From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Snus, made of tobacco, salt, and sodium carbonate
"White portion" snus of the Swedish label General

Snus (/sns/ SNOOSS, Swedish: [ˈsnʉːs] (About this soundlisten)) is a moist powder smokeless tobacco product originating from a variant of dry snuff in early 18th-century Sweden. It is placed inside the lip (between the lip and gums) for extended periods, as in sublabial administration. Snus is not fermented. Although used similarly to American dipping tobacco, snus does not typically result in the need for spitting and, unlike naswar, snus is steam-pasteurized.

Legal status of snus. The EU is exceptional in banning the sale of snus (except in Sweden, which has an exemption). [1]

Sale of snus is illegal in all the European Union countries except for Sweden, Estonia, Hungary and Denmark.[2][3] It is also the most common form of tobacco in Norway and available in Switzerland as well. Canada makes it difficult to obtain snus through discouraging its users by implementing high taxes on products like snus.[citation needed] Some EU countries like Estonia[4] allow the sale of snus-like products that contain nicotine but no tobacco. Local varieties of snus, growing in popularity in the United States, have been seen as an alternative to smoking, vaping, e-smoking, chewing, dipping, dissolvable and snuff tobacco. However, US-manufactured snus does not have the same production standards or ingredients as Swedish snus, and typically uses significant amounts of sweeteners.[5]

Snus usually contains nicotine, which is highly addictive.[6] The chemical constituents of different types of snus vary, and population-level studies suggest that the disease risks do, too.[7]


Catch lid found on many snus tins, which snaps in and out of place. The small compartment is typically used for the temporary storage of used snus portions.

In the 16th century, snuff (pulverized tobacco), the precursor of snus (moist snuff), was introduced to France by French diplomat Jean Nicot, who worked at the court of King Henry II of France. He recommended snuff to Catherine de' Medici as a migraine remedy. When she became a regular user of snuff, it became a fashion among the court and upper-class citizens of France, especially among females, as it was deemed more socially acceptable than other forms of tobacco.

This trend of using snuff in the nose also spread to Sweden at the beginning of the 17th century. In the 18th century, Swedish producers began to manufacture moist snuff, which was placed in the upper lip and did not require spitting. It became known as snus. Ettan (meaning "the number one"), registered in 1822, is the oldest brand of snus still sold.

It is a popular myth that snus or any other forms of smokeless tobacco contains fiberglass, or glass particles, as an aid to the absorption of nicotine by the user's blood. This is not true.[8] Mucous membranes readily absorb free nicotine. The burning sensation is caused by the nicotine itself (similar to the tingle of nicotine gum) and some food additives such as sodium carbonate (E500). Sodium carbonate is a food additive used to increase the pH of the tobacco (reduce the acidity). This increases the bioavailability of the nicotine, meaning more is available for absorption. Some flavorings (mints in particular) are astringent and may increase the tingling or burning sensation.

Confusion of snus and snuff[edit]

Snus, dry snuff, and dipping tobacco are distinct products that English speaking people often call snuff but are processed and used in very different ways, each with their own sets of risks.

The English word "snuff" is translated to snus in Swedish. Often, the word "snuff" is used to refer to the nasal form of tobacco (nasal snuff). The same is true of American dipping tobacco which is known in America simply as snuff[citation needed]. In Sweden, nasal snuff is referred to as torrsnus or luktsnus. Outside of the US, cured moist snuff that is applied to the lower lip, and that requires spitting (American: snuff), is simply called American dipping tobacco.

Differences between snus and similar tobacco products[edit]

Some forms of tobacco consumed in the mouth may be categorized as:

