Stegosauridae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Stegosaurids
Temporal range:
Middle Jurassic - Early Cretaceous,165–136 Ma
Journal.pone.0138352.g001A.jpg
Mounted skeleton of Stegosaurus specimen Natural History Museum, London
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Order: Ornithischia
Clade: Eurypoda
Suborder: Stegosauria
Family: Stegosauridae
Marsh, 1880
Subgroups

Stegosauridae is a clade of Thyreophoran dinosaurs (armoured dinosaurs) within the suborder Stegosauria. The clade is defined as all species of dinosaurs more closely related to Stegosaurus than Huayangosaurus.[1] The name ‘Stegosauridae’ is thus a stem-based name taken from the well-represented genus – Stegosaurus (meaning ‘roofed lizard’).[2] Fossil evidence of stegosaurids, dating from the Middle Jurassic through the Late Cretaceous, have been recovered from North America, Eurasia and Africa. On the other hand, Stegosauridae’s sister clade, huayangosaurids, can be traced only to the Middle Jurassic.[3][4]

The clade Stegosauridae is composed of the genera Stegosaurus, Dacentrurus, Miragaia, Loricatosaurus, and Kentrosaurus, with the last considered to be at the base of the clade.[5] The stegosaurids like all other stegosaurians were quadrupedal herbivores that exhibited the characteristic stegosaurian dorsal dermal plates. These large, thin, erect plates are thought to be aligned parasagittally from the neck to near the end of the tail, where they give way to paired of spikes.[2][4] Although defense, thermo-regulation and display have been theorized to be the possible functions of these dorsal plates, a study of the ontogenetic histology of the plates and spikes suggests that the plates serve different functions at different stages of the stegosaurids’ life histories. The terminal spikes in the tail are thought to have been used in old adults, at least, as a weapon for defence.[6] However, the function of stegosaurid plates and spikes, at different life stages, still remains a matter of great debate.

Stegosaurids are distinguished from huayangosaurids in that the former have lost the plesiomorphic pre-maxillary teeth and lateral scute rows along the trunk.[7] Furthermore, stegosaurids as opposed to huayangosaurids have long narrow skulls and longer hindlimbs compared to their forelimbs.[4] However, these two features are not diagnostic of Stegosauridae because they may also be present in non-stegosaurids other than huayangosaurids.[1]

Classification[edit]

Illustration comparing three stegosaurids by Danny Cicchetti, 2013.

In 1877, Othniel Marsh discovered and named Stegosaurus armatus, from which the name of the family ‘Stegosauridae’ was erected in 1880.[5] In comparison to Huayangosauridae, notable synapomorphies of Stegosauridae include a large antitrochanter (supracetabular process) in the ilium, a long prepubic process and long femur relative to the length of the humerus.[8] Furthermore, stegosaurid sacral ribs are T-shaped in parasagittal cross-section[1] and the dorsal vertebrae have an elongated neural arch.[5]

Stegosaurid specimens originally described under the genera Wuerhosaurus and Hesperosaurus were referred to the genus Stegosaurus, under the names Stegosaurus homheni and Stegosaurus mjosi, respectively, by Maidment et al (2010).[5] Furthermore, many Stegosaurus specimens that were previously believed to from different species, within the genus, were all assigned to Stegosaurus armatus. This reclassification of the specimens occurred after finding that all differences between specimens could be explained by intraspecific variation.[5]

The structure of the stegosaurid family tree has been debated for a while. However, in two of the most extensive cladistics analyses of Stegosauria conducted to date, both Mateus et al. (2009)[9] and Maidment (2010)[5] present similar phylogenetic relationships within Stegosauridae (shown below). The well-resolved phylogenies place the newly discovered long-necked stegosaurid Miragaia as sister taxa to Dacentrurus forming the clade Dacentrurinae. Mateus et al. note that in both Miragaia and Dacentrurus, the cervical rib projects posteriorly and the anterior pubic process is dorsoventrally deep and bears a dorsal projection at its anterior tip in lateral view. Their phylogeny also points to a sister-group relationship between the new clade Dacentrurinae and the genus Stegosaurus, supported by the shared presence of postzygapophyses on cervical vertebrae that are elongate and project posterior to the posterior centrum facet. Dacentrurus was previously considered to be a basal stegosaurid, but the discovery and observation of Miragaia has suggested that it is a derived taxon.[9]

