CRS-1 Dragon is seen approaching the ISS
|Mission type||ISS resupply|
|Mission duration||20 days, 18 hours, 47 minutes|
|Spacecraft type||Dragon CRS|
|Start of mission|
|Launch date||8 October 2012, 00:34:07UTC|
|Rocket||Falcon 9 v1.0|
|Launch site||Cape Canaveral SLC-40|
|End of mission|
|Landing date||28 October 2012, 19:22UTC|
|Berthing at ISS|
|Berthing port||Harmony nadir|
|RMS capture||10 October 2012, 10:56 UTC|
|Berthing date||10 October 2012, 13:03 UTC|
|Unberthing date||28 October 2012, 11:19 UTC|
|RMS release||28 October 2012, 13:29 UTC|
|Time berthed||17 days 22 hours 16 minutes|
|Mass||400 kilograms (880 lb)|
|Pressurised||400 kilograms (880 lb)|
NASA SpX-1 mission patch
SpaceX CRS-1, also known as SpX-1, was the third flight for Space Exploration Technologies Corporation's (SpaceX) uncrewed Dragon cargo spacecraft, the fourth overall flight for the company's two-stage Falcon 9 launch vehicle, and the first SpaceX operational mission under their Commercial Resupply Services contract with NASA. The launch occurred on 7 October 2012 at 20:34 EDT (8 October 2012 at 00:34 UTC).
- 1 History
- 2 Mission timeline
- 3 Payload
- 4 Launch attempts
- 5 Falcon 9 engine anomaly
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
In May 2012, it was reported that the CRS-1 Falcon 9 had been transported to Cape Canaveral. The CRS-1 Dragon later arrived on 14 August 2012. On 31 August 2012, a wet dress rehearsal was completed for the CRS-1 Falcon 9, and on 29 September a static fire test was completed; both of these tests were completed without the Dragon capsule attached to the launch vehicle stack. The mission passed its Launch Readiness Review on 5 October 2012.
The launch occurred on 8 October 2012 (UTC) and successfully placed the Dragon spacecraft into the proper orbit for arriving at the International Space Station with cargo resupply several days later. During the launch, one of the nine engines suffered a sudden loss of pressure about 80 seconds into the flight, and an immediate early shutdown of that engine occurred; debris could be seen in the telescopic video of the night launch. The remaining eight engines fired for a longer period of time and the flight control software adjusted the trajectory to insert Dragon into a near flawless orbit.
Dates are listed in UTC.
Flight day 1, launch (8 October)
The mission plan, as published by NASA before the mission, called for the Falcon 9 to reach supersonic speed at one minute, 10 seconds after liftoff, and pass through the area of maximum aerodynamic pressure, "max Q"—the point when mechanical stress on the rocket peaks due to a combination of the rocket's velocity and resistance created by the Earth's atmosphere—10 seconds later. The plan called for two of the first-stage engines to shut down to reduce the rocket's acceleration at approximately 2 minutes 30 seconds into the flight, when the Falcon 9 would nominally be 90 kilometers (56 miles) high and traveling at 10 times the speed of sound. The remaining engines were planned to cut off shortly after—an event known as main-engine cutoff (MECO). Five seconds after MECO, the first and second stages separate. Seven seconds later, the second stage's single Merlin vacuum engine was projected to ignite to begin a 6-minute, 14-second burn to put Dragon into low-Earth orbit. Forty seconds after second-stage ignition, Dragon's protective nose cone, which covers Dragon's berthing mechanism, was planned to be jettisoned. At the 9-minute, 14-second mark after launch, the second-stage engine was scheduled to cut off (SECO). Thirty-five seconds later, Dragon was planned to separate from Falcon 9's second stage and reach its preliminary orbit. Dragon would, per plan, then deploy its solar arrays and open its guidance and navigation control (GNC) bay door which holds the sensors necessary for rendezvous and Dragon's grapple fixture.