  • Swedish snus is a moist form of smokeless tobacco which is usually placed under the upper lip, and which does not result in the need for spitting. It is sold either as a moist powder known as loose snus, or packaged into pouches known as portion snus. Snus is often mildly flavored with food-grade smoke aroma, bergamot, citrus, juniper berry, herbs and/or floral flavors. Most Scandinavian snus is produced in Sweden and regulated as food under the Swedish Food Act.[9] Many Swedish manufacturers have even implemented their own quality standards on top of the already very stringent regulations for food products, in order to ensure quality. The most commonly known for this is GOTHIATEK by Swedish Match - a quality control system that follows each production from seed to finished can.
  • American snus, available since the late 1990s, is similar to the Scandinavian form, but usually has a lower moisture content and lower pH, resulting in lower bioavailability of nicotine than Scandinavian varieties, meaning less is available for absorption.[10] American snus is often flavored, e.g., with spearmint, wintergreen, vanilla or fruit (e.g. cherry), and may contain sugar. This means that American snus has, unlike Swedish snus, hardly any tobacco flavor at all and the flavoring agents used are intense with an often overbearingly sweet after-taste. Although both the American and Swedish version are categorized as spitless snus, many users of American snus nevertheless find themselves spitting when excess saliva is procured. This is to avoid some common side effects to American snusing such as heartburn and gastric stress. [11]
  • Nasal snuff (mostly English, German, and Scandinavian), referred to as luktsnus in Swedish and luktesnus in Norwegian, and as "Scotch snuff"[citation needed] in the US, is a dry, powdered form of snuff. It is insufflated – "sniffed" but not deeply "snorted" – through the nose. It is often mentholated or otherwise scented.
  • Chewing tobacco (North American, European), also known as chew (or in some Southern US dialects as chaw), is tobacco in the form of short or long, loose leaf and stem strands (like pipe tobacco or longer), or less commonly of chopped leaves and stems compressed into blocks called plugs, or even finely ground pieces compressed into pellets. A few brands are cut into much finer loose strands, like cigarette rolling tobacco. Chew is placed between the cheek and the gums, or actively chewed. It causes copious salivation, especially when chewed, and due to its irritant (even nauseating) effect on the esophagus, this "juice" usually requires spitting. Chewing tobacco is a long-established North American form of tobacco (derived from traditional use of raw tobacco leaf by Indigenous peoples of the Americas), and is also legal in the European Union. Chewing tobacco is sometimes flavored, e.g. with wintergreen, apple, or cherry.
  • Dipping tobacco (North American), also known as dip, spit tobacco or, ambiguously, as moist snuff, is a common American form of tobacco (also available in Canada and Mexico). It is moist, and somewhat finely ground, but less so than snus. Dipping tobacco (so called because users dip their fingers into the package to pinch a portion to insert into the mouth) is placed between the lower lip or cheek and the gums; it is not used nasally. As with chewing tobacco, salivation is copious, and usually spat out. Dipping tobacco is usually flavored, traditionally with wintergreen or mint, though many other flavorings are now available, while some unflavored brands remain popular. Beginning in the mid 1980s, several brands have packaged American dipping tobacco in porous pouches like those used for many brands of Scandinavian and American snus.
  • Chema (Algerian) is a moist tobacco similar to Scandinavian snus in many respects. Outside of Algeria, it is most widely known as "Makla", a name that originates from the Algerian brand "Makla El Hilal", which first produced this type of smokeless tobacco during the French colonization.[12] It is placed in the upper lip in a manner similar to snus; it differs in that it is more finely ground and has an even higher nicotine content and pH level. Sales within the European Union are legal due to its classification as a chewing tobacco. Its safety in comparison to snus has not been studied sufficiently.
  • Naswar (Central Asian) is a moist, powdered form of tobacco, often green and sometimes caked with the mineral lime and/or wood ash. It is used like dipping tobacco or put under the tongue, and is pungent and often heavily flavored, e.g. with culinary oils (cardamom, sesame), the fruit lime, menthol, etc.


Cylindrical (fingertips) pris of Swedish brand Skruf
Left is an original (or "regular") portion. Right is a "white portion". White portions can be any color, as the name refers to the style, not the color.

Many types of snus are available:

  • Loose snus is a moist powder which can be portioned and packed into a cylindrical or spherical shape with the fingertips or a purpose-made cylindrical device. The end result is often referred to as a pris (pinch), buga, prilla, or prell (slang). Some users (usually long-time users) simply pinch the tobacco and place it under their upper lip (farmer's pinch or living snus). Over time, the demand for loose snus has been replaced by portioned varieties. Many users of snus today prefer the discreet nature of the latter variety.
  • Portion snus is packaged moist powder in small teabag-like sachets. It comes in smaller quantities than the loose powder, but is considered more convenient and discreet than loose snus. The two varieties of portion snus are:
    • Original portion, introduced in 1973, is the traditional form. The sachet material is moisturized during the manufacturing process, resulting in a brown, moist pouch.
    • White portion is a milder-tasting and slightly slower-release form. The sachet material is not moisturized during the manufacturing process, resulting in a white, dry pouch. The tobacco within the portion material has the same moisture content as original portion snus, but the nicotine and flavor are somewhat slower in delivery due to the drier sachet. "White portion" refers to the style, not the color, as many white portion snus use a black material instead of white, yet are "white portion". Examples include General Onyx and Grovsnus Svart (Black) and Blue Ocean (Blue).
    • Sting-free portion is a patent-approved [13] snus pouch, introducing a protective side, that reduces the stinging sensation and irritation to the snus users gum and oral mucous membrane. The sting-free snus portion was awarded "Most exciting newcomer to the industry" at the Global Tobacco and Nicotine Forum in New York City 2017.[14]

Portioned snus is available in three different sizes: mini, normal/large (most common) and maxi. The weights may vary, but the labelling on most packages of snus disclose their net weight. Mini portions typically weigh close to 0.5 g, normal (large) portions weigh around .8 to 1 gram, and maxi portions weigh up to 1.7 g, depending on brand. Some brands also offer the choice of "regular" and "long" versions of the normal size sachet, which are similar in content weight. These long portions differ from traditional sachets in that they are slimmer but longer, in order to fit against the gums more comfortably.

The nicotine content of snus varies among brands, with the most common strength being 8 mg of nicotine per gram of tobacco. In recent years, snus manufacturers have released stark (strong or sterk) and extra stark (extra strong or extra sterk) varieties with greater nicotine content. Stark varieties contain, on average, 11 mg of nicotine per gram of tobacco, while extra stark varieties may contain up to 22 mg of nicotine per gram of tobacco. Recently, the Siberia brand released its "Extremely Strong" snus which boasts 43 mg of nicotine per gram of tobacco and is currently the highest nicotine-per-gram snus available.[15]


