Speedy Trial Clause
|Criminal trials and convictions|
|Rights of the accused|
|Related areas of law|
The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial" The Clause protects the defendant from delay between the presentation of the indictment or similar charging instrument and the beginning of trial.
In Barker v. Wingo (1972), the Supreme Court developed a four-part test that considers the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right to a speedy trial, and the prejudice to the defendant. A violation of the Speedy Trial Clause is cause for dismissal with prejudice of a criminal case. Within these parameters it was determined that the five year wait for this case to go trial was not in violation of the Constitution. In response in 1974, Congress passed the Speedy Trial Act.
This speedy trial clause protects defendants from waiting more than a certain amount of time for a trial.
Speedy trial statutes
In addition to the constitutional guarantee, various state and federal statutes confer a more specific right to a speedy trial. In New York, the prosecution must be "ready for trial" within six months on all felonies except murder, or the charges are dismissed by action of law without regard to the merits of the case. This is also known as a "ready rule". In California courts, defendants have a right to a trial within 45 days.
The federal law detailing this right is the Speedy Trial Act of 1974. All U.S. states have either statues or constitutional provisions detailing this right. In 1979 the Act was amended to ensure that the defendant had time to provide a suitable defense. This amendment made it so trial couldn't start within less than 30 days after the defendant first appeared in the court.
Speedy trial cases
In Doggett v. United States (1991-1992) the supreme court determined that Doggett's eight and a half year wait for a trial violated his sixth amendment rights (the speedy trial clause), and they gave him a writ of certiorari.
In Zedner v. United States (2006) it was determined by the supreme court that a defendant can't waive his right to a speedy trial using the speedy trial clause. It was determined that the defendant can't waive his right to a speedy trial because the speedy trial clause protects all parties involved in a case to ensure that no one's interests are being implicated.
- U.S. Const. amend. VI.
- "Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Right: Ancient, Worthy and Elusive | David J. Shestokas". www.shestokas.com. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
- "628. Speedy Trial Act of 1974 | USAM | Department of Justice". www.justice.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
- "Doggett v. United States 505 U.S. 647 (1992)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2016-05-06.
- "Zedner v. United States". oyez.org. IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved 2016-05-06.
- Staff, L. I. I. (2008-12-18). "Zedner v. United States (05-5992)". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
- Nicholaidis, N. (1989). "Sixth Amendment Right to a Speedy and Public Trial". American Criminal Law Review. 26 (4): 1489–1505. NCJ 122967.
- Fair Trial, Criminal - Impartiality., Speedy Trial., The Right to Confront Witnesses., Prejudicial Publicity and Cameras in Court
|This article about a criminal law topic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|