Spruance-class destroyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Spruance-class destroyer
USS Briscoe DD-977.jpg
USS Briscoe on 21 March 2003
Class overview
NameSpruance class
BuildersIngalls Shipbuilding, Pascagoula, Mississippi
Operators United States Navy
Preceded by Charles F. Adams class
Succeeded by
In commission1975–2005
Active1 (Paul F. Foster) as SDTS
General characteristics
Displacement8,040 (long) tons full load
Length529 ft (161 m) waterline; 563 ft (172 m) overall
Beam55 ft (16.8 m)
Draft29 ft (8.8 m)
Propulsion4 × General Electric LM2500 gas turbines, 2 shafts, 80,000 shp (60 MW)
Speed32.5 knots (60.2 km/h; 37.4 mph)
  • 6,000 nautical miles (11,000 km; 6,900 mi) at 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph)
  • 3,300 nautical miles (6,100 km; 3,800 mi) at 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph)
Complement19 officers, 315 enlisted
Sensors and
processing systems
Electronic warfare
& decoys
Aircraft carried2 x Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk LAMPS III helicopters.
Aviation facilitiesFlight deck and enclosed hangar for up to two medium-lift helicopters

The Spruance-class destroyer was developed by the United States to replace the many World War II–built Allen M. Sumner- and Gearing-class destroyers and was the primary destroyer built for the U.S. Navy during the 1970s and 1980s. It was named in honour of United States Navy Admiral Raymond A. Spruance, who successfully led major naval battles in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater during World War II such as the Battle of Midway and Battle of the Philippine Sea.

First commissioned in 1975, the class was designed with gas-turbine propulsion, a flight deck and hangar for up to two medium-lift helicopters, all-digital weapons systems, and automated 127 mm (5-inch) guns. Serving for three decades, the Spruance class was originally designed to escort a carrier group with a primary ASW mission, with point defense anti-aircraft warfare (AAW) missiles and limited anti-ship warfare, while 24 members of the class upgraded with Tomahawk cruise missiles for land attack.[1] Rather than extend the life of the class, the Navy accelerated its retirement. The last ship of the class was decommissioned in 2005, with most examples broken up or destroyed as targets.[2] They were replaced in service by the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer.



The Spruances were much larger than destroyers of that era, being comparable in size to contemporary guided-missile cruisers (CG and CGN) and U.S. Navy light cruisers (CL) in World War II. Their hull dimensions allowed them not only to accommodate a helicopter landing pad, a first for a U.S. Navy destroyer as flight decks were previously only found on frigates and cruisers, they were the first U.S. Navy destroyer/cruiser class to have an enclosed hangar (with space for up to two medium-lift helicopters) which was a considerable improvement over the basic aviation facilities of earlier cruisers.[3] The "Spru-cans" were the first large U.S. Navy ships to use gas turbine propulsion; they had four General Electric LM2500 gas turbines to generate about 80,000 horsepower (60 MW). This configuration (developed in the 1960s by the Royal Canadian Navy for the Iroquois-class destroyers and known as COmbined Gas And Gas, or COGAG) was very successful and used on most subsequent U.S. warships. As of 2010, all U.S. Navy surface combatants (except nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and the LCS-1) use the LM2500 COGAG arrangement, usually with two such turbines per shaft.[4]

The Spruance-class received the "DD" designation in the hull classification symbol system which was previously applied to gun destroyers, though their primary armament as designed was missiles. However their original complement of 8 Sea Sparrow anti-aircraft missiles was only sufficient for point defense, compared to other American destroyers designated as DDG which were designed to provide anti-aircraft warfare screening to the fleet, while some newer DDG ships further added powerful surface-to-surface capabilities for anti-ship or land strike. A major update from the mid-1980s added a 61-cell Vertical Launch Missile System (VLS) for the Tomahawk surface-to-surface missile which modernized 24 members of the Spruance-class to a strike destroyer standard, although they remained as DD because they continued to lack the anti-aircraft capabilities of guided-missile cruisers (CG and CGN) and destroyers (DDG).[5]