Swedish snus is made from air-dried tobacco from various parts of the world. In earlier times, tobacco for making snus was laid out for drying in Scania and Mälardalen, Sweden. Later, Kentucky tobaccos were used. The ground tobacco is mixed with water, salt, an alkalizing agent (today this is sodium carbonate), and aroma, and is prepared through heating. After the heating process, food grade aromas are typically added. In Sweden, snus is regulated as a food product and, for this reason, all ingredients are listed on the label of each individual package (can) of snus. Moist snus contains more than 50% water, and the average use of snus in Sweden is approximately 800 grams (16 units) per person each year. About 12% (1.1 million people) of the population in Sweden use snus.[16] Unlike dipping tobacco and chew, most snus today does not undergo the fermentation process, but is instead steam-pasteurized. Although steam-pasteurization is remarkably complex, it has the advantages of inhibiting the growth of bacteria that facilitate the formation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines, while preserving the desired texture and mouthfeel of the snus. The absorption of nicotine, the addictive substance in tobacco, from snus depends on the level of nicotine in the snus and the pH level in the box.[17] A voluntary quality standard for snus products has been introduced (Gothiatek) that sets maximum levels for certain controversial constituents including nitrosamines, heavy metals, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Most manufacturers of Scandinavian type snus adhere to this standard.

Snus is sold primarily in Sweden, Faroe Islands and Norway, and has more recently been introduced to South Africa and the U.S. It can be found in places frequented by Scandinavian tourists, such as Murmansk in Russia or Chania in Greece. It is illegal in the rest of the European Union. It is sold in small tins which, in the earlier years, were made of porcelain, wood, silver, or gold. Portioned snus usually comes in plastic tins of 24 portions, containing about .75 to 1 gram of snus each, while loose snus is mostly sold in wax coated cardboard containers with plastic lids (similar to dip snuff), at 42 g (50 g before 2008). Mini-portion and medium-portion snus are increasingly popular formats. Most of these products come in tins containing 20 portions, of either 0.65 or 0.5 grams each for a total of just under 13 or 10 grams, particularly with those for whom concealing their use of smokeless tobacco in places is of utmost importance.


Although Swedish snus was previously[when?] only available by mail order in the US, an increasing number of tobacco retailers have now begun to stock it. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA, and U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, and American Snuff Company now produce similar products called Camel Snus, Grizzly Snus, and Skoal snus, (with R.J. Reynolds formerly producing snus under the Marlboro brand) respectively.[citation needed] While American snus is packaged in much the same way (moist tobacco in a small pouch), production methods vary considerably from traditional Swedish methods. Additionally, differences in the way American snus is formulated may diminish some of its possible health benefits over other tobacco products.[10] Swedish Match, the leading manufacturer of Swedish snus, is currently[when?] test-marketing snus in Canada, Russia, and several regions throughout the US.

In October 2012, the European Union's commissioner for health and consumer policy, John Dalli, resigned,[18] following an investigation by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF), into a complaint made by tobacco producer Swedish Match. OLAF found that an unnamed Maltese entrepreneur approached Swedish Match using his contacts with Mr. Dalli, seeking payments in exchange for influence over possible snus legislation. The new EU's Tobacco Products Directive was expected to be appointed during autumn 2012.

Swedish Match has commented that they expect, given the proven scientific facts regarding snus, that it should be considered in a fair legal process for the proposal of a new Tobacco Products Directive.[19]

Health consequences[edit]

Warning label on a container of Swedish snus. The text reads: "This tobacco product may damage your health and is addictive". Note the "best before" date and list of ingredients, which is required by Swedish law.

A study of almost 10,000 Swedish, male construction workers published in the International Journal of Cancer in 2008 found a statistically significant increase in the incidence of the combined category of oral and pharyngeal cancer among daily users of snus.[20] Another study reports 16 cases of oral cancer among snus users.[21][clarification needed] Other studies and opinion pieces in renowned journals, such as the British Medical Journal and The Lancet,[22][23] do not confirm any correlation between snus usage and oral cancer, but one study suggests a probable increased risk of pancreatic cancer as a result of snus use.[24] A pooled analysis of nine prospective studies involving more than 400,000 men and published in the International Journal of Cancer in 2017 found that use of snus was not associated with a greater risk for pancreatic cancer.[25]

Tobacco shop in Neuchâtel, Switzerland in 2020: advertisement for tobacco (here for snus Epok from British American Tobacco) is authorized inside the shop

The European Union banned the sale of snus in 1992, after a 1985 World Health Organization (WHO) study concluded that "oral use of snuffs of the types used in North America and western Europe is carcinogenic to humans",[26] but a WHO committee on tobacco has also acknowledged the evidence is inconclusive regarding health consequences for snus consumers.[5] Only Sweden and European Free Trade Association (EFTA)-member Norway are exempt from this ban. A popular movement during the run-up to the 1994 referendum for Sweden's EU membership made exemption from the EU sale ban of snus a condition of the membership treaty.

Recent actions by many European governments to limit the use of cigarettes has led to calls to lift the ban on snus, as it is generally considered to be less harmful than cigarette smoke, both to the user[27] and to others.

Since snus is not inhaled it does not affect the lungs as cigarettes do. Because it is steam-pasteurized rather than fire-cured like smoking tobacco or other chewing tobacco, it contains lower concentrations of nitrosamines and other carcinogens that form from the partially anaerobic heating of proteins - 2.8 parts per million for Ettan brand, compared to as high as 127.9 parts per million in some American brands.[28] WHO acknowledges Swedish men have the lowest rate of lung cancer in Europe, partly due to the low tobacco smoking rate, but does not argue for substituting snus for smoking, stating that the effects of snus still remain unclear. Around 2005, several reports,[which?] partially funded by the snus industry, indicated that no carcinogenic effects could be attributed to Nordic snus, and this resulted in the removal of the warning label that claimed snus could cause cancer.[citation needed] It was replaced with the more general label "May affect your health negatively". Research is continuing, but no conclusive reports have been made regarding major adverse health effects of snus.

