Stock photography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A public domain stock photo titled "frog on palm frond."

Stock photography is the supply of photographs, which are often licensed for specific uses.[1] The stock photo industry, which began to gain hold in the 1920s,[1] has established models including traditional macrostock photography,[2] midstock photography,[3] and microstock photography.[4] Conventional stock agencies charge from several hundred to several thousand American dollars per image, while microstock photography may sell for around USD 25 cents.[4] Professional stock photographers traditionally place their images with one or more stock agencies on a contractual basis,[1] while stock agencies may accept the high-quality photos of amateur photographers through online submission.[5]

Themes for stock photos are diverse, although Megan Garber of The Atlantic wrote in 2012 that "one of the more wacky/wondrous elements of stock photos is the manner in which, as a genre, they've developed a unifying editorial sensibility. To see a stock image is... to know you're seeing a stock image."[5] Historically notable traditional stock photo agencies have included RobertStock, the Bettman Archive in New York,[1] and the Hulton Archive in the United Kingdom[6] among many others.[7] In the 1990s companies such as Photodisc in Seattle, Washington began selling CD ROMs with packs of images, pioneering the royalty free licensing system at a time when rights managed licensing was the norm in the stock industry.[7] There was a great amount of consolidation among stock photo agencies[8][9] between 1990 and the mid-2000s, particularly through Corbis and Getty Images.[1] The early microstock company iStockphoto was founded in May 2000,[10] followed by companies such as Dreamstime,[11] fotoLibra,[12][13] Can Stock Photo,[14] Shutterstock, and Fotolia.[15]

History[edit]

First stock photo companies (1920-1930s)[edit]

A stock photograph, now in the archive of Getty Images, showing the 1911 Solvay Conference in Belgium. Many stock photos document historical events.

Newspapers and magazines were first able to reproduce photographs instead of line drawings in the mid-1880s with the invention of the half-tone printing press.[16] Initially starting with staff photographers, eventually independent free-lance photographers took over.[16] One of the first examples of a stock photo was circa 1920, when American photographer H. Armstrong Roberts ensured the people photographed in "Group in Front of Tri-Motor Airplane" all signed model releases. This allowed the photograph and others like it to be commercially viable.[1] In an effort to save the cost of hiring photographers for commission-based photo shoots, publishers and advertisers began to consider stock photos as a less risky alternative.[7] One of the first major stock photography libraries[7] was founded in 1920 by H. Armstrong Roberts.[citation needed]

The Bettman Archive in New York is an example of an early traditional stock agency,[1] with the company delivering photos upon 24-hour request to magazines such as Look and Life.[1] Founded in 1936 by Otto Bettmann, a German curator who emigrated to the United States in 1935,[17] the Bettman Archive began with Bettmann's personal collection of 15,000 images which he brought with him in suitcases when he escaped from Nazi Germany.[18] He actively expanded his collection by placing ads in magazines for stills and photos.[17] A different early pioneer with the stock industry was photographer Tony Stone, whose portfolio of mountain scenes proved popular with chocolate advertisers. Stone's stock library eventually reached 20,000 images, each selected for its likelihood to sell multiple copies.[7]

New indexing systems and growth (1940s-1980s)[edit]

Known as a stock resource for newspapers and magazines, the Hulton Archive started as the photographic archive of Picture Post. As the archive expanded through World War II, it became clear that its vast collection of photographs and negatives were becoming an important historical documentary resource. In 1945, Sir Edward Hulton set up the Hulton Press Library as a semi-independent operation and commissioned Charles Gibbs-Smith of the Victoria and Albert Museum to catalogue the entire archive using a system of keywords and classifications. The Gibbs-Smith system claims to be the world’s first indexing system for pictures, and it was eventually adopted by the British Museum collections.[6]

Expansion and transition online (1980s-1990s)[edit]

By the 1980s, stock photography had become a specialty in its own right, with the stock industry advancing quickly.[7] As photo libraries transitioned from physical archives to servers in the mid-1990s, "stock libraries" were increasingly called "stock agencies."[7] The archives also began to rely increasingly on keywords for sorting and retrieving photographs.[7] In 1991 Photodisc in Seattle, Washington began selling CD ROMs with packs of images. Unlike their competitors, Photodisc licensed the image packs as Royalty Free. In contrast to the Rights Managed system, royalty free allowed the purchaser of a CD ROM to use the images as many times as they liked without paying further fees.[7]

