoed later by Caldwell on May 21, 2015. The bans have drawn criticism from residents, stating that the laws are discriminatory towards the homeless. In a study done by the University of Hawaii Department of Urban and Regional Planning, it found that 57% of the 70 homeless individuals studied had identification documents confiscated by the state. This would require them to pay a $200 retrieval fee unless they were able to obtain a fee waiver.
- Discrimination against the homeless
- Anti-homelessness legislation
- List of organizations opposing homelessness
- Hostile architecture
- Camden bench
- Homeless dumping
- Skid row
- Black triangle (badge)
- Coté, John (May 16, 2010). "Sit/lie deja vu?". The San Francisco Chronicle.
- Welch, William M. (March 23, 2010). "Sit-lie laws put spotlight on safety". USA Today. Retrieved March 6, 2013.
- Griffin, Melissa (March 11, 2010). "Revelations about sit-lie". San Francisco Examiner. San Francisco, Calif. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
- The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty; The National Coalition for the Homeless (July 2009). Homes Not Handcuffs: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities. Washington, DC: The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty. p. 191.
- Griffin, Melissa (March 4, 2010). "Sit/Lie Law: local history and the portland experience". Examiner.com.
- Davis, Matt (February 19, 2009). "Judge Rules Sit/Lie Law Unconstitutional" (Weblog). Portland Mercury: Blogtown. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
- "Kakaako homeless encampment cleared, but some haven't moved very far". www.westernmassnews.com. Retrieved 2015-12-11.
- "Photos Of Waikiki's Homeless Reveal What It's Like To Live On The Streets In Paradise". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2015-12-11.
- "Updated: Eight years of sit-lie history". Street Root News. Portland, OR. May 5, 2010. Retrieved 2014-09-16.
- Davis, Matt (July 2, 2009). "Sit-Lie Dies". Portland Mercury. Portland, OR. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
- Collins, Terry (November 3, 2010), "SF voters approve sit/lie ban on sidewalks", San Francisco Chronicle, archived from the original on 2010-11-05
- Tim Phillips, "Campaign Against Proposed Sit/Lie Law in Berkeley Succeeds", Activist Defense, November 12, 2012.
- Staff, Web. "Mayor signs pedestrian mall sit-lie ban into law". KHON2. Retrieved 2015-12-11.
- Remadna, Brent; Garcia, Nestor; Staff, Web. "Honolulu mayor vetoes sit-lie ban expansion". KHON2. Retrieved 2015-12-11.
- "University of Hawaii study finds Honolulu's sit-lie ban ineffective - Pacific Business News". Pacific Business News. Retrieved 2015-12-11.