A 2014 report commissioned by Public Health England on electronic cigarettes concluded that snus has a risk profile that includes possible increases in the risk of oesophageal and pancreatic cancer. The report stated that snus use is not associated with an increase in the risk of having a myocardial infarction, but is associated with an increased risk of dying from one if a person does have one. The report also concluded that there is no increased risk of COPD or lung cancer.[29]

Snus manufacturer Swedish Match filed a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products to modify the warning label requirements by:[30]

  1. removing the current warnings, "This product can cause mouth cancer" and "This product can cause gum disease and tooth loss."
  2. replacing the current warning, "This product is not a safe alternative to cigarettes,” with “No tobacco product is safe, but this product presents substantially lower risks to health than cigarettes."
  3. retaining the current warning, "Smokeless tobacco is addictive."

The FDA's Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee voted against the request in April 2015 but Swedish Match is continuing their efforts for this change.[31]

R. J. Reynolds has also filed an MRTP application with the FDA for its Camel snus product. As of May 2018, the FDA has yet to issue a ruling.[32]

Medical journal The Lancet [33] published a major study, "Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016", in November 2017. The scientific conclusions with regards to snus was the following. "There is sufficient evidence that chewing tobacco and other products of similar toxicity cause excess risk of oral and oesophageal cancer while, at this time, existing evidence does not support attributing burden to snus or similar smokeless tobacco products." ...while for snus or snuff we did not find sufficient evidence of a RR (relative risk) greater than one for any health outcome." A relative risk [RR] of 1.0, means you are average - [there is no difference in risk between the control and experimental groups]".[34]

During pregnancy[35] and breastfeeding,[36] mothers are advised not to use any products containing nicotine,[37] which harms the fetus.[38]

Scandinavian snus is regularly available, refrigerated, in the United States at smokeshops and select gas stations, especially in major cities. The considerably different, sweetened American snus is more commonly found at convenience stores, in multiple brands produced by US-based cigarette companies. Neither product category has made much of an inroad into the market-share held by the dipping tobacco products more common in that country.

Debate among public health researchers[edit]

There is some debate among public health researchers over the use of "safer" tobacco or nicotine delivery systems, generally dividing along two lines of thought. Some (primarily in the European Union and Canada) believe in "tobacco harm reduction", with the general belief that while it should remain a goal to reduce addiction to nicotine in the population as a whole, the reduction of harm to the health of those who choose to use nicotine is more pragmatic than the desire to reduce overall nicotine addiction. In other words, people using more harmful forms of tobacco (e.g., cigarettes) should be encouraged to switch to less harmful products (e.g., snus). The other school of thought is that no tobacco product should be promoted, and that attention should be placed instead on getting users to switch to nicotine replacement therapy or quit altogether.

One proponent of using snus for harm reduction is Karl Fagerström, who has a PhD in psychology and is regarded[by whom?] as a leading researcher in smoking cessation in Sweden. Some research available today shows snus use reduces or eliminates the risk of cancers associated with the use of other tobacco products, such as chewing tobacco (the type primarily used in the US and Canada, created in a process similar to cigarette tobacco) and cigarettes.[39] The widespread use of snus by Swedish men (estimated at 30% of Swedish male ex-smokers), displacing tobacco smoking and other varieties of snuff, is thought to be responsible for the incidence of tobacco-related mortality in men being significantly lower in Sweden than any other European country. In contrast, since women traditionally are less likely to use snus, their rate of tobacco-related deaths in Sweden can be compared to that of other European countries.

Snus may be less harmful than other tobacco products (see above). According to Kenneth Warner, director of the University of Michigan Tobacco Research Network, "The Swedish government has studied this stuff to death and, to date, there is no compelling evidence that it has any adverse health consequences. … Whatever they eventually find out, it is dramatically less dangerous than smoking."[40]

A 2014 report commissioned by Public Health England on another avenue for tobacco harm reduction, electronic cigarettes, examined the case of snus as "a unique natural experiment in the impact of a socially accepted, non-medical, affordable and easily accessible reduced harm product on the prevalence of tobacco smoking". They concluded that "Although controversial, the Swedish natural experiment demonstrates that despite dual use and primary uptake of the reduced-harm product by young people, availability of reduced-harm alternatives for tobacco smokers can have a beneficial effect. While snus is not likely to become a legal or indeed politically viable option in the UK, this data proves the concept that harm reduction strategies can contribute to significant reductions in smoking prevalence."[41]

Ongoing discussion and debates among primary scientific researchers of the effects of snus use on life expectancy appear to indicate a significant increase in life expectancy among persons who previously smoked tobacco and switch to snus, depending on the age of the persons who switch, even when it is assumed that 100% of the risk of cardiovascular diseases among smokers transfers to snus users. This study determined that "for net harm to occur, 14-25 ex-smokers would have to start using snus to offset the health gain from every smoker who switched to snus."[42] It is also noted, in the correspondence seen in the previous citation,[43][44] that concerns about the effect of marketing by the tobacco industry, as influenced by the results of these scientific studies, is of primary concern to many researchers in the field, including the risk of emboldening the industry to attempt to increase snus sales among young people and promote dual-use of snus and smoked tobacco, and the use of medical nicotine, rather than snus, can better target at-risk populations, given better access and pricing.

