The Smith machine is a weight machine used for weight training. It consists of a barbell that is fixed within steel rails allowing only vertical or near-vertical movement. Some Smith machines have the barbell counterbalanced. The machine can be used for a wide variety of exercises though it is most commonly used to perform "Smith machine squats".
Use as a self-spotting device
Behind each vertical post (runner) is a series of slots on which the barbell can be hooked. This means that unlike an ordinary barbell, the Smith machine need not be re-racked after a set of repetitions: it can be secured at any point. This supposedly makes it safer for those who lift without a spotter, as one only needs to twist the wrist in order to lock the barbell in place in the event that the weight becomes too great. Most models also incorporate blocks, pegs, or other devices which can be adjusted to automatically stop the barbell at a predetermined minimum height.
This does not fully eliminate the inherent danger in having a heavy weight on one's back, however, and may instill a false sense of confidence. In 2001, a Smith machine user became quadriplegic when the apparatus crushed his spine. A lawsuit involving Flex Equipment Co. Inc. and Gold's Gym has ended in a jury awarding the plaintiff $14.4 million. During the trial Mark Nalley, president of Flex Equipment, argued that the 21-inch height of the dead stop was sufficient to prevent injury.
Advantages and disadvantages
Use of the Smith machine is frowned upon by many strength training devotees as it forces the user to adopt an unnatural straight-up-and-down "bar path" which can put shear stress on the knees or back (if squatting) or shoulders (if pressing).
The constrained movement of the bar also reduces the role that stabilizing muscles play versus an exercise using free weights. This may allow heavier weights to be lifted, at the expense of engaging less muscle mass overall. It is also hard to keep an accurate training log because Smith machines manufacturers usually don’t indicate bar weights.
As with other exercise machines, the Smith machine is often preferred by casual or inexperienced strength trainees who do not know how to safely perform free weight exercises involving heavy weights. Many gyms cater to casual trainees and thus may provide Smith machines instead of power racks, which are a piece of equipment critical for safely performing squats and other barbell-based free weight exercises. As a consequence, free-weight squatting may not even be an option at many gyms.
The Smith machine does have some advocates amongst experienced trainees, however. The "bar path" issue is minimized for exercises involving a short range of travel such as calf raises and shrugs. It is potentially good for performing exercise variations when progress has slowed using other exercise forms, although care must be taken to avoid joint stress issues. The removal of stabilizing muscles as a factor can also allow one to increase the intensity applied to primary muscles.
3D Smith machine
This section needs additional citations for verification. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A conventional Smith machine has one degree of freedom – the bar can move up and down in a straight line along a vertical track. (Rolling the bar is also typically used to activate the safety locks.) Some variant designs allow an additional degree of freedom – forward and back – while still keeping the bar from rotating or moving side to side. These machines are sometimes called "3D Smith machines" or "Jones Smith machines".
A few designs, such as Shermworks' "Free Spotter" or TuffStuff's "XPT Training System", permit almost all degrees of freedom while still incorporating user-activated safety catches (as opposed to the passive, pre-set safeties of a power rack).
The Smith machine was invented by American Jack LaLanne, who rigged up a sliding apparatus in his gym in the 1950s. It was spotted by men's bath house manager Rudy Smith, who commissioned Paul Martin to improve it. Smith then installed the modified model in a gym he was managing at the time, Vic Tanny's gym in Los Angeles. By the end of the 1950s, Rudy Smith was an executive in Tanny's chain of gyms, and the Smith machine was being manufactured and sold more widely.
Research published in December 2009 reported that free weights triggered 43% more activation of the muscles than a Smith machine when performing squats.
- "Smith Machine Lawsuit Ends with $14.4 Million Decision". Club Industry. September 1, 2003. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- "4 Reasons to Bypass the Smith Machine". dovemed.com. July 23, 2015. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Bret Contreras (July 16, 2013). "Machines Vs. Free Weights: More Research Is Needed". bretcontreras.com. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Stuart McRobert (February 12, 2008). "The Brothers Grimm". Iron Man. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- David Kiesling (January 20, 2019). "How Much Does a Smith Machine Bar Weigh?". tworepcave.com. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Inspire Women to Fitness. IDEA Health & Fitness Association. 2003. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-887781-29-9.
- Tom Banham (August 19, 2014). "Should I use weight machines?". Men's Health. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- John Meadows (January 9, 2012). "Why I Love the Smith Machine". t-nation.com. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Paul Carter (July 12, 2016). "The Most Hated Machine in the Gym". t-nation.com. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Black, Jonathan (2013). "The Machine Age, 1960s-1970s". Making the American Body: The Remarkable Saga of the Men and Women Whose Feats, Feuds, and Passions Shaped Fitness History. University of Nebraska Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-8032-4370-5.
- "Obituary: Smith, Rudolph". Deseret News. July 12, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- John Wood (February 8, 2013). "The Smith Machine". oldtimestrongman.com. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
- Schwanbeck, S; Chilibeck, P. D.; Binsted, G. (December 2009). "A comparison of free weight squat to Smith machine squat using electromyography". The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 23 (9): 2588–2591. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b181. PMID 19855308.