From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Surrogate pregnancy)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Legal status of surrogacy in the world:
  Both gainful and altruistic forms are legal
  No legal regulation
  Only altruistic is legal
  Allowed between relatives up to second degree of consanguinity
  Unregulated/uncertain situation

Surrogacy is an arrangement, often supported by a legal agreement, whereby a woman (the surrogate mother) agrees to become pregnant and give birth to a child for another person(s) who are or will become the parent(s) of the child.

People may seek a surrogacy arrangement when pregnancy is medically impossible, when pregnancy risks are too dangerous for the intended mother, or when a single man or a male couple wish to have a child. In these arrangements, monetary compensation may or may not be involved. Receiving money for the arrangement is considered commercial surrogacy; receiving no compensation beyond reimbursement of reasonable expenses is altruistic.[1] The legality and cost of surrogacy varies widely between jurisdictions, sometimes resulting in problematic interstate or international surrogacy arrangements.

Laws of some countries restrict or regulate surrogacy and its consequences. Those wanting to seek a surrogacy arrangement who, however, live where it is banned may travel to a jurisdiction that permits it. (See surrogacy laws by country and fertility tourism.)


The fertilization of the egg may take place in a number of ways, each of which can allow for the resulting child to be genetically related to the surrogate and/or the future parent(s). There are two main types of surrogacy: gestational surrogacy and traditional surrogacy. In the United States, gestational surrogacy is more common than traditional surrogacy and is considered less legally complex.[2]


Traditional surrogacy (also known as partial, genetic, natural or straight surrogacy[3]) involves natural[4] or artificial insemination of a surrogate. If the intended father's sperm is used in the insemination, then the resulting child is genetically related both the intended father and the surrogate. If donor sperm is used, the resulting child is not genetically related to either intended parent but is genetically related to the surrogate.

In some cases, an insemination may be performed privately by the parties without the intervention of a doctor or physician. In some jurisdictions, the 'commissioning parents' using donor sperms need to go through an adoption process in order to have legal parental rights of the resulting child. Many fertility centers that provide for surrogacy assist the parties through the legal process.


Gestational surrogacy (also known as host or full surrogacy[3]) was first achieved in April 1986.[5] It takes place when an embryo created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology is implanted in a surrogate, sometimes called a gestational carrier. Gestational surrogacy may take a number of forms, but in each form the resulting child is genetically unrelated to the surrogate:

  • the embryo is created using the intended father's sperm and the intended mother's eggs. The resulting child is genetically related to both intended parents.
  • the embryo is created using the intended father's sperm and a donor egg where the donor is not the surrogate. The resulting child is genetically related to the intended father.
  • the embryo is created using the intended mother's egg and donor sperm. The resulting child is genetically related to the intended mother.
  • a donor embryo is implanted in a surrogate. Such an embryo may be available when others undergoing IVF have embryos left over, which they donate to others. The resulting child is genetically unrelated to the intended parent(s).

Among gestational surrogacy arrangements, between 19%-33% of surrogate mothers will successfully become pregnant from an embryo transfer. Of these cases, 30-70% will successfully allow the intended parent(s) to become parent(s) of the resulting child[6].

Indications for surrogacy[edit]

Generally, women choose surrogacy if they do not have a uterus or have a non-functioning uterus. This may because they are born without a uterus as in the case of Mayer-Roakitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.[7][8] Women may also lose their uterus due to complications in childbirth such as heavy bleeding or a ruptured uterus. Medical diseases such as cervical cancer can also lead to surgical removal of the uterus[7]. Structural abnormalities, a scarred uterus, having multiple miscarriages, or having severe heart or renal conditions that may make pregnancy harmful, may also prompt women to consider surrogacy[7][8]. The biological impossibility of single men and same-sex couples having a baby also may necessitate surrogacy.[8]

Surrogacy agencies[edit]

In places where surrogacy is legal, couples may use the help of a third-party agency to overlook the process of finding a surrogate, entering into a contract with her, and recommend fertility centers for insemination, generally via IVF. These agencies can help make sure that surrogates are screened with psychological and other medical tests so as to ensure the best chance of healthy deliveries. They also usually facilitate all legal matters concerning the two parties (intended parents and surrogate).


Having another woman bear a child for a couple to raise, usually with the male half of the couple as the genetic father, has been referenced since the ancient times. Babylonian law and custom allowed this practice, and a woman who cannot give birth could use the practice to avoid a divorce, which would otherwise be inevitable.[9][10]

Many developments in medicine, social customs, and legal proceedings around the world paved the way for modern surrogacy:[11]

  • 1936 – In the U.S., drug companies Schering-Kahlbaum and Parke-Davis started the pharmaceutical production of estrogen.
  • 1944 – Harvard Medical School professor John Rock became the first person to fertilize human ovum outside the uterus.
  • 1953 – Researchers successfully performed the first cryopreservation of sperm.
  • 1971 – The first commercial sperm bank opened in New York.
  • 1978 – Louise Brown, the first "test-tube baby", was born in England, the product of the first successful IVF procedure.
  • 1980 – Michigan lawyer Noel Keane wrote the first surrogacy contract. He continued his work with surrogacy through his Infertility Center, through which he created the contract leading to the Baby M case.[12]
  • 1985–1986 – A woman carried the first successful gestational surrogate pregnancy. [5]
  • 1986 – Melissa Stern, otherwise known as "Baby M," was born in the U.S. The surrogate and biological mother, Mary Beth Whitehead, refused to give up custody of Melissa to the couple with whom she made the surrogacy agreement. The courts of New Jersey found that Whitehead was the child's legal mother and declared contracts for surrogate motherhood illegal and invalid. However, the court found it in the best interest of the infant to award custody of Melissa to the child's biological father, William Stern, and his wife Elizabeth Stern, rather than to Whitehead, the surrogate mother.
  • 1990 – In California, gestational carrier Anna Johnson refused to give up the baby to intended parents Mark and Crispina Calvert. The couple sued her for custody (Calvert v. Johnson), and the court upheld their parental rights. In doing so, it legally defined the true mother as the woman who, according to the surrogacy agreement, intends to create and raise a child.
  • 1994
    • Latin American fertility specialists convened in Chile to discuss assisted reproduction and its ethical and legal status.
    • The Chinese Ministry of Health banned gestational surrogacy because of the legal complications of defining true parenthood and possible refusal by surrogates to relinquish a baby.
  • 2009 – The Chinese government increased enforcement of the gestational-surrogacy ban, and Chinese women began coming forth with complaints of forced abortions.