Stegosauria

Tuojiangosaurus



Paranthodon



Gigantspinosaurus


Huayangosauridae

Huayangosaurus



Chungkingosaurus



Stegosauridae


Kentrosaurus




Loricatosaurus



Dacentrurinae

Dacentrurus



Miragaia



Stegosaurinae

Stegosaurus armatus




Stegosaurus homheni



Stegosaurus mjosi









Anatomy[edit]

General Features[edit]

The cranial remains of stegosaurids, like all stegosaurians, are rarely discovered.[7] Hence, a significant portion of the knowledge of their skull morphology comes from few complete skulls discovered of Stegosaurus and fragmentary remains of other stegosaurids. In general, stegosaurids have proportionally long, low and narrow snouts with a deep mandible, compared to that of Huayangosaurus. Stegosaurids also lack premaxillary teeth.[7]

Among stegosaurids, only Kentrosaurus has been found with parascapular spines, which project posteriorly out of the lower part of the shoulder plates. These spines are long, rounded and comma-shaped in lateral view and have an enlarged base.[10] Loricatosaurus was also believed to have a parascapular spine, but Maidment et al. (2008)[10] observed that the discovered specimen, from which the spine is described, has a completely different morphology than the parascapular spine specimens of other stegosaurs. They suggest it may be a fragmentary tail spine instead. The genuine absence of parascapular spines in other stegosaurids is considered a secondary loss since many basal stegosaurs like Gigantospinosaurus and Huayangosaurus have been discovered with them.[10]

Stegosaurids also lack lateral scute rows that run longitudinally on either side of the trunk in huayangosaurids and ankylosaurs, indicating yet another secondary loss of a plesiomorphic characters.[7] However, the absence of lateral scutes as well as pre-maxillary teeth mentioned above are not specifically diagnostic of stegosaurids, since these features are also present in other non-huayangosaurid stegosaurs, whose phylogenetic relations within Stegosauria are unclear.[7][10]

Plates and Spikes[edit]

Stegosaurids exhibit the characteristic dorsal osteoderms, found in all stegosaurs, in the form of erect plates and spines. Stegosaurid plates have a thick base and central portion, but are transversely thin elsewhere. The plates become remarkably large and thin in Stegosaurus. They are found in varying sizes along the dorsum, with the central region of the back usually having the largest and tallest plates. The arrangement of these parasagittal dorsal plates has been intensely debated in the past. Marsh suggested a single median row of plates running post-cranially along the longitudinal axis[11] and Lull argued in favour of bilaterally paired arrangement throughout the series.[12] Current scientific consensus lies in the arrangement proposed by Gilmore - two parasagittal rows of staggered alternates, after the discovery of an almost complete skeleton preserved in this manner in rock.[13] Furthermore, no two plates share the same size and shape, making the possibility of bilaterally paired rows even less likely. Plates are usually found with distinct vascular grooves on their lateral surfaces, suggesting the presence of a circulatory network. Stegosaurids also have osteoderms on the throat in the form of small depressed ossicles and two pairs of elongated spike-like tail-spines.[1]

In an ontogenetic histological analysis of Stegosaurus plates and spikes, Hayashi et al. (2012)[6] examined their structure and function through juveniles to old adults. They found that throughout the ontogeny, the dorsal osteoderms are composed of dense ossified collagen fibres in both the cortical and cancellous sections of the bone, suggesting that plates and spikes are formed from the direct mineralization of already existing fibrous networks in the skin. However, the many structural features, seen in the spikes and plates of old adults specimens, are acquired at different stages of development. Extensive vascular networks form in the plates during the change from juveniles to young adults and persist in old adults but spikes acquire a thick cortex with a large axial vascular channel only in old adults. Hayashi et al. argue that the formation of nourishing vascular networks in young adults supported the growth of large plates. This would have enhanced the size of the animal, which may have helped attract mates and deter rivals.[6] Furthermore, the presence of the vascular networks in the plates of the young adult indicate a secondary use of the plates as a thermoregulatory device for heat loss much like the elephant ear, toucan bill or alligator osteoderms. The thickening of the cortical section of the bone and the compaction of bone in the terminal tail-spikes in old adults suggest that they were used as defence weapons, but not until an ontogenetically late stage. The development of the large axial channel in old adults from small canals in young adults, facilitated the further enlargement of the spikes by increasing the amount of nourishment supplied. On the other hand, plates do not show a similar degree of bone compaction or cortical thickening indicating they would not be capable of taking much weight from above. This suggests they were not as important as spikes in active defense.[6]