The ships were initially controversial, especially among members of the United States Congress who believed that their unimposing looks, with only two guns and an ASROC and Sea Sparrow missile launcher per ship implied that the vessels were weak compared to Soviet designs which carried large numbers of anti-ship missiles. The Spruance-class was also unfavorably compared to earlier U.S. designs which had more visible guns or launchers for the Standard medium range missiles. Despite the criticism they were successful in their intended ASW role due to their seaworthiness, quiet operation, and ability to operate two helicopters.[6]

The entire class of 30 ships was contracted on 23 June 1970 to the Litton-Ingalls shipyard in Pascagoula, Mississippi, under the Total Package Procurement concept originated by the Whiz Kids of Robert McNamara's Pentagon. The idea was to reap the benefits of mass construction, but labor and technical problems caused cost overruns and delayed construction.[7][8]

Six Spruance-class destroyers fitting out, c. May 1975

One additional ship, USS Hayler, was ordered on 29 September 1979. Hayler was originally planned as a DDH (Destroyer, Helicopter) design, which would carry more anti-submarine helicopters than the standard design of the Spruance class. Eventually this plan to build a DDH was scrapped and a slightly modified DD-963 class hull was put in commission.[citation needed]

Four additional ships were built originally for the Iranian Navy with the Mark 26/Standard AAW missile system and commissioned as the Kidds for the U.S. Navy. The Kidd-class destroyers used the same hull as the Spruances but they were more advanced general-purpose ships with significant anti-air warfare capabilities that the Spruance-class lacked. It was once planned to build all of the Spruance class up to this standard, but it was too expensive. A slightly lengthened version of the hull was also used for the Ticonderoga-class cruisers, originally planned as DDG-47-class destroyers but redesignated as cruisers in 1980 to emphasize the additional capability provided by the ships' Aegis combat systems, and their flag facilities suitable for an admiral and his staff.[9]

An air-capable mini V/STOL aircraft carrier with fighters and ASW helicopters based on the Spruance hull was seriously considered but not produced.[10][11]


The Spruance design is modular in nature, allowing for easy installation of entire subsystems within the ship. Although originally designed for anti-submarine warfare, 24 ships of this class were upgraded with the installation of a 61 cell Vertical Launch Missile System (VLS) capable of launching Tomahawk missiles. The remaining seven ships not upgraded were decommissioned early. Deyo was the only Spruance-class destroyer that received the armored box launchers for Tomahawk that also later received the VLS upgrade, while Harry W. Hill was the only one that never received the Tomahawk, having had its VLS upgrade cancelled.[citation needed]

  • Merrill served as the Navy's test platform for the Tomahawk Cruise Missile Program receiving armored box launchers and test launching a Tomahawk 19 March 1980. Merrill carried two ABLs and an ASROC launcher into the 1990s until the ASROC launcher was removed.[citation needed]
  • David R. Ray tested the RAM system in the 1980s, but had the system removed after the tests.[citation needed]
  • Oldendorf was the test platform for the AN/SPQ-9B Anti-ship Missile Defense (ASMD) Firecontrol Radar to be outfitted on the San Antonio-class amphibious transport docks. The AN/SPQ-9B is used to detect all known and projected sea skimming missiles.[citation needed]
  • Arthur W. Radford tested the Advanced Enclosed Mast/Sensor system which helped in the mast design of the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ships.[citation needed]

At least ten VLS ships, including Cushing, O'Bannon, and Thorn, had a 21 cell RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile launcher mounted on the starboard fantail.[citation needed]

Spruance-class destroyers fired 112 land attack Tomahawks during Operation Desert Storm.[12]


