|250,000 (2001 census)|
|Sora Sompeng, Odia, Latin, Telugu|
The Sora language is part of the Austroasiatic language family. More locally, however, it is a part of the Munda languages which include other tribal languages in close proximity to Sora. Sora is unique because although it is surrounded by the Indo-Aryan language Oriya and the Dravidian language Telugu, Sora is more closely related to the languages of Southeast Asia such as Khmer in Cambodia than it is to the predominant languages of India. Moreover, Sora contains very little formal literature but has an abundance of folk tales and traditions. Most of their passed down knowledge is of the oral tradition. Compared to other languages in the Munda family, Sora is decreasing within the Sora tribe at a faster rate. Most speakers are concentrated in Odisha and Andhra Pradesh but smaller communities also exist in Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Bihar.
Speakers are concentrated mainly in Ganjam District, Gajapati District (central Gumma Hills region (Gumma Block), etc.), and Rayagada District, but are also found in adjacent areas such as Koraput and Phulbani districts; other communities exist in northern Andhra Pradesh (Vizianagaram District and Srikakulam District), Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and the Plains Division of Assam.
The Sora language has faced a wavelike pattern of usage—that is the number of people who speak Sora climbed steadily for decades before crashing down. In fact the number of people who spoke Sora went from 157 thousand in 1901 to 166 thousand in 1911. In 1921, this number marginally rose to 168 thousand and kept climbing. In 1931, speaker numbers jumped to 194 thousand but in 1951, a period of exponential growth occurred with speaker numbers jumping to 256 thousand. in 1961, numbers topped at 265 thousand speakers before crashing down in 1971 when speaker numbers drop back down to 221 thousand.
Sora is spoken by the Sora people, who are a part of the Adivasi, or tribal people,in India, making Sora an Adivasi language. Sora is found in close proximity to Odia and Telugu speaking peoples making a great deal of Sora people bilingual. Sora does not have much in the way of literature except for a few songs and folk tales which are usually transmitted orally. Sora religion is a mix of traditional shamanistic rituals and the surrounding Hinduism predominant in surrounding populations. One particular Sora ritual has to do with death. Sora retains a unique shamanistic view on the subject of death. It is said that people who die from murders, suicides, or accidents are said to be taken, in a sense, by the Sun spirit. These people, called usungdaijen, are then said to reside in the Sun itself after death. Sora uses spirits to explain many phenomena. For example, if a girl in no relationship has a headache or a migrane, it is said that the Pangalsum spirit, or Bachelor Spirit who contains the souls of men who have died before wedlock, has placed a wreath of flowers tightly around the girls head as a symbol of claiming her as his wife.
The Sora numeral system uses a base 12, which only a few other languages in the world do. Ekari, for example, uses a base 60 system. For example, 39 in Sora arithmetic would be thought of as (1 * 20)+ 12 + 7. Here are the first 12 numerals in the Sora language :
English: one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve
Sora: aboy bago yagi unji monloy tudru gulji thamji tinji gelji gelmuy migel
Similar to how English uses the suffix from the numeral ten after twelve (such as thirteen, fourteen, etc.), Sora also uses a suffix assignment to numerals after 12 and before 20. Thirteen in Sora is expressed as migelboy (12+1), fourteen as migelbagu (12+2), etc. Between numerals 20 and 99, Sora adds the suffix kuri to the first constituent of the numeral. For example, 31 is expressed as bokuri gelmuy and 90 as unjikuri gelji.
On a similar note, our understanding of Sora phonology is limited at best but there are some generalizations that can be made. Most syllables are of the Consonant, Vowel, Consonant form and morphemes usually contain one to three syllables. There are 18 identifiable consonants and they fall into most of the established origins of sound. Five consonants originate from the palate while only one consonant originates from the glottis. An interesting facet of Sora consonants is that they contain an inherent ɘ vowel. Although vowels may be pronounced differently, there exist only 6 vowels in Sora. There are no diacritics and aspiration varies depending on the speaker. It is likely that the influence of English, Odisha, and Telugu has also affected vowel pronunciation over the course of Sora's use. Pronunciations also chaange in prevocalic (occurring before a vowel) and non prevocalic environments.