There was a great amount of consolidation among stock photo agencies[8][9] between 1990 and the mid-2000s, with Corbis notably acquiring the massive Bettmann Archive in 1995.[1] After Photodisc went online in 1995,[19] in September 1997, PhotoDisc agreed to combine with London-based Getty Communications to form the Seattle-based Getty Images.[20] In 1996, the Hulton Picture Collection was bought by Getty Images for £8.6 million.[21]

Recent developments (2000-present)[edit]

The early microstock company iStockphoto was founded in May 2000. Originally a free stock imagery website, it transitioned into its current micropayment model in 2001.[10] Helping pioneer the subscription-based model of stock photography,[22] Shutterstock was founded in 2003 with a monthly subscription fee.[23] Online since 2000 as a royalty free stock photography website, in 2004 Dreamstime[11] was founded as new microstock agency.[15] Other stock agencies with new business models around this time included fotoLibra, which opened to the public in 2005,[12][13] and Can Stock Photo, which debuted in 2004.[14] By 2007 Dreamstime was competing with Istockphoto, Fotolia and Shutterstock, all expanded into major microstock companies.[15]

Between the 1990s and the mid-2000s, Bill Gates' Corbis Images and Getty Images combined purchased more than 40 stock photo agencies.[1] iStockphoto, or iStock.com, was acquired by Getty in 2006.[7] In February 2009,[24] Jupitermedia Corporation sold their online stock images division, Jupiterimages, to Getty Images for $96 million in cash,[25] including the sites stock.xchng and StockXpert.[24] In 2005 Scoopt started a photo news agency for citizen journalism enabling the public to upload and sell breaking news images taken with cameraphones. In 2007 Scoopt was purchased by Getty Images, which closed it in 2009.[26] In 2012 Shutterstock became the first microstock agency to complete an initial public offering,[27] with the company's shares reaching a $2.5 billion market value by late 2013.[23] The stock photo company Fotolia announced that it would be acquired by Adobe for $800 million on December 11, 2014.[28]

Description[edit]

Stock photography refers to the supply of photographs, which are often licensed for specific uses such as magazine publishing or pamphlet-making.[citation needed] According to The New York Times, as of 2005, "most" book cover designers prefer stock photography agencies over photographers in efforts to save costs. Publishers can then purchase photographs on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis.[29]

Established models of stock photography include:

  1. Macrostock: High-priced and exclusive stock photography, also known as traditional stock photography[2]
  2. Midstock: Stock photography priced between micro stock and macro stock which is often used online[3]
  3. Microstock: Low-priced and inclusive stock photography. In competition to traditional agencies, microstock photography is a relatively new model of stock photography which is available through agencies that sell images for lower prices but in greater volume.[4]

According to The New York Times, conventional stock agencies charge from several hundred to several thousands American dollars per image, and "base fees on the published size of an image, circulation and other factors." Microstock photos may sell for as little as USD 25 cents.[4] Professional stock photographers traditionally place their images with one or more stock agencies on a contractual basis, with a defined commission basis and specified contract term. The industry standard is purportedly 30 to 50 percent to the photographer, although at the start of the stock photography industry, fees were typically cut half and half between the agency and artist.[1] Other stock agencies may accept the high-quality photos of amateur photographers through online submission.[5]

Some online photo websites have created unique software to search for fitting stock photos, for example searching for complicated keyword combinations, color, shapes, and "moods."[30][31] Other search engines may seek to quantify the best photos by looking for elements as diverse as "bright lights," "evidence of emotional connections between people," and the tilt of faces.[32]

Styles and trends[edit]

A 2013 stock photo entitled "hands with house."