However, a growing consensus among researchers of smoking cessation have found nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products to have limited effectiveness because tobacco users may be seeking the combination of MAO inhibitors (which are found in tobacco) and nicotine, or that NRT products do not deliver sufficient quantities of nicotine. MAO inhibitors in tobacco act to amplify the rewarding effects of nicotine, but may also act as a form of self-medication for people with depression. This could explain the association between mental illness and smoking, but a confounding variable is that chronic nicotine administration itself has been shown to desensitize nicotine receptors over time and lead to antidepressant effects.[45] Smoking cessation itself is strongly associated with reduced depression, anxiety, and stress and improved positive mood and quality of life compared with continuing to smoke.[46] It has been hypothesized that snus' success when compared with conventional NRT as a cigarette substitute could be attributed to its MAO inhibiting properties. However, studies seem to suggest that for MAO inhibition, tobacco has to be pyrolysized (i.e., ignited as in cigarettes, cigars, and pipes). The competing theory is that the success of snus as a smoking alternative is due to its ability to deliver nicotine similar to that acquired through cigarettes, and twice as high as that acquired through NRT.[47] Furthermore, the use of snus, similar to cigarettes, offers a choice of brand, aesthetic rituals of use, and tastes of tobacco and thus has sensory effects that NRT products perhaps lack. The use of daily snus for smoking cessation has had a 54% success rate for complete abstinence, and a 60% success rate for great reduction in cigarette consumption.[48]

Opponents of snus sales maintain, nevertheless, that even the low nitrosamine levels in snus cannot be completely risk-free, but snus proponents point out that, inasmuch as snus is used as a substitute for smoking or a means to quit smoking, the net overall effect is positive, similar to the effect of nicotine patches.[49]

In addition, this eliminates any exposure to second-hand smoke, further reducing possible harm to other non-tobacco users. This is seen by public health advocates who believe in "harm reduction" as a reason for recommending snus, as well as other NRTs, rather than continued use of methods of tobacco consumption that result in second-hand smoke.

This does not, however, eliminate any harm to health caused by the nicotine itself. Current research focuses on possible long-term side effects of nicotine on blood pressure, hypertension, and possible risk of pancreatic cancer due to tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs). TSNAs are the only component of tobacco shown to induce pancreatic cancer in laboratory animals.[50] Nicotine may also exacerbate pancreatic illness, because nicotine stimulates the gastrointestinal tract's production of cholecystokinin, which stimulates pancreatic growth and may be implicated in pancreatic cancer. Thus far, the evidence specifically implicating snus in pancreatic cancer is only suggestive.[51][52] Notably, the probability of developing pancreatic cancer from cigarettes is higher than the suggested chance of developing pancreatic cancer from snus.[53][54]

The effect of Swedish snus on blood pressure has been studied at Umeå University in a randomly selected population sample of 4,305 Swedish men between the ages of 25 and 74. In the study, published in November 2008, the researchers found no elevation of blood pressure in snus users who had never been smokers compared to tobacco nonusers. Snus users had lower systolic blood pressure than tobacco nonusers in the unadjusted data.[55]

Tobacco-free snus[edit]

A tub of Kick-Up tobacco-free snus. This brand uses black tea leaves
Lyft nicotine pouches.
Lyft nicotine pouches.

One variation of snus is tobacco-free snus, which is in fact a snus substitute rather than snus. This snus-like product uses black tea leaves, with salts and flavorings, and has no tobacco content.[56] Like snus, it is available either loose or, more commonly, in bags, which are sometimes known as pods. Even though it is not made from tobacco, most retailers in Sweden will not sell it to persons under the age of 18.[citation needed]

Tobacco-free snus was introduced by the Swedish company Nonico with the brand Choice in 2003.[57][58] Swedish Match launched their competing brand Onico in 2006.[59] At first, it was made with corn starch but in 2008, the formula was changed when it was found to cause dental issues due to the sugar created.

The tobacco-free snus have opened up a new market in Europe, where regular snus with tobacco snus cannot be sold according to imperial brands.

In the Netherlands, it's forbidden to purchase or sell any kind of Snus due to its regulations of the European law.

