Stephen Gray (scientist)
Canterbury, Kent, England
|Died||7 February 1736 (aged 69)
|Institutions||Trinity College, Cambridge|
|Academic advisors||Roger Cotes
John Theophilus Desaguliers
|Known for||Being the 'father' of electricity
|Notable awards||Copley medal (1731, 1732)|
Stephen Gray (December 1666 – 7 February 1736) was an English dyer and astronomer who was the first to systematically experiment with electrical conduction. Until his work in 1729 the emphasis had been on the simple generation of static charges and investigations of the static phenomena (electric shocks, plasma glows, etc). He also first made the distinction between conduction and insulation, and discovered the action-at-a-distance phenomenon of electrostatic induction.
Gray was born in Canterbury, Kent and after some basic schooling, he was apprenticed to his father (and later his elder brother) in the cloth-dyeing trade. His interests lay with natural science and particularly with astronomy, and he managed to educate himself in these developing disciplines, mainly through wealthy friends in the district who gave him access to their libraries and scientific instruments. Science was very much a rich-man's hobby at this time.
He ground his own lenses and constructed his own telescope, and with this instrument he made a number of minor discoveries (mainly in the area of sunspots), gaining a reputation for accuracy in his observations. Some of his reports were published by the Royal Society through the agency of a friend Henry Hunt who was a member of the Society's secretarial staff.
Introduction to Flamsteed
Some of this material came to the notice of John Flamsteed (who was related to some Kent friends of Gray) the first English Astronomer Royal, who was building the new observatory at Greenwich. Flamsteed was attempting to construct a detailed and accurate star-map of the heavens, in the hope that this would eventually solve the problem of longitude determination for ocean navigators. Gray helped him with many of the observations and calculations (possibly without being paid).
Gray and Flamsteed became constant correspondents and friends, and this seems to have created problems for Gray in being accepted formally into the world of science. Flamsteed was involved in a prolonged dispute (more like a 'heated battle') with Sir Isaac Newton over access to preliminary star-chart data. This boiled over and became a factional war in the Royal Society, which Newton dominated (virtually excluding Flamsteed and his associates) for decades.
Gray worked for a while on the second English observatory being built at Cambridge, but it was badly managed by Newton's friend and associate Roger Cotes, and finally the project collapsed leaving Gray with little option but to return to his dyeing trade in Canterbury. His health was a problem, and before long he was in London assisting Dr John Theophilus Desaguliers, an acolyte of Isaac Newton and occasionally one of the Royal Society' demonstrators. Desaguliers acted as a scientific consultant and gave lectures around the country (and on the Continent) about new scientific discoveries: he also ran a boarding house for visiting gentlemen with scientific interests. Gray was not paid by Desaguliers, but provided with accommodation in exchange for his ability to discuss scientific subjects with the boarders.
Desaguliers boarding house was demolished to make way for Westminster Bridge, and poverty intervened for Gray. In 1720, through the efforts of John Flamsteed and Sir Hans Sloane (later President of the Royal Society) he managed to obtain a pensioned position at the Charterhouse in London (a home for destitute gentlemen who had served their country), also linked to a boys' school. During this time he began experimenting again with static electricity, using a glass tube as a friction generator.
One night, in his Charterhouse rooms, he noticed that the cork at the end of his tube (needed to keep moisture and dust out) generated an attractive force on small pieces of paper and chaff when the tube was rubbed. Normally the cork would not have carried an electrical charge, but climatic conditions and variations in the materials meant that the cork was accumulating charge. When he extended the cork with a small fir stick plugged into the middle, the charge manifested itself at the end of the stick, and then on an ivory ball (perforated with a hole) he had stuck on the end. So he tried longer sticks, and finally he added a length of an oily hemp pack-thread connected to the ivory ball. In the process he had discovered that the "electric virtue" was not just a 'static' phenomenon (like a local pin-prick), but rather a fluid-like substance that would carry over distance. The terminating ivory ball would still act to attract light objects in the same way as the electrified glass tube.
Over the next few days he extended the reach of his thread-wire (he only had a short piece of wire, and did not understand the significance of metal as a conductor) and found that it would carry from his balcony down into the courtyard below. He discovered that electricity would travel around bends in the thread and that it appeared unaffected by gravity. He was also able to transmit charges to metal objects (poker, tongs, kettle, etc) which were generally regarded in those days as 'non-electrics' because they couldn't generate or hold static charge. He also discovered that silk would not carry the 'virtue', while the thicker pack-thread and wire could.
Then between 30 June and 2 July 1729 while in Kent he extended this first electrical network and made many new discoveries. On a visit to the Reverend Granville Wheler, (a wealthy friend, member of the Royal Society and Famsteed's relative), the two men extended the conduction experiments through pack-thread laced up and down the length of a large gallery in Wheler's manor house. In the process, Gray and Wheler discovered the importance of insulating their thread 'conductor' from earth contact (the wall of the house) by using silk for suspension. They noticed that if wire was used to support the pack-thread, all the 'electrical virtue' leaked away. Initially they thought the difference was due to the relative thicknesses of the silk, thread and wire, but later they realised that silk itself was much less conducting than the wire—so they used only silk to support (and thereby insulate) the hemp pack-thread used as their main conductor.