Flight day 2 (9 October)
Flight day 3 (10 October)
As Dragon chased the International Space Station, the spacecraft established UHF communication using its COTS ultrahigh-frequency Communication unit (CUCU). Also, using the crew command panel (CCP) on board the station, the expedition crew monitored the approach. This ability for the crew to send commands to Dragon is important during the rendezvous and departure phases of the mission.[failed verification]
During final approach to the station, a go/no-go was performed by Mission Control Houston and the SpaceX team in Hawthorne to allow Dragon to perform another engine burn that brought it 250 meters (820 feet) from the station. At this distance, Dragon began using its close-range guidance systems, composed of LIDAR and thermal imagers. These systems confirmed that Dragon's position and velocity are accurate by comparing the LIDAR image that Dragon receives against Dragon's thermal imagers. The Dragon flight control team in Hawthorne, with assistance from the NASA flight control team at the Johnson Space Center's International Space Station Flight Control Room, commanded the spacecraft to approach the station from its hold position. After another go/no-go was performed by the Houston and Hawthorne teams, Dragon was permitted to enter the keep-out sphere (KOS), an imaginary sphere drawn 200 meters (656 feet) around the station that reduces the risk of collision. Dragon proceeded to a position 30 meters (98 feet) from the station and was automatically held. Another go/no-go was completed. Then Dragon proceeded to the 10-meter (32 feet) position—the capture point. A final go/no-go was performed, and the Mission Control Houston team notified the crew they were go for capture of Dragon.[failed verification]
At that point, Expedition 33 crew member Akihiko Hoshide of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency used the station's 17.6-meter (58 ft) robotic arm, known as Canadarm2, reached for and grappled the Dragon spacecraft at 10:56 UTC. Hoshide, with the help of Expedition 33 Commander Sunita Williams of NASA, guided Dragon to the Earth-facing side of the station's Harmony module. Williams and Hoshide swapped places and Williams gently berthed Dragon to Harmony's Common Berthing Mechanism at 13:03 UTC.
The opening of the hatch between Dragon and the Harmony module, which was originally not scheduled to occur until 11 October, was moved up and occurred at 17:40 UTC.
Remainder of mission (11 to 28 October)
After its mission at the orbital laboratory was completed, newly arrived Expedition 33 Flight Engineer Kevin Ford used the Canadarm2 robotic arm to detach Dragon from Harmony, maneuver it out to the 15-meter (50-foot) release point, and release the vehicle. Dragon then performed a series of three burns to place it on a trajectory away from the station. Approximately six hours after Dragon departed the station, it conducted a deorbit burn, which lasted up to 10 minutes. Dragon's trunk, which contains its solar arrays, was then jettisoned.[failed verification]
The landing was controlled by automatic firing of its Draco thrusters during reentry.[failed verification] In a carefully timed sequence of events, dual drogue parachutes deploy at an altitude of 13,700 m (44,900 ft) to stabilize and slow the spacecraft. Full deployment of the drogues triggers the release of the three main parachutes, each 35 meters (116 feet) in diameter, at about 3,000 m (9,800 ft). While the drogues detach from the spacecraft, the main parachutes further slow the spacecraft's descent to approximately 4.8 to 5.4 meters per second (16 to 18 ft/s). Even if Dragon were to lose one of its main parachutes, the two remaining chutes would still permit a safe landing. The Dragon capsule is expected to land in the Pacific Ocean, about 450 km (280 mi) off the coast of southern California. SpaceX uses a 100-foot boat equipped with an A-frame and an articulating crane, a 90-foot crew boat for telemetry operations, and two 24-foot rigid-hull inflatable boats to perform recovery operations. On board are approximately a dozen SpaceX engineers and technicians as well as a four-person dive team. Once the Dragon capsule splashed down, the recovery team secured the vehicle and then placed it on deck for the journey back to shore.[failed verification]
SpaceX technicians opened the side hatch of the vehicle and retrieved the time-critical items. The critical cargo items were placed on a fast-boat for the 450-Kilometer trip back to California for eventual return to NASA that then took care of the precious science cargo and handle post-flight analysis of the samples. The rest of the cargo was unloaded once the Dragon capsule reached SpaceX's test facility in McGregor, Texas.
When launched the CRS-1 Dragon was filled with about 1,995 lb (905 kg) of cargo, 882 lb (400 kg) without packaging. Included was 260 lb (120 kg) of crew supplies, 390 lb (180 kg) of critical materials to support the 166 experiments on board the station and 66 new experiments, as well as 232 lb (105 kg) of hardware for the station as well as other miscellaneous items.
The Dragon returned 1,995 lb (905 kg) of cargo, 1,673 lb (759 kg) without packaging. Included was 163 lb (74 kg) of crew supplies, 866 lb (393 kg) of scientific experiments and experiment hardware, 518 lb (235 kg) of space station hardware, 68 lb (31 kg) of spacesuit equipment and 55 lb (25 kg) of miscellaneous items.