A nicotine pouch is a white preportioned pouch containing nicotine.[60] It is like snus, but does not contain tobacco leaf.[60] In Canada, nicotine is considered a prescription drug, therefore personal imports of nicotine are prohibited. Exceptions do exist for those being of these criteria: a health practitioner or medical practitioner, a drug manufacturer, a wholesale druggist, a pharmacist, or a resident of a foreign country while a visitor in Canada. [61][62]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Burning Issues: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2020". Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction.
  2. ^ Gray, Nigel (2005). "Mixed feelings on snus". The Lancet. 366 (9490): 966–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67352-7. PMID 16168760. S2CID 706773.
  3. ^ "EUR-Lex - 32001L0037 - EN - EUR-Lex". Archived from the original on 2011-04-03. Retrieved 2010-11-18.
  4. ^ "Seni keelatud Snus ehk mokatubakas jõudis nüüd Eestis ametlikult müügile" (in Estonian). 16 July 2019. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
  5. ^ a b Isabel Conway (21 April 2009). "Snuff is not to be sniffed at". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 16 October 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2009.
  6. ^ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "CDC - Fact Sheet - Smokeless Tobacco: Health Effects - Smoking & Tobacco Use". Archived from the original on 2018-06-27. Retrieved 2018-06-06.
  7. ^ Siddiqi, Kamran; Shah, Sarwat; Abbas, Syed Muslim; Vidyasagaran, Aishwarya; Jawad, Mohammed; Dogar, Omara; Sheikh, Aziz (2015-08-17). "Global burden of disease due to smokeless tobacco consumption in adults: analysis of data from 113 countries". BMC Medicine. 13: 194. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0424-2. ISSN 1741-7015. PMC 4538761. PMID 26278072.
  8. ^ Phillips, Carl V. "Smokeless tobacco and your health". Archived from the original on 26 August 2013. Retrieved 29 August 2013.
  9. ^ "Snus – The Swedish Experience" (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 November 2015. Retrieved 20 October 2014.
  10. ^ a b Foulds, Jonathan; Furberg, Helena (2008). "Is low-nicotine Marlboro snus really snus?". Harm Reduction Journal. 5: 9. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-5-9. PMC 2288606. PMID 18304348.
  11. ^ Differences between American and Swedish snus SnusDirect September 2020
  12. ^ "Tabacs en Algerie-La Chemma - Algerazur". 15 February 2010.
  13. ^ "Swedish Patent Database, Patent SE 1450234-8, SE 539029". Archived from the original on 2 October 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  14. ^ "Winners announced". 14 September 2017. Archived from the original on 2019-10-02. Retrieved 2019-07-10.
  15. ^ "Siberia Dip and Siberia Chew rock the US and the UK |". 2021-02-05. Retrieved 2021-02-05.
  16. ^ "Sidan finns inte - Tobaksfakta". Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
  17. ^ Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, SCENIHR. Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products. 2008:78-79
  18. ^ "European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Press statement on behalf of the European Commission". Archived from the original on 2012-10-18. Retrieved 2012-10-17.
  19. ^ "Swedish Match - Comments by Swedish Match to the press release from the European Commission". 16 October 2012.
  20. ^ Roosaar, Ann; Johansson, Anna L.V.; Sandborgh-Englund, Gunilla; Axéll, Tony; Nyrén, Olof (2008). "Cancer and mortality among users and nonusers of snus". International Journal of Cancer. 123 (1): 168–73. doi:10.1002/ijc.23469. PMID 18412245. S2CID 6667256.
  21. ^ Hirsch, Jan M; Walstrom, Mats.; Carlsson, A.P; Sand, Lars (2012). "Oral Cancer in Swedish Snuff Dippers". Anticancer Research International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment. 32 (8): 3327–30. PMID 22843910.
  22. ^ MacAra, A. W (2008). "Should doctors advocate snus and other nicotine replacements? No". BMJ. 336 (7640): 359. doi:10.1136/bmj.39479.491319.AD. PMC 2244771. PMID 18276711.
  23. ^ Rodu, Brad (2007). "Snus and the risk of cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas". The Lancet. 370 (9594): 1207–8, author reply 1208. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61533-5. PMID 17920914. S2CID 5746881.
  24. ^ Bertuccio, P; La Vecchia, C; Silverman, D. T; Petersen, G. M; Bracci, P. M; Negri, E; Li, D; Risch, H. A; Olson, S. H; Gallinger, S; Miller, A. B; Bueno-De-Mesquita, H. B; Talamini, R; Polesel, J; Ghadirian, P; Baghurst, P. A; Zatonski, W; Fontham, E. T; Bamlet, W. R; Holly, E. A; Lucenteforte, E; Hassan, M; Yu, H; Kurtz, R. C; Cotterchio, M; Su, J; Maisonneuve, P; Duell, E. J; Bosetti, C; Boffetta, P (2011). "Cigar and pipe smoking, smokeless tobacco use and pancreatic cancer: An analysis from the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4)". Annals of Oncology. 22 (6): 1420–6. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq613. PMC 3139985. PMID 21245160.
  25. ^ Araghi, Marzieh; Rosaria Galanti, Maria; Lundberg, Michael; Lager, Anton; Engström, Gunnar; Alfredsson, Lars; Knutsson, Anders; Norberg, Margareta; Sund, Malin; Wennberg, Patrik; Trolle Lagerros, Ylva; Bellocco, Rino; Pedersen, Nancy L; Östergren, Per-Olof; Magnusson, Cecilia (2017). "Use of moist oral snuff (snus) and pancreatic cancer: Pooled analysis of nine prospective observational studies". International Journal of Cancer. 141 (4): 687–693. doi:10.1002/ijc.30773. PMID 28486772.
  26. ^ "Tobacco habits other than smoking; betel-quid and areca-nut chewing; and some related nitrosamines. IARC Working Group. Lyon, 23-30 October 1984" (PDF). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. 37: 1–268. 1985. PMID 3866741. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December 2014. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  27. ^ Levy, David T.; Mumford, Elizabeth A.; Cummings, K. Michael; Gilpin, Elizabeth A.; Giovino, Gary; Hyland, Andrew; Sweanor, David; Warner, Kenneth E. (2004). "The Relative Risks of a Low-Nitrosamine Smokeless Tobacco Product Compared with Smoking Cigarettes: Estimates of a Panel of Experts". Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 13 (12): 2035–42. PMID 15598758. Archived from the original on 2013-02-23. Retrieved 2012-10-23.
  28. ^ Gregory N. Connolly; Howard Saxner (August 21, 2001). "Informational Update Research on Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines (TSNAs) in Oral Snuff and a Request to Tobacco Manufacturers to Voluntarily Set Tolerance Limits For TSNAs in Oral Snuff". Archived from the original on March 6, 2014. Retrieved October 23, 2012. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. ^ Britton, John; Bogdanovica, Ilze (15 May 2014). "Electronic cigarettes – A report commissioned by Public Health England" (PDF). Public Health England. p. 11. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2015. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
  30. ^ "Swedish Match North America MRTP Applications". 27 August 2014. pp. 100, 000+. Archived from the original on 19 October 2014. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  31. ^ "Modified Risk: Down But Not Out". Archived from the original on 2016-02-03. Retrieved 2016-01-28.
  32. ^ "R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP) Applications". Tobacco Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. May 9, 2018. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