Legal issues[edit]

Surrogacy is controversial around the world, raising difficult moral, social and legal issues. As a result, the legal situation varies considerably. Many countries do not have laws which specifically deal with surrogacy. Some countries ban surrogacy outright, while others ban commercial surrogacy but allow altruistic surrogacy (in which the surrogate is not financially compensated). Some countries allow commercial surrogacy, with few restrictions. Some jurisdictions extend a ban on surrogacy to international surrogacy. In some jurisdictions rules applicable to adoptions apply while others do not regulate the practice.

The US, Ukraine, Russia and Georgia have the most liberal laws in the world, allowing commercial surrogacy, including for foreigners.[13] Several Asian countries used to have liberal laws, but the practice has since been restricted. In 2015, Thailand banned commercial surrogacy, and restricted altruistic surrogacy to Thai couples.[14] In 2016, Cambodia also banned commercial surrogacy.[15] Nepal, Mexico, and India, have also recently banned foreign commercial surrogacy.[16] Surrogacy is legal and common in Iran; and monetary remuneration is practiced and allowed by religious authorities.[17][18]

Laws dealing with surrogacy must deal with:

  • enforceability of surrogacy agreements. In some jurisdictions, they are void or prohibited, and some jurisdictions distinguish between commercial and altruistic surrogacy.
  • the different issues raised by traditional and gestational surrogacy
  • mechanisms for the legal recognition of the intended parents as the legal parents, either by pre-birth orders or by post-birth adoption

Although laws differ widely from one jurisdiction to another, some generalizations are possible:

The historical legal assumption has been that the woman giving birth to a child is that child's legal mother, and the only way for another woman to be recognized as the mother is through adoption (usually requiring the birth mother's formal abandonment of parental rights).

Even in jurisdictions that do not recognize surrogacy arrangements, if the potential adoptive parents and the birth mother proceed without any intervention from the government and do not change their mind along the way, they will likely be able to achieve the effects of surrogacy by having the surrogate mother give birth and then give the child up for private adoption to the intended parents.

If the jurisdiction specifically bans surrogacy, however, and authorities find out about the arrangement, there may be financial and legal consequences for the parties involved. One jurisdiction (Quebec) prevented the genetic mother's adoption of the child even though that left the child with no legal mother.[19]

Some jurisdictions specifically prohibit only commercial and not altruistic surrogacy. Even jurisdictions that do not prohibit surrogacy may rule that surrogacy contracts (commercial, altruistic, or both) are void. If the contract is either prohibited or void, then there is no recourse if one party to the agreement has a change of heart: if a surrogate changes her mind and decides to keep the child, the intended mother has no claim to the child even if it is her genetic offspring, and the couple cannot get back any money they may have paid the surrogate; if the intended parents change their mind and do not want the child after all, the surrogate cannot get any money to make up for the expenses, or any promised payment, and she will be left with legal custody of the child.

Jurisdictions that permit surrogacy sometimes offer a way for the intended mother, especially if she is also the genetic mother, to be recognized as the legal mother without going through the process of abandonment and adoption. Often this is via a birth order[20] in which a court rules on the legal parentage of a child. These orders usually require the consent of all parties involved, sometimes even including the husband of a married gestational surrogate. Most jurisdictions provide for only a post-birth order, often out of an unwillingness to force the surrogate mother to give up parental rights if she changes her mind after the birth.

A few jurisdictions do provide for pre-birth orders, generally only in cases when the surrogate mother is not genetically related to the expected child. Some jurisdictions impose other requirements in order to issue birth orders: for example, that the intended parents be heterosexual and married to one another. Jurisdictions that provide for pre-birth orders are also more likely to provide for some kind of enforcement of surrogacy contracts.


The citizenship and legal status of the children resulting from surrogacy arrangements can be problematic. The Hague Conference Permanent Bureau identified the question of citizenship of these children as a "pressing problem" in the Permanent Bureau 2014 Study (Hague Conference Permanent Bureau, 2014a: 84-94).[21][22] According to U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, for the child to be a U.S. citizen one or both of the child's genetic parents must be a U.S. citizen. In other words, the only way for the child to acquire U.S. citizenship automatically at birth is if he/she is the biological son or daughter of a U.S. citizen. Further, in some countries, the child will not be a citizen of the country in which he/she is born because the surrogate mother is not legally the parent of said child. This could result in a child being born without citizenship.[23]

Ethical issues[edit]

Ethical questions that have been raised with regards to surrogacy include the following:[24]

  • To what extent should society be concerned about exploitation, commodification or coercion when women are paid to be pregnant and deliver babies, especially in cases where there are large wealth and power differences between intended parents and surrogates?
  • To what extent is it right for society to permit women to make contracts about the use of their bodies?
    • To what extent is it a woman's human right to make contracts regarding the use of her body?
    • Is contracting for surrogacy more like contracting for employment/labor, or more like an abusive or exploitative contractual relationship, for example where one party donates a kidney or otherwise gives up a fundamental right?
    • Which, if any, of these kinds of contracts should be enforceable?
    • Should the state be able to force a woman to carry out "specific performance" of her contract if that requires her to give birth to an embryo she would like to abort, or to abort an embryo she would like to carry to term?
  • What does motherhood mean?
    • What is the relationship between genetic motherhood, gestational motherhood, and social motherhood?
    • Is it possible to socially or legally conceive of multiple modes of motherhood or the recognition of multiple mothers?
  • Should a child born via surrogacy have the right to know the identity of any or all of the people involved in that child's conception and delivery?

