Social news

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A social news website features user-posted stories that are ranked based on popularity, as voted on by other users of the site or by website administrators. Users can typically comment online on these posts, and these comments may also be ranked in popularity. Since their emergence with the birth of Web 2.0, these sites have been used to link many types of information, including news, humor, support, and discussion. All social news websites allow the users to submit content. Each site differs in how the content is moderated. On the Slashdot and Fark websites, the administrators of the site decide which articles are selected for the front page. On Reddit and Digg, the articles that get the most votes from the community of users will make it to the front page. Many social news websites also feature an online comment system, where users discuss the issues raised in an article. Some of these sites have also applied their voting system to the comments, so that the most popular comments are displayed first. Some social news websites also have a social networking function, in that users can set up a user profile and follow other users' online activity on the website.

Like many other Web 2.0 tools, social news websites use the collective intelligence of all of the users to operate. Social news websites also "impl[y] the technical, economic, legal, and human enhancement of a universally distributed intelligence that will unleash a positive dynamic of recognition and skills mobilization". Social news websites help participants to share a collective vision and awareness of how their actions are integrated with those of other individuals. Social news websites provide a new and innovating way to participate in a community that is constantly being flooded with new information. These social news websites "include opportunities for peer-to-peer learning, a changed attitude toward intellectual property, the diversification of cultural expression, the development of skills valued in the modern workplace, and a more empowered conception of citizenship". These websites can help to shape and reshape democratic opinions and perspectives.[1][2]

Social news sites may mitigate the gatekeeping of mainstream news sources and allow the public to decide what counts as "news", which may facilitate a more participatory culture. Social news sites may also support democratic participation by allowing users from across geographic and national boundaries to access the same information, respond to fellow users' views and beliefs, and create a virtual sphere for users to contribute within.[3]

Websites[edit]

Slashdot[edit]

Slashdot, started in 1997, was one of the first social news websites. It focuses mainly on science and technology-related news. Users can submit stories and the editors pick out the best stories each day for the front page. Users can then post comments on the stories.[4] The influx of web traffic that resulted from Slashdot linking to external websites led to the effect being called the Slashdot effect.

Fark[edit]

Fark, which was started in 1997, features news on any topic. On Fark, users can submit articles to the administrators of the site. Each day, these administrators pick out 50 articles to display on the front page.[5]

Freeskipper[edit]

Freeskipper, started in June 2010, is a social news website where users can submit articles and comments. Freeskipper is a new form of journalism, daughter of the media revolution of the network, which transforms you from audience to Information activist, as a reader writer, lecturer and disseminator of news. A new social publishing system based on dialogue and conversation, where the passive consumer becomes the star of the information process. Journalism is a participatory and democratic phenomenon. His goal is to make clear the connoting information veracity, reliability, accuracy and relevance. Anyone who knows and shares the news, anyone who wants to express their own opinion, can become a reporter, working at first hand the collection, preparation, analysis and dissemination. In this way, more and more important conversation and collaboration with respect to the productivity of a publication. The information does not drop more from above, the approach is reversed and starts from the bottom, turning the flow "filter and public" in "public and subsequently filtered." Conversations happen under the eyes of all, by thinning the editorial structure, which becomes simultaneously and in constant motion. Participatory journalism is developed in various forms and in different degrees of involvement of reader-reporters. Steve Outing, senior editor of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, offers 11 levels deep: from the base of participation, which involves the simple comment, the prompt request for information and contributions, up to structured sites entirely by users, all subjected or not to editorial moderation. Journalism is information and communication technology: advanced tools and easy to use in the hands of an ever online preparation, ready to capture images and spreading them instantly with flat connections, camcorders and mobile phones of the latest generation. The new journalism provides greater breadth of perspective, a hall of mirrors multiforme, a network of satellites that replicates the information to infinity through blogs, news groups, forums, chat rooms and online communities. All this is Freeskipper.

Digg[edit]

Digg's online icon.

Digg, started in December 2004, introduced the voting system. This system allows users to "digg" or "bury" articles. "Digging" is the equivalent of voting positively, so that popular articles are displayed first. "Burying" does not lower an article's score. However, if an article is buried enough times, it will be automatically deleted from the site. Digg has a social networking aspect to it, as members can follow other members and build personal profiles with information about their interests.[6]

Reddit[edit]

Reddit, started in June 2005, is a social news website where users can submit articles and comments and vote on these submissions. The submissions are organized into categories called "subreddits". Unlike Digg, with Reddit, users can directly affect an article's score. An "upvote" will increase the score and a "downvote" will decrease it. Articles with the highest scores are displayed on the front page. There is also a page for "controversial" articles, that have an almost equal number of upvotes and downvotes. Free speech debates have arisen due to the shutting down of obscene or potentially illegal "subreddits" (including /r/jailbait, a collection of sexually suggestive underage pictures.[7] Reddit introduced a system of user-created communities called "subreddits", which are essentially categories for a specific type of news. Comments on the featured posts are shown in a hierarchical fashion also based on votes. Users have the ability to earn "karma" for their participation and time on the website.[8]

Newsvine[edit]

Newsvine, started in March 2006, is a social news website mostly focused on politics, both international and domestic. The Newsvine home page allows users to customize "seeds" and story feeds. Users receive articles via "The Wire" from sources including The Associated Press or The Huffington Post, and from "The Vine" a stream of content from other Newsvine users. The "Top of the Vine" displays the most voted and commented on articles of the day, week, month, or year. Additionally, Newsvine allows members to create their own "Customizable Column," which can highlight a user's content posted, recent comments, and information about the specific Newsvine member.[9]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Levy, Pierre (1997). "Collective Intelligence". Collective Intelligence. 
  2. ^ Jenkins, Henry (2006). "Confronting Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century". 
  3. ^ Papacharissi, Zizi (2007). "The Virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the Public Sphere, and Beyond". 
  4. ^ "Slashdot FAQ". Retrieved 2011-02-04. 
  5. ^ "Fark FAQ". Retrieved 2011-02-04. 
  6. ^ "The Case of Digg" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-02-04. 
  7. ^ "Reddit: "Jailbait is bad, but pics of dead kids are OK"". ExtremeTech. 2012-02-13. Retrieved 2013-01-31. 
  8. ^ Kristina Lerman (2006). "Social Networks and Social Information Filtering on Digg". arXiv:cs/0612046Freely accessible [cs.HC]. 
  9. ^ "Reading: the most basic use of Newsvine". Retrieved 2011-12-14.