  33. ^ Gakidou, Emmanuela; Afshin, Ashkan; Abajobir, Amanuel Alemu; Abate, Kalkidan Hassen; Abbafati, Cristiana; Abbas, Kaja M; Abd-Allah, Foad; Abdulle, Abdishakur M; Abera, Semaw Ferede; Aboyans, Victor; Abu-Raddad, Laith J; Abu-Rmeileh, Niveen M E; Abyu, Gebre Yitayih; Adedeji, Isaac Akinkunmi; Adetokunboh, Olatunji; Afarideh, Mohsen; Agrawal, Anurag; Agrawal, Sutapa; Ahmadieh, Hamid; Ahmed, Muktar Beshir; Aichour, Miloud Taki Eddine; Aichour, Amani Nidhal; Aichour, Ibtihel; Akinyemi, Rufus Olusola; Akseer, Nadia; Alahdab, Fares; Al-Aly, Ziyad; Alam, Khurshid; Alam, Noore; et al. (2017). "Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016". The Lancet. 390 (10100): 1345–1422. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8. PMC 5614451. PMID 28919119.
  34. ^ "understanding absolute and relative-risk in medical risk analysis and putting this in context". Archived from the original on 9 January 2018. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  35. ^ Mann, Denise. "Snuff Use During Pregnancy Is Harmful to Newborns". WebMD. Archived from the original on 2018-10-27. Retrieved 2018-06-06.
  36. ^ Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health (September 2017), Women and Tobacco (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-17, retrieved 2018-06-06, smokeless forms of tobacco such as snuff, chewing tobacco, and snus... it is best not to use tobacco while breastfeeding as nicotine passes to the baby through breast milk.
  37. ^ Bruin, Jennifer E.; Gerstein, Hertzel C.; Holloway, Alison C. (2010-04-02). "Long-Term Consequences of Fetal and Neonatal Nicotine Exposure: A Critical Review". Toxicological Sciences. 116 (2): 364–374. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq103. ISSN 1096-6080. PMC 2905398. PMID 20363831. Overall, the evidence provided in this review overwhelmingly indicates that nicotine should no longer be considered the ‘‘safe’’ component of cigarette smoke. In fact, many of the adverse postnatal health outcomes associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy may be attributable, at least in part, to nicotine alone.
  38. ^ England, Lucinda J.; Kim, Shin Y.; Tomar, Scott L.; Ray, Cecily S.; Gupta, Prakash C.; Eissenberg, Thomas; Cnattingius, Sven; Bernert, John T.; Tita, Alan Thevenet N.; Winn, Deborah M.; Djordjevic, Mirjana V.; Lambe, Mats; Stamilio, David; Chipato, Tsungai; Tolosa, Jorge E. (31 December 2010). "Non-cigarette tobacco use among women and adverse pregnancy outcomes". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 89 (4): 454–464. doi:10.3109/00016341003605719. ISSN 1600-0412. PMC 5881107. PMID 20225987. The use of any products containing nicotine likely will have adverse effects of fetal neurological development.
  39. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-07-14. Retrieved 2006-07-14.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)[full citation needed]
  40. ^ Rabinoff, Michael (2007). "Corporate Social Responsibility As A Tactic Used By Big Tobacco". Ending the Tobacco Holocaust. pp. 375–9. ISBN 978-1-60070-019-4.
  41. ^ Britton, John; Bogdanovica, Ilze (15 May 2014). "Electronic cigarettes – A report commissioned by Public Health England" (PDF). Public Health England. p. 11=12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2015. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
  42. ^ Gartner, Coral E; Hall, Wayne D; Vos, Theo; Bertram, Melanie Y; Wallace, Angela L; Lim, Stephen S (2007). "Assessment of Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction: An epidemiological modelling study" (PDF). The Lancet. 369 (9578): 2010–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60677-1. PMID 17498798. S2CID 10758355.
  43. ^ McKee, Martin; Gilmore, Anna (2007). "Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction". The Lancet. 370 (9594): 1206, author reply 1206–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61530-X. PMID 17920913. S2CID 1196126.
  44. ^ Lambe, Mats (2007). "Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction". The Lancet. 370 (9594): 1206, author reply 1206–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61531-1. PMID 17920911. S2CID 35838314.
  45. ^ Mineur, Yann S.; Picciotto, Marina R. (2010). "Nicotine receptors and depression: Revisiting and revising the cholinergic hypothesis". Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 31 (12): 580–6. doi:10.1016/ PMC 2991594. PMID 20965579.
  46. ^ Taylor, G.; McNeill, A.; Girling, A.; Farley, A.; Lindson-Hawley, N.; Aveyard, P. (2014). "Change in mental health after smoking cessation: Systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 348: g1151. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1151. PMC 3923980. PMID 24524926.
  47. ^ Foulds, J; Ramstrom, L; Burke, M; Fagerström, K (2003). "Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden". Tobacco Control. 12 (4): 349–59. doi:10.1136/tc.12.4.349. PMC 1747791. PMID 14660766.
  48. ^ Lund, K. E.; McNeill, A.; Scheffels, J. (2010). "The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products". Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 12 (8): 817–822. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq105. PMC 2910876. PMID 20622023.
  49. ^ Furberg, H.; Lichtenstein, P.; Pedersen, N. L.; Bulik, C. M.; Lerman, C.; Sullivan, P. F. (2007). "Snus use and other correlates of smoking cessation in the Swedish Twin Registry". Psychological Medicine. 38 (9): 1299–308. doi:10.1017/S0033291707002346. PMC 2914546. PMID 18680625.
  50. ^ Rivenson, Abraham; Hoffmann, Dietrich; Prokopczyk, Bogdan; Amin, Shantu; Hecht, Stephen S. (1988-12-01). "Induction of Lung and Exocrine Pancreas Tumors in F344 Rats by Tobacco-specific and Areca-derived N-Nitrosamines". Cancer Research. 48 (23): 6912–7. PMID 3180100. Archived from the original on 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2009-02-27.
  51. ^ Fesinmeye, Megan Dann (July 14, 2006). Smokeless Tobacco, Swedish Snus, and Pancreatic Cancer. The 13th World Conference on Tobacco and Health Conference. Washington, DC. Archived from the original on December 7, 2008. Retrieved June 13, 2006.
  52. ^ Luo, Juhua; Ye, Weimin; Zendehdel, Kazem; Adami, Johanna; Adami, Hans-Olov; Boffetta, Paolo; Nyrén, Olof (2007). "Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: A retrospective cohort study". The Lancet. 369 (9578): 2015–20. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60678-3. PMID 17498797. S2CID 6676039.
  53. ^ "Use Of Swedish 'Snus' Is Linked To A Doubled Risk Of Pancreatic Cancer". Science Daily. May 11, 2007. Archived from the original on November 16, 2018. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
  54. ^ "Swedish Snus Much Safer Than Smoking But Linked To Pancreatic Cancer". Medical News Today. 10 May 2007. Archived from the original on 23 February 2008. Retrieved 14 June 2008.
  55. ^ "Snus och blodtryck" [Snuff and blood pressure] (in Swedish). Läkartidningen. November 21, 2008. Archived from the original on March 10, 2014. Retrieved May 3, 2012.
  56. ^ Waters, Larry. "Is Swedish Tobacco-Free & Nicotine-Free Snus still Swedish Snus?". Archived from the original on 2018-01-15. Retrieved 2017-07-05.
  57. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2019-04-30. Retrieved 2019-06-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  58. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2019-10-02. Retrieved 2019-06-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  59. ^ "Swedish Match checking tobacco-free snus complaints". Reuters. 6 May 2008. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  60. ^ a b Robichaud, Meagan O.; Seidenberg, Andrew B.; Byron, M. Justin (2019). "Tobacco companies introduce 'tobacco-free' nicotine pouches". Tobacco Control. 29 (e1): tobaccocontrol-2019-055321. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055321. ISSN 0964-4563. PMC 7239723. PMID 31753961.
  61. ^ "Notice: Prescription Drug List (PDL): Nicotine Qualifier Clarification |". Retrieved 2020-12-15.
  62. ^ "Food and Drug Regulations |". Retrieved 2020-12-15.