Furthermore, surrogacy has the potential for various kinds of clash between surrogate mothers and intended parents. For instance, the intended parents of the fetus may ask for an abortion when complications arise and the surrogate mother may oppose the abortion.[25][26]

Religious issues[edit]

Different religions take different approaches to surrogacy, often related to their stances on assisted reproductive technology in general.


The Catholic Church is generally opposed to surrogacy which it views as immoral and incompatible with Biblical texts surrounding topics of birth, marriage, and life.[citation needed] Paragraph 2376 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church states that: "Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral."[27] Many proponents of this stance express concern that the sanctity of marriage may be compromised by the insertion of a third party into the marriage contract.[28][29] Additionally, the practice of in-vitro fertilization involved in gestational surrogacy is generally viewed as morally impermissible due to its removal of human conception from the sacred process of sexual intercourse.[30] Pro-life supporters within the Catholic faith also condemn in-vitro fertilization due to the killing of embryos that accompanies the frequent practice of discarding, freezing, or donating non-implanted eggs to stem cell research.[31][32] As such, the Catholic Church deems all practices involving in-vitro fertilization, including gestational surrogacy, as morally problematic.[citation needed]


In general, there is a lack of consensus within the Jewish community on the matter of surrogacy. Jewish scholars and Rabbies have long debated this topic, expressing conflicting views on both sides of the debate.

Those supportive of surrogacy within the Jewish religion generally view it as a morally permissible way for Jewish women who cannot conceive to fulfill their religious obligations of procreation.[33][34] Rabbies who favour this stance often cite Genesis 9:1 which commands all Jews to “be fruitful and multiply”.[35] In 1988, the Committee on Jewish Laws and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly issued formal approval for surrogacy, concluding that “the mitzvah of parenthood is so great that ovum surrogacy is permissible”.[36]

Jewish scholars and Rabbies which hold an anti-surrogacy stance often see it as a form of modern slavery wherein women’s bodies are exploited and children are commodified.[37] As Jews possess the religious obligation to “actively engage in the redemption of those who are enslaved”, practices seen as involving human exploitation are morally condemned.[38] This thinking aligns with concerns brought fourth by other groups regarding the relation between surrogacy practices and forms of human trafficking in certain countries with large fertility tourism industries. Many Jewish scholars and Rabbies also cite ethical concerns surrounding the “broken relationship” between the child and its surrogate birth mother”.[39] Rabbi Immanuel Jacovits, chief rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth from 1976 to 1991, reported in his 1975 publication Jewish Medical Ethics that “to use another person as an incubator and then take from her the child that she carried and delivered for a fee is a revolting degradation of maternity and an affront to human dignity.”[40]

Another point of contention surrounding surrogacy within the Jewish community is the issue of defining motherhood. There are generally three conflicting views on this topic: 1) the ovum donor is the mother, 2) the surrogate mother is the mother, and 3) the child has two mothers- both the ovum donor and the surrogate mother.[41] While most contend that parenthood is determined by the woman giving birth, a minority opt to consider the genetic parents the legal parents, citing the well-known passage in Sanhedrin 91b of the Talmud which states that life begins at conception.[42] Also controversial is the issue of defining Judaism in the context of surrogacy. Jewish law states that if a Jewish woman is the surrogate, then the child is Jewish.[43] However, this often raises issues when the child is raised by a non-Jewish family and approaches for addressing this issue are also widely debated within the Jewish community.[44]


As India and other countries with large Hindu populations have become epicenters for fertility tourism, numerous questions have been raised regarding whether or not surrogacy conflicts with the Hindu religion.[45] While Hindu scholars have not debated the issue extensively, TC Anand Kumar, a renowned Indian reproductive biologist, argues that there is no conflict between Hinduism and assisted reproduction.[46] Others have supported this stance with reference to Hindu mythology, including a story in the Bhagvata Purana which suggests the practice of surrogate motherhood[47]:

Kan(sh) the wicked king of Mathura, had imprisoned his sister Devaki and her husband Vasudeva because oracles had informed him that her child would be his killer. Every time she delivered a child, he smashed its head on the floor. He killed six children. When the seventh child was conceived, the gods intervened. They summoned the goddess Yogamaya and had her transfer the fetus from the womb of Devaki to the womb of Rohini (Vasudeva’s other wife who lived with her sister Yashoda across the river Yamuna, in the village of cowherds at Gokul). Thus the child conceived in one womb was incubated in and delivered through another womb.[48]

Additionally, infertility Is often associated with Karma in the Hindu tradition and consequently treated as a pathology to be treated.[49] This has led to general acceptance of medical intervention for addressing infertility amongst Hindus.[50]  As such, surrogacy and other scientific methods of assisted reproduction are generally supported within the Hindu community.[51] Nonetheless, Hindu women do not commonly use surrogacy as an option to treat infertility, despite often serving as surrogates for Western commissioning couples.[52][53] When surrogacy is practiced by Hindus, it is more likely to be used within the family circle as opposed to involving anonymous donors.[54]


Harinegameshin Transfers Mahavira's Embryo, from a Kalpasutra manuscript, c. 1300-1350, Philadelphia Museum of Art

Jain scholars have not debated the issue of surrogacy extensively. Nonetheless, the practice of surrogacy is referenced in the Shvetambara tradition of Jainism according to which the embryo of Lord Mahavira was transferred from a Brahmin woman Devananada to the womb of Trishala, the queen of Kshatriya ruler Siddharth, by a divinity named Harinegameshin.[55] This account is not present in Digambara Jain texts, however.

