This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (December 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Theorists[who?] have examined the value of repetition for soft sell versus hard sell messages, in order to determine their relative efficacy. Frank Kardes and others have concluded that a soft sell, with an implied conclusion rather than an overt hard sell, can often be more persuasive. Soft sell is also less likely to be irritating to consumers.
- Herbert E. Krugman. An Application of Learning Theory to TV Copy Testing. The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Winter, 1962), pp. 626–634
- Frank R. Kardes. Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Sep., 1988), pp. 225–233
- David A. Aaker, Donald E. Bruzzone. Causes of Irritation in Advertising. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 2 (Spring, 1985), pp. 47–57
- Frank R. Kardes, Maria Cronley, Thomas Cline. Consumer Behavior, p. 212
|This business-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|