The Homalozoa lacked the typical pentamer body form of other echinoderms, but all were sessile animals. Instead all Homalozoans were markedly asymmetric, and were extremely variable in forms
The body (theca) was covered with calcite plates with a number of openings. Their form is in some cases so unusual that it is unclear which openings are to be considered as mouth and anus. Many of them were stalked, similar to sea lilies (crinoids), but often their bodies were bent over, so that the mouth and anus projected forwards rather than upwards. Some forms, especially stylophorans, rested flat on the sea floor.
Homalozoans were traditionally considered to be stem-group echinoderms, but had also been considered to lie in the stem lineage of the chordates (calcichordates). However, it is now generally accepted that homalozoans were echinoderms because their calcite skeleton was composed of the typical stereom crystalline structure.
They include the unusual stylophorans (mitrates and cornutes), Homoiostelea (solutes), the Homostelea (cinctans), and the Ctenocystoidea (ctenoid-bearing homalozoans). They have recently been recognised as a polyphyletic group. The stylophorans are now classified as a clade of the Crinozoa, whereas the other three are classified as clades of the Blastozoa.
Solutes are from the Paleozoic era. They are carpoid echinoderms. Unlike many other types of echinoderm, they lack radial symmetry (such as the five limbs of a starfish).  Solutes are the sole order of the class Homoiostelea.
Solute fossils have an irregularly shaped flattened body covered in calcite plates, and are up to about 10 cm long. The body has two appendages, interpreted as a "feeding arm" at one end, bearing tube feet at its end, and a "stele" at the other, which may have been used by the animal to propel itself along the sea floor.
- Prehistoric echinoderms — other groups of prehistoric echinoderms include:
- Prehistoric invertebrates
- Paleozoic echinoderms
- Imran Rahman (January–February 2009). "Making sense of carpoids". Geology Today. 25 (1): 34–38. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2451.2009.00703.x.
- Lefebvre, Bertrand (2003). "Functional Morphology of Stylophoran Echinoderms". Palaeontology. 46 (3): 511–555. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00309.
- Barnes, Robert D. (1982). Invertebrate Zoology. Philadelphia, PA: Holt-Saunders International. p. 1011. ISBN 0-03-056747-5.
- Dominguez, Patrício; Jacobson, Antone G.; Jefferies, Richard P. S. (2002). "Paired gill slits in a fossil with a calcite skeleton". Nature. 417 (6891): 841–844. PMID 12075349. doi:10.1038/nature00805.
- James W. Valentine (2004). On the origin of phyla. University Chicago Press. 608 pp. Paperback. ISBN 0-226-84548-6. - pages 401-404
- UCMP Berkeley, edu. "Echinodermata: Morphology". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
- David, Bruno; Lefebvre, Bertrand; Mooi, Rich; Parsley, Ronald (2000). "Are homalozoans echinoderms? An answer from the extraxial-axial theory". Paleobiol. 26 (4): 529–555. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0529:AHEAAF>2.0.CO;2.
- A. B. Smith Deuterostome phylogeny and the interpretation of problematic fossil echinoderms, page 543-544 in Thomas Heinzeller, James H. Nebelsick Echinoderms: München, CRC Press, 2004 ISBN 0-415-36481-7,
- Smith, A. B. (2005). "The pre-radial history of echinoderms". Geological Journal. 40 (3): 255–280. doi:10.1002/gj.1018.
- Henry Gee Before the backbone: views on the origin of the vertebrates, Springer, 1996 ISBN 0-412-48300-9 page 204
|This prehistoric echinoderm-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|