Other sources state that surrogacy is not objectionable in the Jain view as it is seen as a physical operation akin to any other medical treatment used to treat a bodily deficiency.[56] However, some religious concerns related to surrogacy have been raised within the Jain community including the loss of non-implanted embryos, destruction of traditional marriage relationships, and adulterous implications of gestational surrogacy.[56]


Buddhist thought is also inconclusive on the matter of surrogacy. The prominent belief is that Buddhism totally accepts surrogacy since there are no Buddhist teachings suggesting that infertility treatments or surrogacy are immoral.[57] This stance is further supported by the common conception that serving as a surrogate mother is an expression of compassion and therefore automatically aligns with Buddhist values.[58]

However, numerous Buddhist thinkers have expressed concerns with certain aspects of surrogacy, hence challenging the contention that surrogacy is always compatible with Buddhist tradition.[59][60] One Buddhist perspective on surrogacy arises from the Buddhist belief in reincarnation as a manifestation of karma.[61] According to this view, surrogate motherhood circumvents the workings of karma by interfering with the natural cycle of reincarnation.[62]

Others reference the Buddha directly who purportedly taught that trade in sentient beings, including human beings, is not a righteous practice as it almost always involves exploitation that causes suffering.[63] Susumu Shimazono, professor of Religious Studies at the University of Tokyo, contends in the magazine "Dharma World" that surrogacy places the childbearing surrogate in a position of subservience, in which her body becomes a “tool” for another.[64] Simultaneously, other Buddhists thinkers argue that as long as the primary purpose of being a surrogate mother is out of compassion instead of profit, it is not exploitative and is therefore morally permissible.[65] This further highlights the lack of consensus on surrogacy within the Buddhist community.


The Islamic community has largely outlawed the practice of surrogacy, however there remains a small population of Muslims which contend that the practice of surrogacy does not conflict with Islamic law.[66]

The main concerns that Muslims raise with regard to surrogacy relate to issues of adultery and parental lineage.[67][68][69] Many Muslim groups claim that surrogate motherhood is not permitted under Islamic law because it is akin to zina (adultery) which is strictly prohibited in the Muslim religion.[67][68][69] This is based on the fact that in gestational surrogacy, the surrogate carries the fertilized egg of someone who is not her legal husband, thus transgressing the bounds of Allah as stated in the Qur’an: “Those who guard their private parts except from their spouses…” (Al-Mu’minun 23:5)  “Whosoever goes beyond that are indeed transgressors” (Al-Mu’minun 23:7).[67][69] Additionally, arguments have been raised that surrogacy interferes with the preservation of lineage (hifz al-nasl) which is one of the five universals and objectives of Shari’ah law.[67][68][69] For Muslims, the Qur’anic injunction that “their mothers are only those who conceived them and gave birth to them (waladna hum)” denies the distinction between genetic and gestational mothers, hence complicating notions lineage within the context of surrogacy, which are central to the Muslim faith.[67][70]

In contrast, a minority of Muslim proponents of surrogacy argue that Islamic law recognizes the preservation of the human species as one of its primary objectives (maqasid), and allowing married couples to pursue conceiving children is part of this primary objective.[66] They also contend that the surrogate mother cannot be accused of zina because no sexual intercourse with a non-legal husband is required for her pregnancy.[66] Finally, they argue that the lineage of the child can be traced to the biological parents and hence questions of lineage are easily resolvable.[66] They support this by drawing comparisons between hiring a surrogate mother and hiring a woman to breast feed one’s child which is an acceptable practice under Islamic law.[66]

Psychological concerns[edit]


A study by the Family and Child Psychology Research Centre at City University London in 2002 concluded that surrogate mothers rarely had difficulty relinquishing rights to a surrogate child and that the intended mothers showed greater warmth to the child than mothers conceiving naturally.[71][72][73]

Anthropological studies of surrogates have shown that surrogates engage in various distancing techniques throughout the surrogate pregnancy so as to ensure that they do not become emotionally attached to the baby.[74][75] Many surrogates intentionally try to foster the development of emotional attachment between the intended mother and the surrogate child.[76]

Surrogates who work with an agency are generally counseled by the agency to become emotionally detached from the fetus prior to giving birth.[77]

Some surrogates describe feeling empowered by the experience.[75][78]

Although surrogate mothers generally report being satisfied with their experience as surrogates, there are cases in which they are not. Unmet expectations are associated with dissatisfaction. Some women did not feel a certain level of closeness with the couple and others did not feel respected by the couple.[79]

Some women experience emotional distress as a surrogate mother. There may be a lack of access to therapy and emotional support through the surrogate process.[79]

Some surrogate mothers have reactions that include depression when surrendering the child, grief, and even refusal to release the child.[80]

A 2011 study from the Centre for Family Research at the University of Cambridge found that surrogacy does not have a negative impact on the surrogate's own children.[81]

Child and parents[edit]

A study has followed a cohort of 32 surrogacy, 32 egg donation, and 54 natural conception families through to age seven, reporting the impact of surrogacy on the families and children at ages one,[73] two,[82] and seven.[83] At age one, parents through surrogacy showed greater psychological well-being and adaptation to parenthood than those who conceived naturally; there were no differences in infant temperament. At age two, parents through surrogacy showed more positive mother–child relationships and less parenting stress on the part of fathers than their natural conception counterparts; there were no differences in child development between these two groups. At age seven, the surrogacy and egg donation families showed less positive mother–child interaction than the natural conception families, but there were no differences in maternal positive or negative attitudes or child adjustment. The researchers concluded that the surrogacy families continued to function well.