Sora uses grammatical devices, including subject and object agreement, word order, and noun compounding to show case. It is seen as a predominantly nominative-accusative language and once again differs from most other languages with its lack of a passive structure. However, just because Sora lacks a passive case does not mean other established forms of grammatical case are also missing. Rather, Sora has some complex grammatical cases. A few examples are as follows:
In addition, Sora, like many other Munda languages, uses relator nouns to link nouns with the other parts of the sentence in order to provide a more specific meaning, called compounding. These monosyllabic nouns that enhance meaning are called Semantic relator nouns and are used widely in Sora. Sora also has a combining form for every noun in addition to the full form of the noun. The combining form allows the noun to be attached to a verb root to create a more semantically complex word, similar to compounding in other languages. Sora contains prefixes, infixes, and suffixes to form its affixation but only uses its suffixes to change the possession of nouns. The combining form is the form seen when the noun is being used with a verb or another full formed noun. The full form is the form seen when the noun is standing alone or functioning not in tandem with other parts of speech. Some templates of Sora combinations between nouns and verbs are as follows:
Verb + Combined Form
Verb + Combined Form + Combined Form
Full Form + Combined Form
Full Form + Combined Form + Combined Form
An example of a Full Form noun shortened into the Combined Form is as follows: mənra, the Full Form of man, transform into the combined form word --mər . The two—indicate that a Noun (Full or Combined) or Verb has to precede the Combined Form noun; that is the Combined Form Noun can not stand on its own. Although by no means conclusive, a few general guidelines about the Combined Form is that it depends on where the combination with the verb or other noun is to take place. If the combined form is to an infix, then its resulting form will be different than if it where to be combined as a prefix. Some examples of Full Form Nouns and their Combined Forms are as follows:
Full Form Combined Form English Translation
ədɘ'ŋ --dɘ'ŋ honeycomb
ərɘ'ŋ --rɘ'ŋ sour
bɘ'nra'j --bɘn flour
ba'ra' --bal gun barrel
Sora borrows words from surrounding languages like Telugu and Oriya. An example of a word borrowed from Oriya is kɘ'ra'ñja' which is a tree name. From Telugu mu'nu', which means black gram, is borrowed. Moreover, within the Munda family itself most words appear to be mutually intelligible owing to minor differences in pronounications and phonology. Kharia and Korku, two other Munda languages, share mutually intelligible words with Sora. For example, the number 11 in Kharia is ghol moŋ, in Korku it is gel ḑo miya, and in Sora it is gelmuy. Each 11 in each language looks and sounds remarkably similar to the other 11's. This phenomenon is not just contained in numbers but rather a great deal of vocabulary is mutually intelligible among the Munda languages. Within the Austroasiatic language family more knowledge about Sora vocabulary can be found. The Mon-Khmer language family which encompasses the languages primarily spoken in Southeast Asia has lexical cognates with the Munda family. That means that some words found in Sora are of direct proto-Austroasiatic origin and share similarities with other derived Austroasiatic language families. Words that relate to the body, family, home, field, as well as pronouns, demonstratives, and numerals are the ones with the most cognates.
The Sora language has multiple writing systems. One is called Sora Sompeng, a native writing system created only for the Sora language. It was developed in 1936 by Mangei Gomango.
Sora is also written in the Odia alphabet by the bilingual speakers of Odisha.
Similarly, Telugu is used by the bilingual speakers living in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.
Finally, the last commonly used script to write Sora is the Latin script.
- Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian, eds. (2016). "Sora". Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
- Ramamurti, R. S. (1931). A Manual of the Sora (Savara) Language. Delhi: Mittal Publication.
- Veṅkaṭarāmamūrti, G. (1986). Sora–English dictionary. Delhi: Mittal Publication.
- Sora at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
- Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Sora". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
- Anderson, Gregory D.S (ed). 2008. The Munda languages. Routledge Language Family Series 3.New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32890-X.
- Mahapatra, B. (1991). MUNDA LANGUAGES IN CENSUS. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute, 51/52, 329-336. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/42930411
- CHATTERJI, S. (1971). 'Adivasi' Literatures of India: The Uncultivated 'Adivasi' Languages. Indian Literature, 14(3), 5-42. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23329913
- Vitebsky, P. (1980). Birth, Entity and Responsibility: The Spirit of the Sun in Sora Cosmology. L'Homme, 20(1), 47-70. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25131601
- MOHAN, S. (2012). NUMERAL EXPRESSIONS IN KHARIA KORKU, AND SORA: A COMPARATIVE ACCOUNT. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute, 72/73, 367-374. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43610713
- Stampe, D. (1965). Recent Work in Munda Linguistics I. International Journal of American Linguistics, 31(4), 332-341. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1264042
- Sora Sompeng. (n.d.). Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://scriptsource.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=script_detail&key=Sora
- Donegan, Patricia, and David Stampe. "South-East Asian Features in the Munda Languages: Evidence for the Analytic-to-Synthetic Drift of Munda." Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 28.1 (2014): n. pag. Web.
- Starosta, S. (1976). Case Forms and Case Relations in Sora. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, (13), 1069-1107. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20019195
- Zide, A. (1976). Nominal Combining Forms in Sora and Gorum. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, (13), 1259-1294. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20019202