In order to save $28 million a year, the Navy accelerated the decommissioning of the Spruance class, though they could have served to 2019 had they been maintained and updated.[13] Despite the recent modifications to the Spruance and Kidd classes, they were still considered expensive and manpower intensive to operate, while the succeeding Arleigh Burke-class were more capable and versatile due to their Aegis combat system while also being more cost-efficient, and by the end of the 1990s many Arleigh Burke-class destroyers had entered the fleet. While the early Flight I Arleigh Burke ships only had a flight deck, Flight IIA and subsequent vessels added the enclosed hangar which made their aviation facilities comparable to the Spruance-class.[citation needed]

The US Navy planned to replace its current destroyers and cruisers with the new Zumwalt-class (DDG-1000) vessels, but the 2010 U.S. Defense budget funded the construction of only three DDG-1000s[14] and production of Arleigh Burke class continued and it became the U.S. Navy's only operational class of destroyers after the USS Cushing was decommissioned on 21 September 2005.[15]

Rather than being preserved in storage like some older classes or offered up for sale to foreign navies, some were broken up and the remaining majority of the class finished their lives as targets in various fleet exercises. The last Spruance-class destroyer on active service, USS Cushing, was decommissioned on 21 September 2005. It was unsuccessfully offered to the Pakistan Navy before being sunk as a target 29 April 2009. The four Kidd-class destroyers were decommissioned in 1998 and were sold to Taiwan in 2005 and 2006.[citation needed]

One notable exception to this fate is the ex–Paul F. Foster which replaced the ex-Decatur in 2005 as the Self Defense Test Ship. The SDTS is remotely-controlled to tow a barge targeted by live weapons. This avoids the safety concerns and other problems associated with manned ship exposure to live weapons.[16][17]

Ships in class[edit]