Traditional stock photo agencies have large catalogues that may include press archives and works by notable photographers such as Bert Hardy, Bill Brandt, Weegee and Ernst Haas.[33] More recent trends in microstock photography include "lifestyle" photographs of people "at work and play,"[4] food, sports, and fashion.[4] Other stock photo themes may include stereotypes, expressing common emotions and gesticulations, pets,[citation needed] and images related to travel and tourism.[citation needed]

In the early 1990s, the stock industry focused on "conceptual images," which could encapsulate themes such as "global communication, success, and teamwork."[7] After the consolidation of many stock photo agencies in the 1990s and early 2000s, new companies began focusing in "niche collections" including "medical, science, minorities, gay and lesbian lifestyles, aviation, maps, panoramic, historical, sports, and celebrity homes."[1] Opined Megan Garber of The Atlantic in 2012, "one of the more wacky/wondrous elements of stock photos is the manner in which, as a genre, they've developed a unifying editorial sensibility. To see a stock image is, Potter Stewart-style, to know you're seeing a stock image. And while stock images' stockiness may be in art due to the common visual tropes that give them their easy, cheesy impact - prettiness, preciousness, pose-iness - there's part of it that's more ephemeral, too. Though they have little in common, shots of a German Shepherd typing on a laptop and a man contemplating the sunset can both be, in their special way, stocky."[5]

Types of stock photo licenses[edit]

Public domain (PD)[edit]

Example of a public domain stock photo, showing part of the Chicago skyline.

In relation to photography and graphics, public domain (PD) means the image is free to use without purchasing a license, and can be used for commercial or personal purposes. Works in the public domain are those whose exclusive intellectual property rights have expired,[34] have been forfeited,[35] or are inapplicable.[36]

Royalty-free (RF)[edit]

Main article: Royalty-free

In photography and the illustration industry, royalty-free (RF) refers to a copyright license where the user has the right to use the picture without many restrictions based on one-time payment to the licensor. The user can therefore use the image in several projects without having to purchase any additional licenses. RF licenses can not be given on an exclusive basis. In stock photography, RF is one of the common licenses sometimes contrasted with Rights Managed licenses and often employed in subscription-based or microstock photography business models.[37]

Rights-managed (RM)[edit]

Main article: Rights Managed

Rights Managed (RM) in the stock photo industry (sometimes called "licensed images") refers to a copyright license which, if purchased by a user, allows the one-time use of the photo as specified by the license. If the user wants to use the photo for other uses an additional license needs to be purchased. RM licences can be given on a non-exclusive or exclusive basis. In stock photography RM is one of the two common license types together with royalty-free, subscription and microstock photography being business models often confused as separate license types (both use the royalty-free license type).[38]

