This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Part of a series on Statistics|
In statistics, a studentized residual is the quotient resulting from the division of a residual by an estimate of its standard deviation. Typically the standard deviations of residuals in a sample vary greatly from one data point to another even when the errors all have the same standard deviation, particularly in regression analysis; thus it does not make sense to compare residuals at different data points without first studentizing. It is a form of a Student's t-statistic, with the estimate of error varying between points.
This is an important technique in the detection of outliers. It is among several named in honor of William Sealey Gosset, who wrote under the pseudonym Student, and dividing by an estimate of scale is called studentizing, in analogy with standardizing and normalizing.
The key reason for studentizing is that, in regression analysis of a multivariate distribution, the variances of the residuals at different input variable values may differ, even if the variances of the errors at these different input variable values are equal. The issue is the difference between errors and residuals in statistics, particularly the behavior of residuals in regressions.
Consider the simple linear regression model
Given a random sample (Xi, Yi), i = 1, ..., n, each pair (Xi, Yi) satisfies
where the errors εi, are independent and all have the same variance σ2. The residuals are not the true, and unobservable, errors, but rather are estimates, based on the observable data, of the errors. When the method of least squares is used to estimate α0 and α1, then the residuals , unlike the errors , cannot be independent since they satisfy the two constraints
(Here εi is the ith error, and is the ith residual.)
Moreover, and most importantly, the residuals, unlike the errors, do not all have the same variance: the variance decreases as the corresponding x-value gets farther from the average x-value. This is a feature of the regression better fitting values at the ends of the domain, not the data itself, and is also reflected in the influence functions of various data points on the regression coefficients: endpoints have more influence. This can also be seen because the residuals at endpoints depend greatly on the slope of a fitted line, while the residuals at the middle are relatively insensitive to the slope. The fact that the variances of the residuals differ, even though the variances of the true errors are all equal to each other, is the principal reason for the need for studentization.
It is not simply a matter of the population parameters (mean and standard deviation) being unknown – it is that regressions yield different residual distributions at different data points, unlike point estimators of univariate distributions, which share a common distribution for residuals.
How to studentize
For this simple model, the design matrix is
The leverage hii is the ith diagonal entry in the hat matrix. The variance of the ith residual is
In case the design matrix X has only two columns (as in the example above), this is equal to
The corresponding studentized residual is then
where is an appropriate estimate of σ (see below).
Internal and external studentization
The usual estimate of σ2 is the internally studentized residual
where m is the number of parameters in the model (2 in our example).
But if the i th case is suspected of being improbably large, then it would also not be normally distributed. Hence it is prudent to exclude the i th observation from the process of estimating the variance when one is considering whether the i th case may be an outlier, and instead use the externally studentized residual, which is
based on all the residuals except the suspect i th residual.
If the estimate σ2 includes the i th case, then it is called the internally studentized residual, . If the estimate is used instead, excluding the i th case, then it is called the externally studentized, .
If the errors are independent and normally distributed with expected value 0 and variance σ2, then the probability distribution of the ith externally studentized residual is a Student's t-distribution with n − m − 1 degrees of freedom, and can range from to .
On the other hand, the internally studentized residuals are in the range , where ν = n − m is the number of residual degrees of freedom. If ti represents the internally studentized residual, and again assuming that the errors are independent identically distributed Gaussian variables, then:
where t is a random variable distributed as Student's t-distribution with ν − 1 degrees of freedom. In fact, this implies that ti /ν follows the beta distribution B(1/2,(ν − 1)/2). The distribution above is sometimes referred to as the tau distribution; it was first derived by Thompson in 1935.
When ν = 3, the internally studentized residuals are uniformly distributed between and . If there is only one residual degree of freedom, the above formula for the distribution of internally studentized residuals doesn't apply. In this case, the ti are all either +1 or −1, with 50% chance for each.
The standard deviation of the distribution of internally studentized residuals is always 1, but this does not imply that the standard deviation of all the ti of a particular experiment is 1. For instance, the internally studentized residuals when fitting a straight line going through (0, 0) to the points (1, 4), (2, −1), (2, −1) are , and the standard deviation of these is not 1.
- Allen J. Pope (1976), "The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers", U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey, Geodetic Research and Development Laboratory, 136 pages, , eq.(6)
- Thompson, William R. (1935). "On a Criterion for the Rejection of Observations and the Distribution of the Ratio of Deviation to Sample Standard Deviation". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 6 (4): 214–219. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732567.