Although the secondary payload made it to the Dragon insertion orbit, an engine anomaly on one of the nine engines on the Falcon 9 first stage during the ascent resulted in automatic engine shutdown and a longer first-stage burn on the remaining eight engines to complete orbital insertion while subsequently increasing use of propellant over the nominal mission.
The primary payload contractor, NASA, requires a greater-than-99% estimated probability that the stage of any secondary payload on a similar orbital inclination to the International Space Station will reach their orbital altitude goal above the station. Due to the engine failure, the Falcon 9 used more propellant than intended, reducing the success probability estimate to approximately 95%. Because of this, the second stage did not attempt a second burn, and Orbcomm-G2 was left in an unusable orbit and burned up in Earth's atmosphere within 4 days after the launch.
Both SpaceX and Orbcomm were aware, prior to the mission, of the high risk that the secondary payload satellite could remain at the lower altitude of the Dragon insertion orbit, and that was a risk that Orbcomm agreed to take given the dramatically lower cost of launch for a secondary payload.
|Attempt||Planned||Result||Turnaround||Reason||Decision point||Weather go (%)||Notes|
|1||8 Oct 2012, 12:34:07 am||Partial Success: success for primary payload, failure for secondary payload||—||80||At one minute, 19 seconds into the launch, Engine 1 lost pressure and was commanded by the rocket to shut down. Due to the engine failure on the first stage, safety protocols for rendezvous with the ISS prevented the secondary-payload Orbcomm Satellite from being placed in the correct orbit.|
Falcon 9 engine anomaly
During the ascent, 79 seconds after launch, an engine anomaly occurred with one of the nine engines on the Falcon 9 first stage. SpaceX has emphasized for several years that the Falcon 9 first stage is designed for "engine out" capability, with the capability to shut down one or more malfunctioning engines and still make a successful ascent. In the event, the SpaceX CRS-1's first stage shut down engine no. 1, and as a result continued the first-stage burn on the remaining eight engines longer than usual at a somewhat reduced thrust to insert the Dragon spacecraft into the proper orbit. Although unintended, this was the first inflight demonstration of Falcon 9's "engine out" design, and "provides a clear demonstration of the engine out capability."
In response to the anomaly, NASA and SpaceX jointly formed the CRS-1 Post-Flight Investigation Board. Preliminary information from the post-flight review board indicates that the Engine no. 1 fuel dome, above the nozzle, ruptured but did not explode. The burning fuel that exited before the engine was shut down caused the fairing rupture, as seen in the flight video recordings. Subsequent investigations revealed in a Congressional hearing pinpointed the issue as a result of an undetected material flaw in the engine chamber jacket, likely introduced during engine production. During flight, the data suggests this material flaw ultimately developed into a breach in the main combustion chamber. This breach released a jet of hot gas and fuel in the direction of the main fuel line causing a secondary leak and ultimately a rapid drop in engine pressure. As a result, the flight computer commanded shutdown of engine 1 and Falcon 9 continued on its path to ensure Dragon's entry into orbit for subsequent rendezvous and berthing with the ISS.
- NASA Education Hour. Television: NASA TV. 8 October 2012.
- "SpaceX, NASA Target Oct. 7 Launch For Resupply Mission To Space Station". NASA. 20 September 2012. Retrieved 26 September 2012.
- "SpaceX Launch Manifest". SpaceX. Retrieved 31 May 2012.
- "NASA's Consolidated Launch Schedule". NASA. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (28 October 2012). "Return of the Dragon: Commercial craft back home". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (10 October 2012). "Dragon arrives at station with commercial delivery". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
- Carreau, Mark (28 October 2012). "SpaceX Dragon CRS-1 Capsule Departs Space Station". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 6 October 2012. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
- Hartman, Dan (23 July 2012). "International Space Station Program Status" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
- Pasztor, Andy (7 July 2012). "SpaceX Launches Cargo Flight to Space Station". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (5 October 2012). "Commercial resupply of space station blasts off Sunday". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (18 May 2012). "SpaceX's historic commercial mission is 'just a test flight'". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 25 August 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (24 August 2012). "NASA ready for operational cargo flights by SpaceX". SpaceFlightNow. Retrieved 25 August 2012.
