|This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
There are typically fewer state senators than there are members of a state's lower house. In the past, this meant that senators represented various geographic regions within a state, regardless of the population, as a way of balancing the power of the lower house, which was apportioned according to population.
This system changed in 1963, when the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that state legislatures must apportion seats in both houses according to population. However, the Single-member District system remained, and as a result, the State Senates became redundant bodies, as other solutions, such as abolition (as in Canada) or switching to statewide proportional representation (as in Australia) were not considered. A senator's job is to represent the people at a higher level than a state representative in the lower house.
- http://www.pe.com/2011/12/17/california-do-we-need-state-senators/. Missing or empty
|title=(help); External link in
- See Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)
|This article related to the politics of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|