The next day they dropped the thread from the house tower to the garden and then extended it out across a paddock to a distance of 800 feet using paired garden-stakes with short spans of silk to keep the pack-thread from touching the ground.:242–247 Wheler reported this to many of his Royal Society friends, and Gray wrote the full details in a letter to John Desaguliers.
From these experiments came an understanding of the role played by conductors and insulators (names applied by John Desaguliers). The French scientists, the Abbe Nollet and C.F. du Fay, visited Gray and Wheler in 1732, saw the experiment, and returned to France where du Fay formulated the first comprehensive theory of electricity called the "two-fluid" theory. This theory was championed by the Abbé Nollet and accepted by most experimenters in Europe for a time, but later it was refined and then superseded by the ideas of the English experimenters Beavis and Watson who were in correspondence with Benjamin Franklin's group in Philadelphia. They jointly devised theory of a single-fluid/two-states—virtually the super-abundance or absence of one fluid—which Watson later termed positive and negative. These ideas fitted the facts slightly better than the two-fluid concept, especially after the invention of the Leyden Jar, and so this single-fluid theory eventually prevailed. We now know that both were almost equally incorrect.
Gray went on to make more electrical discoveries, the most noticeable being electrical induction (creating an electrical charge in a suspended object without contact). This experiment was widely celebrated around Europe as the famous "Flying Boy" demonstration: a boy was suspended on silk cords, and then charged by Gray bringing his rubbed tube (static electric generator) close to the boy's feet, but without touching. Gray showed that the boy's face and hands still attracted chaff, paper, etc. Gray certainly realised that the phenomenon of 'electric virtue' was the same as lightning (as did most experimenters), many years before Franklin (supposedly) flew his kite and the French experimenters Dilibard and Delor captured a charge from lightning in a Leyden Jar.
When Sloane took over the Royal Society on Newton's death, Gray belatedly received the recognition denied him previously. Gray was too poor to pay the dues so he was not a member of the Royal Society, and many of his experiments had been taken up and became part of the demonstration repertoire of John Desaguliers. There is also a story that he was denied recognition by the Newton faction within the Royal Society because of his links to Flamsteed (who was constantly in dispute with Isaac Newton), but this can be dismissed as highly unlikely: Newton died in March 1727 nearly two years before Gray began his conduction experiments, and Hans Sloan, who ran the Royal Society after Newton's death was a friend and financial supporter of Gray. The fact is that electricity was not considered that important at the time, and the Society's magazine was not published for a couple of years due to financial constraints.
Sloan took an active part in promoting Gray who received the Royal Society's first Copley Medal in 1731 for his work on conduction and insulation, and also its second in 1732 for the induction experiments. In 1732 the Royal Society also admitted him as an honorary member, and he died destitute a few years later in 1736.
After his death
Despite the importance of his discoveries (it can be argued that he was the inventor of electrical communications) he received little credit, supposedly because of the factional dispute in the Royal Society, and the dominance of Newtonianism (which became the Free Masonic 'ideology'). John Desaguliers was far more famous than Gray, and many of the discoveries became attached to the Desaguliers' name by virtue of his flamboyant demonstrations. By the time Gray's priority was publicly recognised, experiments in electricity had moved on and people were interested more in the spectacular feats by Franklin and others in capturing lightning in their Leyden Jars. So Gray's discoveries tended to look trivial, and for this reason, some historians tend to overlook his work.
There is no monument to Gray, and little recognition of what he achieved in his scientific discoveries. He is believed to be buried in a common grave in an old London cemetery, in an area reserved for pauper pensioners from the Charterhouse.
- Michael Ben-Chaim, 'Gray, Stephen', Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004
- Bernal, John Desmond (1997). A History of Classical Physics: From Antiquity to the Quantum, p. 284. Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 0-7607-0601-8.
- Heilbron. Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics.
- Benjamin, Park (1898). A History of Electricity (the Intellectual Rise in Electricity) from Antiquity to the Days of Benjamin Franklin, pp. 470–71. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- David H. Clark & Stephen H.P. Clark, Newton's Tyranny: The Suppressed Scientific Discoveries of Stephen Gray and John Flamsteed, W. H. Freeman, 2001 ISBN 0-7167-4701-4 Reviewed in "Review of Newton's Tyranny: The Suppressed Scientific Discoveries of Stephen Gray and John Flamsteed (AIAA)". Retrieved 2016-10-21.; "Newton's Tyranny: The Suppressed Scientific Discoveries of Stephen Gray and John Flamsteed - Mark Silverman". Retrieved 2016-10-21..
- Cohen, I. Bernard (1954-05-01). "Neglected Sources for the Life of Stephen Gray (1666 or 1667-1736)". Isis. 45 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1086/348285. ISSN 0021-1753.
- "Stephen Gray: the First Copley Medallist". Nature. 1936-02-22.
- Sergio Luiz Bragatto Boss; Joao Jose Caluzi (2010). "Uma breve biografia de Stephen Gray (1666-1736)". Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica. 32 (1): 1602.
- Clark, David H.; Murdin, Lesley (1979). "The enigma of Stephen Gray astronomer and scientist (1666–1736)". Vistas in Astronomy. 23: 351–404. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(79)90018-7.
- David R Lewis (2015). "STEPHEN GRAY (1666-1736) Canterbury dyer and amateur scientist".
- "The Galileo Project: Stephen Gray". Retrieved 2016-10-21.