- Bergin, Chris (31 August 2012). "SpaceX conduct successful WDR on their latest Falcon 9". NASASpaceFlight (not associated with NASA). Retrieved 1 September 2012.
- Bergin, Chris (29 September 2012). "Falcon 9 hot fires its engines as the ISS prepares for Dragon's arrival". NASASpaceFlight (not associated with NASA). Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- Foust, Jeff (8 October 2012). "Commercial spaceflight gets down to business". The Space Review. Retrieved 10 October 2012.
- "SpX CRS-1 Mission Press Kit" (PDF). NASA, SpaceX, 45th Space Wing. 4 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
- "Dragon CRS-1 Mission Updates". SPACEFLIGHT101. Archived from the original on 12 February 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
- "Dragon Mission Report | Return of the Dragon: Commercial craft back home". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
- "Orbcomm Eagerly Awaits Launch of New Satellite on Next Falcon 9" (Press release). Space News. 25 May 2012. Retrieved 28 May 2012.
- Hartman, Dan (23 July 2012). "International Space Station Program Status" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
- Clark, Stephen (11 October 2012). "Orbcomm craft falls to Earth, company claims total loss". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 11 October 2012.
- Lindsey, Clark (10 October 2012). "SpaceX CRS-1: SpaceX statement - review of 1st stage engine failure". NewSpace Watch. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013.
- de Selding, Peter B. (11 October 2012). "Orbcomm Craft Launched by Falcon 9 Falls out of Orbit". Space News. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
Orbcomm requested that SpaceX carry one of their small satellites (weighing a few hundred pounds, vs. Dragon at over 12,000 pounds)... The higher the orbit, the more test data [Orbcomm] can gather, so they requested that we attempt to restart and raise altitude. NASA agreed to allow that, but only on condition that there be substantial propellant reserves, since the orbit would be close to the space station. It is important to appreciate that Orbcomm understood from the beginning that the orbit-raising maneuver was tentative. They accepted that there was a high risk of their satellite remaining at the Dragon insertion orbit. SpaceX would not have agreed to fly their satellite otherwise, since this was not part of the core mission and there was a known, material risk of no altitude raise.
- Orbcomm craft falls to Earth, company claims total loss
- "'Everything is Looking Real Good for Launch'". NASA. 7 October 2012. Retrieved 7 October 2012.
- "SPACEX CRS-1 MISSION UPDATE". Retrieved 9 October 2012.
- "ORBCOMM LAUNCHES PROTOTYPE OG2 SATELLITE" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
- Money, Stewart (9 October 2012). "Falcon 9 Loses an Engine (and Fairing), Demonstrates Resiliance". Innerspace. Retrieved 10 October 2012.
provides a clear demonstration of the engine out capability.
- "Falcon 9 Overview". SpaceX. 8 May 2010.
- Lindsey, Clark (8 October 2012). "SpaceX CRS-1: Post conference press conference". NewSpace Watch. Archived from the original on 17 December 2012.
- Hennigan, WJ (8 October 2012). "SpaceX rocket engine shuts down during launch to station". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
- Svitak, Amy (26 November 2012). "Falcon 9 RUD?". Aviation Week. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
- Lindsey, Clark (12 October 2012). "SpaceX CRS-1: Review board formed to investigate engine failure". NewSpace Watch. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013.
- Bergin, Chris (19 October 2012). "Dragon enjoying ISS stay, despite minor issues – Falcon 9 investigation begins". NASAspaceflight.com. Retrieved 21 October 2012.
The first stage issue related to Engine 1, one of nine Merlin 1Cs, after – it is understood – the fuel dome above the nozzle ruptured. The engine did not explode, but did cause the fairing that protects the engine from aerodynamic loads to rupture and fall away from the vehicle due to the engine pressure release.
- "SpaceX: Engine Anomaly Overview". Aviationweek.com. Retrieved 8 October 2013.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to SpaceX CRS-1.|
- SpaceX CRS-1 NASA page
- SpaceX CRS-1 Mission Press Kit (4 October 2012)
- Video of Static Fire test - YouTube (spacexchannel)
- Video of Launch - YouTube (spacexchannel)
- Video of Approach, Grappling and Berthing of Dragon - YouTube (ReelNASA)
- Video of Hatch Opening - YouTube (NASATelevision)
- Video of Dragon Splashdown - YouTube (spacexchannel)