In Australia, all jurisdictions except the Northern Territory allow altruistic surrogacy, but commercial surrogacy is a criminal offense. The Northern Territory has no legislation governing surrogacy.[84] In New South Wales, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory it is an offence to enter into international commercial surrogacy arrangements, with potential penalties extending to imprisonment for up to one year in Australian Capital Territory, up to two years in New South Wales and up to three years in Queensland.


Altruistic surrogacy was legalized in Belgium.


The Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRC) permits only altruistic surrogacy: surrogate mothers may be reimbursed for approved expenses but payment of any other consideration or fee is illegal.[85]


Altruistic surrogacy was legalized in Denmark.

European Union[edit]

Gainful surrogacy is made illegal by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, whose Article 3 states that "making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain" is prohibited.[86]


Surrogacy has been illegal since law amendment in 2007. Children born abroad for Finnish parents by surrogacy will not be entitled to get Finnish Citizenship.


All surrogacy arrangements (both commercial and altruistic) are illegal. German party FDP wants to allow altruistic surrogacy.[87]


Law 3305/2005 (“Enforcement of Medically Assisted Reproduction”) makes surrogacy in Greece fully legal. Greece is only one of a handful of countries in the world to give legal protection to intended parents. Intended parents must meet certain qualifications and will go before a family judge before entering into a surrogacy contract. As long as they meet the qualifications, the court appearance is procedural and their application will be granted. At present, intended parents must be in a heterosexual partnership or be a single female. Females must be able to prove there is a medical indication they cannot carry and be no older than 50 at the time of the contract. As in all jurisdictions, surrogates must pass medical and psychological tests so they can prove to the court that they are medically and mentally fit. Greece is the only country in Europe, and one of only countries in the world, where the surrogate then has no rights over the child. The intended parents become the legal parents from conception, and there is no mention of the surrogate mother anywhere on hospital or birth documents. The intended parent(s) are listed as the parents. This even applies if an egg or sperm donor is used by one of the partners. As a result of the Schengen Treaty, intended parents from throughout Europe can freely travel home as soon as the baby is born and deal with citizenship issues at that time, as opposed to applying at their own embassy in Greece. Before 2014 (pursuant to art. 8 of Law 3089/2002), the surrogate mother and the commissioning parents were required to be Greek citizens or permanent residents. However, in July 2014, L. 4272/2014 extended legal surrogacy to applicants or surrogate mothers who have either permanent or temporary residence in Greece.


There is no law in Ireland governing surrogacy. In 2005 a Government appointed Commission published a comprehensive report on Assisted Human Reproduction, which made many recommendations on the broader area of assisted human reproduction. In relation to surrogacy it recommended that the commissioning couple would under Irish law be regarded as the parents of the child. Despite the publication there has been no legislation published, and the area essentially remains unregulated. Due to mounting pressure from Irish citizens going abroad to have children through surrogacy, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence published guidelines for them on 21 February 2012.[88]


Altruistic surrogacy was legalized in the Netherlands.

New Zealand[edit]

Altruistic surrogacy is legal, but commercial surrogacy is not.


Gestational surrogacy is currently practiced in Nigeria by a few IVF clinics, under practice guidelines from the Association of Fertility and Reproductive Health of Nigeria. An assisted reproduction technology regulation being considered by the Senate permits surrogacy and allows payments for transport and other expenses.[89]


In 2016, gestational surrogacy was legalized in Portugal. Discussions on the adoption of this law lasted more than 3 years. The first version of the law was adopted May 13, 2016, but the president vetoed it. He demanded that the law specify the rights and obligations of all participants.(given date is not right)

Portugal allows surrogacy only for those couples in which the woman cannot carry and give birth to a child for medical reasons. Only altruistic surrogacy is permitted. A written agreement must be issued between the surrogate mother and the genetic parents. The rights and obligations of the parties as well as their actions in cases of force majeure should be included in it. After the birth, parental rights over the child belong to the genetic parents.

Traditional surrogacy (in which the surrogate is a genetic parent) is illegal in Portugal.

Heterosexual and lesbian couples can become parents via surrogacy in Portugal under the 2016 law. Male homosexual couples and single men and women of any sexual orientation have not yet been included, but they are not addressed specifically. A revision to include them is on the current manifestos of the Left Bloc, People–Animals–Nature, and The Greens). The right-wing party CDS-PP and the Portuguese Communist Party are opposed.

South Africa[edit]

The South Africa Children's Act of 2005 (which came fully into force in 2010) enabled the "commissioning parents" and the surrogate to have their surrogacy agreement validated by the High Court even before fertilization. This allows the commissioning parents to be recognized as legal parents from the outset of the process and helps prevent uncertainty. If the surrogate mother is the genetic mother, however, she has until 60 days after the birth of the child to change her mind. The law permits single people and gay couples to be commissioning parents.[90] However, only those domiciled in South Africa benefit from the protection of the law, no non-validated agreements will be enforced, and agreements must be altruistic rather than commercial. If there is only one commissioning parent, s/he must be genetically related to the child. If there are two, they must both be genetically related to the child unless that is physically impossible due to infertility or sex (as in the case of a same sex couple). The commissioning parent or parents must be physically unable to birth a child independently. The surrogate mother must have had at least one pregnancy and viable delivery and have at least one living child. The surrogate mother has the right to unilaterally terminate the pregnancy, but she must consult with and inform the commissioning parents, and if she is terminating for a non-medical reason, may be obliged to refund any medical reimbursements she had received.[91]


The Spanish Human Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act of 2006 made surrogacy arrangements, either commercial or altruistic, null and void. Thus, the intended mother won't be recognised as such; the woman who gives birth will be the legal mother. On the other hand, the biological father will have an action to claim his paternity, by acknowledgment or judicial claim. Despite the aforementioned, surrogacy arrangements made abroad are recognised by Spanish authorities in some circumstances.