The protective nature of dorsal plates has also been questioned in the past Davitashvili (1961) noted that narrow dorsal location of the plates still left the sides vulnerable. Since the pattern of plates and spines vary between species, he suggested it could be important for intraspecific recognition and as a display for sexual selection.[1] This is corroborated by Spassov’s (1982) observations that the plates are arranged for maximum visible effect when viewed laterally during non-aggressive agonistic behaviour, as opposed to from a head-on aggressive stance.[14]

The discovery of an impression of the skin covering the dorsal plates has implications for all possible functions of stegosaurian plates. Christiansen and Tschopp (2010)[15] found that the skin was smooth with long, parallel, shallow grooves indicating a keratinous structure covering the plates. The addition of beta-keratin, a strong protein, would indeed allow the plates to bear more weight, suggesting they may have been used for active defense. A keratinous covering would also allow greater surface area for the plates to be uses as a mating display structures, which could be potentially coloured like the beaks of modern birds. At the same time this finding implies that the use of plates for thermo-regulation may be less likely because the keratinous covering would make heat transfer from the bone highly ineffective.[15]

Posture[edit]

A digital articulation and manipulation of digital scans of specimen material of Kentrosaurus inferred that stegosaurids may have used an erect limb posture, like that of most mammals, for habitual locomotion while using a sprawled crocodilian pose for defensive behavior. The sprawled pose would allow them to tolerate the large lateral forces used in swinging the spiked-tailed against predators as a clubbing device.[16]

Paleoecology and Behaviour[edit]

Sexual Dimorphism[edit]

There have been several findings of possible sexual dimorphism in stegosaurids. Saitta (2015)[17] presents evidence of two morphs of Stegosaurus dorsal plates, with one morph having a wide, oval plate with a surface area 45% larger than the narrow, tall morph. Considering that dorsal plates most likely functioned as display structures and that the wide oval shape allowed a broad continuous display, Saitta assigns the wider morph with larger surface area as male.

The wide morph exhibits more overlap between adjacent plates than does the tall morph, leading to a more continuous display surface. Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of plates might have also occurred with other sexual differences such as sexual dichromatism.

Kevin Padian, a paleontologist at the University of California, Berkeley, remarked that Saitta had misidentified features in his specimen’s bone tissue sections and said “there’s no evidence the animal has stopped growing”. Paidan also expressed ethical concerns about the use of private specimens in the study.[18]

Kentrosaurus, Dacentrurus and Stegosaurus are also suggested to have exhibited dimorphism in the form of three extra sacral ribs in the females.[1]

Feeding[edit]

In order to explore the feeding habits of stegosaurids, Reichel (2010)[19] created a 3-D model of Stegosaurus teeth using the software ZBrush. The model finds that the bite forces of Stegosaurus was significantly weaker than that of Labradors, wolves and humans. The finding suggests that these dinosaurs would be capable of breaking smaller branches and leaves with their teeth, but would not be able to bite through a thick object (12mm or more in diameter). Parrish et al.’s (2004)[20] description of Jurassic flora in the stegosaurid-rich Morrison Formation supports this finding. The flora during this time-period was dominated by seasonal small, fast-growing herbaceous plants, which stegosaurids could consume easily if Reichel’s reconstruction is accurate.[19]

Mallison (2010)[16] suggested that Kentrosaurus may have used a tripodal stance on their hindlimbs and tail to double the foraging height from the general low browsing height under one metre for stegosaurids. This challenged the view that stegosaurs are primarily low vegetation feeders because of their small heads, short necks and short forelimbs, since the tripodal stance would also give them access to young trees and high bushes.