Ships of the Spruance destroyer class
Name Hull no. Crest Laid down Launched Commissioned Decommissioned Disposition Ref
Spruance DD-963 USS Spruance DD-963 Crest.png 27 November 1972 10 November 1973 20 September 1975 23 March 2005 Sunk as target, 8 December 2006 [18]
Paul F. Foster DD-964 DD964crest.png 6 February 1973 22 February 1974 21 February 1976 27 March 2003 Struck 6 April 2004; in use as a Self Defense Test Ship [19][20]
Kinkaid DD-965 DD965crest.png 19 April 1973 25 May 1974 10 July 1976 7 January 2003 Sunk as target, 14 July 2004 [21]
Hewitt DD-966 DD966crest.png 23 July 1973 24 August 1974 25 September 1976 19 July 2001 Sold for scrap, 9 August 2001 [22]
Elliot DD-967 DD967crest.png 15 October 1973 19 December 1974 22 January 1977 2 December 2003 Sunk as target, 25 June 2005 [23]
Arthur W. Radford DD-968 DD968crest.png 31 January 1974 1 March 1975 16 April 1977 18 March 2003 Scuttled as artificial reef off coast of Delaware, 10 August 2011 [24]
Peterson DD-969 DD969crest.png 29 April 1974 21 June 1975 9 July 1977 4 October 2002 Sunk as target, 16 February 2004 [25]
Caron DD-970 DD970crest.png 1 July 1974 24 June 1975 1 October 1977 15 October 2001 Sunk as target, 4 December 2002 [26]
David R. Ray DD-971 DD971crest.png 23 September 1974 23 August 1975 19 November 1977 28 February 2002 Sunk as target, 11 July 2008 [27]
Oldendorf DD-972 DD972crest.png 27 December 1974 21 October 1975 4 March 1978 20 June 2003 Sunk as target, 22 August 2005 [28]
John Young DD-973 DD-973 crest.png 17 February 1975 6 January 1976 20 May 1978 30 September 2002 Sunk as target, 13 April 2004 [29]
Comte de Grasse DD-974 DD-974 crest.png 4 April 1975 26 March 1976 5 August 1978 5 June 1998 Sunk as target, 7 June 2006 [30]
O'Brien DD-975 DD975crest.png 9 May 1975 8 July 1976 3 December 1977 24 September 2004 Sunk as target, 9 February 2006 [31]
Merrill DD-976 DD-976 crest.png 16 June 1975 1 September 1976 11 March 1978 26 March 1998 Sunk as target, 1 August 2003 [32]
Briscoe DD-977 USS Briscoe (DD-977) patch.png 21 July 1975 28 December 1976 3 June 1978 2 October 2003 Sunk as target, 25 August 2005 [33]
Stump DD-978 DD-978 crest.png 25 August 1975 1 January 1977 19 August 1978 22 October 2004 Sunk as target, 7 June 2006 [34]
Conolly DD-979 DD-979 crest.png 29 September 1975 3 June 1977 14 October 1978 18 September 1998 Sunk as target, 29 April 2009 [35]
Moosbrugger DD-980 DD-980 crest.png 3 November 1975 23 July 1977 16 December 1978 15 December 2000 Scrapped, 2006 [36]
John Hancock DD-981 DD-981 crest.png 16 January 1976 29 October 1977 10 March 1979 16 October 2000 Scrapped, 2007 [37]
Nicholson DD-982 DD-982 crest.png 20 February 1976 11 November 1977 12 May 1979 20 December 2002 Sunk as target, 30 July 2004 [38]
John Rodgers DD-983 DD-983 crest.png 12 August 1976 25 February 1978 14 July 1979 4 September 1998 Scrapped, 2006 [39]
Leftwich DD-984 DD-984 crest.png 12 November 1976 8 April 1978 25 August 1979 27 March 1998 Sunk as target, 1 August 2003 [40]
Cushing DD-985 USS Cushing (DD-985) crest.png 2 February 1977 17 June 1978 21 September 1979 21 September 2005 Sunk as target, 14 July 2008 [41]
Harry W. Hill DD-986 DD-986 crest.png 1 April 1977 10 August 1978 17 November 1979 29 May 1998 Sunk as target, 15 July 2004 [42]
O'Bannon DD-987 DD-987 crest.png 21 February 1977 25 September 1978 15 December 1979 19 August 2005 Sunk as target, 6 October 2008 [43]
Thorn DD-988 DD-988 crest.png 29 August 1977 3 February 1979 16 February 1980 25 August 2004 Sunk as target, 22 July 2006 [44]
Deyo DD-989 USS Deyo (DD-989) crest.png 14 October 1977 20 January 1979 22 March 1980 6 November 2003 Sunk as target, 25 August 2005 [45]
Ingersoll DD-990 USS Ingersoll (DD-990) crest 1978.png 5 December 1977 10 March 1979 12 April 1980 24 July 1998 Sunk as target, 29 July 2003 [46]
Fife DD-991 USS Fife (DD-991) crest.png 6 March 1978 1 May 1979 31 May 1980 28 February 2003 Sunk as target, 23 August 2005 [47]
Fletcher DD-992 USS Fletcher (DD-992) crest.png 24 April 1978 16 June 1979 12 July 1980 1 October 2004 Sunk as target, 16 July 2008 [48]
Hayler DD-997 USS Hayler (DD-997) crest.png 20 October 1980 2 March 1982 5 March 1983 25 August 2003 Sunk as target, 13 November 2004 [49]