In popular culture[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l R. Peres, Michael (2007). "The Focal Encyclopedia of Photography: Digital Imaging, Theory and Applications, History, and Science". Taylor & Francis. Retrieved 2016-03-14.  page 351
  2. ^ a b "Traditional Stock Agencies". budgetstockphoto.com. Retrieved 2016-03-14. 
  3. ^ a b Grunbaum, Rami (March 13, 2015). "Co-founder of Getty Images steps down as CEO". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2016-07-15. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f Eric A. Taub, "When Are Photos Like Penny Stocks? When They Sell", New York Times, June 5, 2007
  5. ^ a b c d Garber, Megan (May 18, 2012). "The Tao of Shutterstock: What Makes a Stock Photo a Stock Photo?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2016-07-16. 
  6. ^ a b Hulton|Archive – History in Pictures History of Picture Post by the Archive Curator Sarah McDonald, 15/10/04. Accessed March 2008
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "A Brief History of Stock Photography". alamy.com. June 16, 2015. Retrieved 2016-03-14. 
  8. ^ a b Heron, Michal (2001). How to Shoot Stock Photos That Sell (3rd ed.). Allworth Communications. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-58115-087-2. 
  9. ^ a b Heron, Michal (2007). Digital Stock Photography: How to Shoot and Sell. Allworth Communications. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-58115-484-9. 
  10. ^ a b Kim Peterson, "Microstock photography represents a new business model", Seattle Times, May 28, 2007
  11. ^ a b Gibson, Steve (April 13, 2008). "Dreamstime Site Review". Microstock Insider. Retrieved July 19, 2012. 
  12. ^ a b Basheera, Khan (9 June 2004). "fotoLibra gets it picture perfect". i.t.wales. Retrieved 21 March 2012. 
  13. ^ a b "New Approach Brings Down Picture Buying Costs". creativematch. 16 June 2005. Retrieved 21 March 2012. 
  14. ^ a b "About Can Stock Photo". Can Stock Photo. Retrieved 2015-08-28. 
  15. ^ a b c Levine, Robert (April 4, 2007). "Photo wars: A $2 billion business gets rough". CNN Money. Retrieved July 19, 2012. 
  16. ^ a b Heron, Michal (2001). How to Shoot Stock Photos That Sell (3rd ed.). Allworth Communications. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-58115-087-2. 
  17. ^ a b "Film Quarterly". 13 (2). Winter 1959: 8. 
  18. ^ Snow, Richard F. (May 2001). "Goodbye To All That". American Heritage. 52 (3). New York City: American Heritage Publishing Company. p. 5. 
  19. ^ Crotty, Cameron (February 1, 1996). "Image is everything.(West Stock and PhotoDisc introduce Web sites) (Internet Watch) (Company Business and Marketing)(Brief Article)". Macworld. Retrieved 2008-10-06. 
  20. ^ The Getty-PhotoDisc Deal: Image is Everything - Business Week
  21. ^ Gross, Larry P.; Katz, John Stuart; Ruby, Jay (2003). Image ethics in the digital age. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-3824-6. 
  22. ^ "Small Business: How to Beat a Goliath"SmartMoney, February 2, 2009 Archived July 2, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.
  23. ^ a b Steven Bertoni, "Silicon Alley's First Billionaire Aims To Dominate Images On Web", Forbes, October 28, 2013
  24. ^ a b "Jupitermedia Announces Completion Of Sale Of Jupiterimages To Getty Images and Change Of Jupitermedia Name to WebMediaBrands". Getty Images. 2009-02-23. Retrieved 2009-08-13. 
  25. ^ D'Souza, Savio (2008-10-23). "Jupitermedia to sell online image unit to Getty". Reuters. Retrieved 2009-08-14. 
  26. ^ "Getty shutting Scoopt citizen journalism photo site to focus on core business". The Guardian (U.K.). February 4, 2009. 
  27. ^ "Shutterstock Announces Closing of Initial Public Offering and Exercise of Underwriters' Option to Purchase Additional Shares". Shutterstock. 2012-10-16. Retrieved 2013-01-18. 
  28. ^ Stynes, Tess (December 11, 2014). "Adobe to buy stock-photo web company Fotolia for $800 million". MarketWatch. Retrieved 2016-07-15. 
  29. ^ Adam Newman, Andrew (July 7, 2005). "With Covers, Publishers Take More Than Page From Rivals". The New York Times. Retrieved 2016-07-15. 
  30. ^ Zipkin, Nina (March 10, 2016). "How Shutterstock Is Training Its System to Help You Find Better Photos". Entrepreneur. Retrieved 2016-06-15. 
  31. ^ Ossola, Alexandra (March 10, 2016). "Shutterstock Has Trained A Computer To Find You The Perfect Photos". Popular Science. Retrieved 2016-06-15. 
  32. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth (October 1, 2015). "New Software Sifts Photos for the Most Clickable". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2016-07-15. 
  33. ^ "About Hulton Archive". Hulton Archive. 2001. Archived from the original on 2001-10-21. Retrieved 2009-08-14.  (archived on the Web Archive)
  34. ^ Boyle, Jnu ble Zdrf pacanaiames (2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. CSPD. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-300-13740-8. 
  35. ^ Graber, Christoph B.; Nenova, Mira B. (2008). Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 173. ISBN 978-1-84720-921-4. 
  36. ^ unprotected on bitlaw.com
  37. ^ Peres, Michael R (2007). The Focal encyclopaedia of photography: digital imaging, theory and applications, history, and science. Focal Press. pp. 352–353. ISBN 978-0-240-80740-9. 
  38. ^ Peres, Michael R (2007). The Focal encyclopaedia of photography: digital imaging, theory and applications, history, and science. Focal Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-240-80740-9. 
  39. ^ Umlauf, Taylor (March 4, 2015). "See Vince Vaughn's Stock Photos With 'Unfinished Business' Cast". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2016-03-14. 

External links[edit]