Another piece of evidence suggesting that some stegosaurids may have consumed more than just low vegetation was the discovery of the long-necked stegosaurid Miragaia longicollum. This dinosaur’s neck has at least 17 cervical vertebrae achieved through the transformation of thoracic vertebrae into cervical vertebrae and possible lengthening of the centrum. This is more than most sauropod dinosaurs, which also achieved the elongation of the neck through similar mechanisms and had access to fodder higher off the ground.[9]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f David B. Weishampel, Peter Dodson, Halszka Osmólska. The Dinosauria (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  2. ^ a b Billon-Bruyat, Jean-Paul; Marty, Daniel (2010-09-04). "Preface: Symposium on Stegosauria proceedings". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 103 (2): 139–141. doi:10.1007/s00015-010-0027-z. ISSN 1661-8726. 
  3. ^ Ulansky R. E., 2014. Dinosaurs Classification. Basal Thyreophora & Stegosauria. Dinologia,
  4. ^ a b c Sereno, Paul C. (1999-06-25). "The Evolution of Dinosaurs". Science. 284 (5423): 2137–2147. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2137. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 10381873. 
  5. ^ a b c d e f Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2010-09-07). "Stegosauria: a historical review of the body fossil record and phylogenetic relationships". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 103 (2): 199–210. doi:10.1007/s00015-010-0023-3. ISSN 1661-8726. 
  6. ^ a b c d Hayashi, Shoji; Carpenter, Kenneth; Watabe, Mahito; McWHINNEY, Lorrie A. (2012-01-01). "Ontogenetic histology of Stegosaurus plates and spikes". Palaeontology. 55 (1): 145–161. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01122.x. ISSN 1475-4983. 
  7. ^ a b c d e Sereno, Paul C., and Dong Zhimin. "The Skull of the Basal Stegosaur Huayangosaurus Taibaii and a Cladistic Diagnosis of Stegosauria." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12, no. 3 (1992): 318-43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4523456.
  8. ^ David E. Fastovsky , David B. Weishampel. The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs. p. 123
  9. ^ a b c Mateus, Octávio; Maidment, Susannah C. R.; Christiansen, Nicolai A. (2009-05-22). "A new long-necked 'sauropod-mimic' stegosaur and the evolution of the plated dinosaurs". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1663): 1815–1821. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1909. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 2674496free to read. PMID 19324778. 
  10. ^ a b c d Maidment, Susannah C. R.; Norman, David B.; Barrett, Paul M.; Upchurch, Paul (2008-01-01). "Systematics and phylogeny of Stegosauria (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 6 (4): 367–407. doi:10.1017/S1477201908002459. ISSN 1477-2019. 
  11. ^ Marsh, O. C. (1891). Restoration of Stegosaurus. American Journal of Science, 3rd series, 42, 179–182.
  12. ^ Lull, R. S. (1910a). Stegosaurus ungulatus Marsh, recently mounted at the Peabody Museum of Yale University. American Journal of Science, 4th series, 30, 361–377
  13. ^ Gilmore, C. W. (1914). Osteology of the armored Dinosauria in the United States National Museum, with special reference to the genus Stegosaurus. United States National Museum Bulletin, 89, 1–143.
  14. ^ Spassov, N. B. (1982). The ‘‘bizarre’’ dorsal plates of stegosaurs: ethological approach. Comptes rendus de l’academie bulgare des Sciences, 35, 367–370.
  15. ^ a b Christiansen, Nicolai A.; Tschopp, Emanuel (2010-09-07). "Exceptional stegosaur integument impressions from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Wyoming". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 103 (2): 163–171. doi:10.1007/s00015-010-0026-0. ISSN 1661-8726. 
  16. ^ a b Mallison, Heinrich (2010-09-07). "CAD assessment of the posture and range of motion of Kentrosaurus aethiopicus Hennig 1915". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 103 (2): 211–233. doi:10.1007/s00015-010-0024-2. ISSN 1661-8726. 
  17. ^ Saitta, Evan Thomas (2015-04-22). "Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism in the Plated Dinosaur Stegosaurus mjosi (Ornithischia, Stegosauria) from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Western USA". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0123503. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123503. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4406738free to read. PMID 25901727. 
  18. ^ "Dino 'sexing' study slammed by critics". Science | AAAS. 2015-04-22. Retrieved 2016-06-04. 
  19. ^ a b Reichel, Miriam (2010-08-31). "A model for the bite mechanics in the herbivorous dinosaur Stegosaurus (Ornithischia, Stegosauridae)". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 103 (2): 235–240. doi:10.1007/s00015-010-0025-1. ISSN 1661-8726. 
  20. ^ Parrish, Judith Totman; Peterson, Fred; Turner, Christine E (2004-05-15). "Jurassic "savannah"—plant taphonomy and climate of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic, Western USA)". Sedimentary Geology. Reconstruction of the Extinct Ecosystem of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. 167 (3–4): 137–162. doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.01.004.