  1. ^ "DD-963 SPRUANCE-class".
  2. ^ Military Officer Greyhounds of the Sea By Gina DiNicolo Archived 20 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ "Bigger, Costlier Destroyers". The Morning Record. Meriden, Connecticut. 15 July 1970.
  4. ^ Bishop, Chris. Encyclopedia of World Sea Power. 1988. ISBN 0-517-65342-7. Page 94-95
  5. ^ Bishop, Chris. Encyclopedia of World Sea Power. 1988. ISBN 0-517-65342-7. Page 94-95
  6. ^ Bishop, Chris. Encyclopedia of World Sea Power. 1988. ISBN 0-517-65342-7. Page 94-95
  7. ^ "Spruance Akin to Vacation Cruise". Times Daily. Florence, Alabama. Associated Press. 18 September 1975. DD-963 ... is a year behind schedule due to a strike, a drydock accident and other instances of what Ingalls calls "excusable delays."
  8. ^ "Shipyard Begins Design Work on Sub for Saudis". Times Daily. Florence, Alabama. Associated Press. 23 October 1975. The Litton-owned shipyard has come under heavy fire from the Navy and Congress for delays and cost overruns on U.S. destroyers and assault ships.
  9. ^ "RIP: 6 U.S. Navy Ticonderoga-Class Cruisers Could be Headed to the Scrapper". 21 March 2019.
  10. ^ "Historical Review of Cruiser Characteristics, Roles and Missions". Aandc.org.
  11. ^ John Pike. "CG-47 Ticonderoga-class". Globalsecurity.org.
  12. ^ "DD-963 SPRUANCE-class – Navy Ships". Fas.org.
  13. ^ Dunnigan, James F. (2 August 2008). "USN Abandons New Ship Designs". Strategypage.com.
  14. ^ Bennett, John T. and Kris Osborn. "Gates Reveals DoD Program Overhaul"[dead link]. Defense News, 6 April 2009.
  15. ^ "US guided missile destroyer to visit Subic Bay Tuesday". The Philippine Star. 4 February 2013. Retrieved 4 March 2013.
  16. ^ "Paul F Foster EDD-964 Final DOI Naval Vessel Historical Evaluation" (PDF). navsea.navy.mil. 5 March 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2015.
  17. ^ John Pike. "Global Security information". Globalsecurity.org.
  18. ^ "USS Spruance". Naval Vessel Register.
  19. ^ "USS Paul F. Foster". Naval Vessel Register.
  20. ^ "USS Paul F. Foster (EDD-964)". Naval Vessel Register.
  21. ^ "USS Kinkaid". Naval Vessel Register.
  22. ^ "USS Hewitt". Naval Vessel Register.
  23. ^ "USS Elliot". Naval Vessel Register.
  24. ^ "USS Arthur W. Radford". Naval Vessel Register.
  25. ^ "USS Peterson". Naval Vessel Register.
  26. ^ "USS Caron". Naval Vessel Register.
  27. ^ "USS David R. Ray". Naval Vessel Register.
  28. ^ "USS Oldendorf". Naval Vessel Register.
  29. ^ "USS John Young". Naval Vessel Register.
  30. ^ "USS Comte de Grasse". Naval Vessel Register.
  31. ^ "USS O'Brien". Naval Vessel Register.
  32. ^ "USS Merrill". Naval Vessel Register.
  33. ^ "USS 'Briscoe". Naval Vessel Register.
  34. ^ "USS Stump". Naval Vessel Register.
  35. ^ "USS Conolly". Naval Vessel Register.
  36. ^ "USS Moosbrugger". Naval Vessel Register.
  37. ^ "USS John Hancock". Naval Vessel Register.
  38. ^ "USS Nicholson". Naval Vessel Register.
  39. ^ "USS John Rodgers". Naval Vessel Register.
  40. ^ "USS Leftwich". Naval Vessel Register.
  41. ^ "USS Cushing". Naval Vessel Register.
  42. ^ "USS Harry W. Hill". Naval Vessel Register.
  43. ^ "USS O'Bannon". Naval Vessel Register.
  44. ^ "USS Thorn". Naval Vessel Register.
  45. ^ "USS Deyo". Naval Vessel Register.
  46. ^ "USS Ingersoll". Naval Vessel Register.
  47. ^ "USS Fife". Naval Vessel Register.
  48. ^ "USS Fletcher". Naval Vessel Register.
  49. ^ "USS Hayler". Naval Vessel Register.

External links[edit]