-
(UTC) I take issue with the subject's section on his involvement in the Gamergate controversy[4], in particular his claims of receiving harassment. Some
217 KB (29,875 words) - 22:19, 13 January 2015
-
Gamergate controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Another link was redacted [47] from the Gamergate talk
211 KB (29,139 words) - 22:31, 16 March 2015
-
Hermansson Tom Schweich Jeffrey Fenwick Ardian Fullani Government of India GamerGate Tom Paulin Stephen Yagman Nick de Bois Dennis Rawlins Quamrul Hassan Karl
94 KB (10,612 words) - 05:00, 13 April 2016
-
WP:FRINGE argument is the belief that Gamergate concerns ethics in journalism: it could perhaps be true, and Gamergate fans insist it is true, but right now
204 KB (27,807 words) - 17:26, 10 July 2015
-
page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Some of the GamerGate personalities are still being vandalized especially due to arbcom and
197 KB (27,663 words) - 15:40, 20 February 2015
-
vote from sole purpose GamerGate account. It is obvious from your contributions that your agenda here relates solely to Gamergate, and you participate here
196 KB (26,392 words) - 04:06, 10 February 2016
-
Steven Emerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) There has been some serious controversy at the Steven Emerson
198 KB (26,461 words) - 21:30, 24 February 2015
-
notability of the group, and seems almost entirely concerned with the ongoing GamerGate controversy. In short, the article is a coatrack, and should be deleted
213 KB (28,780 words) - 02:05, 10 October 2014
-
at Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Auerbach.27s_response_regarding_expertise. Some discussion still appears in the conversation at Talk:Gamergate controversy#A
215 KB (30,202 words) - 04:06, 10 February 2016
-
but it is hardly pressing. Even the article edits are stale. Is it more gamergate business? Only in death does duty end (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2015
209 KB (26,043 words) - 14:50, 9 November 2015
-
page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Article: Talk:Gamergate_controversy Danielle Maiorino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |
253 KB (35,048 words) - 05:49, 9 November 2015
-
even better IMHO.--ukexpat (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC) GamerGate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
227 KB (31,314 words) - 00:37, 20 February 2015
-
--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:27, 6 October 2014 (UTC) The article on the Gamergate controversy is somehow consider as a biography, and is under editing protection
261 KB (35,931 words) - 01:01, 20 February 2015
-
which should suggest we shouldn't. Also, note the parallel discussion at Gamergate controvery. GraniteSand (talk) 02:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Yes - You
196 KB (27,404 words) - 02:46, 2 March 2015
-
Emerson. User:Callanecc tried to explain to me the reasons behind the Gamergate controversy as follows: If you have a look at the wording of the discretionary
325 KB (45,199 words) - 02:35, 2 April 2015
-
deletion, but it also has a lot of interest for much the same reason, oh, Gamergate controversy does—Blanc is a controversial pickup artist who has been banned
214 KB (29,995 words) - 23:28, 19 February 2015
-
contacted with. I've been keeping right away from anything even slightly Gamergate controversy-related on Wikipedia myself (I'm active on RationalWiki on
195 KB (27,532 words) - 02:23, 1 February 2016
-
name is a "SJW", just as not everyone who opposes using his name is a GamerGate supporter or men's rights activist. --SonicY (talk) 19:08, 5 May 2015
447 KB (59,986 words) - 22:37, 24 May 2015
