User contributions for 69.228.81.16

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

05:2105:21, 27 December 2008 diff hist 0‎ Cenosphere ‎ →‎Fuel or Oil Cenospheres: header case

14:5414:54, 26 December 2008 diff hist −14‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
14:5314:53, 26 December 2008 diff hist +508‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
14:4914:49, 26 December 2008 diff hist +461‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
14:4514:45, 26 December 2008 diff hist +296‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
14:4214:42, 26 December 2008 diff hist +24‎ Cold fusion ‎ please do not remove dispute tags until the dispute has been resolved
12:3512:35, 26 December 2008 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
12:3312:33, 26 December 2008 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
12:3212:32, 26 December 2008 diff hist +911‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
11:4111:41, 26 December 2008 diff hist +166‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
11:3811:38, 26 December 2008 diff hist +24‎ Cold fusion ‎ trying to play the non-peer reviewed DOE 2008 panel off as if it was unanimous is a biased abuse of weasel words, especially in light of peer-reviewed reliable sources such as Biberian 2007
11:3511:35, 26 December 2008 diff hist +1,042‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
09:2109:21, 26 December 2008 diff hist +25‎ Cold fusion ‎ per talk, pretending it was unanimous is wrong
09:2009:20, 26 December 2008 diff hist +681‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
09:1009:10, 26 December 2008 diff hist +528‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
06:5706:57, 26 December 2008 diff hist +86‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
06:5606:56, 26 December 2008 diff hist −458‎ Cold fusion ‎ Undid revision 260138066 by Orangemarlin (talk) - removing text is not "POV commentary" - please discuss on talk as I have
06:5506:55, 26 December 2008 diff hist −11‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
06:5406:54, 26 December 2008 diff hist +324‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
05:5805:58, 26 December 2008 diff hist −458‎ Cold fusion ‎ not "minority" by any measure of the reliable sources; DOE panel is less reliable per talk
05:3605:36, 26 December 2008 diff hist +14‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantitative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
05:3405:34, 26 December 2008 diff hist +141‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantatative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?
05:1705:17, 26 December 2008 diff hist +1,903‎ Talk:Cold fusion ‎ →‎Is a non-quantatative summary of DOE 2004 really better for the last paragraph of the intro than reliable sources?: new section

27 December 2008

26 December 2008