Help
Editing filter
Edit Filter navigation
(
Home
|
Recent filter changes
|
Examine past edits
|
Edit Filter Log
)
Editing filter 98 (see also a
graph
of recent actions)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Filter parameters
Filter ID:
98
Description:
(publicly viewable)
Filter hits:
338,890 hits
Statistics:
Of the last 8,747 actions, this filter has matched 1 (0.01%). On average, its run time is 0.12 ms, and it consumes 1 condition of the condition limit.
Conditions:
(
documentation
)
article_articleid == 0 & ( new_size < 150 & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( !"extendedconfirmed" in user_rights & ( !added_lines irlike "{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect|db-unpatrolled)}}|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html) ) ) ) )
article_articleid == 0 & ( new_size < 150 & ( article_namespace == 0 & ( !"extendedconfirmed" in user_rights & ( !added_lines irlike "{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect|db-unpatrolled)}}|#redirect" & !'disambig' in lcase(new_html) ) ) ) )
Notes:
Users creating very short articles A size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior. Apparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters... Added {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik Added {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle Stubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning ("make your article longer") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego Disabled for sysops. - KoH I limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik add tag "very short new article" - Cen I rearranged conditions. - Ruslik As did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold Nope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold Try this instead... - Hersfold There is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P Agree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen Optimizing. -TS Optimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010 optimised 2015 --zzuuzz User user_rights instead of user_groups to turn off for sysops after recent ACPERM-inspired bump-up to extendedconfirmed from confirmed (see [[Special:Permalink/822578953#Filter 98 and ACTRIAL]]) -- Amory
Flags:
Hide details of this filter from public view
Enable this filter
Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:
16:02, 2 August 2018
by
Amorymeltzer
(
talk
|
contribs
)
History:
View this filter's history
Tools:
Export this filter to another wiki
{"row":{"af_id":"98","af_pattern":"article_articleid == 0 \u0026 \r\n(\r\n new_size \u003C 150 \u0026\r\n (\r\n article_namespace == 0 \u0026 \r\n (\r\n !\"extendedconfirmed\" in user_rights \u0026\r\n (\r\n !added_lines irlike \"{{(?:surname|given name|delrev|softredirect|db-unpatrolled)}}|#redirect\" \u0026\r\n !'disambig' in lcase(new_html)\r\n )\r\n )\r\n )\r\n)","af_user":"141948","af_user_text":"Amorymeltzer","af_timestamp":"20180802160245","af_enabled":"1","af_comments":"Users creating very short articles\r\n\r\nA size of 200 was more or less chosen at random, it make sense to adjust it higher or lower to better fit user behavior.\r\n\r\nApparently one can create correct disambigs in less than 200 characters...\r\nAdded {{softredirect}}. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nAdded {{db-unpatrolled}}, see bugzilla #18114 - Stifle\r\n\r\nStubs aren't necessarily bad. I think the warning (\"make your article longer\") needs to be changed, we don't want to discourage good edits. -Prodego\r\n\r\nDisabled for sysops. - KoH\r\n\r\nI limited this filter to non-autoconfirmed users and decreased the size limit to 150. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nadd tag \"very short new article\" - Cen\r\n\r\nI rearranged conditions. - Ruslik\r\nAs did I, hopefully this will improve runtime. - Hersfold\r\nNope, that made it markedly worse. - Hersfold\r\nTry this instead... - Hersfold\r\n\r\nThere is nothing wrong with a short article, lets not patronize. People can work in steps. Disable - P\r\n\r\nAgree - remove warning bur re-enable because tagging them is useful - Cen\r\n\r\nOptimizing. -TS\r\nOptimized -- Shirik 21 Feb 2010\r\n\r\noptimised 2015 --zzuuzz\r\n\r\nUser user_rights instead of user_groups to turn off for sysops after recent ACPERM-inspired bump-up to extendedconfirmed from confirmed (see [[Special:Permalink/822578953#Filter 98 and ACTRIAL]]) -- Amory","af_public_comments":"Creating very short new article","af_hidden":"0","af_hit_count":"338890","af_throttled":"0","af_deleted":"0","af_actions":"tag","af_global":"0","af_group":"default"},"actions":{"tag":{"action":"tag","parameters":["very short new article"]}}}
Actions to take when matched
Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit
Number of actions to allow:
Period of time (in seconds):
Group throttle by:
IP address
User account
/16 range
Date of account creation
Edit count
The whole site
Page
Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning
System message to use for warning:
abusefilter-warning
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Prevent the user from performing the action in question
System message to use for disallowing:
abusefilter-disallowed
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status
Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories
Tags to apply:
(see
Wikipedia:Tags
for use and formatting)
(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)
(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)
very short new article
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Special page
Variants
Views
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Languages