In June 2017, the political party Ciudadanos registered a bill in the Congress of the Deputies to legalise altruistic surrogacy. No other political party supports this idea.


Altruistic surrogacy remains illegal in Sweden.

United Kingdom[edit]

Commercial surrogacy arrangements are not legal in the United Kingdom. Such arrangements were prohibited by the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985.[92] Whilst it is illegal in the UK to pay more than expenses for a surrogacy, the relationship is recognised under section 30 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Regardless of contractual or financial consideration for expenses, surrogacy arrangements are not legally enforceable so a surrogate mother maintains the legal right of determination for the child, even if they are genetically unrelated. Unless a parental order or adoption order is made, the surrogate mother remains the legal mother of the child.

United States[edit]

Surrogacy and its attendant legal issues fall under state jurisdiction and the legal situation for surrogacy varies greatly from state to state. Some states have written legislation, while others have developed common law regimes for dealing with surrogacy issues. Some states facilitate surrogacy and surrogacy contracts, others simply refuse to enforce them, and some penalize commercial surrogacy. Surrogacy-friendly states tend to enforce both commercial and altruistic surrogacy contracts and facilitate straightforward ways for the intended parents to be recognized as the child's legal parents. Some relatively surrogacy-friendly states offer support only for married heterosexual couples. Generally, only gestational surrogacy is supported and traditional surrogacy finds little to no legal support.

States generally considered to be surrogacy friendly include California,[93] Oregon,[94] Illinois,[95] Arkansas,[96] Maryland,[97] New Hampshire,[98] New Jersey (effective from 1/1/2019) and Washington State (eff. 1/1/2019).[99][100]

For legal purposes, key factors are where the contract is completed, where the surrogate mother resides, and where the birth takes place. Therefore, individuals living in a non-friendly state can still benefit from the policies of surrogacy friendly states by working with a surrogate who lives and will give birth in a friendly state.

Fertility tourism[edit]

Fertility tourism for surrogacy is driven by legal regulations in the home country or lower price abroad.


India is a main destination for surrogacy. Indian surrogates have been increasingly popular with intended parents in industrialized nations because of the relatively low cost. Clinics charge patients between $10,000 and $28,000 for the complete package, including fertilization, the surrogate's fee, and delivery of the baby at a hospital. Including the costs of flight tickets, medical procedures and hotels, it comes to roughly a third of the price compared with going through the procedure in the UK.[101]

Surrogacy in India is of low cost and the laws are flexible. In 2008, the Supreme Court of India in the Manji's case (Japanese Baby) has held that commercial surrogacy is permitted in India. That has increased the international confidence in surrogacy arrangements in India. As of 2014, however, surrogacy by homosexual couples and single parents was banned[citation needed].

There is an upcoming Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill, aimed at regulating the surrogacy business. It may increase parent confidence in clinics by eliminating dubious practitioners, and in this way stimulate the practice.[101]

Russian Federation[edit]

Liberal legislation makes Russia attractive for those looking for techniques not available in their countries. Intended parents come there for oocyte donation, because of advanced age or marital status (single women and single men), and when surrogacy is considered. Commercial gestational surrogacy is legal in Russia, being available to almost all adults willing to be parents.[102] Foreigners have the same rights to assisted reproduction as Russian citizens. Within three days after the birth, the commissioning parents obtain a Russian birth certificate with both their names on it. Genetic relation to the child (in case of donation) is not a factor.[103] On August 4, 2010, a Moscow court ruled that a single man who applied for gestational surrogacy (using donor eggs) could be listed on the birth certificate as the only parent of his son.[104]


Surrogacy is legal in Ukraine. Only healthy women who have had children before can become surrogates. Surrogates in Ukraine have no parental rights over the child, as stated on Article 123 of the Family Code of Ukraine. Thus, a surrogate cannot refuse to hand the baby over if she changes her mind after birth. Only married couples can legally go through gestational surrogacy in Ukraine.

United States[edit]

