This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Learn how and when to remove this template message)(September 2013) (
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (September 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Suppose the plant consists of followed by a pure time delay .
As a first step, suppose we only consider (the plant without a delay) and design a controller with a closed-loop transfer function that we consider satisfactory.
Next, our objective is to design a controller for the plant so that the closed loop transfer function equals .
Solving , we obtain . The controller is implemented as shown in the following figure, where has been changed to to indicate that it is a model used by the controller.
Note that there are two feedback loops. The outer control loop feeds the output back to the input, as usual. However, this loop alone would not provide satisfactory control, because of the delay; this loop is feeding back outdated information. Intuitively, for the k sample intervals during which no fresh information is available, the system is controlled by the inner loop which contains a predictor of what the (unobservable) output of the plant G currently is.
To check that this works, a re-arrangement can be made as follows:
Here we can see that if the model used in the controller, , matches the plant perfectly, then the outer and middle feedback loops cancel each other, and the controller generates the "correct" control action.
- K. Warwick and D. Rees, Industrial Digital Control Systems, IET, 1988. 
- "Overcoming process deadtime with a Smith Predictor". www.controleng.com.
- "Control of Processes with Long Dead Time: The Smith Predictor - MATLAB & Simulink Example". www.mathworks.com.
|This systems-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|