Subvertising

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Two billboards with the same original content; the billboard on the right is an example of subvertising after being vandalized.
The ExxonMobil logo as subverted by Greenpeace.
Anti-abortion poster with pro-choice inscriptions, Gdańsk, Poland 2021

Subvertising (a portmanteau of subvert and advertising) is the practice of making spoofs or parodies of corporate and political advertisements.[1] The cultural critic Mark Dery coined the term in 1991.[2] Subvertisements are anti-ads that deflect advertising's attempts to turn the people's attention in a given direction.[3] According to author Naomi Klein, subvertising offers a way of speaking back to advertising, ‘forcing a dialogue where before there was only a declaration.’[4] They may take the form of a new image or an alteration to an existing image or icon, often in a satirical manner.

A subvertisement can also be referred to as a meme hack and can be a part of social hacking, billboard hacking or culture jamming.[5] According to Adbusters, a Canadian magazine and a proponent of counter-culture and subvertising, "A well-produced 'subvert' mimics the look and feel of the targeted ad, promoting the classic 'double-take' as viewers suddenly realize they have been duped. Subverts create cognitive dissonance, with the apparent aim of cutting through the 'hype and glitz of our mediated reality' to reveal a 'deeper truth within'.[citation needed]

Subvertising is a type of advertising hijacking (détournement publicité), where détournement techniques developed in the 1950s by the French Letterist International and later used by the better-known Situationist International have been used as a contemporary critical form to re-route advertising messages.

In 1972, the logo of Richard Nixon's reelection campaign posters was subverted with two x's in Nixon's name (as in the Exxon logo) to suggest the corporate ownership of the Republican party.[6][7]

Notable instances[edit]

In Sydney, Australia in October 1979, a group of anti-smoking activists formed a group called B.U.G.A.U.P. and began altering the text on tobacco billboards to subvert the messages of tobacco advertisers, although advertisements for other unhealthy products were also targeted.[8]

On November 6, 2008, The Yes Men recruited thousands of social activists to hand out 100,000 copies of a spoof New York Times newspaper set six months in the future. The goal was to utilize a tangible and trusted medium, the New York Times, to argue for a particular future.[example needed] Other groups involved with this project included Anti-Advertising Agency, Code Pink, United for Peace and Justice, May First/People Link, and Improv Everywhere.[citation needed]

At the 2015 Paris COP21 climate conference, the collective known as Brandalism installed 600 posters that attacked what they perceived as the hypocrisy of corporate sponsors.[9]

In 2017, Brandalism and other groups of subvertisers founded the collective Subvertisers International.[10] Using billboard hacking and other forms of subvertising, they promote the idea that advertising creates unhealthy body images, impacts democracy negatively, and sustains a culture of consumerism that takes a heavy toll on the planet.

Around 2018, a group in London called Legally Black changed the race of the characters in Harry Potter posters from white to black.[9]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Alexander Barley (May 21, 2001). "Battle of the image". New Statesman. Retrieved 2010-12-09. Subvertising is an attempt to turn the iconography of the advertisers into a noose around their neck. If images can create a brand, they can also destroy one. A subvert is a satirical version or the defacing of an existing advert, a detournement, an inversion designed to make us forget consumerism and consider instead social or political issues.
  2. ^ Dekeyser, Thomas (2020-08-09). "Dismantling the advertising city: Subvertising and the urban commons to come". Environment and Planning D: Society and Space: 0263775820946755. doi:10.1177/0263775820946755. ISSN 0263-7758.
  3. ^ Dery, Mark (1993). Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of Signs. New York: Open Media.
  4. ^ Klein, Naomi (8 May 1997). "Subvertising: Culture jamming reemerges on the media landscape". The Village Voice.
  5. ^ "Clearing the Mindscape". Adbusters. March 4, 2009. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved 2010-12-09. So I think that, for me, "subvertising", or "culture jamming", as I call it, is the art of creating a new kind of cool.
  6. ^ "Exxon Victorious". Time. March 5, 1973. Archived from the original on February 5, 2008. One sure sign that Exxon has arrived as a brand name is that it has become the butt of cartoonists' jokes. For example, a cartoon in Mad magazine shows a picture of the White House with a sign overhead emblazoned Nixxon. The caption: 'But it's still the same old gas'.
  7. ^ "Sore-Loserman: From political parody to charity's windfall. CNN. 4 Dec. 2000". Archives.cnn.com. Retrieved 2014-03-29.
  8. ^ "Civil Disobedience and Tobacco Control: The Case of BUGA UP, Simon Chapman" (PDF). Tobacco Control Vol. 5, No. 3, 1996. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
  9. ^ a b "The hackers using street ads to protest". 23 March 2018.
  10. ^ Kieron Monks. "'Subvertising' hackers are using street ads to protest". CNN. Retrieved 2020-08-15.

External links[edit]