People come to the US for surrogacy procedures for the high quality of medical technology and care, as well as the high level of legal protections afforded through some US state courts to surrogacy contracts as compared to many other countries. Single men or male couples who face restrictions using IVF and surrogacy procedures in their home countries may travel to US states with favorable legal climates. The United States is occasionally sought as a location for surrogate mothers by couples seeking a green card in the U.S., since the resulting child can get birthright citizenship in the United States and can thereby apply for green cards for the parents when the child turns 21 years of age.[105]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Reproductive Law". Lisa Feldstrin Law Office. Retrieved March 4, 2016.
  2. ^ "Using a Surrogate Mother: What You Need to Know". WebMD. Retrieved April 6, 2014.
  3. ^ a b Imrie, Susan; Jadva, Vasanti (4 July 2014). "The long-term experiences of surrogates: relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements". Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 29 (4): 424–435. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.004. PMID 25131555.
  4. ^ "Surrogate Parenting Act (Excerpt) – Act 199 of 1988. Michigan Legislature. Retrieved July 7, 201gsanket and pragati .
  5. ^ a b,,20096199,00.html
  6. ^ Bergh, Christina; Romundstad, Liv Bente; Aittomäki, Kristiina; Pinborg, Anja; Loft, Anne; Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt; Söderström-Anttila, Viveca (2016-03-01). "Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review". Human Reproduction Update. 22 (2): 260–276. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv046. ISSN 1355-4786.
  7. ^ a b c Söderström-Anttila, Viveca; Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt; Loft, Anne; Pinborg, Anja; Aittomäki, Kristiina; Romundstad, Liv Bente; Bergh, Christina (9 October 2015). "Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review". Human Reproduction Update: dmv046. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv046.
  8. ^ a b c Patel, Nayana Hitesh; Jadeja, Yuvraj Digvijaysingh; Bhadarka, Harsha Karsan; Patel, Molina Niket; Patel, Niket Hitesh; Sodagar, Nilofar Rahematkhan (2018). "Insight into different aspects of surrogacy practices". Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 11 (3): 212. doi:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17. PMC 6262674. PMID 30568349.
  9. ^ Postgate, J.N. (1992). Early Mesopotamia Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. Routledge. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-415-11032-7.
  10. ^
  11. ^ Merino, Faith (2010). Adoption and Surrogate Pregnancy. New York: Infobase Publishing.
  12. ^ Van Gelder, Lawrence (January 28, 1997). "Noel Keane, 58, Lawyer in Surrogate Mother Cases, Is Dead". The New York Times. Retrieved February 2013. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^
  17. ^ Aramesh, K (May 2009). "Iran's experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns". Journal of medical ethics. 35 (5): 320–2. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027763. PMID 19407039.
  18. ^
  19. ^ Baudouin, Christine. ""Surrogacy in Quebec: First Legal Test". Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society.
  20. ^ Bognar, Tara (November 28, 2011). "Birth Orders: An Overview" Archived April 23, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved December 13, 2011.
  21. ^ "HCCH - New site".
  22. ^ "RePub, Erasmus University Repository: Global surrogacy practices".
  23. ^ "Important Information for U.S. Citizens Considering the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Abroad". Archived from the original on September 7, 2015.
  24. ^ See Tong, Rosemarie (2011). "Surrogate Parenting". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  25. ^ "Surrogate Mother Sues over Demand for Abortion". The Independent. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  26. ^ "New Hampshire Surrogacy Law: What No One Wants to Talk About". Retrieved August 23, 2014.
  27. ^ "Paragraph 2376". Catechism of the Catholic Church.
  28. ^ "Catholic bishop explains why surrogacy is a 'moral evil'". LifeSiteNews. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  29. ^ Pope, Msgr Charles (2013-06-19). "Why the Church Opposes Surrogate Motherhood and attempts to legalize it in The District of Columbia". Community in Mission. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  30. ^ Pope, Msgr Charles (2013-06-19). "Why the Church Opposes Surrogate Motherhood and attempts to legalize it in The District of Columbia". Community in Mission. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  31. ^ "Catholic bishop explains why surrogacy is a 'moral evil'". LifeSiteNews. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  32. ^ Pope, Msgr Charles (2013-06-19). "Why the Church Opposes Surrogate Motherhood and attempts to legalize it in The District of Columbia". Community in Mission. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  33. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  34. ^ Golinkin, Rabbi Prof David (2012-12-18). "What does Jewish Law Have to Say about Surrogacy?". The Schechter Institutes. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  35. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  36. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  37. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  38. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  39. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  40. ^ "Jewish ethics and surrogacy – Jewish Independent". Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  41. ^ Golinkin, Rabbi Prof David (2012-12-18). "What does Jewish Law Have to Say about Surrogacy?". The Schechter Institutes. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  42. ^ Golinkin, Rabbi Prof David (2012-12-18). "What does Jewish Law Have to Say about Surrogacy?". The Schechter Institutes. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  43. ^ Golinkin, Rabbi Prof David (2012-12-18). "What does Jewish Law Have to Say about Surrogacy?". The Schechter Institutes. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  44. ^ Golinkin, Rabbi Prof David (2012-12-18). "What does Jewish Law Have to Say about Surrogacy?". The Schechter Institutes. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
  45. ^ keyadutta (2016-06-06). "Surrogacy and Hindu mythology". herencyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  46. ^ Ethical aspects of assisted reproduction – an Indian viewpoint, TC Anand Kumar, Reproductive BioMedicine Online , Volume 14 , 140 - 142
  47. ^ keyadutta (2016-06-06). "Surrogacy and Hindu mythology". herencyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  48. ^ keyadutta (2016-06-06). "Surrogacy and Hindu mythology". herencyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  49. ^ "Hinduism's View on Infertility". Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  50. ^ "Hinduism's View on Infertility". Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  51. ^ "Hinduism's View on Infertility". Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  52. ^ keyadutta (2016-06-06). "Surrogacy and Hindu mythology". herencyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  53. ^ "Hinduism's View on Infertility". Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  54. ^ "Hinduism's View on Infertility". Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  55. ^ Harinegameshin Transfers Mahavira's Embryo, Philadelphia Museum of Art