Further reading[edit]

A number of peer-reviewed studies of snus use have been published:

Cardiovascular diseases[edit]

  • Hergens, Maria-Pia; Ahlbom, Anders; Andersson, Tomas; Pershagen, Göran (2005). "Swedish Moist Snuff and Myocardial Infarction Among Men". Epidemiology. 16 (1): 12–6. doi:10.1097/ PMID 15613940. S2CID 37661792.
  • Broadstock, Marita (February 2007). "Cardiovascular disease" (PDF). Systematic review of the health effects of modified smokeless tobacco products. New Zealand Health Technology Assessment Report. 10. pp. 37–56.


  • Eliasson, M.; Asplund, K.; Nasic, S.; Rodu, B. (2004). "Influence of smoking and snus on the prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes amongst men: The northern Sweden MONICA study". Journal of Internal Medicine. 256 (2): 101–10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01344.x. PMID 15257722. S2CID 8298507.


  • Luo, Juhua; Ye, Weimin; Zendehdel, Kazem; Adami, Johanna; Adami, Hans-Olov; Boffetta, Paolo; Nyrén, Olof (2007). "Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: A retrospective cohort study". The Lancet. 369 (9578): 2015–20. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60678-3. PMID 17498797. S2CID 6676039.
  • Roosaar, Ann; Johansson, Anna L.V.; Sandborgh-Englund, Gunilla; Axéll, Tony; Nyrén, Olof (2008). "Cancer and mortality among users and nonusers of snus". International Journal of Cancer. 123 (1): 168–73. doi:10.1002/ijc.23469. PMID 18412245. S2CID 6667256.

Smoking cessation[edit]

Medical community discussions and reports[edit]