  56. ^ a b Kachhara, N.L. (Feb 2017). "Some Bioethical Issues in Jain Perspective" (PDF). National Seminar on Engaging Jainism on Modern Issues, Ladnun, Feb 2017.
  57. ^ keyadutta (2016-06-06). "Surrogacy and Hindu mythology". herencyclopedia. Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  58. ^ "Buddhist Beliefs About Surrogate Mothers | Synonym". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  59. ^ Damnoen, Somchai (2017-08-04). "Buddhist Ethics and Surrogacy Problem of Thai Society". Rochester, NY.
  60. ^ "Buddhist Beliefs About Surrogate Mothers | Synonym". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  61. ^ "Buddhist Beliefs About Surrogate Mothers | Synonym". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  62. ^ "Buddhist Beliefs About Surrogate Mothers | Synonym". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  63. ^ "The Daily Enlightenment » Is Surrogacy Right In Buddhism?". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  64. ^ "Buddhist Beliefs About Surrogate Mothers | Synonym". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  65. ^ "The Daily Enlightenment » Is Surrogacy Right In Buddhism?". Retrieved 2019-03-16.
  66. ^ a b c d e "The Islamic Ruling on Surrogate Motherhood". IlmGate. 2010-10-01. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
  67. ^ a b c d e "The Islamic Ruling on Surrogate Motherhood". IlmGate. 2010-10-01. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
  68. ^ a b c "Islamic Position on IVF Surrogate Motherhood". IslamQA. 2012-07-28. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
  69. ^ a b c d "Does Islam Allow "Surrogate Motherhood"?". About Islam. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
  70. ^ "Religion, Culture and Religious Discrimination", Religious Discrimination and Cultural Context, Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–78, ISBN 9781108394871, retrieved 2019-03-18
  71. ^ MacCallum, F.; Lycett, E.; Murray, C.; Jadva, V.; Golombok, S. (June 2003). "Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples". Human Reproduction. 18 (6): 1334–42. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg253. PMID 12773469.
  72. ^ Jadva, V.; Murray, C.; Lycett, E.; MacCallum, F.; Golombok, S. (October 2003). "Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers". Human Reproduction. 18 (10): 2196–204. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg397. PMID 14507844.
  73. ^ a b Golombok, S.; Murray, C.; Jadva, V.; MacCallum, F.; Lycett, E. (May 2004). "Families created through surrogacy arrangements: parent-child relationships in the 1st year of life". Developmental Psychology. 40 (3): 400–11. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.400. PMID 15122966.
  74. ^ Teman, E. (March 2003). "The medicalization of "nature" in the "artificial body": surrogate motherhood in Israel". Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 17 (1): 78–98. doi:10.1525/maq.2003.17.1.78. PMID 12703390.
  75. ^ a b Teman, Elly (2010). "Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self". Berkeley: University of California Press.
  76. ^ Teman, Elly. 2003. "Knowing the Surrogate Body in Israel" in: Rachel Cook and Shelley Day Schlater (eds.), Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives. London: Hart Press. pp. 261-280.
  77. ^ Van den Akker; Olga B.A. (2007). "Psychological trait and state characteristics, social support and attitudes to the surrogate pregnancy and baby". Human Reproduction. 22 (8): 2287–2295. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem155. PMID 17635845.
  78. ^ Ragone, Helena (1994). Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Westview Books.
  79. ^ a b Ciccarelli, Janice; Beckman, Linda (March 2005). "Navigating Rough Waters: An Overview of Psychological Aspects of Surrogacy". Journal of Social Issues. 61 (1): 21–43. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00392.x. Retrieved December 13, 2013.
  80. ^ Milliez, J. (September 2008). "Surrogacy: FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health". International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 102 (3): 312–3. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.04.016. PMID 18603243.
  81. ^ British Fertility Society Press Release, "Surrogacy does not have a negative effect on the surrogate's own children, Study: Children of surrogate mothers: an investigation into their experiences and psychological health" Archived January 26, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Susan Imrie, Vasanti Jadva, Susan Golombok. Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  82. ^ Golombok, Susan; MacCallum, Fiona; Murray, Clare; Lycett, Emma; Jadva, Vasanti (February 2006). "Surrogacy families: parental functioning, parent-child relationships and children's psychological development at age 2". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 47 (2): 213–222. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01453.x. ISSN 0021-9630. PMID 16423152.
  83. ^ Golombok Susan; Readings Jennifer; Blake Lucy; Casey Polly; Marks Alex; Jadva Vasanti (2011). "Families created through surrogacy: Mother–child relationships and children's psychological adjustment at age 7". Developmental Psychology. 47 (6): 1579–1588. doi:10.1037/a0025292. PMC 3210890. PMID 21895360.
  84. ^
  85. ^ Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 6(1), 12(1)c, 12(2), 12(3)
  86. ^
  87. ^ Eizellspenden und Leihmutterschaft unter Auflagen (german)
  88. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on August 12, 2013. Retrieved 2013-07-26.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  89. ^ Abiola Adewusi, Chizara Okeke, Kemi Ailoje and Oladapo A. Ashiru, The 6th Conference of GIERAF Cote Dé Ivoire, February 7–10, 2017.
  90. ^ Christie, Annabel, "South Africa shows a way to ensure more predictability in surrogacy arrangements," BioNews, January 9, 2012. Retrieved 1-11-2012
  91. ^ South Africa Children's Act of 2005, Chapter 19 (ss292-303). Retrieved 1-11-2012
  92. ^ Brahams D (February 1987). "The hasty British ban on commercial surrogacy". Hastings Cent Rep. 17 (1): 16–9. doi:10.2307/3562435. JSTOR 3562435. PMID 3557939.
  93. ^
  94. ^
  95. ^
  96. ^ Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Sunday, August 5, 2007, reproduced on Simple Surrogacy Archived September 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine "Restored version Arkansas Democrat Gazette". Retrieved 12-19-2011
  97. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on December 6, 2011. Retrieved 2011-12-25.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  98. ^ FAQs About Surrogacy in New Hampshire, Accessed August 2, 2014.
  99. ^ [1]
  100. ^ [2]
  101. ^ a b Kannan, Shilpa. "Regulators Eye India's Surrogacy Sector". India Business Report, BBC World. Retrieved March 23, 2009.
  102. ^ "" (PDF). Retrieved November 13, 2012.
  103. ^ Stuyver, I.; De Sutter, P.; Svitnev, K.; Taylor, K.; Haimes, E.; Sills, E. S.; Collins, G. S.; Walsh, D. J.; Omar, A. B.; Salma, U.; Walsh, A. P. H. (2010). "Posters * Ethics and Law". Human Reproduction. 25: i235–i236. doi:10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.306.
  104. ^ "". August 4, 2010. Archived from the original on March 31, 2012. Retrieved November 13, 2012.
  105. ^ Harney, Alexandra (September 23, 2013). "Wealthy Chinese Seek U.S. Surrogates for Second Child, Green Card". Reuters Health Information (via Medscape).

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]